Configuration management of computer programs
Extension of configuration management techniques to computer programming
MANAGEMENT PLANNING↗
SEARCH · Search NASA
Results for “Program management”
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Breathe Well, Live Well: Implementing an Adult Asthma Self-Management Education Program
Asthma remains a significant health problem in the United States. Adults with poorly controlled asthma can affect their community in a number of ways, from lost productivity in the workplace to health care costs to premature death. Asthma self-management education helps individuals achieve better control of their asthma and is critical for the overall health and well-being of individuals with asthma. While there are numerous programs and initiatives targeting children with asthma, there is a lack of comparable focus on the needs of adults with asthma. The American Lung Association developed Breathe Well, Live Well, an adult asthma self-management education program, and launched it nationwide in 2007. The program for adults has a flexible delivery format for community-based implementation. This article describes the development, dissemination, and transformation of the program. Each stage of implementation showed positive changes in asthma self-management practices that contribute to better asthma control, and one local implementation additionally showed decreased reports of missed work and unscheduled health care visits among participants. The findings from the three evaluations support the use of Breathe Well, Live Well for broad community-based implementation to improve asthma self-management efficacy and behaviors.
Gardner, Emily A.↗
Technetium Management for Hanford Tank Waste Processing and Disposition - 16399
Technetium-99 (Tc) generated from the fission of {sup 235}U and {sup 239}Pu in high yields is one of the most difficult contaminants to be addressed at the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Hanford Site. Among radioactive constituents in the tank waste, Tc presents a unique challenge in that it is radio-toxic (β = 292 keV), has a long half-life (T{sub 1/2} = 2.11x10{sup 5} y), and exists predominantly in the liquid fraction of the alkaline tank waste, generally in the anionic form of pertechnetate TcO{sub 4}{sup -}, which is highly volatile at low-activity waste vitrification melter temperatures and mobile in the subsurface environment. This makes immobilization of Tc into high-durability waste forms a critical technical challenge for nuclear waste management. The complex behavior of Tc under storage, treatment, and immobilization conditions significantly affects its management options. The overall objective of the Technetium Management program is to provide the DOE Office of Environmental Management with practical solutions to Tc needs encountered in the processing of Hanford tank waste. To reduce the technical uncertainty associated with the long-term environmental impact of Tc, a systems-based approach is needed to address Tc management needs by evaluating and developing science and engineering options for treatment, immobilization, and disposition of Tc contained in Hanford tank wastes. This paper describes major elements of Technetium Management program, including: - Identifying the chemical forms of Tc in tank waste through analytical speciation of low-valent Tc(I) species in alkaline solutions. - Performing proof-of-concept demonstration for detection of low-valent Tc(I) by fluorescence spectroscopy. - Identifying alternative non-glass Tc immobilization methods. (authors)
12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
Technology requirements to be addressed by the NASA Lewis Research Center Cryogenic Fluid Management Facility program
The NASA Lewis Research Center is responsible for the planning and execution of a scientific program which will provide advance in space cryogenic fluid management technology. A number of future space missions were identified that require or could benefit from this technology. These fluid management technology needs were prioritized and a shuttle attached reuseable test bed, the cryogenic fluid management facility (CFMF), is being designed to provide the experimental data necessary for the technology development effort.
Aydelott, J. C.↗
Technology requirements to be addressed by the NASA Lewis Research Center Cryogenic Fluid Management Facility program
The NASA Lewis Research Center is responsible for the planning and execution of a scientific program which will provide advance in space cryogenic fluid management technology. A number of future space missions were identified that require or could benefit from this technology. These fluid management technology needs were prioritized and a shuttle attached reuseable test bed, the cryogenic fluid management facility (CFMF), is being designed to provide the experimental data necessary for the technology development effort.
Aydelott, J. C.↗
Constellation X-Ray Mission and Support
This report is a supplement to the Third Annual Report summarizing work performed by the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory (SAO) for NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) under Cooperative Agreement NCC5-3681. The Agreement is entitled 'Constellation X-ray Mission Study and Support.' This supplementary report covers the period from October 1, 2001 through January 10, 2002. The report has been prepared and submitted to ensure that the Constellation-X Project Office at GSFC has current performance information needed to evaluate a proposed modified budget for FY02. That proposed budget is being submitted separately. SAO continues to perform work under the overall direction of Dr. Harvey Tananbaum, the SAO Principal Investigator for the program. Mr. Robert Rasche is the SAO Program Manager and is responsible for day-to-day program management at SAO and coordination with GSFC. The report summarizes the main areas of SAO activity. Most of the work has been done jointly with personnel from GSFC and Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC). We describe SAO participation in these efforts. Under the Agreement, SAO performed work in seven major areas of activity. These areas related to: (1) Constellation X-ray Mission Facility Definition Team and Study Management; (2) Science Support; (3) Spectroscopy X-ray Telescope (SXT); (4) Systems Engineering; (5) Travel in Support of the Work Effort; and (6) In-house Management and Coordination.
Tananbaum, H.↗
EFCOG, IOSC Best Practices Guide
Members of the Energy Facility Contractors Group (EFCOG), Safeguards and Security Working Group, Information Security Sub-Working Group Incidents of Security Concern (IOSC) Team prepared this best practice guide. For the purposes of this guide, “best practices” are “positive examples of work processes, procedures, good ideas, or effective solutions. The team made up of IOSC Subject Matter Experts (SME) identified these best practices as a result of actual operational experience and training. The guide describes best practices for categorizing incidents and managing inquiries. These practices may serve as guidelines for developing program plans, policy and procedures. These practices are suggestions for Department sites to consider while working in the IOSC subject area. The authors acknowledge that there may be alternatives to the practices identified in this guide. Subject matter Experts from the IOSC program across the Department developed this guide. Extensive discussion and document reviews were conducted to identify best practices relating to security inquiries. It was not within the scope of this study to assess individual site performance or evaluate compliance. Department of Energy’s (DOE), Order 470.4B, Chg.2, Safeguards and Security Program, July-21-2011, Chg 2, January-17-2017, Attachment 5, Incidents of Security Concern, contains the requirements for the IOSC program. In accordance with DOE directives and requirements established by DOE/National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) oversight, the working group evaluated elements of the IOSC program at each of the working group member’s sites such as categorizing events, conducting inquiries, and reporting events. Inconsistencies in categorization across the sites may be due to various factors, including each local field office having different reporting expectations, subjectivity in making determinations, and potential inherent deficiencies in the categorization tables and category descriptions. Many sites have adopted a sub reportable category for a security anomaly event that it believes does not meet the criteria as a reportable IOSC. The sites typically establish a local standardized process for reporting, analyzing, and trending sub-reportable events. Security incident program managers may need to discuss inconsistent categorization with other Inquiry Officials (IO) and suggest standardized solutions (ie…through policy changes or a forum attended by incident program managers and inquiry officials to discuss standardization solutions. At least one EFCOG IOSC team member’s site is currently using the best practices identified in this guide.
96 KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND PRESERVATION↗
FEMP's Distributed Energy Program
Fact sheet describes the Federal Energy Management Program's (FEMP) Distributed Energy Program and outlines related resources available from FEMP.
29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY↗
FEMP’s Distributed Energy Program
Fact sheet describes the Federal Energy Management Program’s Distributed Energy Program, which facilitates the implementation of cost-effective, on-site renewable energy and energy storage technologies for federal agencies.
Distributed Energy Program↗
Invasive Plant Management Plan for the Oak Ridge Reservation
Invasive non-native plant species have become one of the greatest ecological threats across the country and around the world. Actively managing incursions of invasive plants is crucial to maintaining ecosystems, protecting natural resources, and ensuring proper function of facilities and their support infrastructures, power lines and other utility rights-of-way (ROWs), communications structures, roadways, and waterways. Invasive plants can threaten cultural resources, public and private properties, forests, wetlands, and other natural areas through increased risks of fire and storm damage, as well as decrease native plant diversity, particularly disrupting vital habitats of threatened and endangered species, both plant and animal. In 2000, the Federal Plant Protection Act came into effect. Under this Act, federal agencies are required to develop and coordinate an undesirable plants management program for control of invasive plants on federal lands under each agency’s respective jurisdiction. The agency must adequately fund the undesirable plants management program using an Integrated Pest Management Plan. Additionally, each agency is required to implement cooperative agreements with local and state agencies, as well as other federal agencies, to manage undesirable plants on federal lands under the agency’s jurisdiction. The US Department of Energy (DOE) takes its responsibility for addressing invasive and undesirable plant issues very seriously. Many DOE sites have programs to control invasive pest plant species. DOE has taken a proactive stance toward invasive plant control, and the Invasive Plant Management Plan— created to meet regulatory requirements of federal laws, executive orders, presidential memos, contracts, and agreements on DOE’s Oak Ridge Reservation (ORR)—has been in effect since 2004. This document represents the second revision of this plan.
59 BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES↗
Science and the Constellation Systems Program Office
An underlying tension has existed throughout the history of NASA between the human spaceflight programs and the external scientific constituencies of the robotic exploration programs. The large human space projects have been perceived as squandering resources that might otherwise be utilized for scientific discoveries. In particular, the history of the relationship of science to the International Space Station Program has not been a happy one. The leadership of the Constellation Program Office, created in NASA in October, 2005, asked me to serve on the Program Manager s staff as a liaison to the science community. Through the creation of my position, the Program Manager wanted to communicate and elucidate decisions inside the program to the scientific community and, conversely, ensure that the community had a voice at the highest levels within the program. Almost all of my technical contributions at NASA, dating back to the Apollo Program, has been within the auspices of what is now known as the Science Mission Directorate. However, working at the Johnson Space Center, where human spaceflight is the principal activity, has given me a good deal of incidental contact and some more direct exposure through management positions to the structures and culture of human spaceflight programs. I entered the Constellation family somewhat naive but not uninformed. In addition to my background in NASA science, I have also written extensively over the past 25 years on the topic of human exploration of the Moon and Mars. (See, for example, Mendell, 1985). I have found that my scientific colleagues generally have little understanding of the structure and processes of a NASA program office; and many of them do not recognize the name, Constellation. In many respects, the international ILEWG community is better informed. Nevertheless, some NASA decision processes on the role of science, particularly with respect to the formulation of a lunar surface architecture, are not well known, even in ILEWG. At the recent annual Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, I reviewed the evolution of the program as a function of Agency leadership and the constraints put on NASA by the President in his 2004 announcement. I plan to continue my long-time ILEWG tradition of reporting a personal view of the state of development of human exploration of the solar system, this time coming from within the program office tasked to implement the vision for the United States. The current NASA implementation of the Vision for Space Exploration is consistent with certain classical scenarios that have been discussed extensively in the literature. I will discuss the role of science within the Vision, both from official policy and from a de facto interaction. While science goals are not officially driving the implementation of the Vision, the tools of scientific exploration are integral to defining the extraterrestrial design environments. In this respect the sharing of results from international missions to the Moon can make significant contributions to the success of the future human activities.
Mendell, Wendell↗
Security and Emergency Management: NMPEA Application
The Security and Emergency Management (S&EM) Center at Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) is responsible for ensuring overall security for people, information, and facilities at SNL. The center runs a broad Security and Emergency Management Program in close cooperation with other organizations throughout SNL. The mission of the Security program is to minimize current and future security threats so that Sandia can protect, sustain and enhance SNL’s ability to function as a multidisciplinary national security laboratory. The mission of the Emergency Management program is to provide SNL with dedicated professionals who deliver safe, prompt, courteous, efficient emergency planning and response to fire-related incidents, hazardous materials, confined space, emergency medical emergencies, and non-emergency events to protect the workers, the public and the environment. They embrace mission success in the National Interest, actively supporting all Divisions. The Emergency Management (EM) Program’s vision is to be recognized by SNL/NM and the entire DOE complex as the model for superior emergency management services. Emergency Management plans to accomplish this vision through a leadership philosophy that promotes respect and mutual trust among all members through open and honest communication.
99 GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS↗
OE ADMS Program: Advanced Distribution Management System Test Bed Development
This poster presents a high-level review of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability, Advanced Distribution Management System Program and test bed development.
24 POWER TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION↗
Canadian Nuclear Laboratories: An Asset Management Journey - 19438
In this paper, Canadian Nuclear Laboratories (CNL) outlines key tools, strategies and lessons learned from development of their Asset Management Program. Canadian Nuclear Laboratories is a 60-year old site in the midst of a C$1.2B redevelopment that includes construction of six new facilities and demolition of over 120 buildings and structures. The presentation outlines CNL's progress in creating an efficient and effective asset management program that leverages and optimizes current good practices while creating a consistent, disciplined and information-based approach for the maintenance and management of assets. (authors)
12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
Flight Manifesting Process for NASA Microgravity Payloads
The objective of NASA's Microgravity Research Program is to utilize the low gravity environment of space to explore the nature of physical phenomena that contributes to progress in science and technology on Earth. Under the oversight of NASA Headquarters, the Microgravity Research Program Office (MRPO) at the Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) assumes all program management responsibilities associated with Microgravity Research and Space Product Development. One program management responsibility that plays a vital role to the success of the MRPO is the flight manifesting process for MRPO-sponsored payloads. In this paper, the authors will examine the various processes utilized by MRPO personnel in acquiring flight opportunities for MRPO-sponsored payloads.
Matisak, Brian↗
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Marshall Space Flight Center Space Transportation Directorate Risk Management Implementation Program
The US civil aerospace program has been a great contributor to the creation and implementation of techniques and methods to identify, analyze, and confront risk. NASA has accomplished mission success in many instances, but also has had many failures. Anomalies have kept the Agency from achieving success on other occasions, as well. While NASA has mastered ways to prevent risks, and to quickly and effectively react and recover from anomalies or failures, it was not until few years ago that a comprehensive Risk Management process started being implemented in some of its programs and projects. A Continuous Risk Management (CRM) cycle process was developed and has been promoted and used successfully in programs and projects across the Agency.
Duarte, Luis Alberto↗
Annual Report on Federal Government Energy Management and Conservation Programs (Fiscal Year 2010)
Annual reports on Federal energy management respond to section 548 of the National Energy Conservation Policy Act (NECPA, Pub. L. No. 95-619), as amended, and provide information on energy consumption in Federal buildings, operations, and vehicles. Compiled by the Federal Energy Management Program, these reports document activities conducted by Federal agencies under the: Energy management and energy consumption requirements of section 543 of NECPA, as amended (42 U.S.C. § 8253); Energy savings performance contract authority of section 801 of NECPA, Pub. L. No. 95-619, as amended (42 U.S.C. §§ 8287-8287d); Renewable energy purchase goal of section 203 of the Energy Policy Act (EPAct) of 2005, Pub. L. No. 109-58 (codified at 42 U.S.C. § 15852); Federal building performance standard requirements under Section 109 of EPAct 2005, Pub. L. No. 109-58 (codified at 42 U.S.C. § 6834(a)); Requirements on the procurement and identification of energy efficient products under section 161 of EPAct 1992, Pub. L. No. 102-486 (codified at 42 U.S.C. § 8262g); Sections 431, 432, and 434 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA), Pub. L. No. 110-140 (42 U.S.C. § 8253) and section 527 of EISA (42 U.S.C. § 17143); Executive Order 13423, Strengthening Federal Environmental, Energy, and Transportation Management, 72 Fed. Reg. 3,919 (Jan. 26, 2007); Executive Order 13514, Federal Leadership in Environmental, Energy, and Economic Performance, 74 Fed. Reg. 52,117 (Oct. 5, 2009).
32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗
Annual Report on Federal Government Energy Management and Conservation Programs (Fiscal Year 2011)
Annual reports on Federal energy management respond to section 548 of the National Energy Conservation Policy Act (NECPA, Pub. L. No. 95-619), as amended, and provide information on energy consumption in Federal buildings, operations, and vehicles. Compiled by the Federal Energy Management Program, these reports document activities conducted by Federal agencies under the: Energy management and energy consumption requirements of section 543 of NECPA, as amended (42 U.S.C. § 8253); Energy savings performance contract authority of section 801 of NECPA, Pub. L. No. 95-619, as amended (42 U.S.C. §§ 8287-8287d); Renewable energy purchase goal of section 203 of the Energy Policy Act (EPAct) of 2005, Pub. L. No. 109-58 (codified at 42 U.S.C. § 15852); Federal building performance standard requirements under Section 109 of EPAct 2005, Pub. L. No. 109-58 (codified at 42 U.S.C. § 6834(a)); Requirements on the procurement and identification of energy efficient products under section 161 of EPAct 1992, Pub. L. No. 102-486 (codified at 42 U.S.C. § 8262g); Sections 431, 432, and 434 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA), Pub. L. No. 110-140 (42 U.S.C. § 8253) and section 527 of EISA (42 U.S.C. § 17143); Executive Order 13423, Strengthening Federal Environmental, Energy, and Transportation Management, 72 Fed. Reg. 3,919 (Jan. 26, 2007); Executive Order 13514, Federal Leadership in Environmental, Energy, and Economic Performance, 74 Fed. Reg. 52,117 (Oct. 5, 2009).
32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗