Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “BISON Modeling”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 271 records · Page 15
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2021

BISON As-run AGR-3/4 Irradiation Test Predictions

BISON, a nuclear fuel performance application built using the Multiphysics Object-Oriented Simulation Environment (MOOSE) finite element library, was used to model the Advanced Gas Reactor (AGR)-3/4 irradiation test using as-run physics and thermal hydraulics data. The AGR-3/4 test consists of the combined third and fourth planned irradiations of the AGR Fuel Development and Qualification Program. The AGR-3/4 test train consists of twelve separate and independently controlled and monitored capsules. Each capsule contains four compacts filled with both uranium oxycarbide (UCO) unaltered “driver” fuel particles and UCO designed-to-fail (DTF) fuel particles. The DTF fraction was specified to be 1×10-2. This report documents the calculations performed to predict the failure probability of tristructural isotropic (TRISO) coated driver fuel particles during the AGR-3/4 experiment on a single compact. This report will demonstrate the capabilities of BISON to model the complex AGR-3/4 irradiation test and identify further development needed to capture the fuel particle failure probability and source term on every compact for further comparison from post-irradiation examination (PIE) data. The calculations include the modeling of the AGR-3/4 irradiation that occurred from December 2011 to April 2014 in the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) over a total of 10 ATR cycles including seven normal cycles, one low power cycle, one unplanned outage cycle, and one Power Axial Locator Mechanism (PALM) cycle.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2016

Uncertainty Quantification and Sensitivity Analysis Applications to Fuel Performance Modeling

Best-estimate fuel performance codes such as BISON currently under development at the Idaho National Laboratory, utilize empirical and mechanistic lower-length-scale informed correlations to predict fuel behavior under normal operating and accident reactor conditions. Traditionally, best-estimate results are presented using the correlations with no quantification of the uncertainty in the output metrics of interest. However, there are associated uncertainties in the input parameters and correlations used to determine the behavior of the fuel and cladding under irradiation. Therefore, it is important to perform uncertainty quantification and include confidence bounds on the output metrics that take into account the uncertainties in the inputs. In addition, sensitivity analyses can be performed to determine which input parameters have the greatest influence on the outputs. In this paper we couple the BISON fuel performance code to the DAKOTA uncertainty analysis software to analyze a representative fuel performance problem. The case studied in this paper is based upon rod 1 from the IFA-432 integral experiment performed at the Halden Reactor in Norway. The rodlet is representative of a BWR fuel rod. The input parameters uncertainties are broken into three separate categories including boundary condition uncertainties (e.g., power, coolant flow rate), manufacturing uncertainties (e.g., pellet diameter, cladding thickness), and model uncertainties (e.g., fuel thermal conductivity, fuel swelling). Utilizing DAKOTA, a variety of statistical analysis techniques are applied to quantify the uncertainty and sensitivity of the output metrics of interest. Specifically, we demonstrate the use of sampling methods, polynomial chaos expansions, surrogate models, and variance-based decomposition. The output metrics investigated in this study are the fuel centerline temperature, cladding surface temperature, fission gas released, and fuel rod diameter. The results highlight the importance of quantifying the uncertainty and sensitivity in fuel performance modeling predictions and the need for additional research into improving the material models that are currently available.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2017

Warthog: Coupling Status Update

The Warthog code was developed to couple codes that are developed in both the Multi-Physics Object-Oriented Simulation Environment (MOOSE) from Idaho National Laboratory (INL) and SHARP from Argonne National Laboratory (ANL). The initial phase of this work, focused on coupling the neutronics code PROTEUS with the fuel performance code BISON. The main technical challenge involves mapping the power density solution determined by PROTEUS to the fuel in BISON. This presents a challenge since PROTEUS uses the MOAB mesh format, but BISON, like all other MOOSE codes, uses the libMesh format. When coupling the different codes, one must consider that Warthog is a light-weight MOOSE-based program that uses the Data Transfer Kit (DTK) to transfer data between the various mesh types. Users set up inputs for the codes they want to run, and then Warthog transfers the data between them. Currently Warthog supports XSProc from SCALE or the Sub-Group Application Programming Interface (SGAPI) in PROTEUS for generating cross sections. It supports arbitrary geometries using PROTEUS and BISON. DTK will transfer power densities and temperatures between the codes where the domains overlap. In the past fiscal year (FY), much work has gone into demonstrating two-way coupling for simple pin cells of various materials. XSProc was used to calculate the cross sections, which were then passed to PROTEUS in an external file. PROTEUS calculates the fission/power density, and Warthog uses DTK to pass this information to BISON, where it is used as the heat source. BISON then calculates the temperature profile of the pin cell and sends it back to XSProc to obtain the temperature corrected cross sections. This process is repeated until the convergence criteria (tolerance on BISON solve, or number of time steps) is reached. Models have been constructed and run for both uranium oxide and uranium silicide fuels. These models demonstrate a clear difference in power shape that is not accounted for in a stand-alone BISON run. Future work involves improving the user interface (UI), likely through integration with the Nuclear Energy Advanced Modeling and Simulation (NEAMS) Workbench. Furthermore, automating the input creation would ease the user experience. The next priority is to continue coupling the work with other codes in the SHARP package. Efforts on other projects include work to couple the Nek5000 thermo-hydraulics code to MOOSE, but this is in the preliminary stages.

71 CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM MECHANICS, GENERAL PHYSIC↗
DOE OSTI2018

Summary and Assessment of Metal Fuel Capabilities in Bison

The work described in this report was performed under funding from the Nuclear Energy Advanced Modeling and Simulation (NEAMS) program. This report is issued in satisfaction of the level 2 milestone M2MS-18IN0201012 on Release Bison with Initial Metallic Fuel Performance Capability. Metallic fuel development began in Bison a few years after light water reactor development began (~ 2009). The initial development was funded by the Advanced Fuels Campaign. With recent interest from industry, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and the Versatile Test Reactor program, the Nuclear Energy Modeling Simulation Program has increased funding for metallic fuel development and validation in FY18. The material models with the most mature development are binary uranium-zirconium and ternary uranium-plutonium-zirconium alloys for fuel and HT9 for cladding. The first material models were incorporated from open literature sources, which include mechanical and thermal material properties that are functions of temperature, porosity, and zirconium concentration, swelling, fission gas release, zirconium diffusion, creep, and sodium coolant channel boundary conditions. These material models have been utilized to simulate ERB-II fuel pins and the results compared to measurements. The EBR-II experiment measurements mostly consist of cladding strain and zirconium redistribution. As such, comparisons to EBR-II measurements are currently limited to these two figures of merit. Simulations and comparisons to experiment measurements have also been done for transient testing of EBR- II fuel pins in TREAT, which included temperature measurements. Preliminary comparisons between Bison calculations and experiment measurements are favorable. These comparisons have also highlighted the importance of the fuel swelling and fission gas release models on cladding strain. Also, Bison metallic fuel simulations are currently being run in support of ATR experiments and VTR exploratory design calculations. Further development and evaluation of individual material models and fuel system models are planned for FY19.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2020

BISON capability and validation for U3Si2, Cr2O3-doped UO2, FeCrAl, and Cr-coated Zircaloy ATF concepts

Development, implementation, and validation of material and behavior models for accident tolerant fuel (ATF) concepts in the BISON fuel performance code began in 2014 in response to the events that occurred at the Fukushima Daichii nuclear power plant in March 2011. Early on, the focus was on U3Si2 fuel and FeCrAl cladding as part of a high-impact problem through the Nuclear Energy and Advanced Model- ing Simulation program [1]. Then, developments for Cr2O3- doped UO2 fuel, as well as SiC-SiC and Cr-coated Zircaloy cladding began based upon industry interests. Near the end of fiscal year 2018 the Consortium for Advanced Simulation of Light Water Reactors took over further Accident Tolerant Fuel (ATF) work in BISON in support of Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) engagement. Discussions with the NRC clarified their list of priority fuel and cladding concepts, which included Cr2O3-doped UO2 and U3Si2 fuels, as well as Cr-coated Zircaloy and FeCrAl claddings. Further, reports similar in form to NUREG/CR-7024 [2] that was developed for traditional light water reactor (LWR) materials, UO2 fuel with Zircaloy claddings were created for the priority fuel and cladding concepts. In this paper select details from the reports entitled "ATF material model development and validation for priority fuel concepts" [3] and "ATF material model development and validation for priority cladding concepts" [4] are presented. First, a brief overview of the available models and their associated uncertainty are provided for the priority fuel and cladding concepts. Then, for the concepts with experimental data, comparisons between simulation and experiment are shown taking into account forward uncertainty quantification (UQ) techniques. For the concepts without publicly available experimental data, parametric studies incorporating forward UQ are completed to verify claims made about the materials’ behavior.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2024

The effect of temperature and burnup on U-10Zr metallic fuel chemical interaction with HT-9: A SEM-EDS study

The fuel cladding chemical interaction (FCCI) between Uranium-Zirconium-based metallic fuel and cladding materials during in-pile service is one of the most constraining phenomena affecting the performance of this fuel system. In this study, we investigated the effect of temperature and burnup on the FCCI development in two U-10 wt.% Zr (U-10Zr) fuel samples with HT-9 cladding irradiated as part of the MFF-3 irradiation test in the Fast Flux Test Facility (FFTF). One sample achieved a burnup of 13.1 at.% and operated with an average inner cladding temperature of 530°C, while the other achieved a burnup of 8.5 at.% and was subjected to an average inner cladding temperature of 615°C. Automated scanning electron microscopy (SEM) back-scattered electron (BSE) imaging of entire fuel cross-sections and SEM energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDS) analysis on specific fuel-cladding interface regions successfully provided a comprehensive characterization of the depth and type of interaction happening under different irradiation conditions. Further, our analysis shows that FCCI development on both fuel and cladding side is strongly influenced by the inner cladding temperature and, to some extent, the formation and integrity of Zr-rich layers between the fuel and cladding, while the impact of burnup and power is negligible. Measured FCCI thicknesses were compared to BISON simulations using both an empirical model based upon legacy data from the Experimental Breeder Reactor II (EBR II) irradiations and a mechanistic model currently under development for the Nuclear Energy Advanced Modeling and Simulation (NEAMS) program, showing satisfactory agreement. Nonetheless, this comparison supports the need for additional microstructural characterization in intermediate ranges of temperature, power, and burnups in prototypic-length pins.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2022

BISON validation of FeCrAl cladding mechanical failure during simulated reactivity-initiated accident conditions*

Here, a reactivity-initiated accident (RIA) is a postulated design basis accident in light water reactors (LWRs) in which a rapid reactivity insertion induces a fission rate increase and a fuel pellet temperature rise. During RIA, the fuel pellet thermally expands and may cause pellet-cladding mechanical interaction (PCMI). Separate effects PCMI tests were performed on C26M FeCrAl cladding tube samples, introducing biaxial stress via a well understood modified burst test (MBT) system. A high-speed camera in the MBT system captured the projections, covering a 360° view of the cladding deformation and enabling a digital image correlation (DIC) method to quantify the surface strains with high fidelity. Representative hot zero-power RIA mechanical loading conditions were applied to the sample, and the test duration ranged from 20 to 500 ms at an average temperature of 573 K. BISON finite element–based fuel performance code modeling was performed against the high-fidelity DIC data produced from the MBTs. Validation calculations were conducted with 2D models and systematically compared with test data of the burst time, burst pressure, burst hoop strains, and hoop strain rates. Based on the behaviors from the separate effects test, BISON calculations satisfactorily predicted the cladding deformation behaviors. Sensitivity analysis was conducted to identify highly influential mechanical properties responsible for the cladding failure behavior during the MBT experiments. The results highlight the significance of the cladding's mechanical strength in governing cladding strain, followed by the significance of the mechanical interactions between the pellet and the cladding.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2025

Unpacking model inadequacy: The quantification of silver release from TRISO fuel by considering empirical and mechanistic approaches

Increasing adoption of the proposed tristructural isotropic (TRISO) particle fuel for both advanced and existing reactors makes it critical to assess and address any uncertainties and inadequacies of TRISO fission product release models. Model inadequacy stems from simplifications made to the computational model when compared to the experiments. The modeling and simulation efforts conducted using the BISON fuel performance code, along with the experimental campaigns carried out under the Advanced Gas Reactor Fuel Development and Qualification Program, afford a unique opportunity to conduct a rigorous modeling inadequacy assessment within the Bayesian uncertainty quantification (UQ) framework. Here, this study compares the standard Bayesian framework against the Kennedy-O'Hagan (KOH) framework, which explicitly represents modeling inadequacy, in regard to UQ for TRISO silver release models. For this purpose, both the traditional Arrhenius equation fitted to experimental data and the more advanced lower-length-scale (LLS)-informed model, which considers microstructure information, are independently considered. Applying the inverse UQ process on the AGR-2 and -3/4 datasets revealed modeling inadequacy to be the most dominant source of uncertainty. Experimental noise uncertainty is also significant; however, model parameter uncertainty can be considered negligible. Interestingly, both the Arrhenius equation and the LLS-informed model demonstrated similar levels of modeling inadequacy. For the forward predictive UQ, the KOH framework improved both the accuracy and quality of quantified uncertainties in comparison to the standard Bayesian framework. This is true for both the Arrhenius equation and the LLS-informed model. In comparing these modeling approaches, both demonstrated similar performance at the engineering scale, while the LLS-informed model expectedly outperformed the Arrhenius equation at the mesoscale. These conclusions highlight the importance of explicitly accounting for modeling inadequacy in the UQ process, and reinforce the need for continuous refinement of physics-based models in order to address the modeling inadequacy.

Advanced reactors↗
DOE OSTI2023

Fuel Performance Analysis of Fast Flux Test Facility MFF-3 and -5 Fuel Pins Using BISON with Post Irradiation Examination Data

Using the BISON fuel-performance code, simulations were conducted of an automated process to read initial and operating conditions from the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) database and reports, which contain metallic-fuel data from the Fast Flux Test Facility (FFTF) MFF Experiments. This work builds on previous modeling efforts involving 1977 EBR-II metallic fuel pins from experiments. Coupling the FFTF PNNL reports to BISON allowed for all 338 pins from MFF-3 and MFF-5 campaigns to be simulated. Each BISON simulation contains unique power and flux histories, axial power and flux profiles, and coolant-channel flow rates. Fission-gas release (FGR), fuel axial swelling, cladding profilometry, and burnup were all simulated in BISON and compared to available post-irradiation examination (PIE) data. Cladding profilometry, FGR, and fuel axial swelling simulation results for full-length MFF metallic pins were found to be in agreement with PIE measurements using FFTF physics and models used previously for EBR-II simulations. The main two peaks observed within the cladding profilometry were able to be simulated, with fuel-cladding mechanical interaction (FCMI), fuel-cladding chemical interaction (FCCI), and thermal and irradiation-induced creep being the cause. A U-Pu-Zr hot-pressing model was included in this work to allow pore collapse within the fuel matrix. This allowed better agreement between BISON-simulated cladding profilometry and PIE measurements for the peak caused by FCMI. This work shows that metallic fuel models used to accurately represent fuel performance for smaller EBR-II pins may be used for full-length metallic fuel, such as FFTF MFF assemblies and the Versatile Test Reactor (VTR). As new material models and PIE measurements become available, FFTF MFF assessment cases will be reassessed to further BISON model development.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2016

Investigating Accident Tolerant Fuel Concepts using the BISON Fuel Performance Code

There has been an increased interest in research of accident tolerant fuels (ATF) and claddings for use in commercial reactors ever since the events that occurred at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant in 2011. The economic impact of these events on the nuclear energy sector is significant. As a result, the United States Department of Energy's Office of Nuclear Energy accelerated research in nuclear fuel concepts with enhanced accident tolerance as part of its Fuel Cycle Research and Development (FCRD) Advanced Fuels Campaign (AFC). A report produced by the AFC entitled Light Water Reactor Accident Tolerant Fuel Performance Metrics outlines a set of metrics that can be used to guide selection of promising ATF concepts. Moreover, the report specifies that a down-selection is to occur in the 2016-2017 time frame, at which time the program will move from a proof-of-concept to a proof-of-principle stage with continued research and development into a small set of concepts. Given the time necessary for comprehensive irradiation experiments and post-irradiation examination, it is impossible to perform a complete set of experiments for material characterization. Therefore, the AFC is utilizing computational analysis tools in an effort to understand the proposed materials under a variety of normal operating and accident conditions. For some time, the DOE's Nuclear Energy Advanced Modeling and Simulation (NEAMS) program has been developing computational analysis tools for nuclear fuel simulation. These codes include BISON and Marmot which investigate fuel behavior at the continuum and microstructural scales, respectively. In 2014, NEAMS introduced what it calls High Impact Problems (HIPs) into its program plan. These HIPs are intended to make significant advancements in a particular area of nuclear power research in a short period of time (3 years or less). NEAMS has chosen an ATF project, which emphasizes utilizing BISON and Marmot to model proposed materials, as its first HIP. This summary focuses on the methodology being utilized for investigation of ATF concepts using the BISON fuel performance code. First, we give an overview of the model development for two candidate ATF materials, FeCrAl for cladding and uranium silicide (U{sub 3}Si{sub 2}) for fuel. Then, we present the approach for deciding which simulations are necessary given the importance of such simulations in providing a detailed report into the fuel performance behavior of these materials by the conclusion of the HIP. In absence of experimental data and given the aggressive schedule outlined by the AFC for ATF research and development, computational analysis tools are required. These tools are being used to help guide experiment design and to perform bounding and sensitivity studies to gain valuable information for which experimental data is limited. In support of this effort, models have been incorporated into BISON for simulation of U{sub 3}Si{sub 2} and FeCrAl. Continued material model development and engineering analysis will help address questions related to the performance of these ATF materials under normal operating and accident conditions. (authors)

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2025

High-Burnup BWR LOCA Burst Analysis Using High-Fidelity Multiphysics Simulations

The US nuclear industry is looking to improve on the operating economics of the current fleet of light-water reactors (LWRs). One way of achieving this is by operating fuel to higher burnup. In pressurized water reactors (PWRs), relaxing the current burnup limit will allow for cycle length extensions and power uprates; in boiling water reactors (BWRs) it may allow for improved fuel utilization and reduced feed assemblies, as well as more efficient power uprates and increased capacity factors that will support the Administration’s Executive Order to facilitate 5 GW of power uprates at existing nuclear facilities. However, one of the key limitations to operating fuel to higher burnup is the risk of fuel fragmentation, relocation, and dispersal (FFRD). Recognizing the high interest in extending burnup limits, the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has issued Draft Regulatory Guide DG-1434, which defines an approach that would be acceptable to the NRC for addressing FFRD risk. The approach defined will require better understanding of the phenomena leading to FFRD as well as best-estimate simulation methods to understand FFRD risk in high-burnup cores. The Nuclear Energy Advanced Modeling and Simulation program is supporting the FFRD industry challenge problem through development of state-of-the-art, high-fidelity modeling and simulation LWR analysis capabilities; namely, the BISON fuel performance code and the VERA core simulator software. These tools, along with the US NRC TRACE system analysis code, have been utilized for analysis of FFRD risk in both PWR and BWR cores in recent years. The work documented in this report addresses the lack of high-fidelity research for BWRs and builds on a previous activity where the framework has been applied to Cycles 16 through 18 of Limerick Unit 1, a BWR/4, with introduction of 8 high-burnup lead use assemblies (HBLUAs) that were representative of the 8 HBLUAs loaded into Limerick Unit 2 in 2021. VERA was used in this previous activity to model rod-by-rod depletion in these cycles, and its solution was used to initialize a TRACE simulation of a large-break loss-of-coolant accident (LBLOCA) at the end of Cycle 18. In the work documented in this report, the TRACE model was improved by refining the core mesh and utilizing a new feature that allows for capturing the full 3D VERA power distribution in the model. This allows for a more detailed solution for setting BISON boundary conditions. Furthermore, the solutions from VERA and TRACE were used to set up and perform BISON simulations of about 1,000 rods sampled from the core, including all burnup levels. Utilizing two cladding burst models, it was shown that no fuel rods were predicted to burst during the postulated LBLOCA transient. Additionally, a sensitivity study was performed by artificially increasing linear heat rate during the postulated LBLOCA to identify parameters that correlate with rod burst susceptibility. Burnup, fission gas release, and hoop strain were all found to be positively correlated with rod burst susceptibility. Small-break loss-of-coolant accident (SBLOCA) analyses were also performed; these analyses predicted cladding temperature increases that were bounded by the LBLOCA cladding temperatures for all small break sizes studied for this plant. However, future refinements to the plant response assumptions during the SBLOCA could impact the predicted cladding response. Finally, a benchmark study was performed between CTF and TRACE for LOCA conditions to better qualify CTF for BWR LOCA modeling.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2016

Uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis applications to fuel performance modeling

Best-estimate fuel performance codes such as BISON currently under development at the Idaho National Laboratory, utilize empirical and mechanistic lower-length-scale informed correlations to predict fuel behavior under normal operating and accident reactor conditions. Traditionally, best-estimate results are presented using the correlations with no quantification of the uncertainty in the output metrics of interest. However, there are associated uncertainties in the input parameters and correlations used to determine the behavior of the fuel and cladding under irradiation. Therefore, it is important to perform uncertainty quantification and include confidence bounds on the output metrics that take into account the uncertainties in the inputs. In addition, sensitivity analyses can be performed to determine which input parameters have the greatest influence on the outputs. In this paper we couple the BISON fuel performance code to the DAKOTA uncertainty analysis software to analyze a representative fuel performance problem. The case studied in this paper is based upon rod 1 from the IFA-432 integral experiment performed at the Halden Reactor in Norway. The rodlet is representative of a BWR fuel rod. The input parameters uncertainties are broken into three separate categories including boundary condition uncertainties (e.g., power, coolant flow rate), manufacturing uncertainties (e.g., pellet diameter, cladding thickness), and model uncertainties (e.g., fuel thermal conductivity, fuel swelling). Utilizing DAKOTA, a variety of statistical analysis techniques are applied to quantify the uncertainty and sensitivity of the output metrics of interest. Specifically, we demonstrate the use of sampling methods, polynomial chaos expansions, surrogate models, and variance-based decomposition. The output metrics investigated in this study are the fuel centerline temperature, cladding surface temperature, fission gas released, and fuel rod diameter. The results highlighted the importance of the thermal conductivity of the fuel, the thermal conductivity of the cladding, the gap thickness, the fuel thermal expansion, and the system power factor as influential parameters.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2017

SCANAIR-BISON BENCHMARK ON CIP0-1 RIA TEST

In the frame of their research programs on fuel safety, the French “Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire” (IRSN) and the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) have developed respectively SCANAIR and BISON codes to describe the thermo-mechanical behavior of irradiated fuel rods during Reactivity Initiated Accidents (RIA) in LWR. A RIA, characterized by a very rapid increase of reactivity and power in some rods of the reactor, can be schematically represented in two main phases. First, the energy deposition leads to a rapid rise of the fuel temperature which induces thermal swelling of the fuel pellets. During this phase, the Pellet Clad Mechanical Interaction (PCMI) leads to clad deformation and potentially to failure depending on fuel enthalpy increase and on the level of clad embrittlement. After the PCMI phase, the increase of clad temperature can lead to the boiling crisis of the water surrounding the rod. During the film boiling phase, the clad to coolant heat transfer becomes very low and the clad can reach high temperature (>700°C). Depending on the internal gas pressure, the ductile clad can undergo large deformation and possible failure. The RIA codes have to predict properly these two phases of the transient in order to be used, in particular, to assess current fuel safety criteria but also to be able to predict the behavior of upcoming fuel (such as accident tolerant fuel). In this paper, codes computation comparison against experimental data obtained on CIP0-1 test is done for the first phase of the transient, the PCMI phase, in order to point out the strengths and weaknesses of the codes. The CIP0-1 experiment was performed with UO2 high burnup fuel in the CABRI sodium loop facility, at 280°C and low pressure (~3 bars) without boiling crisis and no failure of the fuel rod. The initial state of the rod calculated by irradiation codes are compared with measurements before the transient. Then global rod thermal behavior during the CIP0-1 test is assessed with the sodium coolant temperature measurements. The rod mechanical behavior is analyzed with the fuel and clad elongation and the clad residual hoop strain. Finally comparison of the fission gas behavior between codes is performed and compared to the measurements of the fission gas released in the experiment.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2016

Predicting Fueled Experiment Swelling and Thermal Expansion Using STAR-CCM+

An experiment being designed at Idaho National Laboratory (INL) has an unusual temperature requirement. The surface temperature must remain above 300 C over the irradiation lifetime. The fuel in this experiment is composed of uranium-nitride (UN) tri-structural-isotropic (TRISO) particles encased in a cylindrical, SiC matrix. Increased swelling of SiC at lower temperatures is the basis for this lower temperature limit. For a typical thermal analysis, the focus is on some upper limit of the center-line temperature. This tends to be a more straight-forward process where the analyst makes a series of worst-case assumptions and demonstrates that the experiment - even under those conditions - cannot exceed the maximum temperature. The model used to ensure the experiment will always have a surface temperature in excess of 300 C has been developed using STAR-CCM+. Notable properties of the simulation include - Full 3D fluid and heat transfer modeling; - Geometry input taken directly from design engineer's CAD files; - Fuel swelling and thermal conductivity as functions of displacements per atom (DPA) and temperature; - Radial thermal expansion of fuel, rodlet, and capsule; - Jump gap and surface roughness implemented using equations from BISON. These things together have yielded a model with sufficient detail to predict minimum surface temperatures with the greatest precision attainable with available data. The only notable approximation is the zirconia insulator, which will actually be a sphere. This particular shape was chosen to expedite meshing, while maintaining a realistic degree of physical contact with adjacent components. Given temperature and irradiation dependent data for thermal conductivity and fuel swelling of a SiC matrix, it was possible to perform an in-depth thermal analysis to find an optimal configuration of radial gas gaps. Of greatest importance was that the fuel surface temperature remain above 300 C. This criteria was met with a healthy margin, even when considering machining tolerances of ±1 mil on the gas gaps.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2016

Assessment of the Analysis Capability for Core-wide PWR Pellet-Clad Interaction (PCI) Screening

The Level 1 Milestone, L1:CASL.P13.03, “Assess the analysis capability for core-wide PWR Pellet-Clad Interaction (PCI) screening and demonstrate detailed 3-D analysis on selected sub-region.”, has been completed by the Fuels, Materials and Chemistry and Physics Integration focus areas of CASL. This report illustrates the application of VERA simulation to PWR core-wide PCI screening, with emphasis on the multi-dimensional analysis capabilities of BISON fuel performance code. The VERA codes utilized in this effort are: the fuel performance code BISON and the VERA-CS sub-element, which combines the neutron transport code MPACT and the thermal-hydraulics code COBRA-TF (CTF). The target reactor for this work is Watts Bar Unit 1, Cycles 6 and 7, selected on the basis that PCI failures had occurred during power start-up in both cycles, despite the moderate power levels, which offered an interesting test of the code’s veracity and a particularly challenging condition for this Milestone’s assessment. The analysis began by performing BISON-IN-VERA, i.e. VERA-CS + BISON, quarter-core depletion calculations, from which limiting assemblies and limiting fuel rods were selected using a four-parameter selection criterion: high power, high temperature, small gap thickness and high cladding hoop stress. The cladding material being Westinghouse Zirlo, the analysis utilized a new material model developed for this cladding by CASL’s FMC team using open literature sources. The VERA-CS + BISON analysis resulted in identifying 51 limiting rods as candidates for more detailed PCI analysis using stand-alone BISON, employing local 2D and 3D geometric models. This local-effects BISON analysis provided detailed PCI failure assessment, considering the impact of power histories on the two potential sources of PCI failure: the classical SCC-PCI and the missing pellet surface geometry MPS-PCI. The 51-rod analyses of Watts Bar Unit 1 cycle 6 and 7 revealed that the classical SCC-PCI stress levels were well below the failure threshold determined in a previous CASL study, which implicated the other mode of failure, namely MPS-PCI. Considering MPS defects to be the root cause for the failure, the local-effects calculations was repeated using MPS defect sizes equal to and larger than Westinghouse quality assurance standards. Initial results of this new analysis showed a significant increase in the cladding stress, indicating that an MPS may have been present in cycle 6 and 7 for the failure to occur. In order to determine the size of MPS needed for cycle 6 and 7 rods to fail, a sensitivity study using 2-D and 3-D models was performed. The results showed cladding hoop stresses, while remaining below the failure level for an MPS of equal size to the acceptance standard, continued to increase as the size of the MPS increased. This report has demonstrated the use of BISON, in consort with VERA’s simulation methodology, for core-wide PCI failure screening capability. Utilizing this demonstration, and emulating the PCI margin analysis methodology developed in the EPRI PCI guidelines, BISON-IN-VERA simulation can be used very effectively to develop core power histories to minimize PCI failure potential.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2017

Nuclear Energy Advanced Modeling and Simulation (NEAMS) Accident Tolerant Fuels High Impact Problem: Coordinate Multiscale U 3 Si 2 Modeling

Since the events at the Fukushima-Daiichi nuclear power plant in March 2011 significant research has unfolded at national laboratories, universities and other institutions into alternative materials that have potential enhanced accident tolerance when compared to traditional \uo~fuel zircaloy clad fuel rods. One of the potential replacement fuels is uranium silicide (\usi) for its higher thermal conductivity and uranium density. The lower melting temperature is of potential concern during postulated accident conditions. Another disadvantage for \usi~ is the lack of experimental data under power reactor conditions. Due to the aggressive development schedule for inserting some of the potential materials into lead test assemblies or rods by 2022~\cite{bragg-sitton_2014} multiscale multiphysics modeling approaches have been used to provide insight into these materials. \\ \noindent The purpose of this letter report is to highlight the multiscale modeling effort for \usi~fuel as part of the Nuclear Energy Advanced Modeling and Simulation (NEAMS) Accident Tolerant Fuel (ATF) High Impact Problem (HIP). This fiscal year two new models for \usi~fuel have been incorporated into the BISON fuel performance code~\cite{Williamson2012} based upon lower length scale simulations using the GRASS-SST rate theory code. The models are briefly described in the following sections.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2025

Understanding Model Inadequacy in TRISO Nuclear Fuel Fission Products Release Models: Empirical and Mechanistic Approaches

The increasing use of tristructural isotropic (TRISO) particle fuel in both advanced and existing reactors necessitates a thorough evaluation of uncertainties and shortcomings in TRISO fission product release models. These inadequacies arise from the simplifications made in computational models compared to experimental data. Utilizing the BISON fuel performance code and experimental data from the Advanced Gas Reactor (AGR) program provides a unique chance to rigorously assess these inadequacies within a Bayesian uncertainty quantification (UQ) framework. This study contrasts the standard Bayesian framework with the Kennedy-O'Hagan (KOH) framework, which explicitly accounts for modeling inadequacies, in the context of UQ for TRISO silver release models. It examines both the traditional Arrhenius equation and a more advanced lower-length-scale (LLS)-informed model that incorporates microstructure information. The inverse UQ process applied to AGR-2 and AGR-3/4 datasets identified modeling inadequacy as the primary source of uncertainty, with experimental noise also being significant, while model parameter uncertainty was minimal. Both the Arrhenius and LLS-informed models showed similar levels of modeling inadequacy. For forward predictive UQ using the AGR-1 dataset, the KOH framework enhanced the accuracy and quality of quantified uncertainties by approximately 30% and 40%, respectively, compared to the standard Bayesian framework. This improvement was observed for both the Arrhenius and LLS-informed models. At the engineering scale, both models performed similarly, but the LLS-informed model outperformed the Arrhenius equation at the mesoscale. These findings underscore the importance of explicitly considering modeling inadequacy in the UQ process and highlight the need for ongoing refinement of physics-based models to address these shortcomings.

11 - NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗