Comparative Effects of Radiation Sterilization Modality on Medical PVC Tubing
As the production volume of single-use, polymer-based medical devices increases each year, so does the need for throughput capacity to sterilize the devices. Around 80% of radiation-sterilized devices are processed using gamma-ray radiation from industrial cobalt-60 sources. Supply chain, security, and disposal concerns are prompting manufacturers and contract sterilizers to explore alternatives to irradiation using cobalt-60 gamma-rays, such as electron beam (E-beam) and X-ray radiation. Advantages of these ‘machine’ sources over radioisotope-based sources are that they do not decay, a characteristic that requires cobalt-60 to be replaced over time, they can be turned off when not in use, and they do not represent the same level of concern regarding misuse. One of the barriers to direct transition from gamma-ray sterilization to E-beam or X-ray sterilization is concern over the relatively unknown effects of sterilization dose of these alternative modalities on the performance of medical device polymers. Commercially available medical devices sterilized with gamma-ray irradiation exhibit acceptable device function, acceptable mechanical performance, and acceptable discoloration. To be viable, alternate sterilization methods must not only achieve acceptable sterilization, but the process must also result in a product with functional, mechanical, and visual effects acceptable to customers and the regulator. Flexible polyvinyl chloride (PVC) is a plastic material that is commonly found in single-use medical devices and is known for its sensitivity to radiation processing. For instance, transparent PVC is known to yellow upon irradiation. To encouraging sterilization alternatives to cobalt-60 gamma-ray, we directly compared the effects of gamma-ray, E-beam, and X-ray radiation exposure at similar sterilization-relevant doses on key properties of medical grade PVC tubing.