Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “ARTEMIS”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 289 records · Page 16
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2018

Formation Timescales of Amosphous Rims on Lunar Grains Derived from ARTEMIS Observations

The weathering of airless bodies exposed to space is a fundamental process in the formation and evolution of planetary surfaces. At the Moon, space weathering induces a variety of physical, chemical, and optical changes including the formation of nanometer-sized amorphous rims on individual lunar grains. These rims are formed by vapor redeposition from micrometeoroid impacts and ion irradiation-induced amorphization of the crystalline matrix. For ion irradiation-induced rims, however, laboratory experiments of the depth and formation timescales of these rims stand in stark disagreement with observations of lunar soil grains. We use observations by the Acceleration, Reconnection, Turbulence, and Electrodynamics of the Moon's Interaction with the Sun (ARTEMIS) spacecraft in orbit around the Moon to compute the mean ion flux to the lunar surface between 10 eV and 5 MeV and convolve this flux with ion irradiation-induced vacancy production rates as a function of depth calculated using the Stopping Range of Ions in Matter model. By combining these results with laboratory measurements of the critical fluence for charged-particle amorphization in olivine, we can predict the formation timescale of amorphous rims as a function of depth in olivinic grains. This analysis resolves two outstanding issues: (1) the provenance of >100 nm amorphous rims on lunar grains and (2) the nature of the depth-age relationship for amorphous rims on lunar grains.

Amorphous Rims↗
NASA NTRS2018

Magnetotail Boundary Crossings at Lunar Distances: ARTEMIS Observations

We compare results from a preliminary analysis of two years of ARTEMIS magnetopause boundary crossings at lunar distances with available empirical models. We remove the effects of variable solar wind flow directions and aberration angles to study the magnetotail cross-section as a function of solar wind conditions. The average magnetopause distance from the central axis is 26 RE, but this distance ranges from 10 RE for high solar wind dynamic pressures and strong northward IMF orientations to 39 RE for low solar wind dynamic pressures and weak southward IMF orientations compared to the nominal solar wind conditions. The time-independent Howe and Binsack (1972) model describes the average location of the crossings very well. For high solar wind dynamic pressures, the Lu et al., (2011) model performs best, while for low pressures the Petrinec and Russell (1996) model gives the closest prediction. As predicted by theory and seen in past studies, the magnetotail cross-section is suggestive of prolate during intervals of strong IMF By, but oblate during intervals of strong IMF Bz. Any asymmetric variation of the tail boundary with respect to the sign of IMF By was not observed. The decreasing size of boundary with the increasing dynamic pressure was found when dynamic pressures are smaller than 2nPa. Although the scatter is larger, the tail size for pressures larger than 2nPa suggests a constant radius. The tail boundary size decreases as the strength of IMF Bz increases regardless of its polarity. However, it was also observed that an even stronger southward IMF Bz can cause larger magnetopause size in the presence of large dynamic pressures.

Magnetotail↗
NASA NTRS2020

Apollo to Artemis: Mining 50-Year Old Records to Inform Future Human Lunar Landing Systems

Under the Artemis lunar exploration program, NASA is committed to landing American astronauts on the moon by 2024. While NASA’s new Space Launch System rocket and Orion capsule will carry astronauts from Earth to the Gateway, the human lunar landing system has not yet been fully defined. As in the Apollo program, there are concerns for vehicle weight and internal volume such that seats may not be desirable, and standing during lunar descent and ascent may be a preferred engineering solution. With such a design, astronauts will experience +GZ (head-to-foot) accelerations during capsule accelerations, and it is unclear whether spaceflight deconditioned astronauts can tolerate these. Apollo astronauts stood during lunar descent and ascent, and the data contained in the early program records for those missions represent a unique resource that may provide insights to the cardiovascular stress associated with this human landing system design.

Petersen, D.↗
NASA NTRS2020

Apollo 17 EVA-1 and EVA-2 Task Decomposition: Planning for Artemis and Future Mars Missions

A decomposition of the Apollo 17 mission extravehicular activities (EVA) tasks can be used to prepare for Artemis and future Mars missions. A categorized minute by minute breakdown of the astronauts’ activites could be used to plan future EVAs and determine which scientific tasks or equipment may be prioritized. This is especially relevant in this critical stage for the upcoming Atemis missions and science activity planning. The infographics generated from the decomposition provide a higher level view of actual EVAs and could aid in making future EVAs more efficient and successful.

Haney, N. C.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Launch Availability Analysis for the Artemis Program

On March 26, 2019, Vice President Pence stated that the policy of the Trump administration and the United States of America is to return American astronauts to the Moon within the next five years i.e., by 2024. Since that time, NASA has begun the process of developing concepts of operations and launch campaign options to achieve that goal as well as to provide a sustainable human presence on the Moon. Whereas the Apollo program utilized one Saturn V rocket to carry out a single lunar landing mission of short duration, NASA’s preliminary plans for the Artemis Program call for a combination of medium lift class rockets along with the heavy lift Space Launch System (SLS)to achieve a lunar landing by 2024 as well as subsequent missions. This paper describes how discrete event simulation is used to model the launch campaigns and provide metrics on launch availability and mission duration for each element being launched. Possible methods for improving launch availability are presented.

Grant Cates↗
NASA NTRS2020

Artemis Sustained Translational Acceleration Limits: Human Tolerance Evidence from Apollo to ISS

The designers of the next generation of lunar landers may adopt novel, crew-body orientations outside of our flight history or applied to flight durations and environments outside of our experience. Current sustained translational acceleration requirements in NASA-STD-3001 are applicable only to crewmembers in a seated posture and are thus inadequate to address human tolerance in non-seated configurations. Initial designs for the Apollo Lunar Module (LM) included seats for both commander and pilot; however, these were subsequently removed from the vehicle due to mass constraints and a willingness to accept the unknown risks for short-duration missions given the limited human physiologic data at the time. In the years since Apollo, our evidence base has grown immensely. Initial Artemis mission timelines under consideration will be longer than the longest Apollo mission, by a significant margin, with timeframes more analogous to longer Space Shuttle missions. Given the incidence of postflight orthostatic intolerance following shuttle missions, a significant risk may exist for lander design(s) pursuing a standing crew configuration similar to Apollo LM. New sustained translational acceleration limits developed to address this risk are presented herein. These limits were derived from evaluations of Apollo biomedical and flight profile data during lunar descent and ascent operations, Soyuz and Space Shuttle flight profile and post-landing biomedical data, and analogue bed rest post-exposure data on orthostatic intolerance.

James M. Pattarini↗
NASA NTRS2020

Artemis III Neutron Surface Science

This paper highlights lunar neutron science that can be performed in support of the Artemis 2024 mission within 6 degrees of the lunar south pole. There are two primary science goals: the characterization of the radiation environment, and secondly, inference of regolith composition including the presence of water. Characterizing the surface radiation environment is important for risk identification and mitigation during crewed lunar missions. The lunar surface radiation environment includes a unique neutron contribution. The relative contribution from neutrons is higher outside the shielding effects of Earth’s magnetic field, which the Moon experiences ~25% of its orbit. To evaluate the radiation risk to astronauts at the lunar surface, fast neutron measurements are needed. Neutrons are generated when galactic cosmic rays (GCR) collide with the lunar regolith and provide valuable elemental composition information about the near surface (< 1m). For the characterization of regolith composition, a low energy neutron spectrometer or counter can determine surface composition. This provides ground truth for orbital neutron data from the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter and Lunar Prospector missions.

Lunar science, Moon, geology, geophysics, neutron ↗
NASA NTRS2020

Lunar Lettuce Production During Artemis III Mission to the Moon's South Pole

The Artemis Science Plan identified that the infrastructure and resources associated during a human/robotic exploration mission can be used to conduct fundamental lunar science needed to mitigate the risks of human exploration of surface systems (i.e. Mars and the Moon). In particular, studying the response of life to the combination of fractional gravity and deep space radiation of the Moon is needed to mitigate the HEOMD risks to the crew that result from inadequate diets. Essential nutrients and vitamins available to astronauts have been shown to degrade within the stored food system during long duration missions. Other risks to exploration missions were isolation and confinement, distance from the Earth, radiation and partial gravity.

O. Monje↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Artemis Lunar Surface VR/ARGOS Trainer

This proposal aims to provide insight by identifying potential risks and unknowns of lander egress and surface operations through a Mixed Reality (MR) planning, training, and analysis capability that integrates Virtual Reality (VR) simulations and the Active Response Gravity Offload System (ARGOS) in support of Artemis missions to the moon. The VR simulation will incorporate lunar digital elevation map data and imagery to provide accurate terrain of the south pole and Shackleton Crater. Date specific ephemerides will used to simulate the extreme lighting environment. Virtual representations of a lunar lander vehicle will be represented with a physical mockup of the porch and ladder assembly. Human-in-the-loop engineering test runs within ARGOS will be used to refine performance of the Mixed Reality interface with the mockup platform and define procedures for training.

Lee K Bingham↗
NASA NTRS2021

ARTEMIS Observations of Plasma Waves in Laminar and Perturbed Interplanetary Shocks

The ‘Acceleration, Reconnection, Turbulence and Electrodynamics of the Moon's Interaction with the Sun’ (ARTEMIS) mission provides a unique opportunity to study the structure of interplanetary shocks and the associated generation of plasma waves with frequencies between ~50-8000 Hz due to its long duration electric and magnetic field burst waveform captures. We compare wave properties and occurrence rates at 11 quasi-perpendicular interplanetary shocks with burst data within 10 minutes (~3200 proton gyroradii upstream, ~1900 downstream) of the shock ramp. A perturbed shock is defined as possessing a large amplitude whistler precursor in the quasi-static magnetic field with an amplitude greater than ⅓ the difference between the upstream and downstream average magnetic field magnitudes; laminar shocks lack these large precursors and have a smooth, step function-like transition. In addition to wave modes previously observed, including ion acoustic, whistler, and electrostatic solitary waves, waves in the ion acoustic frequency range that show rapid temporal frequency change are common. Three shocks had burst captures in the ramp; of these, the two laminar shocks with burst data in the ramp contained a wide range of large amplitude wave modes in the ramp whereas the one perturbed shock contained no such waves. Thus, energy dissipation through wave-particle interactions is more prominent in these two laminar shocks than in the perturbed shock. Based on observations from all 11 shocks, the The wave occurrence rates for laminar shocks are higher in the transition region, especially the ramp, than downstream. In contrast, perturbed shocks have approximately 2-3 times the wave occurrence rate downstream than laminar shocks.

L. A. Davis↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

The Flight Dynamics Risk Assessment of Artemis I

With launch vehicles and spacecraft, it is necessary to dynamically test the structure to validate structural models. These validated models are then used to determine a launch vehicle's control stability margin and the loads on the structure. While often a dedicated structural test article is used to correlate the integrated structure in preparation for the final analysis cycles, the Artemis I flight is using an approach where the components of the launch vehicle are dynamically tested and the component models validated. The fully integrated vehicle is not tested until a few months before launch, which limits the ability to fully correlate a model prior to launch. This paper introduces the Flight Dynamics Risk Assessment of the vehicle, which is the process being used to determine the adequacy of the vehicle structural model after the Integrated Modal Test. This work outlines the process of quickly tuning a model post-test then determining any control margin violations and increases in loads due to that tuned model.

Eric C Stewart↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Artemis I Prelaunch Flight Readiness Analysis

The Prelaunch loads analysis traditionally captures the vehicle and Mobile Launcher (ML) loads associated with stacking in the Vehicle Assembly Building (VAB), rollout to the pad, and high-speed winds while out on the pad prior to liftoff. The following paper details the methodology used in this analysis for loads for the Artemis Flight Readiness assessment. This paper focuses on the stacking and assembly loads, the loads induced by fueling, and the load seen during rollout to the pad. Methods for integrating multiple structural models in dynamic simulations using interface forces, constraint modes, and residual vectors is discussed. Both linear and nonlinear responses are addressed. Simulation results are compared to measured data from the Dynamic Rollout Test (DRT) and Wet Dress Rehearsal (WDR).

SLS↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

NASA's Artemis Human Landing Systems

The Human Landing System (HLS) is the mode of transportation that will take astronauts to the lunar surface in NASA's Artemis lunar exploration program. On early missions, the astronauts will live inside the pressurized crew cabin portion of the lander for up to a week. The HLS program, based at Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Alabama, is working closely with commercial partners to build innovative and technically advanced lunar landers, leveraging decades of human spaceflight experience and the speed of the commercial sector. In addition to the NextSTEP-2 Broad Agency Announcement Appendix H Option A contract that includes one uncrewed and one crewed demonstration mission to the lunar surface, the HLS program is taking steps to establish a regular cadence of crewed missions to the surface of the Moon. This paper will discuss the HLS program’s latest development activities.

Lisa Watson-Morgan↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Smart Crop Farming Systems for Artemis Exploration Missions

Space crop production systems that mitigate risks of crew poor performance or illness due to inadequate food and nutrition are needed during manned Artemis exploration missions beyond LEO. Prototype farms must be designed for deployment on ISS and tested in manned platforms: Gateway, lunar habitats, and Mars trans-hab spacecraft in preparation for human missions to Mars. Food production must be optimal and safe for human consumption. Thus, plant growth facilities (i.e. Veggie and APH) can be enhanced with imaging systems (including hyperspectral, multispectral, lidar, and fluorescence imaging systems) for nondestructive monitoring of plant health, stress and assessing food safety. Databases of crop responses to stress obtained during ground studies can be used to develop novel artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms for optimizing crop production (i.e. environmental settings during growth) and for detecting crop indices that ensure food safety. Future farming systems should be sustainable and smart. Novel adaptive AI algorithms requiring limited data sets for calibration are needed for reducing crew intervention during plant cultivation except for maintenance and harvesting events. Eventually, AI driven control systems that include autonomous planting, growing, and harvesting as well as periodic sanitization need evaluation for supplementing crew diets with fresh produce during future Mars exploration missions.

O Monje↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

NASA’s Artemis Human Landing Systems

The Human Landing System (HLS) is the mode of transportation that will take astronauts to the lunar surface in NASA's Artemis lunar exploration program. On early missions, the astronauts will live inside the pressurized crew cabin portion of the lander for up to a week. The HLS program, based at NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Alabama, is working closely with commercial partners to build innovative and technically advanced lunar landers, leveraging decades of human spaceflight experience and the speed of the commercial sector. In addition to the NextSTEP-2 Broad Agency Announcement Appendix H Option A contract that includes one uncrewed and one crewed demonstration mission to the lunar surface, the HLS program is taking steps to establish a regular cadence of crewed missions to the surface of the Moon. This paper will discuss the HLS program’s latest development activities.

Lisa Watson-Morgan↗