Postflight Evaluation of Atlas-Centaur AC-6 (Launched August 11, 1965)
The sixth Atlas Centaur vehicle (AC-6) was successfully launched from the Eastern T e s t Range, Complex 36B, on August 11, 1965, at 0931:04.430 EST. A 2084-pound dynamic model of the Surveyor payload was placed in a simulated lunar transfer trajectory. Vehicle systems operated satisfactorily and all the flight objectives were accomplished. Lift-off within 4 seconds of the window opening demonstrated the launch-on-time capability of the vehicle were accurately compensated for by the Centaur guidance system. the Surveyor model into a near-perfect lunar transfer trajectory would have resulted in an impact of the moon without a midcourse correction. To hit the precise target area on the lunar surface, the required correction would have been 4.25 meters per second, which is well within the spacecraft capability. Normal thrust and impulse levels were obtained with both the A t l a s and Centaur propulsion systems. However, a sizeable thrust overshoot on startup of the Centaur engines has not been resolved. A propellant-utilization system used for the first time on the Centaur, accurately controlled the fuel and oxidant consumption. The turnaround and retrothrust maneuver were performed without incident. Relatively high longitudinal modal excitations and lateral payload excitations were obtained at lift-off; these high perturbations are believed t o be related t o the launcher holddown arms. Nominal temperatures were recorded for both the external vehicle skin and the payload compartment; however, abnormally low temperatures were measured in the forward equipment area, which may have resulted from leakage of cold helium purge gas. All vehicle electrical systems performed satisfactorily; the only difficulty with the RF systems was obtained with the C-band transponder. of the vehicle instrumentation yielded valid data. The AC-6 vehicle was constructed with several new lightweight designs including the forward bulkhead, thrust barrel, interstage adapter and tank skin thickness reduction from 0.016 t o 0.014 inch. No deficiencies were observed in any of these new structural elements.