Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Terminal”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 271 records · Page 15

Polymerization of Terminal Acetylenes by a Bulky Monophosphine-Palladium Catalyst

A well-defined palladium complex [(tBuXPhos)Pd(Me)(BAr f )] bearing a bulky monophosphine ligand was synthesized and fully characterized. X-ray diffraction analysis shows that the 1,3,5-triisopropylaryl group of the dialkylbiaryl phosphine ligand exhibits a weak η 6 -interaction with the Pd(II) center. This catalyst exhibits excellent functional group tolerance and polymerizes propargyl esters containing benzoyl and acetyl groups, propargyl methyl ether, propargyl alcohol, benzyl acetylene, and phenyl acetylene to yield polymers with M n values in the range of 5–15 kDa with monomodal molecular weight distributions between ca. 1.4 and 2.1.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗

Reactivity of [Tism Pr i Benz ]MgH and [Tism Pr i Benz ]MgMe towards Carbonyl Compounds: Access to Terminal Alkoxide and Enolate Complexes

The hydride and methyl compounds [Tism Pr i Benz ]MgH and [Tism Pr i Benz ]MgMe undergo insertion of the carbonyl moieties of non-enolizable aldehydes and ketones such as PhCHO and Ph 2 CO into the Mg–H and Mg–Me bonds to form alkoxide compounds, namely [Tism Pr i Benz ]MgOCH 2 Ph, [Tism Pr i Benz ]MgOCHPh 2 , [Tism Pr i Benz ]MgMOCH(Me)Ph and [Tism Pr i Benz ]MgOCMePh 2 . In contrast to the insertion of the carbonyl moiety, the reactions of the enolizable ketones Me 2 CO and PhC(O)Me with [Tism Pr i Benz ]MgMe afford the enolate complexes, [Tism Pr i Benz ]MgOC(Me)=CH 2 and [Tism Pr i Benz ]MgOC(Ph)=CH 2 . The formation of [Tism Pr i Benz ]MgOC(Me)=CH 2 is of note because methyl Grignard reagents preferentially react with acetone to form t-butoxide derivatives. The hydride compound, [Tism Pr i Benz ]MgH, also reacts with acetone to yield the enolate compound, [Tism Pr i Benz ]MgOC(Me)=CH 2 , but while the overall transformation is similar to that of the methyl derivative, [Tism Pr i Benz ]MgMe, the enolate compound is not the initially formed product. Specifically, acetone undergoes preferential insertion into the Mg–H bond to generate the corresponding alkoxide, [Tism Pr i Benz ]MgOPr i , which subsequently converts to the respective enolate in the presence of excess acetone. Furthermore, the relative ability of the hydride and methyl compounds to undergo insertion of carbonyl compounds into the Mg–H and Mg–Me bonds has been addressed computationally, which indicates that the barrier for insertion of the carbonyl group into the Mg–H bond is lower than that for insertion into the Mg–Me bond. The molecular structures of [Tism Pr i Benz ]MgOCH 2 Ph, [Tism Pr i Benz ]MgOCHPh 2 , [Tism Pr i Benz ]MgOCMePh 2 , [Tism Pr i Benz ]MgOC(Me)=CH 2 and [Tism Pr i Benz ]MgOC(Ph)=CH 2 have been determined by X-ray diffraction.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗

Synthesis of Cp* Terphenylamido U(III) Iodide Complexes with a Substitutable Iodide Position to Generate Terminal U(III)–(κ 3 -BH 4 ) Complexes

Reaction of Cp*UI 2 (THF) 3 (Cp* = pentamethylcyclopentadienide; THF = tetrahydrofuran) with Na R3 TerNH ( R3 Ter = 2,6(2,4,6-R 3 C 6 H 2 ) 2 C 6 H 3 ; R = Me, Et, iPr) gave the U(III) monoiodide complexes Cp*( R3 TerNH)UI (R = Me, 1-Me; R = Et, 2-Et; R = iPr, 3-iPr). These complexes contain a functionalizable iodide position which reacts favorably with NaBH4 to give the κ 3 -borohydride complexes Cp*( R3 TerNH)U(H 3 BH) (R = Me, 4-Me; R = Et, 5-Et; R = iPr, 6-iPr). All compounds were experimentally characterized by SC-XRD, 1 H and 11 B NMR spectroscopy as well as UV–vis–NIR and FTIR analyses. DFT calculations corroborate the experimental findings, confirming the 5f 3 U(III) configuration across the entire series and revealing an increased U 5f orbital contribution in the borohydride derivatives. All compounds exhibit small but non-negligible U(III)–(η 6 -arene) δ-back-bonding interactions arising from the unpaired 5f electrons. Calculated steric parameters show progressively greater shielding of the U(III) center with increasing bulk of the terphenyl substituents from Me to iPr.

38 RADIATION CHEMISTRY, RADIOCHEMISTRY, AND NUCLEA↗