Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “FUELS - ATOMIZATION”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 271 records · Page 15
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2021

Enhancing Oxygen Reduction Activity and Cr Tolerance of Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Cathodes by a Multiphase Catalyst Coating

Intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cells (IT-SOFCs) are cost-effective and efficient energy conversion systems. Here, the sluggish oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) and the degradation of cathodes are critical challenges to the commercialization of IT-SOFCs. Here, a highly efficient multiphase (MP) catalyst coating, consisting of Ba 1–x Co 0.7 Fe 0.2 Nb 0.1 O 3–δ (BCFN) and BaCO 3 , to enhance the ORR activity and durability of the state-of-the-art lanthanum strontium cobalt ferrite (La 0.6 Sr 0.4 Co 0.2 Fe 0.8 O 3–δ , LSCF) cathode is reported. The conformal MP catalyst-coated LSCF cathode shows a polarization resistance (R p ) of 0.048 Ω cm 2 at 650 °C, about one order of magnitude smaller than that of the bare LSCF. In an accelerated Cr-poisoning test, the degradation rate of the catalyst-coated LSCF electrode is 10 –3 Ω cm 2 h –1 (0.59% h –1 ) over 200 h, only one fifth of the degradation rate of the bare LSCF electrode at 750 °C. In addition, anode-supported single cells with the MP catalyst-coated LSCF cathode show a dramatically enhanced peak power density (1.4 W cm –2 vs 0.67 W cm –2 at 750 °C) and increased durability against Cr and H 2 O. Both experimental results and density functional theory-based calculations indicate that the BCFN phase improves the ORR activity while the BaCO 3 phase enhances the stability of the LSCF cathode.

solid oxide fuel cells↗
DOE OSTI2020

Examining Ohmic Losses in Fuel-Cell Catalyst Layers with Different Pt/C Ratios

A model of a fuel-cell cathode with distinct proton conductivities at the agglomerate and electrode scales was used to simulate polarization curves under conditions with facile oxygen transport. Here, the model was applied to electrodes containing agglomerates with different ratios of platinum to carbon in order to examine the hypothesis that intra-agglomerate proton conductivity is substantially lower than ionomer conductivity. The model predicts decreasing performance and increasing sensitivity to Pt/C ratio as intra-agglomerate conductivity declines relative to a constant through-electrode conductivity. Experiments on catalyst layers with Vulcan supports do not show the predicted trend indicating that mesoscale intra-agglomerate conductivity is not orders of magnitude lower than bulk ionomer conductivity.

08 HYDROGEN↗
DOE OSTI2023

Advanced Fuel Cycle Cost Basis Report: Module D1-2 LWR Pelletized MOX Fuel Fabrication

Nature of this 2021 Module update from previous AFC-CBRs: Use of U,Pu MOX life cycle cost data from late 1970s Non-proliferation Assessment Systems Analysis Program (NASAP). This archived data has been updated in 2018-2019 to reflect today’s regulatory and economic conditions and is presented in 2017. For the lower unit cost MOX fabrication case the PuO 2 from the reprocessed LWR SNF is assumed to be fabricated immediately after aqueous PUREX reprocessing, thus minimizing the time for undesirable actinide radioisotopes, from the standpoint of radiation safety, to build in. Fabricated MOX utilizing separated and multi-year stored Pu from aqueously reprocessed SNF has also been added to this Module as a second LWR MOX fabrication variant, requiring additional and more costly glovebox design and operations to protect personnel. This new NASAP-informed data augments historical data and unit cost projections appearing in the 2009 (Shropshire et al 2009), 2012 (Dixon et al 2012), and 2017 Dixon et al 2017) AFC-CBRs. The “What-it-takes” 2017 unit fabrication cost values based on the updated NASAP studies are escalated to 2020$ for this 2021 Update Report.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2023

Assessing feasible H2–CO2 sources in the US as Feedstocks for Sustainable Aviation Fuel Precursors: Acetic Acid and Ethanol Production via Hydrogenotrophic Pathways

The environmental impact of carbon dioxide emissions is significant, and research is focused on mitigating these emissions and developing eco-friendly technologies in line with green chemistry principles. Waste-to-energy technologies play a crucial role in converting waste into renewable energy and valuable biofuels and bioproducts. This study specifically explores the utilization of waste gas emissions, particularly carbon dioxide, from various sources in the United States for the production of sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) precursors, such as ethanol and acetic acid. The study categorizes and quantifies the volumes of carbon dioxide emissions into three types: non-biogenic, biogenic, and biogenic emissions from ethanol production facilities. Stoichiometric calculations are applied to compare the amounts of carbon dioxide from each category with the available hydrogen production capacity, determining if sufficient hydrogen is present for converting carbon dioxide into SAF precursors. The study reveals two key findings. Firstly, there is a significant reserve of carbon dioxide, approximately 1648 million metric tons per year (MMTy), combining all three categories, which would require a substantial increase of approximately 35–40 times in the existing hydrogen production capacity of 4.988 MMTy. This increased hydrogen production has the potential to yield approximately 1067.82 MMTy of acetic acid and 189.19 MMTy of ethanol annually. Secondly, upon analyzing the quality and application of the three sources of carbon dioxide with the currently available hydrogen production capacity, it is found that biogenic carbon dioxide from ethanol plants is the most suitable choice for immediate production of SAF precursors. This would theoretically result in an annual production of 1.36 MMTy of ethanol and 1.772 MMTy of acetic acid. The other two sources of carbon dioxide can be considered potential reserves for future utilization when additional hydrogen production facilities are established. The study provides a foundation for assessing the aggregation potential required for acetic acid and ethanol production. By optimizing the use of waste gases as raw materials, the study not only enables the production of SAF precursors but also contributes to the passive reduction of greenhouse gas emissions.

Carbon Dioxide↗
DOE OSTI2025

Reference Fuel Development for NonAluminum Spent Nuclear Fuel Management

Background – The L Area Facility was initially constructed as a nuclear reactor for nuclear material production in the 1950s – The reactor was shut down in the late 1980s: in the 1990s the mission changed to storing nuclear material • Current Mission – L Area provides for the safe receipt, storage, handling, and shipping of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) and other nuclear materials – Received more than 47,000 SNF assemblies since 1964 from power and research reactors (domestic and foreign)

Sifuentes, Christian A. [Savannah River Nuclear So↗
DOE OSTI2021

Characterization of Fuel and Cladding In and Near the Pellet-Pellet Gap of a High-Burnup Pressurized Water Reactor Fuel Rod

Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) is performing extensive destructive examinations of 15 high-burnup (HBU) spent nuclear fuel (SNF) rods from the North Anna Power Station (NAPS), which is operated by Dominion Energy Virginia [1]. The examinations are being conducted to obtain a baseline condition of the HBU rods before dry storage and are focused on understanding overall SNF rod strength and durability [2,3]. The HBU rods, referred to as sister rods or sibling rods, are similar to rods placed into dry storage at NAPS that are planned to be examined after one decade. The sister rods include several ZIRLO®-clad rods manufactured by Westinghouse Electric Company. One of the ZIRLO®-clad rods examined includes a pellet-pellet gap of 1 mm that was identified during the nondestructive examinations (NDEs) [4]. The rod was sectioned axially at that elevation to reveal the pellet-pellet interfaces and the pellet-pellet gap. The section was mounted and polished to reveal the distribution of hydride precipitates in the cladding above, below, and within the gap [5]. Total cladding hydrogen measurements will be performed to quantify the total cladding hydrogen through the gap and any additional in-solution or precipitated hydrogen in the pellet-pellet gap region

Montgomery, Rose↗
DOE OSTI2023

Fuel cell cathode and fuel cell system including a polymeric additive

A cathode configured for use within a fuel cell system is provided. The cathode includes a cathode substrate. The cathode further includes a coating disposed upon the cathode substrate and including a fluorocarbon polymer additive configured for sintering at a temperature of less than 200° C. The fluorocarbon polymer additive may be mixed with a catalyst ink coating or may be applied separately as a topcoat layer.

Ramaswamy, Nagappan↗
DOE OSTI2024

Characterization of Fuel and Cladding In and Near the Pellet-Pellet Gap of a High-Burnup Pressurized Water Reactor Fuel Rod

At TopFuel 2021, we reported on metallographic examinations of a high burnup ZIRLO-clad spent fuel rod operated at the North Anna Power Station having a 3-mm gap between pellets at an elevation of ~1,403 mm. The rod was sectioned axially at that elevation to reveal the pellet-pellet interfaces and the pellet-pellet gap. Sections were mounted and polished to reveal the distribution of cladding inner and outer oxide layer thicknesses above, below, and within the gap. Since then, total cladding hydrogen measurements have been performed to quantify the cladding hydrogen content through the gap and above and below the pellet-pellet gap region. This paper provides the cladding hydrogen concentrations and discusses the overall findings regarding cladding waterside oxidation and cladding hydrogen diffusion to a pellet-pellet gap.

Montgomery, Rose↗