Practical approaches to modeling and control design for a wave energy converter.
Abstract not provided.
SEARCH · Search NASA
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.
Systems and methods for a WEC controller that uses a self-tuning proportional-integral control law prescribing motor torques to maximize electrical power generation and automatically tune the controller to maximize power absorption. In an embodiment, the controller may be part of any resonant WEC system. The control law relies upon an identified model of device intrinsic impedance to generate a frequency-domain estimate of the wave-induced excitation force and measurements of device velocities. The control law was tested in irregular sea-states that evolved over hours (a rapid, but realistic time-scale) and that changed instantly (an unrealistic scenario to evaluate controller response).
A floating mooring system for a single CycWEC applies counter forces and torques to keep a generator suitably stationary for power generation without requiring fixed attachments to the ocean floor or requiring a large frame interconnecting multiple CycWECs. The mooring system uses floats or floatation structure with differential ballasting to counter operating torque and drag plates to counter reactive forces. The floatation structures may be used to float the CycWEC for transport to a deployment location, where changing the overall ballasting of the floatation structures submerges the CycWEC to a desired depth and differential ballasting in the floatation structures counts expected operating torques.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Innovation side of Wave-SPARC Project. Looking into an analytical generator to use within a co-design optimization study
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Marine energy (ME) has the potential to power businesses in the blue economy. Kelp farms are an emerging maritime market of the blue economy and are predicted to grow, but they are not currently using ME for their power needs. As the number and size of kelp farms increase, more offshore power will be needed onsite for operations, monitoring, and harvesting. ME devices such as tidal current energy converters and wave energy converters (WECs) may be used to supply power for these needs. This article assesses the status of kelp farming in the continental United States, investigates the electricity needs of kelp farms, and examinesthe feasibility of generating the required electricity from wave and tidal current energy. The United States currently has 165 kelp farms that have either active or pending permits. The farms use electricity for boat operations, kelp drying, environmental monitoring, offshore lighting, and the raising and lowering of lines. Most kelp farms are in protected, nearshore waters that do not have significant wave energy resources. The limited available wave energy could be used to power small devices, but WECs have not yet been developed for that application. Some kelp farms are in locations that feature significant tidal energy resources, but small tidal current energy converters that are compatible with existing farm operations are not yet commercially available. As low-power WECs and tidal current energy converters are developed, kelp farms could be research partners and early adopters of the new technologies, which would encourage their broader use by other blue economy businesses.
Energy recovery from capacitive deionization (CDI) has the potential to increase overall desalination efficiency. We here define the storage (one-way) and utilization (round-trip) efficiencies between a CDI cell and an energy storage device using a generic direct current/direct current (DC/DC) converter circuit. Presented is a closed-form analytical model for the case of a supercapacitor (SC) as the energy storage device and a buck-boost converter as the DC/DC converter. The model is benchmarked with a numerical model, showing good agreement. Also presented is a comparison among energy transfer methods wherein desalination productivity is fixed. For constant current operation, this condition requires higher currents to compensate for the inactive time introduced by the converter. For fixed productivity, the mean current of the converter circuit approaches the constant current value for higher initial voltages and lower capacitances in the supercapacitor. Finally, we show the effect of relevant parameters of the SC in the storage and utilization efficiency. The model predicts storage and utilization efficiencies of at least 90% for an initial voltage of 1 V or higher and reasonable CDI and SC parameters. Finally, we provide engineering operational parameters to maximize the efficiency of energy transfer and guidance in the selection of electronic components.
An optimal damping selection strategy on the power electronics in wave energy application is introduced to increase the total energy produced from the power converter in a wave energy converter (WEC) system. A damping map for maximum energy is built for the selection. The map is based on an irregular wave-towire simulation and reliability analysis on the IGBT module. From the yearly wave mission profile, the damping selection strategy is proved to provide 40% more energy than the conventional optimal power with passive damping selection in the WEC power converter.
Data from Advanced Laboratory and Field Arrays (ALFA) Non-linear Ocean Waves and Power Take-Off (PTO). Control Strategy project conducted at the O.H. Hinsdale Wave Research Laboratory (HWRL) at Oregon State University in 2019/2020. Contains two zip files (ALFANL.zip, ALFANL2.zip) from two phases of testing with data in engineering units and a report detailing the testing. This data collected by HWRL. A readme file in the docs folder explains the data collection and format. Six zip files (foswec-1 to foswec-6) data recorded by the Floating Oscillating Surge Wave Energy Converter (FOSWEC). Data organized by date and time and report describes data. A test report (ALFA Non-linear Ocean Waves Test Report.docx) details the experiments and data recording.