Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Design analysis”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 271 records · Page 15
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2017

Trace Contaminant Control for the International Space Station's Node 1- Analysis, Design, and Verification

Trace chemical contaminant generation inside crewed spacecraft cabins is a technical and medical problem that must be continuously evaluated. Although passive control through materials selection and active control by adsorption and catalytic oxidation devices is employed during normal operations of a spacecraft, contaminant buildup can still become a problem. Buildup is particularly troublesome during the stages between the final closure of a spacecraft during ground processing and the time that a crewmember enters for the first time during the mission. Typically, the elapsed time between preflight closure and first entry on orbit for spacecraft such as Spacelab modules was 30 days. During that time, the active contamination control systems are not activated and contaminants can potentially build up to levels which exceed the spacecraft maximum allowable concentrations (SMACs) specified by NASA toxicology experts. To prevent excessively high contamination levels at crew entry, the Spacelab active contamination control system was operated for 53 hours just before launch.

Perry, J. L.↗
NASA NTRS2015

Mission Design Analysis for the Martian Moon Phobos: Close Flybys, Missed Thrusts, and Other In-Flight Entertainment

A robotic mission to the Martian moons Phobos and Deimos would offer a wealth of scientific information and serve as a useful precursor to potential human missions. In this paper, we investigate a prospective mission enabled by solar electric propulsion that would explore Phobos via a series of flybys followed by capture into orbit around the moon. Of particular interest are low-cost options for capture and walkdown to the target science orbits aided by multi-body effects due to the mutual gravitational interaction of Phobos and Mars. We also consider contingency operations in the event of missed thrust or maneuver execution errors.

SEP↗
NASA NTRS2020

Maven Orbital Trajectory Analysis: Design and Implementation of Lander Relay Support

NASA’s successful Mars Atmosphere and Volatile Evolution Mission (MAVEN), currently engaged in a survey of the Martian atmosphere and its evolution over time, has successfully completed a series of orbit changes, including a two-month aerobraking campaign, to satisfy additional mission roles. Launched on 18 November 2013, it entered Martian orbit on 22 September 2014. Having finished its primary one-year mission, the NASA Mars Program Office (MPO) started discussions with the MAVEN project on feasible options for extending the mission lifetime along with providing support for various Mars lander functions. MAVEN is the latest of the three active NASA Mars orbiters, with no others planned for the foreseeable future. Given that the landers need orbital relay support for years to come, and the MRO and Odyssey orbiters are aging, MAVEN’s role in providing critical orbital relay support has become increasingly important. After several years of studies, MPO directed the MAVEN project in 2018 to reduce its orbit size to provide better telecommunications relay support for Martian surface landers and to support Mars 2020 EDL under the constraint that MAVEN will have enough fuel to operate until 2030. As a part of this effort, the recent aerobraking campaign was one of several steps crucial to accomplishing this goal. This paper discusses the challenges of the entire mission design and its distillation into a concrete set of targeted objectives. With the successful orbit change, MAVEN will be able to provide support for the Mars 2020 relay activities from EDL through surface operations beyond 2030. This effort can serve as an excellent example for future missions having similar needs and requirements.

Jakosky, B. M.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

A TPS Design Analysis of Entry Probe Delivery from Orbit for Ice Giant Missions

Previous investigation of direct delivery of a probe into Neptune’s atmosphere showed said approach to be challenging due to high stagnation pressures and heat loads. Entering at a high entry flight path angle (EFPA) results in stagnation pressure beyond current Heatshield for Extreme Entry Environment Technology (HEEET) qualification, while entering at a lower EFPA results in higher heat loads, leading to required HEEET thicknesses beyond manufacturing capabilities. Aerocapture is an enticing alternative entry scenario because it enables a fast trip and the placement of a payload in orbit around Neptune that can also reach Triton. Here, we investigate entry conditions associated with delivering a probe from orbit to assess feasibility. We consider whether 1) this entry scenario results in reasonable conditions, and 2) HEEET single insulating layer (mid-density carbon phenolic, 3MDCP) can be used to decrease mass, risk, and cost.

H. S. Alpert↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

A TPS Design Analysis of Entry Probe Delivery from Orbit for Ice Giant Missions

Previous investigation of direct delivery of a probe into Neptune’s atmosphere showed said approach to be challenging due to high stagnation pressures and heat loads. Entering at a high entry flight path angle (EFPA) results in stagnation pressure beyond current Heatshield for Extreme Entry Environment Technology (HEEET) qualification, while entering at a lower EFPA results in higher heat loads, leading to required HEEET thicknesses beyond manufacturing capabilities. Aerocapture is an enticing alternative entry scenario because it enables a fast trip and the placement of a payload in orbit around Neptune that can also reach Triton. Here, we investigate entry conditions associated with delivering a probe from orbit to assess feasibility. We consider whether 1) this entry scenario results in reasonable conditions, and 2) HEEET single insulating layer (mid-density carbon phenolic, 3MDCP) can be used to decrease mass, risk, and cost.

Hannah S. Alpert↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Design, Analysis, Testing, and Flight Activities for A Green Propulsion Dual Mode (Gpdm) Technology Demonstration Mission

NASA’s Strategic Plan (2022) outlines specific technology development objectives which direct the Agency to “innovate and advance transformational space technologies.” An example of these potentially high-impact space technologies is the low-toxicity or “green” rocket propellant known as ASCENT (or Advanced Spacecraft Energetic Non-Toxic Propellant). Developed in the 2010’s by the Air Force Research Lab (AFRL), ASCENT (formerly AF-315E) has shown improved specific impulse density (50% higher) vs. hydrazine in addition to its favorable in-space storability and ease of handling capability. The chemical propulsion capability of ASCENT has been demonstrated on several missions including the Green Propulsion Infusion Mission (GPIM) in 2019 and most recently, the Lunar Flashlight mission. ASCENT is an ionic liquid, which lends itself as both a chemical and an electrospray propellant. The capability to use the same propellants in multiple modes using the same propellant tank and feed system has yet to be demonstrated in orbit. This capability, if proven successful has the potential to reduce system weight and complexity, while taking advantage of both high thrust and high propellant efficiency in electrospray mode. The GPDM Project, managed by the Marshall Space Flight Center is seeking to develop a dual-mode propulsion system as the payload on a small spacecraft (6U CubeSat) and subsequent in-space demonstration. This paper will summarize the concept, ground testing as well as mission operations plan for demonstrating green “dual-mode” propulsion.

Nehemiah J. Williams↗
NASA NTRS1987

Shape design sensitivity analysis and optimal design of structural systems

The material derivative concept of continuum mechanics and an adjoint variable method of design sensitivity analysis are used to relate variations in structural shape to measures of structural performance. A domain method of shape design sensitivity analysis is used to best utilize the basic character of the finite element method that gives accurate information not on the boundary but in the domain. Implementation of shape design sensitivty analysis using finite element computer codes is discussed. Recent numerical results are used to demonstrate the accuracy obtainable using the method. Result of design sensitivity analysis is used to carry out design optimization of a built-up structure.

Choi, Kyung K.↗
NASA NTRS1992

Automated Simulation For Analysis And Design

Design Assistant Workstation (DAWN) software being developed to facilitate simulation of qualitative and quantitative aspects of behavior of life-support system in spacecraft, chemical-processing plant, heating and cooling system of large building, or any of variety of systems including interacting process streams and processes. Used to analyze alternative design scenarios or specific designs of such systems. Expert system will automate part of design analysis: reason independently by simulating design scenarios and return to designer with overall evaluations and recommendations.

Cantwell, E.↗
NASA NTRS2020

NASA Fastener Procurement, Receiving Inspection, and Storage Practices for NASA Mission Hardware

This document establishes minimum requirements for supply chain risk management, procurement, receiving inspection, testing, traceability management, and storage practices for fasteners used in NASA mission hardware. This document does not contain fastener requirements pertaining to design or design analysis; design and design analysis requirements are contained in NASA-STD-5020, Requirements for Threaded Fastening Systems in Spaceflight Hardware.

Safety and Mission Assurance↗