SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “ATR REACTOR”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 271 records · Page 15

All sources NASA NTRS DOE OSTI

DOE OSTI2023

The Innovation of I-Loop

The closing and decommissioning of Halden Boiling Water Reactor in Norway resulted in the loss of many nuclear irradiation testing facilities, notably those providing boiling water reactor (BWR) environments. To lighten the loss of such an important asset, the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) is being called upon. The recent overhaul of the ATR’s core and the installation of the new Top Head Closure Plate now makes it possible to utilize the ATR’s I-loop locations for I-Loop Tube test facilities. Similar to the current in-pile tube facilities, these new I-Loop facilities will capitalize on the available space and neutron flux the ATR generates in this region of the core for fuels and materials testing. Current efforts are underway to add new PWR and BWR I-Loop Tube facilities to the I-Loop positions for these purposes.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

DOE OSTI2019

Technical Basis and Implementation of Groundwater Pathway Models Used for INL’s RH LLW Disposal Facility Performance Assessment

The Idaho National Laboratory’s (INL’s) Remote-Handled Low-Level Waste (RH LLW) Disposal Facility has been designed and constructed to receive waste generated on INL in support of the Office of Nuclear Energy (NE) and Naval Reactors (NR) missions. RH LLW is generated on the INL site from spent nuclear fuel handling and operations at the Naval Reactors Facility (NRF), the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR), and at the Material and Fuels Complex (MFC) in addition to other miscellaneous research activities. The facility has been designed to receive RH LLW currently in storage at INL facilities and new waste generated by nuclear research programs. RH LLW received at the facility is solid waste consisting of surface contaminated debris, ion exchange resins used to purify cooling water, and activated metals generated during reactor core change outs, Naval spent fuel management, and nuclear R&D. The facility has been designed to meet the requirements of DOE Order 435.1, Radioactive Waste Management [1] for all-pathways including groundwater and air, radon emissions limits, and inadvertent intrusion limits. The facility design includes a vault system incorporating robust concrete vaults oriented vertically in close-packed arrays, a hydraulic drainage system designed to limit water contact with the stainless steel waste canisters/liners and concrete vaults, and a robust monitoring system. Per the environmental assessment (EA) [2], all waste will be disposed of in stainless steel waste canisters/liners. During facility design and construction, site-specific data was collected to provide laboratory and field scale performance characteristics for the concrete vault and hydraulic drainage systems. Field-scale infiltration tests were conducted and monitored and the data was interpreted using numerical simulation. Based on interpretation of the observed laboratory and field test data, the facility performance assessment (PA) was developed. The PA groundwater pathway source release model differentially credits release from surface contaminated debris, ion exchange resins, and activated metals. It also credits failure of the steel waste canisters/liners with failure rates based on actual corrosion data. Once released, transport through the vadose zone and aquifer to downgradient receptor locations was simulated in the PA using a one-dimensional modeling approach based on historical three-dimensional modeling of historically-contaminated INL sites. This paper provides an overview of the groundwater pathway source release models and their technical implementation in the PA. It also describes the one-dimensional transport model used for the vadose zone and multi-dimensional model used for the aquifer.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2019

Technical Basis and Implementation of Groundwater Pathway Models Used for INL's RH LLW Disposal Facility Performance Assessment - 19440

The Idaho National Laboratory's (INL's) Remote-Handled Low-Level Waste (RH LLW) Disposal Facility has been designed and constructed to receive waste generated by INL in support of the Office of Nuclear Energy (NE) and Naval Reactors (NR) missions. RH LLW is generated on the INL site from spent nuclear fuel handling and operations at the Naval Reactors Facility (NRF), the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR), and at the Material and Fuels Complex (MFC) in addition to other miscellaneous research activities. The facility has been designed to receive RH LLW currently in storage at INL facilities and new waste generated by nuclear research programs. RH LLW received at the facility is solid waste consisting of surface contaminated materials, ion exchange resins used to purify cooling water, and activated metals generated during reactor core change outs, Naval spent fuel management, and nuclear R and D. The facility has been designed to meet the requirements of DOE Order 435.1, Radioactive Waste Management for all-pathways including groundwater and air, radon emissions limits, and inadvertent intrusion limits. The facility design includes a vault system incorporating robust concrete vaults oriented vertically in close-packed arrays, a hydraulic drainage system designed to limit water contact with the stainless steel waste canisters and concrete vaults, and a robust monitoring system. Per the environmental assessment (EA), all waste will be disposed of in stainless steel waste canisters. During facility design and construction, site-specific data was collected to provide laboratory and field scale performance characteristics for the concrete vault and hydraulic drainage systems. Field-scale infiltration tests were conducted and monitoring data was interpreted using numerical simulation. Based on interpretation of the observed laboratory and field test data, the facility performance assessment (PA) was developed. The PA groundwater pathway source release model differentially credits release from surface contaminated waste, ion exchange resins, and activated metals. It also credits steel waste canisters with failure rates based on actual corrosion data. Once released, radionuclide transport through the vadose zone and aquifer to downgradient receptor locations was simulated in the PA using a one-dimensional modeling approach based on three-dimensional modeling of historically-contaminated INL sites. This paper provides an overview of the groundwater pathway source release models and their technical implementation in the PA. It also describes the one-dimensional transport model used for the vadose zone and multi-dimensional model used for the aquifer. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2016

Advanced Test Reactor Mini-Plate Hydraulic Testing

Currently, flow testing is being performed at Oregon State University (OSU) on the hydromechanical Fuel Test Facility (HMFTF) and the Endurance Flow Loop (EFL) to aid in the qualification of low enriched plate-type Uranium fuels for use in high performance research reactors in the US, under the Global Threat Reduction Initiative (GTRI). Under this project, varying geometries of small capsules proposed for irradiation testing in the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) are being hydraulically testing prior to being placed in the ATR. The premise of this study was to conduct a number of flow tests on these capsules to characterize the pressure loss through each as a function of flow rate and compare the results against predicted theoretical values. Two categories of flow tests were performed in the Endurance Flow Loop to supplement flow testing of proposed LEU plate-type fuel for conversion of High Performance Research Reactors: Capsule Comparison Tests and Orifice Characterization Tests. The purpose of these tests were to determine the pressure drop across each experiment as a function of flow rate and to compare the results against a simple analytical model of the pressure loss through a pipe, to support the safety basis for the in-pile experiments. The capsule comparison tests compared the pressure loss through three types of capsules: RERTR, MP-1, and EMPIRE. In this category, nine flow tests were performed to determine the effect of having one, two, and three of each type of capsule placed in series in a test section. The analytical model accurately predicted, for each case, an increase in hydraulic resistance for each capsule that was added, though the values were conservative. The orifice characterization tests compared the pressure loss through various configurations of small orifice spacers in conjunction with blank spacers and the MP-1 capsules. The analytical model predicted that adding blank spacers would slightly increase the pressure drop due to added frictional effects, but indicated no change in the pressure drop based on the orientation of the capsules. The measured results indicated that the addition of the blank spacers had no measurable effect on the pressure drop, while changing the orientation of the capsules did. In all 15 flow tests, the theoretical model provides a conservative estimate of the pressure drop through each configuration for an equivalent flow rate, over that of the measured results.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

DOE OSTI2024

Contribution of Lobe Power to Experiment Heating in the Advanced Test Reactor

In order to ease the computational burden associated with designing irradiation experiments in the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR), scaling factors are often used to estimate design parameters at different lobe powers. Here, this paper examines the validity of long-standing assumptions about the contribution of lobe power to total experiment heating in the ATR. For each of the ATR’s 77 different experiment positions, the fractional contribution of each of the ATR’s five lobes to the total heating in that position is calculated and compared to traditional assumptions. The updated fractional contributions are then used to scale heating rates in a sample problem, and the results are compared to traditional scaling methods as well as explicit MC21 heating calculations. It is concluded that for experiment locations in close proximity to the ATR driver fuel (i.e. flux traps and the A, H, and B positions), heating rates scaled with the updated fractional contributions generally agree better with explicit MC21 calculations than do heating rates scaled using the traditionally assumed contributions. For the I positions, which are located on the very periphery of the ATR core, both scaling methods led to poor results when compared against explicit calculations due to the effect that movement of the outer shim control cylinders has on the experiment heating in those positions.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗

DOE OSTI2017

Flux in a 1D-Reactor Cell by Response Matrix

Legacy computational reactor physics software tools and protocols currently used for support of the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) core fuel management and safety assurance, and to some extent, experiment management, are inconsistent with the state of modern nuclear engineering practice, and are difficult, if not impossible, to verify and validate (V&V) according to modern standards. Furthermore, the legacy staff knowledge required for effective application of these tools and protocols from the 1960s and 1970s is rapidly being lost due to staff turnover and retirements. Thus in late 2009, the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) initiated a focused effort, the ATR Core Modeling Update Project, to address this situation through the introduction of modern high-fidelity transport theory based computational software and models to replace the legacy methods, with appropriate (V&V) protocols according to applicable national standards.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

DOE OSTI2025

AGR 1 and 2 Isotopic Depletion Validation

This presentation includes work performed developing a computational benchmark for the AGR 1 and 2 experiments. These experiments involve irradiation of TRISO particle compact in the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR). Many post-irradiation measurements were made from these experiments, including isotopic concentrations of fission products. The benchmark involves a MCNP-ORIGEN coupled model of the ATR and AGR experiment capsules to calculate a comprehensive inventory of fission product and actinide concentrations in the compacts. This presentation describes the experiments, the measurements obtained, the benchmark model, and results of the model evaluation.

97 - MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗

DOE OSTI2018

Applicability of HBU Fuel Cask R and D Project to Al Clad Fuel Storage - 18558

Aluminum clad spent nuclear fuel (SNF) not destined to be reprocessed at Savannah River's H Canyon will eventually be moved from existing wet and dry storage facilities into standardized dry storage systems (e.g., Universal Canisters), ideally suited for disposal. With the current lack of disposal capacity in the U.S., placement of this SNF into dry storage requires plans for demonstrating to the regulator the safety of both the extended storage and the subsequent transportation to a future disposal facility of this SNF. For commercial SNF, concerns related to extended dry storage and subsequent transportation have been, and continue to be, addressed through several demonstration projects including, but not limited to, one for the lower burnup SNF at Idaho National Laboratory (INL) and one for the higher burnup SNF at Dominion's North Anna Power Station. Lessons learned from the more recent Orano led higher burnup demonstration project (HBU Demo Project) provides relevant information for advancing the concept of a 'smart cask' system for dry interim storage, which will allow for collection of data to support the safety demonstration for extended dry storage and subsequent transportation of the aluminum clad SNF. This 'smart cask' would eliminate the need for multiple demonstration projects that may have to be performed for different types of aluminum clad SNF designs and/or for potentially age distinguishing parameters, such as burnup or initial enrichment. This 'smart cask' would be developed and deployed by leveraging the HBU Demo Project's experience associated with modifying and deploying a TN-32B bolted carbon steel vertical storage cask system to monitor key parameters related to the criticality, structural, confinement, and thermal safety of the SNF and the canister system containing this SNF. This paper will focus on how the extensive design, licensing, and fabrication experience accumulated by the HBU Demo Project's cask system can be leveraged to support the design, licensing, and fabrication of a 'smart cask' system intended to support/confirm the interim dry storage, potential extended storage, and subsequent transportation of aluminum clad SNF, such as the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) SNF. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

DOE OSTI2022

Pu-238 Production Calculator and Estimation Tool in the Advanced Test Reactor

A MS Excel tool was created to help track Pu-238 production, Np-237 feedstock use, estimate production scenarios, and coordinate planning for shipments at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) and Advanced Test Reactor (ATR). As-run estimates were used as a basis for beginning and end of life isotopic concentrations. Multiple target types were created to demonstrate a proof of concept while actual results were not yet available.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2018

FY 2018 Annual Status Report for the Nuclear Fuels and Materials Library

The Nuclear Fuels and Materials Library (NFML), which is owned by U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Nuclear Energy (DOE-NE) and curated by the Nuclear Science User Facilities (NSUF), is a collection of specialized information and nuclear fuel and material samples from past and ongoing irradiation test campaigns. The NFML also includes real-world components retrieved from decommissioned power reactors and donations from other sources. The NFML can be accessed through a web portal at the NSUF web page NSUF.INL.gov or directly at https://nsuf-infrastructure.inl.gov/. The NFML was conceived shortly after the NSUF was established in 2007. The concept was to offer Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) irradiated materials and NSUF project samples that were stored in Idaho National Laboratory (INL) hot cells to researchers for use in NSUF-awarded research projects. The NFML catalogue began as a series of electronic spreadsheets gathered from principal investigators (PI) and INL programs. In the summer of 2016, the spreadsheets were migrated into an online database within the NSUF website. The NFML inventory has continued to grow with the addition of NSUF-funded project specimens, Experimental Breeder Reactor No. 2 (EBR-II) legacy samples, and donated material from Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). The online library technology further evolved with upgrades for users and administrators of the database. NFML outreach in FY 2018 included NSUF representatives at conferences and workshops domestically and internationally. This document provides a status report on the NFML for FY 2018.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2017

Nuclear Science User Facility: Overview of Neutron Irradiation Activities

The Nuclear Science User Facilities (NSUF), established in 2007 as the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) National Scientific User Facility is chartered to provide cost-free access to unique and important research and development capabilities and infrastructure to nuclear energy-focused researchers. Users can apply for access to any of the NSUF INL or partner facilities using the same process, either through the annual Office of Nuclear Energy Consolidated Innovative Nuclear Research funding announcement or the NSUF Rapid Turnaround Experiment (RTE) opportunities, offered three times each year. The NSUF has several research and test reactors available as well as ion beamlines and x-ray light sources for experimental use in support of the R&D objectives of the DOE Office of Nuclear Energy. This presentation reviews the current capabilities, needs, awarded irradiation experiments and potential use in FY 2018.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

DOE OSTI2018

Nuclear Science User Facility: Neutron Irradiation Challenges and Opportunities

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

DOE OSTI2019

Test Plan for Reirradiation and 1200°C Heating Test of AGR-3/4 Compact 8-1

Post irradiation examination (PIE) and heating tests of tristructural isotropic (TRISO)-coated fuel particles, fuel compacts, and graphite from Advanced Gas Reactor (AGR) irradiation experiment AGR 3/4 are in progress. The AGR-3/4 test train consisted of twelve separate capsules irradiated in the northeast flux trap of the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) at Idaho National Laboratory (INL) from December 14, 2011, to April 12, 2014 (Collin 2015b). This test plan describes the reirradiation and subsequent heating test of AGR-3/4 Compact 8-1. One of the main goals of this test is to assess the retention of short-lived fission products I-131 (t1/2 = 8.02 d) and Xe-133 (t1/2 = 5.2 d) in fuel kernels. To generate short-lived fission products, the compact will first be reirradiated in the Neutron Radiography Reactor (NRAD). Following reirradiation, the compact will be removed from NRAD, gamma scanned on the Precision Gamma Scanner (PGS), and then loaded into the Fuel Accident Condition Simulator (FACS) furnace for heating at 1200°C. Fission gases and condensable fission products released from the compact will be collected in the Fission Gas Monitoring System (FGMS) and the FACS condensation plates, respectively. The planned uses of AGR-3/4 compacts (including heating testing and destructive analysis) are discussed in the AGR-3/4 PIE plan (Demkowicz 2017). Significant portions of this plan have been completed and additional samples are being used for purposes not captured in that plan.

42 ENGINEERING↗

DOE OSTI2019

Test Plan for Reirradiation and 1400°C Heating Test of AGR-3/4 Compact 10-1

Post irradiation examination (PIE) and heating tests of tristructural isotropic (TRISO)-coated fuel particles, fuel compacts, and graphite from Advanced Gas Reactor (AGR) irradiation experiment AGR 3/4 are in progress. The AGR-3/4 test train consisted of twelve separate capsules irradiated in the northeast flux trap of the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) at Idaho National Laboratory (INL) from December 14, 2011, to April 12, 2014 (Collin 2015b). This test plan describes the reirradiation and subsequent heating test of AGR-3/4 Compact 10-1. One of the main goals of this test is to assess the retention of short-lived fission products I-131 (t1/2 = 8.02 d) and Xe-133 (t1/2 = 5.2 d) in fuel kernels. To generate short-lived fission products, the compact will first be reirradiated in the Neutron Radiography Reactor (NRAD). Following reirradiation, the compact will be removed from NRAD, gamma scanned on the Precision Gamma Scanner (PGS), and then loaded into the Fuel Accident Condition Simulator (FACS) furnace for heating at 1400°C. Fission gases and condensable fission products released from the compact will be collected in the Fission Gas Monitoring System (FGMS) and the FACS condensation plates, respectively.

42 ENGINEERING↗

DOE OSTI2019

Test Plan for Reirradiation and 1600°C Heating Test of AGR-3/4 Compact 3-1

Post irradiation examination (PIE) and heating tests of tristructural isotropic (TRISO)-coated fuel particles, fuel compacts, and graphite from Advanced Gas Reactor (AGR) irradiation experiment AGR 3/4 are in progress. The AGR-3/4 test train consisted of twelve separate capsules irradiated in the northeast flux trap of the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) at Idaho National Laboratory (INL) from December 14, 2011, to April 12, 2014 (Collin 2015b). This test plan describes the reirradiation and subsequent heating test of AGR-3/4 Compact 3-1. One of the main goals of this test is to assess the retention of short-lived fission products I-131 (t1/2 = 8.02 d) and Xe-133 (t1/2 = 5.2 d) in fuel kernels. To generate short-lived fission products, the compact will first be reirradiated in the Neutron Radiography Reactor (NRAD). Following reirradiation, the compact will be removed from NRAD, gamma scanned on the Precision Gamma Scanner (PGS), and then loaded into the Fuel Accident Condition Simulator (FACS) furnace for heating at 1600°C. Fission gases and condensable fission products released from the compact will be collected in the Fission Gas Monitoring System (FGMS) and the FACS condensation plates, respectively. The planned uses of AGR-3/4 compacts (including heating testing and destructive analysis) are discussed in the AGR-3/4 PIE plan (Demkowicz 2017).

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2022

Recent 238 Pu Production Activities at Idaho National Laboratory

The Plutonium-238 ( 238 Pu) Production program at Idaho National Laboratory (INL) is actively qualifying irradiation targets containing 237 Np for the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) to produce 238 Pu for future National Aeronautics and Space Administration missions. INL qualified and loaded seven targets in the ATR’s south flux trap for cycle 169A, which occurred in Spring 2021. The irradiation qualification program has expanded to additional ATR irradiation positions after two baseline production targets in three positions validated significant production of 238 Pu. The validation model was followed by the PFS-1 experimental test in the ATR Critical Facility that verified 238 Pu production cross sections. This paper outlines the progress and status of the 238 Pu production program at INL. The qualification effort, safety analysis, hardware status, and future activities for qualification of an updated target design for use in the ATR are discussed.

07 ISOTOPE AND RADIATION SOURCES↗

DOE OSTI2017

Radial Deconsolidation of Leach-Burn-Leach of AGR-3/4 Compacts 3-3, 12-1, and 12-3

The Advanced Gas Reactor (AGR) Fuel Development and Qualification Program was established to perform the requisite research and development on tristructural isotropic (TRISO)-coated particle fuel to support deployment of a high-temperature gas-cooled reactor (HTGR). The work continues as part of the Advanced Reactor Technologies (ART) TRISO Fuel Program. The overarching goal of the program is to provide a baseline fuel qualification data set to support licensing and operation of an HTGR. To achieve these goals, the program includes the elements of fuel fabrication, irradiation, post-irradiation examination (PIE) and safety testing, fuel performance modeling, and fission product transport (INL 2016). A series of fuel irradiation experiments is being performed at the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) at Idaho National Laboratory (INL). These experiments are intended to provide data on fuel performance under irradiation, support fuel fabrication process development, qualify fuel for operating and accident conditions, provide irradiated fuel for accident testing, and support development of fuel performance and fission product transport models.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2018

Development of LWR Fuels with Enhanced Accident Tolerance ATF Feasibility Analysis Report Deliverable for the Westinghouse Accident Tolerant Fuel Program

The Westinghouse Electric Company LLC (Westinghouse) accident tolerant fuel (ATF) program utilizes chromium (Cr) coated zirconium alloy cladding with uranium silicide (U 3 Si 2 ) high density/high thermal conductivity fuel for its lead test rod (LTR) program with irradiation beginning in 2019. The lead test assembly (LTA) program will use both SiC/SiC composites and Cr coated zirconium alloy claddings with the high density/high thermal conductivity U 3 Si 2 pellet which will begin in 2022. Over the past several years, Westinghouse has tested the Cr coated zirconium (Zr) and silicon carbide (SiC) claddings in autoclaves and in the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) reactor and the U 3 Si 2 pellets have been tested in the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) at Idaho National Laboratory (INL). High temperature tests at the state-of-the-art Westinghouse facilities in Churchill, PA have been carried out to determine the time and temperature limits for the SiC and Cr coated zirconium claddings. Fuel rod and assembly design in preparation for the LTR and LTA programs is underway as well as licensing efforts with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). Finally, accident analyses coupled with economic evaluations for both operating savings as well as fuel savings have been initiated. Cr coated zirconium alloy claddings showed low corrosion rates in both autoclave and in-reactor tests and will be fabricated using commercial processes for the first LTRs for insertion in 2019. Current autoclave results for SiC composite claddings indicate that a corrosion rate of fewer than 2 micrometers per year which meets corrosion requirements may be achieved under normal operating conditions. Modular Accident Analysis Program 5 (MAAP5) calculations indicate that solid fission products can be contained within SiC cladding for up to two hours longer than current Zr based cladding in a station blackout scenario. This additional time is due to the much higher temperature capability of SiC (~2000°C). These two hours can be used to implement additional response options instituted through the FLEX program by reactor operators. While the Cr coated Zr alloy option offers more modest ATF gains (~200°C higher than bare Zr) in similar situations, the coatings do delay the runaway oxidation encountered by uncoated zirconium cladding. Both ATF cladding options also reduce hydrogen production which dramatically reduces primary system and containment pressure and the risk of fission product release beyond containment in the unlikely event of an accident. The lower pressure in the system allows more time to feed cooling water to the core, resulting in the avoidance of fuel melting. The coping time is extended indefinitely as long as the water flow continues. SiC exhibits the highest accident tolerance of any cladding and significant advances in understanding the design, manufacture and accident behavior of SiC cladding have been made. Department of Energy support is needed to continue the on-going experimental work addressing the interaction between U 3 Si 2 and SiC at temperatures >1200°C, the effect of SiC manufacturing methods and manufacturing variability on physical properties, and the ability to predict the mechanical properties of SiC composites based on the composite design. Additionally, experimental work on methods to rapidly fabricate SiC composite structures with high density and reduce the fabrication price of SiC fibers while maintaining a high level of performance is needed. Minimal (<1%) swelling of U 3 Si 2 and subsequent fission gas release has been demonstrated up to 20 MWd/kgU. Irradiation experiments with U 3 Si 2 fuel in ATR to determine these properties at 40 to 50 MWd/kgU are underway. These experiments will provide the data needed to license fuel rod design codes. Research is continuing on production methods for making U 3 Si 2 from UF 6 without going through the U metal step. Oxidation tests of fuel pellets and powder in steam and synthetic air indicate that U 3 Si 2 has a lower oxidation reaction initiation temperature than UO 2 . Options to reduce the U 3 Si 2 oxidation rate are being explored. A hybrid fuel design using pellets with the weight ratio of 30%/70% U 3 Si 2 /UN is currently undergoing testing in the ATR. This approach is being explored to further increase the positive economics of the U 3 Si 2 fuel. In addition to the work supported by the USDOE, research and testing activities are being carried on in a world-wide effort funded by many countries such as Sweden, United Kingdom, Belgium, Netherlands, Spain, Germany, Japan and France. This work is being facilitated through the Westinghouse led Collaboration for Advanced Research on Accident Tolerant Fuel (CARAT) program. Annual meetings are organized by Westinghouse as a venue for presentation of this work and to provide for the cross-fertilization of ideas among the many outstanding researchers in the ATF area. Since SiC, coated cladding and high density fuel options are not currently used in the nuclear industry, support from the government and industry members is needed to further the significant effort of setting new standards. The same is true for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) which must review and approve the commercial use of these new fuels since all current regulations are oriented toward Zr/ UO 2 fuel. There are no showstoppers for accident tolerant fuel technologies when considering supply chain, fabrication, enrichment suppliers, production, and licensing. Due to the cost savings from higher density fuel and the accident tolerance of coated claddings, Exelon has identified potential commercial plants to host the LTRs and LTAs. Planning is underway to implement this schedule.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗