Evolutionary Stability of Microbial Mutualism in Simulated Microgravity
Sustainable long-term space travel will require astronauts to live in built environments cohabited by microbes. Though much of space biology research has focused on microbial monocultures, microbes naturally live in multispecies communities in which they compete and cooperate. Understanding how communities experience spaceflight over generations can influence sanitation measures and the design of synthetic communities for applications in spaceflight. In this study, we investigated the evolutionary stability of mutualism in multispecies communities in microgravity using a model system of cooperating microbes. Our model consisted of bioengineered strains of mutually dependent E. coli and S. enterica. E. coli metabolized lactose and produced a carbon source for S. enterica, which secreted methionine for E. coli. By introducing a noncooperative ("cheater") strain of S. enterica, we tested the dynamic stability of mutualism. Using a rotating wall vessel, we simulated microgravity, specifically a low-shear, diffusion-limited environment where metabolite transfer is limited compared to 1g conditions. Fluorescent motile and non-motile strains were used to assess how motility affects the microbial experience of microgravity. We hypothesized that mutualism in non-motile cocultures would be favored in microgravity due to the diffusion-limited spatial structure, while motile strains would show less difference between simulated microgravity and other conditions. We cultured communities for approximately 20 generations and assessed community composition over time using flow cytometry. We compared simulated microgravity to cultures grown in agar plates as spatially structured controls, shaken flasks as well-mixed controls, and still flasks representing the convective mixing of 1g. A high, sustained cooperator-to-cheater ratio represented stable mutualism within the community. Our results show that microbial communities may better maintain mutualism in microgravity compared to their counterparts in 1g conditions and that the motility of a community’s constituents influences how the community experiences microgravity on generational timescales.