SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “SALT WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 253 records · Page 14

All sources NASA NTRS DOE OSTI

DOE OSTI2020

Cesium Removal Performance Comparisons of Crystalline Silicotitanate Media Batches with Savannah River Site Waste Simulant

The Tank Closure Cesium Removal (TCCR) system uses ion exchange columns filled with Crystalline Silicotitanate (CST) media to process radioactive waste solutions for the removal of Cs137. TCCR currently focuses on dissolving Savannah River Site (SRS) Tank 10H waste (primarily sodium salt cake solids) within the tank followed by at-tank ion exchange column treatment. Plans are underway to prepare and install a second TCCR unit at SRS. Capacity and particle size differences exist between archived (IE-911) and more recently-prepared CST media batches (9120- B and 9140-B). Side-by-side comparison testing was performed to evaluate the cesium removal performance of each batch to aid in selecting the preferred CST batch and media characteristics to load into the second TCCR unit. Batch contact equilibrium and flow-through column tests have been conducted with three CST batches using an SRS Average Simulant. Simulant batch contact equilibrium cesium loading results for the three CST batches (including two lots of one batch) are provided in Table ES-1. The 35 °C data indicates that the archived IE-911 batch has a higher cesium capacity than recently-prepared CST media and that the minor TCCR CST 9120-B media lot (2099000035) has similar cesium removal performance to the major TCCR lot (2099000034). Tests conducted at 25 ºC for the archived IE-911 CST batch indicated lower cesium removal performance with this simulant batch than was observed recently with a different SRS Average Simulant batch. A dilution factor (DF) is typically utilized when modeling engineered CST media cesium loading performance to account for mass contributions from the binder material. In cases where CST performance is lower than expected, this factor includes corrections for the binder and for low performance. The ZAM (Zheng, Anthony, and Miller) Isotherm Model DF values are provided in Table ES-1 for each simulant batch contact result. DF values near 0.5 were determined for the 9120-B and 9140-B CST batch contact tests while DF values near 0.6 (20% higher) were determined for the tests with IE-911. These dilution factors are lower than recently observed with a different SRS Average Simulant batch (9140-B DF = 0.68; IE-911 DF = 1.0). Based on these results, it appears that some component in the simulant solution used for equilibrium testing may have resulted in reduced cesium loading on the CST media.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2016

Developing a Signature Based Safeguards Approach for the Electrorefiner and Salt Cleanup Unit Operations in Pyroprocessing Facilities

Traditional nuclear materials accounting does not work well for safeguards when applied to pyroprocessing. Alternate methods such as Signature Based Safeguards (SBS) are being investigated. The goal of SBS is real-time/near-real-time detection of anomalous events in the pyroprocessing facility as they could indicate loss of special nuclear material. In high-throughput reprocessing facilities, metric tons of separated material are processed that must be accounted for. Even with very low uncertainties of accountancy measurements (<0.1%) the uncertainty of the material balances is still greater than the desired level. Novel contributions of this work are as follows: (1) significant enhancement of SBS development for the salt cleanup process by creating a new gas sparging process model, selecting sensors to monitor normal operation, identifying safeguards-significant off-normal scenarios, and simulating those off-normal events and generating sensor output; (2) further enhancement of SBS development for the electrorefiner by simulating off-normal events caused by changes in salt concentration and identifying which conditions lead to Pu and Cm not tracking throughout the rest of the system; and (3) new contribution in applying statistical techniques to analyze the signatures gained from these two models to help draw real-time conclusions on anomalous events.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2015

Leaning the tank closure process at the Savannah River Site - 15515

The Savannah River Site liquid waste system consists of multiple facilities that safely receive and store legacy radioactive waste prior to treatment and disposition. The liquid radioactive waste is stored in large underground tanks. The waste inventory currently stored in these tanks is a complex mixture of insoluble metal hydroxide solids and soluble salt supernate. The high-level (radioactive) portion of the waste is vitrified into a glass waste form, while the low-level waste is immobilized into a cementitious grout waste form called salt-stone. Once the waste is retrieved and processed, the tanks are closed. The closure process includes; waste removal, characterizing residuals, isolating the tank systems, and stabilizing the tank with tailored grout formulations. The core of Lean is to eliminate waste or non-value added steps from processes to maximize customer value. From the perspective of the customer, 'value' is defined as any action or process for which a customer would willingly pay. In this case our product is to safely and efficiently remove waste from the underground storage tanks and demonstrate operational closure to the State of South Carolina. Savannah River Remediation (SRR) initiated the use of the Lean process in late 2013 and identified the Tank Closure process as one of the targeted areas to improve. The first step in the Lean process is to 'map' out the value stream and identify areas where non-value added steps are present and then prioritize Rapid Improvement Events (RIE). Based on this mapping process, there were a number of areas that SRR determined warranted further evaluation for improvements, including; standard equipment design, characterization, standard work packages, regulatory documentation, tank characterization, structural evaluations, engineering documentation and equipment re-use. This paper focuses on the application of the Lean process at SRR and more specifically, effective application to the Tank Closure Process. This paper discusses the value stream mapping process for Tank Closures, as well as, summarizes the RIEs and demonstrate the realized benefits. Benefits can come in a variety of forms, from schedule compression to decreased costs. Through the Lean process we have been able to identify close to $10 M in savings over the life cycle of the tank closure process and a 4 year schedule compression. Cost and schedule savings are used to accomplish further risk reduction efforts. In addition to hard benefits, there are also soft benefits. These soft benefits are a result of the process itself and help drive improved efficiencies through better communication with key stakeholders, such as regulators and customers. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2013

Management of salt waste from electrochemical processing of used nuclear fuel

Electrochemical processing of used nuclear fuel involves operation of one or more cells containing molten salt electrolyte. Processing of the fuel results in contamination of the salt via accumulation of fission products and transuranic (TRU) actinides. Upon reaching contamination limits, the salt must be removed and either disposed or treated to remove the contaminants and recycled back to the process. During development of the Experimental Breeder Reactor-II spent fuel treatment process, waste salt from the electro-refiner was to be stabilized in a ceramic waste form and disposed of in a high-level waste repository. With the cancellation of the Yucca Mountain high-level waste repository, other options are now being considered. One approach that involves direct disposal of the salt in a geologic salt formation has been evaluated. While waste forms such as the ceramic provide near-term resistance to corrosion, they may not be necessary to ensure adequate performance of the repository. To improve the feasibility of direct disposal, recycling a substantial fraction of the useful salt back to the process equipment could minimize the volume of the waste. Experiments have been run in which a cold finger is used for this purpose to crystallize LiCl from LiCl/CsCl. If it is found to be unsuitable for transportation, the salt waste could also be immobilized in zeolite without conversion to the ceramic waste form. (authors)

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2013

Assessment of the Impact of a New Guanidine Suppressor In NGS on F/H Laboratory Analyses For DWPF and Saltstone MCU Transfers

Implementation of the Next Generation Solvent (NGS) in the Modular Caustic-Side Solvent Extraction Unit (MCU) will now proceed with a new suppressor compound, 1,2,3-tris(3,7-dimethyloctyl)guanidine (TiDG), replacing the originally planned suppressor for NGS, 1,3-dicyclohexyl-2-(11-methyldodecyl) guanidine (DCiTG). The Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) was tasked with evaluating the potential impact to F/H Laboratory analyses supporting the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) Waste Acceptance Criteria (WAC) used to qualify transfers of MCU Strip Effluent (SE) into the facility and the Saltstone WAC used to qualify transfers of Tank 50 containing Decontaminated Salt Solution (DSS) from MCU into Saltstone. This assigned scope is covered by a Task Technical and Quality Assurance Plan (TTQAP). Previous impact evaluations were conducted when the DCiTG suppressor was planned for NGS and concluded that there was no impact to either the determination of MCU SE pH nor the analysis of Isopar ® L carryover in the MCU SE and DSS streams. SRNL reported on this series of cross-check studies between the SRNL and F/H Laboratories. The change in suppressor from DCiTG to TiDG in the NGS should not impact the measurement of Isopar ® L or pH in SE or DSS necessary to satisfy DWPF and Saltstone WAC (Tank 50) criteria, respectively. A statistical study of the low bias observed in Isopar ® L measurements in both SRNL and F/H Laboratories may be necessary now that the final NGS composition is fixed in order to quantify the low bias so that a proper correction can be applied to measurements critical to the DWPF and Saltstone WACs. Depending upon the final DWPF WAC requirement put in place for SE pH, it could become necessary to implement an alternative ICP-AES measurement of boron. The current blended solvent system testing in SRNL should address any impacts to Isopar ® L carryover into either the DSS or the SE. It is recommended that SRNL monitor the current blended solvent work underway with simulants in SRNL as well as any DWPF CPC testing done with the new SE stream to ascertain whether any need develops that could result in modification of any currently planned F/H Laboratory testing protocols.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2017

Investigation of variable compositions on the removal of technetium from Hanford Waste Treatment Plant low activity waste melter off-gas condensate simulant

The Low Activity Waste (LAW) vitrification facility at the Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) will generate an aqueous condensate recycle stream (LAW Off-Gas Condensate) from the offgas system. The plan for disposition of this stream during baseline operations is to send it to the WTP Pretreatment Facility, where it will be blended with LAW, concentrated by evaporation and recycled to the LAW vitrification facility again. The primary reason to recycle this stream is so that the semi-volatile 99 Tc isotope eventually becomes incorporated into the glass. This stream also contains non-radioactive salt components that are problematic in the melter, so diversion of this stream to another process would eliminate recycling of these salts and would enable simplified operation of the LAW melter and the Pretreatment Facilities. This diversion from recycling this stream within WTP would have the effect of decreasing the LAW vitrification mission duration and quantity of glass waste. The concept being tested here involves removing the 99 Tc so that the decontaminated aqueous stream, with the problematic salts, can be disposed elsewhere.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2012

Impacts of Antifoam Additions and Argon Bubbling on Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) REDuction/OXidation (REDOX)

Control of the REDuction/OXidation (REDOX) state of glass in High Level Waste (HLW) melters, such as the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF), is critical in order to eliminate the formation of metallic species from overly reduced melts while minimizing foaming from overly oxidized melts. The REDOX control is normally a balance of the oxidants and reductants from the feed and from processing additives. However, after reflux in the Sludge Receipt and Adjustment Tank (SRAT) and the Slurry Mix Evaporator (SME), the balance between the oxidizing salts vs. reducing salts can be altered once the mixture is fed to the melter if the melt pool is bubbled with gaseous species that either oxidize or sparge the melt of oxygen. Hence, for a bubbled melt pool, the REDOX of the melt pool must be targeted based on the balance of the oxidizing and reducing salts from the feed and from the processing additives, as well as, accounting for the effects of any gas being bubbled through the melt to improve convection and mixing while also increasing melt rate. For example, one would not set a REDOX target of Fe 2+ /ΣFe of 0.20 based on chemical balancing and then bubble pure air through the melter as pure air would oxidize the melt pool to an Fe 2+ /ΣFe ~0. Some gases, such as argon, are inert but act as chemical sparging agents or “degassing” agents that can sparge out oxygen from the melt and cause the glass to become more reducing. This study examines DWPF flowsheets at various concentrations of antifoam (a reducing processing additive) in the absence of melt pool bubbling (crucible and production data) and in the presence of melt pool bubbling with argon (crucible and production data), a known sparging/degassing agent. In order to de-convolute the impacts of antifoam on the melt pool REDOX from the impacts of melt pool bubbling, crucible studies were performed with (1) varying antifoam concentrations without bubbling, and (2) minimal antifoam with Ar bubbling. This allowed an antifoam term to be added to the REDOX model and suggested that (1) more oxidizing Fe 2+ /ΣFe ratios could be targeted which would create more oxidizing species in the cold cap to offset the effects of Ar-sparging or (2) Ar-air gas mixtures could be blended with a mixing valve to control the melt pool REDOX at the same Fe 2+ /ΣFe ratios (same –log fO 2 ) as chosen for the chemical REDOX balancing. The 2006 EE REDOX model is an electron equivalents (EE) model that balances the electrons lost during oxidation of a reductant against the electrons gained during the reduction of an oxidant. The EE terms for the formates, nitrates, and oxalates in the REDOX model are based on the formatted salts like NaCOOH, the nitrated salts like NaNO 3 , and the oxalated salts like Na 2 C 2 O 4 that have higher decomposition temperatures than their acidic counterparts which flash off. Thus it is the higher decomposition salts that participate in the establishing the melt REDOX during their interactions in the melter cold cap.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2022

Integrating the Safety Evaluation for a Molten Salt Reactor Operation and Fuel Cycle Facility Application

Molten salt reactor (MSR) sites may include additional elements of the nuclear fuel cycle beyond those of the existing fleet. In the existing fleet, the individual elements of the fuel cycle typically have been located on different sites and licensed separately. Providing robust separation between hazards remains a useful safety practice for MSRs. Although the different elements of the fuel cycle at a nuclear site that includes MSRs may transfer material between processes more frequently than prior practices, providing adequate separation between distinct facilities avoids the potential for adverse interactions. Additionally, some elements of the MSR fuel cycle, such as fuel salt preparation or waste stabilization, may be more efficient to share among multiple nearby reactors, and nuclear sites that include MSRs may also include other reactor classes. Hence, discrete MSR fuel cycle facilities located at a common site could be physically separated with robust barriers—albeit potentially connected by piping—and licensed individually. This report describes the hazards of individual elements of representative MSR fuel cycle facilities, including their relationship to overall site level hazards. The report maps the regulatory compliance aspects of the individual MSR fuel cycle elements (e.g., fuel salt preparation, reactor, waste stabilization) to existing and developing regulations, as well as describes current and developing site-level regulations from an MSR perspective.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2024

A Framework to Assess Advanced Reactor Spent Fuel Management Facility Deployment

Advanced nuclear reactors offer various operational advantages over existing light water reactors but could produce types of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) with a wide variety of forms and characteristics depending on how many different concepts are deployed. Each advanced reactor SNF type potentially poses unique management challenges. New planning efforts will be necessary to anticipate how the management requirements of advanced reactor SNF will affect the deployment of an integrated waste management system. This paper applies a framework of high-level facility deployment milestones to a generic SNF management system, reviewing them together with the advanced reactor SNF characteristics and management requirements. This allows for the investigation of factors that influence facility and system deployment, and ultimately, the identification of challenges facing the deployment of different kinds of SNF management facilities. Here, the back end of the once-through fuel cycle is examined for four advanced reactor system technology types: sodium-cooled fast reactors, high-temperature gas-cooled reactors, liquid-fuel molten salt reactors, and lead-cooled fast reactors. It is observed that milestones earlier in the facility deployment process (e.g., siting and facility design) are more impacted by the uniqueness of advanced reactor SNF characteristics than others (e.g., construction and testing). Ultimately, none of the differences are seen as fundamentally disqualifying in a technical sense; however, they should be considered early, potentially as part of reactor design, to avoid issues in the future.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2016

Summary Report of Laboratory Testing to Establish the Effectiveness of Proposed Treatment Methods for Unremediated and Remediated Nitrate Salt Waste Streams

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2011

I-NERI-2007-004-K, Development and Characterization of New High-Level Waste Forms for Achieving Waste Minimization from Pyroprocessing

Work describe in this report represents the final year activities for the 3-year International Nuclear Energy Research Initiative (I-NERI) project: Development and Characterization of New High-Level Waste Forms for Achieving Waste Minimization from Pyroprocessing. Used electrorefiner salt that contained actinide chlorides and was highly loaded with surrogate fission products was processed into three candidate waste forms. The first waste form, a high-loaded ceramic waste form is a variant to the CWF produced during the treatment of Experimental Breeder Reactor-II used fuel at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL). The two other waste forms were developed by researchers at the Korean Atomic Energy Research Institute (KAERI). These materials are based on a silica-alumina-phosphate matrix and a zinc/titanium oxide matrix. The proposed waste forms, and the processes to fabricate them, were designed to immobilize spent electrorefiner chloride salts containing alkali, alkaline earth, lanthanide, and halide fission products that accumulate in the salt during the processing of used nuclear fuel. This aspect of the I-NERI project was to demonstrate 'hot cell' fabrication and characterization of the proposed waste forms. The outline of the report includes the processing of the spent electrorefiner salt and the fabrication of each of the three waste forms. Also described is the characterization of the waste forms, and chemical durability testing of the material. While waste form fabrication and sample preparation for characterization must be accomplished in a radiological hot cell facility due to hazardous radioactivity levels, smaller quantities of each waste form were removed from the hot cell to perform various analyses. Characterization included density measurement, elemental analysis, x-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy and the Product Consistency Test, which is a leaching method to measure chemical durability. Favorable results from this demonstration project will provide additional options for fission product immobilization and waste management associated the electrochemical/pyrometallurgical processing of used nuclear fuel.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2021

Characterization of Tank 9H Dissolution Batches in Support of Tank Closure Cesium Removal (TCCR) 1A Batch 1 Preparations

Savannah River Remediation (SRR) is currently preparing the first batch of material to be processed through the Tank Closure Cesium Removal (TCCR) 1A system. The feed for TCCR 1A will consist of dissolved saltcake from Tank 9H. Two batches of salt (Batch 1A and Batch 1B) have been dissolved in Tank 9H and subsequently transferred to Tank 10H to prepare Batch 1 for TCCR 1A. Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) received samples from each batch of dissolved salt prior to transfer for characterization. SRNL received both a surface and a variable depth sample from Batches 1A and 1B. In both cases no solids were observed in the surface sample, but were observed in the depth sample. For Batch 1A the variable depth sample was only slightly cloudy, while for Batch 1B the variable depth sample contained a significant amount (10.14 wt%) of solids. The solids were determined to be primarily aluminum containing phases, with only a small fraction (0.22 wt%) being sludge solids. In general, the samples from Batch 1A were more concentrated salt solutions than Batch 1B, with sodium concentrations of 8.53 and 8.57 M for the surface and filtered depth samples in Batch 1A, respectively. The sodium concentrations in Batch 1B samples ranged from 4.27 M for the surface sample to 7.57 M for the depth sample filtrate, indicating some stratification within the tank. The 137 Cs activity as well as the total Cs concentration in the filtered Batch 1A depth sample were approximately double the activity and concentration measured in the filtrate from the Batch 1B depth sample. The total Cs concentration in the Batch 1A depth sample filtrate was 22.4 mg/L, while for the Batch 1B depth sample filtrate the total Cs concentration was calculated to be 12.0 mg/L. These Cs concentrations are significantly higher than was measured in Batches 1-3 from Tank 10H dissolved saltcake which was previously processed through the original TCCR unit.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2015

Characterization of DWPF recycle condensate tank materials

A Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) Recycle Condensate Tank (RCT) sample was delivered to the Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) for characterization with particular interest in the concentration of I-129, U-233, U-235, total U, and total Pu. Since a portion of Salt Batch 8 will contain DWPF recycle materials, the concentration of I-129 is important to undertand for salt batch planning purposes. The chemical and physical characterizations are also needed as input to the interpretation of future work aimed at determining the propensity of the RCT material to foam, and methods to remediate any foaming potential. According to DWPF the Tank Farm 2H evaporator has experienced foaming while processing DWPF recycle materials. The characterization work on the RCT samples has been completed and is reported here. The composition of the Sludge Batch 8 (SB8) RCT material is largely a low base solution of 0.2M NaNO 2 and 0.1M NaNO 3 with a small amount of formate present. Insoluble solids comprise only 0.05 wt.% of the slurry. The solids appear to be largely sludge-like solids based on elemental composition and SEM-EDS analysis. The sample contains an elevated concentration of I-129 (38x) and substantial 59% fraction of Tc-99, as compared to the incoming SB8 Tank 40 feed material. The Hg concentration is 5x, when compared to Fe, of that expected based on sludge carryover. The total U and Pu concentrations are reduced significantly, 0.536 wt.% TS and 2.42E-03 wt.% TS, respectively, with the fissile components, U-233, U-235, Pu-239, and Pu-241, an order of magnitude lower in concentration than those in the SB8 Tank 40 DWPF feed material. This report will be revised to include the foaming study requested in the TTR and outlined in the TTQAP when that work is concluded.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2014

Savannah River Salt Processing Options Study

No abstract provided.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2017

Summary Report of Comprehensive Laboratory Testing to Establish the Effectiveness of Proposed Treatment Methods for Unremediated and Remediated Nitrate Salt Waste Streams

The inadvertent creation of transuranic waste carrying hazardous waste codes D001 and D002 requires the treatment of the material to eliminate the hazardous characteristics and allow its eventual shipment and disposal at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). This report documents the effectiveness of two treatment methods proposed to stabilize both the unremediated and remediated nitrate salt waste streams (UNS and RNS, respectively) at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL). The two technologies include the addition of zeolite (with and without the addition of water as a processing aid) and cementation. Surrogates were developed to evaluate both the solid and liquid fractions expected from parent waste containers, and both the solid and liquid fractions were tested. Both technologies are shown to be effective at eliminating the characteristic of ignitability (D001), and the addition of zeolite was determined to be effective at eliminating corrosivity (D002), with the preferred option1 of adding zeolite currently planned for implementation at LANL’s Waste Characterization, Reduction, and Repackaging Facility (WCRRF). The course of this work verified the need to evaluate and demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed remedy for debris material, if required. The evaluation determined that WypAlls, cheesecloth, and Celotex absorbed with saturated nitrate salt solutions exhibit the ignitability characteristic (all other expected debris is not classified as ignitable). Finally, liquid surrogates containing saturated nitrate salts did not exhibit the characteristic of ignitability in their pure form (those neutralized with Kolorsafe and mixed with sWheat did exhibit D001). Sensitivity testing and an analysis were conducted to evaluate the waste form for reactivity. Tests included subjecting surrogate material to mechanical impact, friction, electrostatic discharge and thermal insults. The testing confirmed that the waste does not exhibit the characteristic of reactivity (D003). Follow-on testing was conducted to demonstrate the effectiveness of zeolite stabilization for ignitable WypAll and cheesecloth debris and additional nitrate salt solutions (those exhibiting the oxidizer characteristic) to demonstrate the effectiveness of the remedy. Follow-on testing also included testing of surrogate materials containing Waste Lock 770, which is present in four of the RNS containers, and potential items of debris such as plywood and Celotex material. Testing to evaluate the effectiveness of the remedy was performed using the specific remediation processes that are planned for use at the WCRRF. Finally, testing was also performed to evaluate the holding capacity of zeolite using a highly acidic surrogate solution and to characterize the composition of gases generated during mixing of zeolite with surrogate solutions. All these tests demonstrated the effectiveness of adding zeolite as the planned remedy.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2016

Scientific Investigations on the Chemical Reactivity of Los Alamos Remediated Nitrate Salt Wastes - 16540

The February 14, 2014 release of radioactivity at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) was the result of runaway thermal reactions that occurred in a TRU waste drum containing nitrate salts remediated using an organic absorbent. Experimental and modeling studies performed at LANL indicate that mixtures of metal nitrate salts (oxidizer) with sWheat Scoop{sup R} organic kitty litter (fuel) create the potential for exothermic chemical reactions. The use of sWheat{sup R} absorbent in the processing of nitrate salt wastes can be pinpointed as the critical processing decision that led to the failure of the breached drum in the WIPP repository. The most plausible scenario is that a production of heat, either from low-level chemical reactions or the growth of natural microbes, in concert with mixed metal nitrate salts, bismuth lined glovebox gloves and/or lead nitrates when combined with the sWheat{sup R} organic kitty litter, generated a series of exothermic reactions that heated and pressurized the drum resulting in the venting of high-temperature gases and radioactive material into the room. Observations and modeling studies indicate that the probability of thermal runaway in another drum has decreased with time since the WIPP event. However, the complexity of the mixtures, ambiguity in procedures such as those used for neutralization, the heterogeneity of the drum contents, and the difficulty of sampling leads to an irreducible level of uncertainty that mandates the exercise of caution in managing RNS wastes. The situation also requires that this waste stream continue to be stored in a temperature-controlled environment and monitored until the waste can be remediated to remove the hazard permanently. We recommend that proposals to treat nitrate salts with organic absorbents of any kind be accompanied by experimental studies to confirm that similarly sensitive mixtures are not inadvertently created over the range of conditions (mixture quantities, moisture content, etc.) anticipated during processing and storage. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2019

Investigation of Thermolytic Hydrogen Generation Rate in Tank 28 and Tank 39 Samples

This report contains hydrogen generation rate (HGR) measurements of Tank 28 and Tank 39 radioactive samples with and without added glycolate as a function of temperature. The objective of the Tank 28 and Tank 39 HGR measurements is to extend the knowledge from previous sample thermolysis HGR measurements and augment simulant testing for developing models for the Savannah River Site (SRS) Concentration, Storage, and Transfer Facilities (CSTF) thermolysis HGR with and without added glycolate. Tank 28 testing is applicable to concentrated salt supernate, legacy organic compounds resulting from the F-Canyon processes and boiling in the 3H-Evaporator System. Tank 39 testing is applicable to moderately concentrated salt supernate and organic compounds in fresh waste from the H-Canyon processes. For HGR tests with added sodium glycolate, the glycolate concentrations added to Tank 28 (500 mg/L) and Tank 39 (2000 mg/L) are based on concentrations expected to result in quantifiable HGR between temperatures of 70 °C and the atmospheric pressure boiling point. The added glycolate is much higher than the expected future glycolate concentrations in Tank 28, Tank 39, and similar CSTF tanks.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2017

Results from the Interim Salt Disposition Program Macrobatch 11 Tank 21H Acceptance Samples

Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) analyzed samples from Tank 21H in support of verification of Macrobatch (Salt Batch) 11 for the Interim Salt Disposition Program (ISDP) for processing. This document reports characterization data on the samples of Tank 21H and fulfills the requirements of Deliverable 3 of the Technical Task Request (TTR).

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗