Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “SRB”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 253 records · Page 14
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Surface and Atmospheric Shortwave Radiative Fluxes From ISCCP Data and Fu-Liou Algorithm at Higher Spatial and Vertical Resolution

NASA/GEWEX Surface Radiation Budget (SRB) has provided surface and TOA shortwave and longwave radiative fluxes using International Satellite Cloud Climatology data as the primary input. Release 4.0 came out in 2019, with data from July 1983 through June 2017, and improved validation stats relative to Release 3.0 (Stackhouse et al., 2012). Release 4.0 used the newly reprocessed ISCCP H data set. The shortwave algorithm for versions 3 and 4 has been based on the Pinker and Laszlo (1992) algorithm, which relies on the satellite-measured shortwave radiance to produce a TOA albedo. This background TOA albedo is made utilizing the background clear-sky visible radiance (called clear-sky composite radiance in the ISCCP data) and applying narrowband-to-broadband angular distribution models. Using a climatological aerosol assumption, the surface albedo is estimated using radiative transfer based (i.e., Fu/Liou radiative transfer model; Fu and Liou, 1993) look-up tables. Using this surface albedo and an instantaneous TOA albedo, the look-up tables are used to adjust both the aerosol optical depth (for clear sky) and cloud optical depth (for cloudy sky) for each scene. These properties and look up tables are then used to generate surface fluxes. While this has worked well to provide useful fluxes, it has occasionally resulted in inaccurate direct and diffuse surface SW fluxes due to the overreliance on aerosol optical depth. With increased computational power and storage now available, a more direct approach is now possible. Here we present a different approach for a future high resolution SRB Release 5.0. We replace the Pinker-Laszlo lookup table approach with a forward call to the Fu-Liou radiative transfer model as modified by the CERES team (Rose et al., 2006). In addition to being a proven radiation code, Fu-Liou allows the calculation of fluxes at different atmospheric levels and spectral bands, which will provide more insight into the surface radiation budget, its variability and attribution. It is expected that horizontal resolution will increase to at least 0.5°x0.5° from the current 1°x1°. Here we demonstrate a preliminary look at the next SRB, and show comparisons with the current release.

Earth Radiation Budget↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Overview of the High Reynolds Number Ascent Wind Tunnel Test of the Space Launch System at the National Transonic Facility

Transonic, high Reynolds number wind tunnel testing for the Space Launch System (SLS) ascent flight environment was conducted in the National Transonic Facility (NTF) at the NASA Langley Research Center from December 2019 to April 2021. The test was sponsored by the SLS Program and the NASA Engineering & Safety Center with the ob- jective of assessing and characterizing Reynolds number effects on the ascent aerodynamics of the SLS launch vehicle. The cryogenic test article was a 1.75%-scale representation of the SLS Block 1 Cargo configuration that was fabricated mostly out of stainless steel, but with several additive-manufactured components including the Solid Rocket Booster (SRB) attach brackets and the SRB nozzles. This was the first use of additive manufacturing on structural components of a cryogenic model in the NTF, therefore post-fabrication material testing and inspections were performed to satisfy safety requirements. Force & moment and surface pressure data were acquired for Mach numbers between 0.50 and 0.95 over a range of Reynolds numbers based on core stage diameter between 2x10^6 and a maximum of 40x10^6 corresponding to 45% of flight Reynolds number. Additionally, flow visualization data using Pressure Sensitive Paint were acquired with a focus on the SRB forward attach area, which is susceptible to Reynolds number sensitivity at transonic speeds. This pa- per provides an overview of the test campaign including details on the unique test article and the experimental setup and test execution. General test findings and observations are also presented, but the majority of the test results and data analyses are provided in a companion paper.

Space Launch System↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Multiphase Simulations of the SLS Launch Environment

NASA’s Space Launch System (SLS), which will send astronauts back to the Moon in the next few years, is powered by four RS-25 engines and two RSRMV solid rocket boosters (SRBs). During launch the SLS propulsion system generates intense acoustics and other powerful waves, such as ignition overpressure (IOP) which, if unmitigated, have the potential to damage the vehicle and possibly cause loss of mission or crew. To protect the vehicle from these powerful waves, the SLS launch pad design includes an ignition overpressure/sound suppression (IOP/SS) system which sprays 270,000 gallons per minute of water very close to the SRB and RS-25 nozzles. The SRB and RS-25 engine plumes, and the proximity of the IOP/SS water, create a complex multiphase (gas and liquid) environment during the SLS ignition sequence. The interplay among these systems creates challenges related to water spray into/onto engine nozzles, potential debris transport, and additional transient loads due to strong plume-water interactions - all of which the SLS vehicle must be able to withstand. Prior to the Artemis I launch, the SLS multiphase liftoff environment was largely unknown due to differences from the Space Shuttle and other programs. Some data was available from tests of individual systems, but no integrated testing or analysis was available. Even post-launch analysis of Artemis I cannot provide a full understanding of the complex physics involved due to limited (or obstructed) camera views and instrumentation. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is being used to investigate the details of the multiphase environment which could not be measured, help comprehend the data gathered from the launch, and ultimately identify phenomena that are a concern for future flights. Project Details Engineers at NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) have executed simulations using the Loci/STREAM-Volume of Fluid (VoF) multiphase CFD solver to understand this environment. Initial efforts successfully validated the CFD solver on various tests, giving confidence to simulate the SLS multiphase liftoff environment prior to the Artemis I launch. The CFD simulation of the SLS ignition sequence was conducted in three phases. First the IOP/SS water system was simulated for approximately 6 seconds to reach a quasi-steady state. Next, the RS-25 engine plumes were activated and held at full power for 1 second. Lastly, the SRB booster was activated and the simulation was carried out until just prior to vehicle motion. This simulation process mimics the conditions that exist at launch. Results and Impact The SLS ignition sequence simulation results provide deep understanding of the underlying physics occuring during launch. Observations from the simulation include reduction of water splashing into/onto the engine nozzles, change in angling of the dense water sheets, and the origin of the powerful ignition overpressure (IOP) wave. These observations directly inform the SLS program on subjects including plume-water induced side loads, debris transport, and the acoustic launch environment. Additionally, with post launch comparison of CFD observations to flight data, these tools can be applied to launch vehicles and environments other than SLS with confidence. Why HPC Matters The SLS ignition sequence CFD simulations are conducted on meshes up to hundreds of millions of cells on thousands of processors for weeks at a time. These simulations generate terabytes of data that must also be stored and archived for future use on HPC systems. Simply put, the CFD simulations would not be possible without NASA HPC resources. What’s Next Comparisons between the Artemis I flight data and the CFD simulations will be continued to both improve confidence in the CFD results and provide deeper understanding into the SLS multiphase launch environment. This will be used to provide insight for decision making for the first manned SLS flight, Artemis II. Future simulations will target new configurations of the SLS IOP/SS water required to support the more powerful variants of the SLS vehicle, such as Block 1B. Additionally, this capability provides NASA the ability to investigate launch environments for vehicles other than SLS to support other missions.

Travis Rivord↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Overview of the High Reynolds Number Ascent Wind Tunnel Test of the Space Launch System at the National Transonic Facility

Transonic, high Reynolds number wind tunnel testing for the Space Launch System (SLS) ascent flight environment was conducted in the National Transonic Facility (NTF) at the NASA Langley Research Center from December 2019 to April 2021. The test was sponsored by the SLS Program and the NASA Engineering & Safety Center with the ob- jective of assessing and characterizing Reynolds number effects on the ascent aerodynamics of the SLS launch vehicle. The cryogenic test article was a 1.75%-scale representation of the SLS Block 1 Cargo configuration that was fabricated mostly out of stainless steel, but with several additive-manufactured components including the Solid Rocket Booster (SRB) attach brackets and the SRB nozzles. This was the first use of additive manufacturing on structural components of a cryogenic model in the NTF, therefore post-fabrication material testing and inspections were performed to satisfy safety requirements. Force & moment and surface pressure data were acquired for Mach numbers between 0.50 and 0.95 over a range of Reynolds numbers based on core stage diameter between 2x10^6 and a maximum of 40x10^6 corresponding to 45% of flight Reynolds number. Additionally, flow visualization data using Pressure Sensitive Paint were acquired with a focus on the SRB forward attach area, which is susceptible to Reynolds number sensitivity at transonic speeds. This paper provides an overview of the test campaign including details on the unique test article and the experimental setup and test execution. General test findings and observations are also presented, but the majority of the test results and data analyses are provided in a companion paper.

Space Launch System↗
NASA NTRS2023

NASA Standing Review Board Handbook

This handbook provides guidance based on best practices for the planning, preparation, review, reporting, and closeout of Standing Review Board (SRB) activities. Revision C updates the Revision B version of the SRB Handbook published in 2016 to incorporate updates to NASA Procedural Requirements (NPR) 7120.5F, NASA Space Flight Program and Project Management Requirements. These updates include: - Changing the Dissenting Opinion process to the Formal Dissent process, which retains the current process augmented with an expedited escalation path. - Updates to requirements for establishing an Agency Baseline Commitment (ABC) and for performing Joint Cost and Schedule Confidence Level (JCL) analyses for tightly coupled programs. - Additional requirements for performing a JCL analysis for single-project programs and projects over $1B Life-Cycle Cost (LCC). - Use of initial capability cost estimates instead of LCC estimates in specific, identified instances for single-project programs and projects that plan continuing operations and production, including integration of capability upgrades, with an unspecified Phase E end point. These single-project programs and projects define an initial capability during Phase A and develop an initial capability cost that establishes the ABC at Key Decision Point (KDP) C. Initial capability is the first operational mission flight (or as defined in the KDP B Review Plan) and is documented in the KDP B Decision Memorandum. Initial capability cost includes operations cost for the initial capability. The Phase E cost estimate for continuing operations and production is established separately as part of the Operational Readiness Review (ORR) and KDP E for the 5 years after initial capability and subsequently updated and documented annually for the next 5-year period. Upgrades during Phase E that meet the Agency criteria for a major project for external reporting are treated as projects for the purposes of establishing their own development ABC outside the Phase E cost estimate. The Phase E cost estimate is updated to include production and operations costs associated with these upgrades. Development, production, and operations costs of other (i.e., non-major) upgrades are included in the Phase E cost estimate. (See NPR 7120.5, Sections 2.4.1.5 and 2.4.1.6 and the NASA Space Flight Program and Project Management Handbook (PM Handbook), Section 5.5.4 for additional information.) The scope of the SRB’s assessment with respect to initial capability, Phase E cost estimate, and major upgrades for these single-project programs and projects is defined in the Terms of Reference (ToR).

Kevin Michael Gilligan↗
NASA NTRS1973

Space shuttle: Aerodynamic characteristics of a 162-inch diameter solid rocket booster with and without strakes

Tests conducted at NASA-Langley have shown that a small flap or strake can generate a significant amount of lift on a circular cylinder with large cross flow. If strakes are placed on the opposite sides and ends on a circular body, a moment will be produced about the center of mass of the body. The purpose of this test was to determine the static-aerodynamic forces and moments of a 162-inch diameter SRB (PRR) with and without strakes. The total angle-of-attack range of the SRB test was from -10 to 190 degrees. Model roll angles were 0, 45, 90, and 135 degrees with some intermediate angles. The Mach range was from 0.6 to 3.48. The 0.00494 scale model was designated as MSFC No. 449.

Johnson, J. D.↗
NASA NTRS1973

Prediction of space shuttle fluctuating pressure environments, including rocket plume effects

Preliminary estimates of space shuttle fluctuating pressure environments have been made based on prediction techniques developed by Wyle Laboratories. Particular emphasis has been given to the transonic speed regime during launch of a parallel-burn space shuttle configuration. A baseline configuration consisting of a lightweight orbiter and monolithic SRB, together with a typical flight trajectory, have been used as models for the predictions. Critical fluctuating pressure environments are predicted at transonic Mach numbers. Comparisons between predicted environments and wind tunnel test results, in general, showed good agreement. Predicted one-third octave band spectra for the above environments were generally one of three types: (1) attached turbulent boundary layer spectra (typically high frequencies); (2) homogeneous separated flow and shock-free interference flow spectra (typically intermediate frequencies); and (3) shock-oscillation and shock-induced interference flow spectra (typically low frequencies). Predictions of plume induced separated flow environments were made. Only the SRB plumes are important, with fluctuating levels comparable to compression-corner induced separated flow shock oscillation.

Plotkin, K. J.↗
NASA NTRS1973

Ocean recovery of Shuttle Solid Rocket Boosters.

Cost effective recovery of the expended Space-Shuttle Solid Rocket Boosters (SRB) from the ocean will result in significant overall cost savings to the Space Shuttle Program. The ocean recovery mission begins with the dispatching of the recovery team to the predicted splashdown area. The SRBs, drogue parachutes and main parachutes must be tracked, located, retrieved, and transported to land where they will be refurbished and recycled for reuse. Trade studies to be conducted will consider the recovery mission requirements and weigh the advantages, disadvantages and costs of various candidate recovery systems. Major parameters effecting the selection of the final system will ensure that the system will meet overall objectives. Large- and small-scale SRB model testing has been conducted to establish characteristics of SRBs during water entry, floating free and under tow.

Junker, L. J.↗
NASA NTRS1973

Evaluation of shuttle solid rocket booster case materials. Corrosion and stress corrosion susceptibility of several high temperature materials

Candidate alloys for the Shuttle Solid Rocket Booster (SRB) case were tested under simulated service conditions to define subcritical flaw growth behavior under both sustained and cyclic loading conditions. The materials evaluated were D6AC and 18 Ni maraging steel, both heat treated to a nominal yield strength of 1380 MN/sq m (200 ksi). The sustained load tests were conducted by exposing precracked, stressed specimens of both alloys to alternate immersion in synthetic sea water. It was found that the corrosion and stress corrosion resistance of the 18 Ni maraging steel were superior to that of the D6AC steel under these test conditions. It was also found that austenitizing temperature had little influence on the threshold stress intensity of the D6AC. The cyclic tests were conducted by subjecting precracked surface-flawed specimens of both alloys to repeated load/thermal/environmental profiles which were selected to simulate the SRB missions. It was found that linear removal operations that involve heating to 589 K (600 F) cause a decrease in cyclic life of D6AC steel relative to those tests conducted with no thermal cycling.

Pionke, L. J.↗
NASA NTRS1974

Flutter tests (IS4) of the 0.0125-scale shuttle reflection plane model 30-OTS in the Langley Research Center 26-inch transonic blowdown tunnel test no. 547

A series of slab wing flutter models with rigid orbiter fuselage, external tank, and SRB models of the space shuttle were tested, in a reflection plane arrangement, in the NASA Langley Research Center's 26-inch Transonic Blowdown Tunnel. Model flutter boundaries were obtained for both a wing-alone configuration and a wing-with-orbiter, tank and SRB configuration. Additional test points were taken of the wing-with-orbiter configuration, as a correlation with the wing-alone condition. A description of the wind tunnel models and test procedures utilized in the experiment are provided.

Kotch, M. A.↗
NASA NTRS1974

Results of transonic wind tunnel tests on an 0.015-scale space shuttle mated vehicle model (67-ots) in the LaRC 8 foot TPT (IA41)

Wind tunnel tests were conducted to obtain aerodynamic force data for Mach numbers from 0.60 to 1.20. Data were obtained for an alpha range of -10 deg to +10 deg (beta = 0 deg beta = 5 deg) and beta range of -10 deg to +10 deg (alpha = 0 deg). Longitudinal and lateral-directional stability and control data were obtained for tank alone, tank plus SRB's, tank plus Orbiter, and mated configuration of tank + Orbiter + SRB's. Also, single-component rudder hinge moment data were obtained at rudder deflections of 0 and -20 deg for each Mach number tested. Plots of aerodynamic coefficients vs. Mach number are presented, using data from both test IA41 and tests LRC-UPWT-1056, 1073 (IA42A/B) for Mach numbers of 1.60 to 4.63. The model tested in IA42A/B was the same model as tested in IA41.

Hardin, R.↗
NASA NTRS1974

Effect of engine shroud configuration on the static aerodynamic characteristics of a 0.00563 scale 142-inch diameter solid rocket booster (SA10F)

A test of a 0.563 percent scale space shuttle Solid Rocket Booster (SRB) model, MSFC Model 449, was conducted in a trisonic wind tunnel. Test Mach numbers were 0.4, 0.6, 0.9, 1.2, 1.96, 3.48, 4.0, 4.45, and 4.96. Test angles-of-attack ranged from minus 10 degrees to 190 degrees. Test Reynolds numbers ranged from 3.0 million per foot to 8.6 million per foot. Test roll angles were 0, 11.25, 22.5, 45, and 90 degrees. In addition to the static stability evaluation of the primary SRB configuration, five parametric investigations were made: (1) effect of Reynolds number, (2) effect of engine shroud flare angle, (3) effect of engine shroud length, (4) effect of engine shroud strakes, and (5) effect of engine shroud strakes and trust vector control bottles.

Johnson, J. D.↗
NASA NTRS1974

Heat transfer tests of an 0.006-scale thin-skin space shuttle model (41-OTS) in the Ames 3.5-foot HWT at M equals 5.3 (IH15)

Data obtained from heat transfer tests of an 0.006-scale space shuttle vehicle in a 3.5-foot hypersonic wind tunnel are presented. The purpose of these tests was to parametrically investigate the ascent heating of the integrated vehicle. Configurations tested were complete for integrated vehicle, orbiter alone, external tank alone, and SRB alone. All configurations were tested with and without transition grit. Testing was conducted at a Mach number of 5.3, and at Reynolds numbers of 2 and 5 million per foot. The angle of attack range varied from 0 to minus 5 degress, execpt for SRB alone, which was tested from minus 5 to 90 degrees. Heat transfer data were obtained from 223 iron-constantan thermocouples attached to thin-skin stainless steel inserts.

Walstad, D. G.↗
NASA NTRS1974

Aerodynamic results of wind tunnel separation tests on a 0.01-scale model (32-OTS) space shuttle integrated vehicle in the AEDC-VKF-SWTA (IA57)

The integrated space shuttle vehicle was tested to determine proximity force and moment data for the orbiter/external tank and solid rocket booster (SRB) with and without separation rockets firing for both single and dual booster runs. Data were obtained at points t = 0 sec, t = 1.25 sec, and t = 2 sec on the nominal SRB separation trajectory.

Daileda, J. J.↗
NASA NTRS1975

Heat transfer tests of an 0.006-scale thin-skin space shuttle thermocouple model (41-OTS) in the Langley Research Center unitary plan wind tunnel at M equals 3.7 (IH16)

The results are presented of supersonic heat transfer tests performed on the .006 scale space shuttle vehicle model (41-OTS) in the Langley Research Center Unitary Plan Wind Tunnel. These tests were conducted to parametrically investigate ascent heating of the integrated vehicle and its components. The tests were conducted at a nominal Mach number of 3.7 and Reynolds numbers per foot of 2 and 5 million. The model configurations investigated were the integrated vehicle and each component alone (i.e. orbiter, tank and SRB). All the configurations were run with and without transition strips and through an angle of attack range of 0 deg to minus 5 deg with the exception of the SRB which was tested through an angle of attack range of minus 5 deg to 90 deg. The heat transfer data were obtained from 223 iron constantan thermocouples attached to stainless steel thin-skin areas of the model.

Walstad, D. G.↗
NASA NTRS1975

Results of aerothermodynamic heating tests on a 0.013-scale model solid rocket booster in the NASA/LaRC unitary plan wind tunnel (SH12F)

A 0.013 scale model of the solid rocket booster (SRB) used to launch the space shuttle was tested at a Mach number of 3.7 and Reynolds numbers of 1,500,000 and 3,500,000 per foot. The objective of the test was to obtain aerodynamic heat transfer data on the surface of scaled models of the SRB at simulated full scale reentry flight conditions. Three separate models were utilized to measure film coefficients over an angle of attack range from 0 deg to 180 deg at 0 deg sideslip. All three models were representations of the MCR0200 baseline configuration and varied only by the way they were mounted in the tunnel. Model A, sting mounted thru the model base, was utilized for testing between 0 deg and 40 deg angle of attack. Model B was blade mounted from the top of the model and was tested between 60 deg and 120 deg angle of attack. Model C was sting mounted thru the model nose and utilized for testing between 140 deg and 180 deg angle of attack.

Brewer, E. B.↗
NASA NTRS1974

Shuttle ground turnaround operations

It is pointed out that a Shuttle turnaround of two weeks will require new innovative and creative ideas for ground operations. The approach selected implements proven techniques and reduces system level checkout as performance confidence is achieved. Details of operational turnaround are discussed, giving attention also to external tank processing, solid rocket booster (SRB) processing, the SRB recovery concept, and payload processing.

Buckley, R. H.↗
NASA NTRS1976

Aerodynamic results of wind tunnel tests on a 0.010-scale model (32-QTS) space shuttle integrated vehicle in the AEDC VKF-40-inch supersonic wind tunnel (IA61)

Plotted and tabulated aerodynamic coefficient data from a wind tunnel test of the integrated space shuttle vehicle are presented. The primary test objective was to determine proximity force and moment data for the orbiter/external tank and solid rocket booster (SRB) with and without separation rockets firing for both single and dual booster runs. Data were obtained at three points (t = 0, 1.25, and 2.0 seconds) on the nominal SRB separation trajectory.

Daileda, J. J.↗