Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “probe science”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 253 records · Page 14

Titan aerosol and gas experiment for the Huygens Probe

The Cassini Mission is a joint undertaking of NASA and the European Space Agency (ESA) to explore the Saturnian System with a Saturn Orbiter and a Titan Probe. The launch vehicle and the Saturn Orbiter are the responsibility of NASA while the Huygens Probe (detachable Titan Probe) is the responsibility of ESA. The spacecraft will be launched in 1996 and the Huygens Probe will arrive at Titan in 2003. The Cassini Mission-Huygens Probe provides a unique opportunity to obtain detailed information about the atmosphere and, possibly, the surface of Titan. Titan possesses a substantial nitrogen atmosphere containing methane and many other organic compounds. Aerosols play an important role in the atmospheric processes on Titan. The Huygens Probe offers an opportunity to determine how organic particles are formed and grow which will clarify their role on Earth. A powerful analytical instrument, capable of addressing the above technology and other science questions, was recently proposed for the Huygens Probe. It is comprised of an aerosol and gas sampler and processor, and a gas chromatograph-ion mobility spectrometer. The instrument will be able to measure complex organics that make up the collected aerosols to the approximate 1 ppm level. Gases will be measured to approximately 10 ppb. Because the Titan atmosphere is expected to be quite complex, a gas chromatograph-ion mobility spectrometer is used to provide unequivocal identification of the components of the analytes. Further details of the science question to be investigated and the proposed instrument are described. The expected results and their implications are also addressed.

Carle, G. C.↗

Uranus and Neptune Missions: A Study in Advance of the Next Planetary Science Decadal Survey

The ice giant planets, Uranus and Neptune, represent an important and relatively unexplored class of planet. Most of our detailed information about them comes from fleeting looks by the Voyager 2 spacecraft in the 1980s. Voyager, and ground-based work since then, found that these planets, their satellites, rings, and magnetospheres, challenge our understanding of the formation and evolution of planetary systems. We also now know that Uranus- Neptune size planets are common around other stars. These are some of the reasons ice giant exploration was a high priority in NASA's most recent Planetary Science Decadal Survey. In preparation for the next Decadal Survey, NASA, with ESA participation, conducted a broad study of possible ice giant missions in the 2024–2037 timeframe. This paper summarizes the key results of the study, and addresses questions that have been raised by the science community and in a recent NASA review. Foremost amongst these are questions about the science objectives, the science payload, and the importance of an atmospheric probe. The conclusions of the NASA/ESA study remain valid. In particular, it is a high priority to send an orbiter and atmospheric probe to at least one of the ice giants, with instrumentation to study all components of an ice giant system. Uranus and Neptune are found to be equally compelling as science targets. The two planets are not equivalent, however, and each system has things to teach us the other cannot. An additional mission study is needed to refine plans for future exploration of these worlds.

Ice giant↗

Solar System Science with JWST

JWST will enable breakthroughs in our understanding of the physical characteristics of cold bodies in the outer reaches of the Solar System. These objects include Pluto and other Kuiper Belt Objects (KBOs), the icy moons of the giant planets, and distant cometary nuclei. Recent discoveries of large objects in the Kuiper belt, along with many smaller members, make it clear that this region represents a major constituent of our Solar System, one that was hidden until recently because it is so remote and challenging to observe. The near-IR and mid-IR performance of JWST will be unique in its power to probe this region. This poster describes the science drivers for JWST observations of Solar System objects and plans for implementing this capability.

Sonneborn, G.↗

Inner Heliosphere Science

The future HELEX mission concept by NASA/ESA to the inner heliosphere (0.22 AU < r < 0.7 AU) and the possibility of a Solar Probe mission to the Sun (9.5 Rs < r < 0.7 AU) will allow for a comprehensive exploration of the inner heliosphere with the prospect for major discoveries and resolution of long standing issues of heliospheric science. The new Solar Probe mission being considered is equatorial and will allow exploration of the streamer belt region from a closeup perspective. We'll be able to look for the suprathermal ion population some think are necessary as the seed population for SEP events, look closeup at CMEs and formation of shock inside the Alfven critical point, probe the outer boundaries of the streamer belts, reconnection within the current sheets, MHD waves and turbulence and the inner source where they are felt to form and may reveal themselves as pickup ions. All will be launched around Solar Minimum with rise in solar activity toward the end of these missions. Extended missions could then occur during Solar Maximum. I'll talk about the complement of instrumentation and mission strategies.

Sillter, Edward C., Jr.↗

The NASA Beyond Einstein Program

Einstein's legacy is incomplete, his theory of General relativity raises -- but cannot answer --three profound questions: What powered the big bang? What happens to space, time, and matter at the edge of a black hole? and What is the mysterious dark energy pulling the Universe apart? The Beyond Einstein program within NASA's Office of Space Science aims to answer these questions, employing a series of missions linked by powerful new technologies and complementary approaches towards shared science goals. The Beyond Einstein program has three linked elements which advance science and technology towards two visions; to detect directly gravitational wave signals from the earliest possible moments of the BIg Bang, and to image the event horizon of a black hole. The central element is a pair of Einstein Great Observatories, Constellation-X and LISA. Constellation-X is a powerful new X-ray observatory dedicated to X-Ray Spectroscopy. LISA is the first spaced based gravitational wave detector. These powerful facilities will blaze new paths to the questions about black holes, the Big Bang and dark energy. The second element is a series of competitively selected Einstein Probes, each focused on one of the science questions and includes a mission dedicated resolving the Dark Energy mystery. The third element is a program of technology development, theoretical studies and education. The Beyond Einstein program is a new element in the proposed NASA budget for 2004. This talk will give an overview of the program and the missions contained within it.

White, Nicholas E.↗

The View From Out Here: The Solar System Planets as Exoplanet Analogs

As we begin to characterize planets orbiting other stars, one of the most important tools available to us is the collection of disk-integrated solar system observations. To date, these have been limited in how they match up with expected exoplanet observations in terms of wavelength, time, viewing geometry, and separations. The Interstellar Probe mission could push the boundaries of planetary science by providing a much-needed and unique dataset for the solar system viewed as an extrasolar system in advance of the next generation of ground and space-based telescopes. Viewing the solar system at large separations over a long period serves several purposes. It acts as a practical test directly analogous to exoplanet observations under realistic conditions, including such effects as zodiacal dust (e.g., Roberge et al., 2012). Secondly, it allows for both the validation of forward models (that is, simulating a planet and generating spectra) and retrievals (where some of the planetary properties are not known) (e.g., Robinson et al., 2011; Agarwal and Wettlaufer, 2017). Third, the mission pro le would be able to collect data at both high- and low-phase angles, which are lacking for most of the solar system planets (e.g., Mallama and Hilton, 2018). Lastly, the long duration of the proposed mission would allow not only snapshots, but time resolved observations using the same instrument, highlighting the dynamic nature of the planets (e.g., seasonality, storms). The planets need not be resolved to make these observations, which eases instrumentation requirements. Here, we show simulations of what an Interstellar Probe imager would see, improving on work that was part of a white paper submitted to the Planetary Science and Astrobiology Decadal Survey. The opportunity for multiple full orbits for most of the solar system planets, including a full phase curve of Saturn, is unique and worth pursuing during the development of the Interstellar Probe mission.

Chester Harman↗

A Thermal Analysis of a Hot-Wire Probe for Icing Applications

This paper presents a steady-state thermal model of a hot-wire instrument applicable to atmospheric measurement of water content in clouds. In this application, the power required to maintain the wire at a given temperature is used to deduce the water content of the cloud. The model considers electrical resistive heating, axial conduction, convection to the flow, radiation to the surroundings, as well as energy loss due to the heating, melting, and evaporation of impinging liquid and or ice. All of these parameters can be varied axially along the wire. The model further introduces a parameter called the evaporation potential which locally gauges the maximum fraction of incoming water that evaporates. The primary outputs of the model are the steady-state power required to maintain a spatially-average constant temperature as well as the variation of that temperature and other parameters along the wire. The model is used to understand the sensitivity of the hot-wire performance to various flow and boundary conditions including a detailed comparison of dry air and wet (i.e. cloud-on) conditions. The steady-state power values are compared to experimental results from a Science Engineering Associates (SEA) Multi-Element probe, a commonly used water-content measurement instrument. The model results show good agreement with experiment for both dry and cloud-on conditions with liquid water content. For ice, the experimental measurements under read the actual water content due to incomplete evaporation and splashing. Model results, which account for incomplete evaporation, are still higher than experimental results where the discrepancy is attributed to splashing mass-loss which is not accounted in the model.

Thermal Analysis↗

Simultaneous Ice Water Content Measurements at Multiple Locations on the NASA DC-8 Aircraft during the 2018 HIWC RADAR Flight Campaign

Ice water content measurements were made simultaneously at three locations on the NASA DC-8 in natural, glaciated conditions during the 2018 High Ice Water Content RADAR flight campaign. The purpose of these measurements was to further evaluate efficiency factors of hot-wire total water content probes in glaciated conditions and investigate the enhancement of ice crystal concentrations near fuselage surfaces due to flow field inertial effects, and ice crystals impacting the nose, breaking up, and flowing downstream. The total water content measurements were made using either Science Engineering Associates Ice Crystal Detectors or Robust Probes. Three common sensors were mounted on an underwing canister considered to be in near free-flow conditions, a standoff from a fuselage window, and the nose of the fuselage near the pitot probes. The Ice Crystal Detector total water content sensor and Robust Probe sensor collection and retention efficiencies were evaluated through comparisons with the underwing Ice Crystal Detector and Robust Probe measurements to the IKP2 isokinetic evaporator probe, which provided the reference ice water content measurement. Local ice water content at the nose position was evaluated by comparing ratios of the nose and underwing ice crystal detectors to the IKP2. Local ice water content at the window-standoff location was also evaluated by comparing total water content sensor measurements from the window ice crystal detector to the measurements made with the underwing and nose Ice Crystal Detectors The key findings were: 1) the Ice Crystal Detector total water content sensor ice water content efficiency factor was similar to previous estimates, but reduced with increased ice crystal median mass diameter; 2) the ice water content at the fuselage nose location near the DC-8 pitot probes was approximately 2.5 times the freestream values – although this estimate is affected by a higher probe efficiency factor due to smaller particles in the debris cloud from impacts upstream of the probe; and 3) the ice water content at the 17” standoff from the port window varied from about 50% to 3 times freestream values in a complicated manner. Similar measurement locations are not uncommon on cloud research aircraft, where ice particle measurements may be subject to similar uncertainties.

Aircraft Icing↗

Simultaneous Ice Water Content Measurements at Multiple Locations on the NASA DC-8 Aircraft during the 2018 HIWC RADAR Flight Campaign

Ice water content measurements were made simultaneously at three locations on the NASA DC-8 in natural, glaciated conditions during the 2018 High Ice Water Content RADAR flight campaign. The purpose of these measurements was to further evaluate efficiency factors of hot-wire total water content probes in glaciated conditions and investigate the enhancement of ice crystal concentrations near fuselage surfaces due to flow field inertial effects, and ice crystals impacting the nose, breaking up, and flowing downstream. The total water content measurements were made using either Science Engineering Associates Ice Crystal Detectors or Robust Probes. Three common sensors were mounted on an underwing canister considered to be in near free-flow conditions, a standoff from a fuselage window, and the nose of the fuselage near the pitot probes. The Ice Crystal Detector total water content sensor and Robust Probe sensor collection and retention efficiencies were evaluated through comparisons with the underwing Ice Crystal Detector and Robust Probe measurements to the IKP2 isokinetic evaporator probe, which provided the reference ice water content measurement. Local ice water content at the nose position was evaluated by comparing ratios of the nose and underwing ice crystal detectors to the IKP2. Local ice water content at the window-standoff location was also evaluated by comparing total water content sensor measurements from the window ice crystal detector to the measurements made with the underwing and nose Ice Crystal Detectors The key findings were: 1) the Ice Crystal Detector total water content sensor ice water content efficiency factor was similar to previous estimates, but reduced with increased ice crystal median mass diameter; 2) the ice water content at the fuselage nose location near the DC-8 pitot probes was approximately 2.5 times the freestream values – although this estimate is affected by a higher probe efficiency factor due to smaller particles in the debris cloud from impacts upstream of the probe; and 3) the ice water content at the 17” standoff from the port window varied from about 50% to 3 times freestream values in a complicated manner. Similar measurement locations are not uncommon on cloud research aircraft, where ice particle measurements may be subject to similar uncertainties.

o Aircraft Icing↗

Simultaneous Ice Water Content Measurements at Multiple Locations on the NASA DC-8 Aircraft during the 2018 HIWC RADAR Flight Campaign

Ice water content measurements were made simultaneously at three locations on the NASA DC-8 in natural, glaciated conditions during the 2018 High Ice Water Content RADAR flight campaign. The purpose of these measurements was to further evaluate efficiency factors of hot-wire total water content probes in glaciated conditions and investigate the enhancement of ice crystal concentrations near fuselage surfaces due to flow field inertial effects, and ice crystals impacting the nose, breaking up, and flowing downstream. The total water content measurements were made using either Science Engineering Associates Ice Crystal Detectors or Robust Probes. Three common sensors were mounted on an underwing canister considered to be in near free-flow conditions, a standoff from a fuselage window, and the nose of the fuselage near the pitot probes. The Ice Crystal Detector concave total water content sensor and Robust Probe sensor collection and retention efficiencies were evaluated through comparisons with the underwing Ice Crystal Detector and Robust Probe measurements to the Isokinetic Probe version 2 (IKP2), which provided the reference ice water content measurement. Local ice water content at the nose position was evaluated by comparing ratios of the nose and underwing ice crystal detectors to the IKP2. Local ice water content at the window-standoff location was also evaluated by comparing total water content sensor measurements from the window probes to the measurements made with the underwing and nose probes. The key findings were: (1) the Ice Crystal Detector concave water content sensor efficiency factor to glaciated conditions was similar to previous estimates, but reduced with increased ice crystal median mass diameter; (2) the ice water content at the fuselage nose location near the DC-8 pitot probes was approximately 2.5 times the freestream values—although this estimate is affected by a higher probe efficiency factor due to smaller particles in the debris cloud from impacts upstream of the probe; and (3) the ice water content at the 17 in. standoff from the port window varied from about 50 percent to nearly three times freestream values in a complicated manner. Similar measurement locations are not uncommon on cloud research aircraft, where ice particle measurements may be subject to similar uncertainties.

Aircraft Icing↗

How Dark the Sky: The JWST Backgrounds

We describe the sources of stray light and thermal background that affect JWST observations; report actual backgrounds as measured from commissioning and early science observations; compare those background levels to pre-launch predictions; estimate the impact of the backgrounds on science performance; and explore how the backgrounds probe the achieved configuration of the deployed observatory. We find the observatory is limited by the irreducible astrophysical backgrounds, rather than scattered stray light and thermal self-emission, for all wavelengths λ<12.5 micron, thus meeting the level 1 requirement. This result was not assured given the open architecture and thermal challenges of JWST, and is the result of meticulous attention to stray light and thermal issues in the design, construction, integration, and test phases. From background considerations alone, JWST will require less integration time in the near-infrared compared to a system that just met the stray light requirements; as such, JWST will be even more powerful than expected for deep imaging at 1--5 micron. In the mid-infrared, the measured thermal backgrounds closely match pre-launch predictions. The background near 10 micron is slightly higher than predicted before launch, but the impact on observations is mitigated by the excellent throughput of MIRI, such that instrument sensitivity will be as good as expected pre-launch. These measured background levels are fully compatible with JWST's science goals and the Cycle 1 science program currently underway.

Astronomical instrumentation↗

Potential of Probing the Lunar Regolith using Rover-Mounted Ground Penetrating Radar: Moses Lake Dune Field Analog Study

Probing radars have been widely recognized by the science community to be an efficient tool to explore lunar subsurface providing a unique capability to address several scientific and operational issues. A wideband (200 to 1200 MHz) Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) mounted on a surface rover can provide high vertical resolution and probing depth from few tens of centimeters to few tens of meters depending on the sounding frequency and the ground conductivity. This in term can provide a better understand regolith thickness, elemental iron concentration (including ilmenite), volatile presence, structural anomalies and fracturing. All those objectives are of important significance for understanding the local geology and potential sustainable resources for future landing sites in particular exploring the thickness, structural heterogeneity and potential volatiles presence in the lunar regolith. While the operation and data collection of GPR is a straightforward case for most terrestrial surveys, it is a challenging task for remote planetary study especially on robotic platforms due to the complexity of remote operation in rough terrains and the data collection constrains imposed by the mechanical motion of the rover and limitation in data transfer. Nevertheless, Rover mounted GPR can be of great support to perform systematic subsurface surveys for a given landing site as it can provide scientific and operational support in exploring subsurface resources and sample collections which can increase the efficiency of the EVA activities for potential human crews as part of the NASA Constellation Program. In this study we attempt to explore the operational challenges and their impact on the EVA scientific return for operating a rover mounted GPR in support of potential human activity on the moon. In this first field study, we mainly focused on the ability of GPR to support subsurface sample collection and explore shallow subsurface volatiles.

Horz, F.↗

Study of alternative probe technologies

A number of implied technologies for a deep probe mission was examined; i.e., one that would provide the capability to scientifically examine planetary atmospheres at the 1000 bar level. Conditions imposed by current Jupiter, Saturn, and Uranus atmospheric models were considered. The major thrust of the measurements was to determine lower atmosphere composition, even to trace constituents of one part per billion. Two types of instruments having the necessary accuracy to meet the science objectives were considered and integrated into a deep probe configuration. One deep probe option that resulted was identified as a Minimum Technology Development approach. The significant feature of this option is that only three technology developments are required to enable the mission, i.e., (1) science instrument development, (2) advanced data processing, and (3) external high pressure/thermal insulation. It is concluded that a probe designed for a Jupiter mission could, with minor changes, be used for a Saturn or Uranus mission.

Source record↗

Spitzer Space Telescope in-orbit checkout and science verification operations

Spitzer Space Telescope, the fourth and final of NASA's great observatories, and the first mission in NASA's Origins Program was launched 25 August 2003 into an Earth-trailing solar orbit. The observatory was designed to probe and explore the universe in the infrared. Before science data could be acquired, however, the observatory had to be initialized, characterized, calibrated, and commissioned. A two phased operations approach was defined to complete this work. These phases were identified as In-Orbit Checkout (IOC) and Science Verification (SV). Because the observatory lifetime is cryogen-limited these operations had to be highly efficient. The IOC/SV operations design accommodated a pre-defined distributed organizational structure and a complex, cryogenic flight system. Many checkout activities were inter-dependent, and therefore the operations concept and ground data system had to provide the flexibility required for a 'short turn-around' environment. This paper describes the adaptive operations system design and evolution, implementation, and lessons-learned from the completion of IOC/SV.

space verification↗