SEARCH · Search NASA
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
The project implements an architecture for delivery of integrated health management capabilities for the 21st Century launch complex. The delivered capabilities include anomaly detection, fault isolation, prognostics and physics based diagnostics.
This technical paper documents Kennedy Space Centers Independent Assessment team work completed on three assessments for the Ground Systems Development and Operations (GSDO) Program to assist the Chief Safety and Mission Assurance Officer (CSO) and GSDO management during key programmatic reviews. The assessments provided the GSDO Program with an analysis of how egress time affects the likelihood of astronaut and worker survival during an emergency. For each assessment, the team developed probability distributions for hazard scenarios to address statistical uncertainty, resulting in survivability plots over time. The first assessment developed a mathematical model of probabilistic survivability versus time to reach a safe location using an ideal Emergency Egress System at Launch Complex 39B (LC-39B); the second used the first model to evaluate and compare various egress systems under consideration at LC-39B. The third used a modified LC-39B model to determine if a specific hazard decreased survivability more rapidly than other events during flight hardware processing in Kennedys Vehicle Assembly Building (VAB).Based on the composite survivability versus time graphs from the first two assessments, there was a soft knee in the Figure of Merit graphs at eight minutes (ten minutes after egress ordered). Thus, the graphs illustrated to the decision makers that the final emergency egress design selected should have the capability of transporting the flight crew from the top of LC 39B to a safe location in eight minutes or less. Results for the third assessment were dominated by hazards that were classified as instantaneous in nature (e.g. stacking mishaps) and therefore had no effect on survivability vs time to egress the VAB. VAB emergency scenarios that degraded over time (e.g. fire) produced survivability vs time graphs that were line with aerospace industry norms.
The Deep Space Climate Observatory (DSCOVR), formerly known as Triana, is a unique mission, not because of its objectives but because of how long it was in storage before launch. The Triana spacecraft was built in the late 90s and later renamed as DSCOVR, but the project was canceled before the spacecraft was launched. The nearly-complete spacecraft was put in controlled storage for 10 years, until the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) provided funding for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) to refurbish the spacecraft. On February 11, 2015, DSCOVR was launched on a Falcon 9 v1.1 from launch complex 40 at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station. This paper describes the DSCOVR propulsion system, which utilizes ten 4.5 N thrusters in blowdown mode to perform Midcourse Correction (MCC) maneuvers, Lissajous Orbit Insertion (LOI) at Lagrangian point L1, momentum unloading maneuvers, and station keeping delta-v maneuvers at L1. This paper also describes the testing that was performed, including susbsystem-level and spacecraft-level tests, to verify the propulsion system's integrity for flight. Finally, this paper concludes with a discussion of the challenges and lessons learned during this unique mission, including replacement of a bent thruster and installation of an auxiliary heater over existing propellant line heaters.
This presentation documents Kennedy Space Center's Independent Assessment work completed on three assessments for the Ground Systems Development and Operations (GSDO) Program to assist the Chief Safety and Mission Assurance Officer during key programmatic reviews and provided the GSDO Program with analyses of how egress time affects the likelihood of astronaut and ground worker survival during an emergency. For each assessment, a team developed probability distributions for hazard scenarios to address statistical uncertainty, resulting in survivability plots over time. The first assessment developed a mathematical model of probabilistic survivability versus time to reach a safe location using an ideal Emergency Egress System at Launch Complex 39B (LC-39B); the second used the first model to evaluate and compare various egress systems under consideration at LC-39B. The third used a modified LC-39B model to determine if a specific hazard decreased survivability more rapidly than other events during flight hardware processing in Kennedy's Vehicle Assembly Building.
Generally speaking, systems engineering (SE) tool-sets face a dilemma balancing power and accessibility. High-powered SE tools (MagicDraw, Cradle, Core, etc.) tend to be specialized and are available only to highly trained Systems Engineers, and/or through the use of a 'back room' developer team making the output products available to the broader team. On the other hand, highly accessible tools (MS Word, Excel, etc.) do not have the power to implement SE in a rigorous manner. NASA has to test all aspects of the new human-rated Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle spacecraft prior to its first crewed mission. The test program includes uncrewed launch abort flight tests to demonstrate the capability to save the crew in the event that a launch failure occurs. Orion's second abort flight test will be a low-altitude flight test known as "Ascent Abort 2 (AA-2)." This test is currently scheduled to be carried out at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station's Space Launch Complex 46 (SLC-46) in Florida in 2019. NASA's in-house AA-2 Crew Module and Separation Ring (CSR) Team is producing the crew module and separation ring. Operating jointly as both an Advanced Exploration Systems (AES) Project and an Orion Project, the CSR project charter includes development of innovative, streamlined and generally more efficient practices for creation of flight hardware and software. One result of this tasking has been development of a collaborative and data-centric systems engineering environment within the team's shared web environment (Microsoft SharePoint). Through the use of built-in, 'out of the box capabilities' present in MS SharePoint, the CSR Systems Engineering team has created (with some limited developer support) a data-centric architecture for the project's SE implementation, including functional and interface analysis, requirements development and management, risk management, verification planning and management, test results, and end item management. Data elements are linked between data structures so as to define and control relationships between item types, link requirements to parents and children, and link tests to the requirements that they verify. The overall project team integration is increased by also linking SE content to project management content over the project life cycle, including team communication, action items, configuration management, decisional and meeting materials, and life cycle reviews. This presentation will provide an overview of the collaborative SE environment, showing how it provides the power for a number of SE tasks while still providing the accessibility and transparency to allow the full project team to collaborate and succeed. Given the project phase, we'll be able to present a nearly full lifecycle discussion, from concept through verification and approaching delivery.
A new comprehensive lightning instrumentation system has been designed for the Mobile Launcher 1 (ML-1) at the Kennedy Space Center, Florida. This new instrumentation system includes the synchronized recording of three B-dot, 3-axis measurement stations, one D-dot sensor and eighteen vehicle measurement channels. Each vehicle measurement channel is comprised of two currents and one voltage measurements. The instrumentation system is composed of centralized transient recorders and digitizers, connected to the transient recorders via fiber optic cables. The transient recorders are triggered by the B-dot or D-dot sensors. When the Space Launch System (SLS) vehicle is present at the ML-1, the transient recorders record data on a dual sampling rate mode, continuous slow 5 kilo-samples per second (per channel) and event driven fast 100 mega-samples per second (per channel). Without the presence of the vehicle at the ML-1, the instrumentation system operates only as an event driven fast 100 mega-samples per second (per channel). In the absence of the vehicle, the only measurements recorded are the B-dot and D-dot stations. Additionally, a portable Lightning Monitoring System (LMS) is temporarily installed inside the Orion Crew Capsule module monitoring one portable B-dot, 3-axis measurement station, and 2 Crew Capsule BUS voltages. The portable LMS has a transient recorder independent of the ML-1 transient recorders, that is triggered by the portable B-dot sensor or transients on the vehicle BUS voltages. This portable instrumentation is removed while performing close out operations before the vehicle launch. For the ML-1 lightning instrumentation system, new custom B-dot and D-dot sensors were designed and prototypes were tested at the International Center for Lightning Research and Testing (ICLRT) at Camp Blanding, Florida. The Ground Special Power (GSP) vehicle measurement channels monitoring on the ML-1 is done via 1) Commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) current shunts and 2) custom Voltage Dividers. The new ML-1 lightning instrumentation system was designed, fabricated, deployed, and tested prior to the summer of 2019, in preparation for the first NASA's SLS mission to be launched from the Launch Complex 39B (LC-39B). The ML-1 lightning instrumentation was designed to complement the LC-39B lightning instrumentation system providing electromagnetic measurements closer to the vehicle, at different heights and inside the Crew capsule module.
NASA and its commercial and international partners are on the way back to the Moon. Significant progress towards that goal was made in 2021, including on the agency’s Space Launch System (SLS) rocket – a key part of the Artemis initiative. The SLS core stage for the Artemis I mission – the first launch of SLS and an uncrewed Orion capsule – completed its Green Run test series in early 2021 and was successfully mated with the SLS twin solid rocket boosters on the mobile launcher at Kennedy Space Center (KSC). The launch vehicle stage adapter, interim cryogenic propulsion stage, and the Orion stage adapter structural test article and Orion spacecraft mass simulator were also stacked. The flight Orion spacecraft and Orion stage adapter are being prepared for stacking and launch, targeted for late 2021 following a wet dress rehearsal at Launch Complex 39B. SLS hardware for Artemis II, which will be the first flight of crew on Orion and SLS, is also in work. Work progressed on core stage components, booster segments, and other hardware for Artemis III and future missions. This paper will detail the progress made.
The NASA's Advanced Composite Solar Sail System (ACS3) mission consist of a spacecraft that will deploy an 80 m 2 solar sail in a 1000 km sun-synchronous orbit. The main objective of the mission is to demonstrate that the solar wind can impulse the spacecraft to change the semimajor-axis and obtain a different orbit altitude. The sail will be composed of a combination of composite materials with distinct properties, and it will be deployed with lightweight booms from a 12U CubeSat bus, developed by Nanoavionics. The spacecraft will be launched aboard an Electron launch vehicle from Rocket LAB Launch Complex in New Zealand no earlier than July 2023. This paper covers the orbital mechanics and navigation developments to support the mission, from the solar sail trajectory model to the actual flight dynamics system to provide the orbit determination analysis prior to flight. First, we introduce a description of our high-fidelity propagation that accounts for the solar radiation pressure to produce predictive ephemeris of the solar sail performance with several spacecraft attitude modes. As part of our results, we present plots of the expected altitudes achieved by the spacecraft once the solar sail is deployed under various assumptions of the solar weather. In addition to that, we present a full description of our orbit determination process which relies in GPS state vectors to accurately estimate the position and velocity uncertainties at a frequent cadence during the mission. The outcome of this process will be critical to achieving the objective of determining effective altitude change produced by the solar sail.
The NASA's Advanced Composite Solar Sail System (ACS3) mission consist of a spacecraft that will deploy an 80 m2 solar sail in Low Earth Orbit (LEO). The main objective of the mission is to demonstrate that the solar wind can impulse the spacecraft to change the semimajor-axis and obtain a different orbit altitude. The sail will be composed of a combination of composite materials with distinct properties, and it will be deployed with lightweight booms from a 12U CubeSat bus, developed by Nanoavionics. The spacecraft will be launched aboard an Electron launch vehicle from Rocket LAB Launch Complex in New Zealand. This paper covers the orbital mechanics and navigation developments to support the mission, from the solar sail trajectory model to the actual flight dynamics system to provide the orbit determination analysis prior to flight. First, we introduce a description of our high-fidelity propagation that accounts for the solar radiation pressure to produce predictive ephemeris of the solar sail performance with several spacecraft attitude modes. As part of our results, we present plots of the expected altitudes achieved by the spacecraft once the solar sail is deployed under various assumptions of the solar weather. In addition to that, we present a full description of our orbit determination process which relies in GPS state vectors to accurately estimate the position and velocity uncertainties at a frequent cadence during the mission. The outcome of this process will be critical to achieving the objective of determining effective altitude change produced by the solar sail.
This report presents a summary of the groundwater monitoring activities that occurred in February 2024 at two sites in the Vehicle Assembly Building (VAB) Area Long-Term Monitoring (LTM) program at the John F. Kennedy Space Center, Florida. The two sites are Fire Station 3 (formerly Fire Station 6) (FS3) – Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) 106 and Launch Complex 39 Observation Gantry Area (LC39OGA) – SWMU 107.
Orbital Launch Facility for performing launch operations of advanced planetary missions
Saturn V mechanical ground support equipment including umbilical, disconnector, pneumatic, servicing, handling and auxiliary systems
Ground support equipment and launch installations for manned lunar landing program at Cape Kennedy
Mobile launch concept for Apollo/Saturn V lunar landing mission, discussing structural composition, functions and performance of launcher
As the capabilities of the operational Space Station increase, emphasis will be placed on use of the Station for final development of missions, including the launch of large, complex, and reusable launch vehicles with destinations to geosynchronous orbit; lunar exploration or lunar development bases; and planetary exploration. This paper identifies and discusses the capabilities that would be needed to support the on-orbit prelaunch processing and refurbishing of a manned Mars vehicle launched from Space Station. The on-orbit launch vehicle prelaunch and refurbishment resource requirements needed to perform processing operations are projected from experience and data developed by the actual preparation of payloads for launch at the National Space Transportation System (NSTS) launch and landing site.
NASA’s Kennedy Space Center (KSC) and Cape CanaveralSpace Force Station (CCSFS) are the world’s preeminent multi-user spaceport, providing facilities and launch capabilities to the agency, NASA’s commercial partners, and other government agencies. KSC works to ensure an environment in which NASA’s programs and other users can safely and effectively carry out their operations. Approximately 100 launches are expected to take place in 2024. KSC needs to meet the needs of customers who request launches based on their own schedules, but who may not be aware of KSC-wide resource limitations and external constraints on launch operations. KSC-wide resources include telecommunications, range tracking, commodities such as Helium and Nitrogen, and special equipment needed to support launches. External constraints include seasonal launch operations. Since space vehicles are complex and launch operations are uncertain, unexpected events can also cause delays in operations. The Spaceport Throughput AnalysisResource (STAR) assesses whether a specific set of pro-posed launches and associated activities can be performed given the resources KSC currently has available, and external constraints imposed on KSC operations. STAR integrates short-horizon scheduling and simulation of launches using a monte-carlo approach driven by configurable probabilities of different classes of event outcomes, including de-lays and worst-case use of resources. The resulting analyses inform stakeholders of key constraints preventing customers from being able to perform their missions as desired, and give insight into how to improve spaceport throughput. The rest of the paper is organized as follows. In 2 we de-scribe the problem STAR is intended to solve. In Section3 we formally describe the scheduling problem ingredients. In Section 4 we describe how manifests are simulated. InSection 5 we describe the constraints problem that is solved when rescheduling. In Section 6 we describe what information is recorded during manifest simulation in order to evaluate delays. In Section 7 we describe the specific problem solved for KSC. In Section 8 we describe the challenges of knowledge engineering for STAR.
The Atlas-Centaur AC-5 vehicle was launched from ETR Complex 36A on March 2., 1965 at 8:25.04 a.m. EST. Within about 1 second after launch the thrust of the Atlas booster engine decayed rapidly; the vehicle settled back on the launch pad and was quickly destroyed by fire and explosion. Considerable damage was sustained by the launch complex and its associated equipment. Loss of booster engine thrust was due to fuel depletion at the turbopump inlets, which is attributed to closure of the fuel prevalve or the staging valve. To preclude the recurrence of either of these fuel valving malfunctions, the following corrective action has been taken: The remote control actuator has been replaced by manual operation of the Atlas fuel prevalve; the internal passage dimensions in the staging valve have been increased to lessen the hydraulic load on the valve poppet. In addition to the Atlas fuel system malfunction, a failure in the power control circuitry of the Centaur guidance computer resulted in partial removal of power at umbilical ejection. To prevent such a guidance system failure on future flights some redundant circuitry has been eliminated and more rigorous checkout procedures have been adopted. No further anomalies were discovered in the telemetered data prior to the Atlas booster thrust decay. A prime objective of the AC-5 flight was to place a dynamic model of the Surveyor spacecraft in a simulated lunar transfer trajectory. An important facet of this problem is the demonstration of a launch-on-time capability in accordance with the proper Earth-moon relation. The window opening time was established at 8:25 a.m. EST; thus the actual launch occurred within 4 seconds of the planned time.
The Space Transportation (STS) launch vehicles are more complex than other launch vehicles. A comprehensive analysis of the lift-off event is required so that the responses of the vehicle and payloads can be predicted. The transient overpressure induced by ignition of the solid rocket motors (SRM's) is one of the critical design factors assessed for lift-off. The STS-1 ignition overpressure design environment was developed from 6.4-percent scale-model tests in which the Tomahawk solid rocket motors were used to simulate the start-up process of the SRM's. The overpressures measured during STS-1 lift-off were much more severe than predicted. The reasons for this anomaly are discussed in this paper. The 6.4-percent scale model was redesigned and used as a tool to develop an effective ignition overpressure suppression system for STS-2 and subsequent flights. Also presented are advancements in subscale-model simulation and theoretical understanding of this transient overpressure phenomenon that led to the successful development of the fix.