Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Cladding design”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 289 records · Page 16
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2019

Preliminary Evaluation of Fuel Management Strategies for the Versatile Test Reactor (VTR)

Different fuel management approaches have been investigated for the Versatile Test Reactor (VTR). The main design variables were the number of batches, the number of (orifice) zones, and the loading pattern within the core. The optimization criteria are maximizing the fast flux at the centermost position, minimizing the peak assembly power, and reducing fuel consumption. Design constraints were mainly driven by material limits such as peak clad temperature, and maximum fuel burnup. The exploratory study determined that active fuel shuffling only brought very limited benefits. A three-orifice region was found to provide enough flexibility to ensure thermal criteria were met. Lastly, a flexible batch loading termed ‘5-6-8’ was identified as a promising management strategy from a resource utilization standpoint.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Overview of Base Model in Parametric Studies Specific to Performance of U-Mo Plates

This paper provides an overview of the base model specifically developed to perform parametric sensitivity studies on the U-10Mo monolithic fuel system. U-Mo monolithic fuels are being considered for the conversion of test reactors into high-performance research reactors that operate using proliferation-resistant, low-enriched uranium (LEU) fuels. These plate-type fuels contain a high-density, low-enrichment fuel sandwiched between zirconium diffusion barriers and encapsulated in aluminum claddings. All U.S. high-performance research reactors have released the designs of their LEU monolithic fuel reactor cores. These designs include nearly 50 distinct fuel plate geometries with different operational parameters. Consequently, a single generic plate geometry representing all the extreme points in this design matrix is unrealistic. To evaluate the performance for various parameters, a set of sensitivity studies was performed. These studies considered various input parameters (i.e., geometric, operational, and material property-related). The results revealed valuable information about plate performance and the sensitivity of this performance to various modeling inputs. To establish a reference state for comparing these result, base model featuring representative irradiation conditions was developed. To capture in-reactor behavior accurately, incorporation of representative constitutive models capable of evolving properties with respect to temperature, irradiation time, and burnup was needed. The behavioral models considered burnup-dependent properties, swelling, creep, and degradation. This paper introduces the base model created for the parametric sensitivity studies. The detailed description of the procedure includes the model geometry, model discretization, thermo-mechanical coupling, material properties and behavioral models. This paper also provides selected results and assesses the performance of the base model.

42 ENGINEERING↗
DOE OSTI2015

Measure Guideline: Incorporating Thick Layers of Exterior Rigid Insulation on Walls

This measure guideline provides information about the design and construction of wall assemblies that use layers of rigid exterior insulation thicker than 1-½ inches and that require a secondary cladding attachment location exterior to the insulation. The guideline is separated into several distinct sections that cover: fundamental building science principles relating to the use of exterior insulation on wall assemblies; design principles for tailoring this use to the specific project goals and requirements; and construction detailing to increase understanding about implementing the various design elements.

42 ENGINEERING↗
DOE OSTI2019

Full-core analysis for FeCrAl enhanced accident tolerant fuel in boiling water reactors

The impact of replacing Zircaloy with FeCrAl, a candidate enhanced accident-tolerant fuel cladding material, was evaluated for 10 × 10 boiling water reactor fuel bundles. Results from a series of full-core parametric studies estimated that replacing UO 2 /Zircaloy with UO 2 /FeCrAl would require an average enrichment increase of 0.6% 235 U throughout the fuel lattice with the cladding and channel box thicknesses halved and fuel pellet diameter increased. Full-core results indicated that UO 2 /FeCrAl models with these geometric/enrichment specifications matched the base UO 2 /Zircaloy cycle length of 527 effective full power days. Optimization studies of the full-core design established loading and control blade patterns for both Zircaloy and FeCrAl models. A side study was conducted modeling a hybrid fuel bundle consisting of FeCrAl cladding and a SiC/Ni/Cr channel box. By halving the cladding thickness, the enrichment level required was less than that of the Zircaloy base case design after performing loading pattern optimization of the hybrid bundle core. Lastly, the thermomechanical performance of a Zircaloy-cladded fuel rod was compared to that of a FeCrAl system. Results from this analysis show that, if starting from the same fuel-cladding gap thickness, a FeCrAl-clad fuel rod operates with a greater average fuel centerline temperature, comparable axial elongation and radial displacement, and longer time to gap closure compared to a Zircaloy-clad fuel rod. Furthermore, this fuel performance analysis was primarily based on the commercial Kanthal APMT FeCrAl alloy but also used available data for the C35M FeCrAl alloy developed at Oak Ridge National Laboratory.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2019

Development of LWR Fuels with Enhanced Accident Tolerance ATF Feasibility Analysis and Final Technical Report Deliverable for the Westinghouse Accident Tolerant Fuel Program (Rev. 2)

The beyond design basis accident at Fukushima Daiichi in March 2011 and the Three Mile Island accident in 1979 imply that severe nuclear accidents may occur at somewhat higher frequencies than previously predicted, and that the financial liabilities of such accidents can cripple a utility. While current fuel is more than adequate for design basis accidents, the potential for harm from beyond design basis accidents (BDBA) has been a driver for Westinghouse development efforts since 2003. After Fukushima, other fuel vendors also began pursuing new fuel materials that can provide significant increases in the time, enabling reactor operators to respond to unforeseen events before significant releases of fuel materials and fission products occur. In order to be commercially successful, accident tolerant fuel (ATF) products must also provide significant fuel cost savings, operating cost improvements as well as safety improvements. This report documents the engineering, design and testing that occurred from October 1, 2016, through September 30, 2018, by the Westinghouse team. In addition, it includes: 1. The results of modeling and simulation work completed to date that supports technical feasibility of the ATF concept in meeting the goals of the enhanced ATF program including a core level analysis predicting how an existing LWR will perform when loaded with ATF. 2. Regulatory Analysis showing path to LTA/LTR acceptance. 3. Business Analysis showing commercial viability of the ATF concept.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2023

Fuel performance evaluation of two high burnup PWR core designs during normal operation, control rod withdrawal, and control rod ejection scenarios

There is interest among utilities to extend the current, 18-month operating cycle to 24 months. Economically, this extension would require greater than 5 % enrichment and peak rod average discharge burnup levels above 62 GWd/MTU. A notable challenge of increasing enrichment is the resulting additional excess reactivity encountered during the early stages of fuel life. To accommodate, burnable absorbers beyond soluble boron are introduced into the fuel system. In high burnup fuels, the possibilities of cladding lift-off and fuel melting increase due, in part, to increased rod internal pressures and limited fuel thermal conductivity, respectively. This work collaboratively employs PARCS, RELAP5-3D, and BISON to compare the fuel performance of two high burnup fuel candidates with higher than 5 % enrichment. Here, the fuel performance parameters were compared to current NRC guidance. The results demonstrate an annular fuel design with homogenously blended gadolinium as a burnable absorber operates with greater safety margins during normal operation, allowing for additional operational flexibility. During normal operation, the core design utilizing Integral Fuel Burnable Absorber pins contained fuel pins which reached plenum pressures above 15.5 MPa by the end of the first fuel cycle and fuel pins experienced cladding hoop strains above 1 %. In the Gd core design, only two observed pins experienced plenum pressures above 15.5 MPa and no pins exceeded 1 % cladding hoop strain. During the control rod withdrawal scenario, plenum pressures for pins in both designs marginally exceeded system pressure, however neither experienced excessive hoop strain. The Gd core design experienced a maximum fuel temperature of 2418 K, which is significantly higher than the Integral Fuel Burnable Absorber design at 2157 K, but still within regulatory guidance. We predicted that the fuel in both could return to service after the CRW event. We also predicted that cladding would not fail during the Control Rod Ejection in either core design. Generally, the Integral Fuel Burnable Absorber core design performed with greater safety margin with regards to temperature during normal operation and the transient events. However, the Gd core design performed with greater safety margin regarding plenum pressure and hoop strain limits during normal operation and both transient events.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2023

Development and formulation of physics based metallic fuel models and comparison to integral irradiation data

Metallic fuel has an important historical significance in the development of nuclear reactors and continues to be relevant to the progression of advanced test and power reactors. A number of models, ranging from empirical to mechanistic, have been developed and implemented in various fuel performance codes to describe U-Zr and U-Pu-Zr fuel and typical fast reactor cladding materials. One challenge of using these models to simulate fuel performance is the inevitable tangling of coupled phenomena that can cloud proper implementation, calibration, and eventual utilization of new models. Here in an effort to provide a baseline capability that will facilitate the use of advanced models, new capabilities have been implemented into the fuel performance code BISON specific to metallic fuel simulations, ranging from materials properties, fission gas release and swelling calculations, coolant channel models, and cladding correlations. These models have been applied to the X441/X441A EBR-II experimental assembly data, a set of irradiated metallic UPuZr fuel rods of varying pin designs. The models implemented in BISON are able to capture the general trend of the expected response of the fuel and cladding to irradiation in EBR-II, especially when considering the spread in experimental measurements and the uncertainties inherited from the historical material models. Ultimately, the models outlined here provide the baseline capabilities on which new models can build upon in order to improve the prediction of metallic fuel performance simulations in off-normal designs or operations.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2016

A Methodology for Loading the Advanced Test Reactor Driver Core for Experiment Analysis

The Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) is one of the premier irradiation facilities in the world. The ATR hosts experiments from a variety of laboratories, companies, and disciplines. Because of its flexibility in providing customized irradiation conditions to experiments, such as coolant chemistry, temperature, and reactor power, analysis for experiments, both from a programmatic and safety perspective, can be a challenging endeavor. Because of these experiment variables, there is always an effort to improve upon the existing analysis methodology in order to provide the sponsor of any given experiment with the most accurate predictions possible. The paper discusses the effort to improve upon the methodology for loading the ATR driver core for experiment analysis. Experiment analysis at INL is generally broken up into three separate disciplines: neutronics, thermal-hydraulics, and structural. The focus of this paper is neutronics analysis. After the experiment has a preliminary design, the neutronics analyst will create a model in the Monte Carlo N-Particle (MCNP) transport code to calculate fuel and material heating rates from MCNP tallies and provide those to the thermal-hydraulics analyst, and calculate reactivity worths, perturbation on the axial fission profile of the ATR driver core by the experiment, void worths, and experiment backup worths. Also, there are usually several programmatic parameters that the experiment sponsor requests that the neutronics analyst calculates. These can include heat generation rates, burnup and displacements per atom (DPA). In order to accurately analyze these parameters, an important input into the physics analyst's MCNP model is the loading of the ATR driver core. The ATR driver core consists of 40, 19-plate highly-enriched uranium (HEU) fuel elements, arranged in a serpentine shape, as pictured in Figure 1. The ATR driver core is responsible for the vast majority of the thermal power of the reactor and the nuclear interactions with the experiments being irradiated in ATR. A unique feature of ATR is the 'power tilt' across the reactor. A power tilt means that the Northwest, Northeast, Southwest, and Southeast Lobes of ATR frequently operate at different powers, providing different irradiation conditions for the experiments in and around the lobes of the reactor. In order to achieve lobe power splits, different fuel elements for each of the 40 positions are chosen by ATR Reactor Engineering so that lobe power splits can be maintained during an operating cycle. A typical fuel loading for an ATR cycle consists of 14 to 18 new fuel elements and 2 to 26 depleted fuel elements. These loadings are typically chosen from three different types of fuel elements. All three ATR fuel element types share a common design, spelled out in Chapter 4 of the ATR Safety Analysis Report (SAR). The fuel element meat is HEU UAlx dispersion fuel sandwiched between aluminum cladding with a length of 121.92 cm (4 ft), with 19 plates per fuel element. The three variations of this common design are designated by the first two letters in their serial numbers: XA, YA, and NB. XA elements are most commonly used. These elements have nominally 1075 g of uranium-235 and 0.66 g of boron-10. The NB elements have the same uranium-235 loading as the XA elements, but no boron in any plates. These elements are used when excess reactivity is needed. The YA elements have the same loading as the XA elements, except that the outermost plate (Plate 19) has no boron or uranium. These elements are used to mitigate aged reflector damage. In order to accurately model the ATR driver core, all three types of fuel elements must be accounted for in the MCNP model. (authors)

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2016

Development of surface modified Zr cladding by coating technology for ATF

It is expected that the accident tolerance fuels (ATF) will provide an enhanced fuel performance of active cooling in the reactor core for a longer time period during design-basis events as well as maintain or improve the fuel performance during normal operations and operational transients. Thus, various ATF cladding concepts have being suggested and developed in many countries. Among them, the coated cladding concept is studied in this work after the considerations of various performances in both the accidents and normal operation of LWRs. In the surface coated cladding concepts, the combination of coating material and coating method is a very important factor to determine the ATF cladding performance. As a new coating material, Cr-based alloy was developed to increase the corrosion resistance under normal operation as well as the oxidation resistance during an accident. From the high temperature oxidation test at 1200 Celsius degrees, the Cr-based alloy showed a superior oxidation resistance to Zircaloy-4 cladding, and showed more improved corrosion resistance than Zircaloy-4 cladding under 360 Celsius degrees PWR simulated loop conditions. The 3D laser coating and a combination of arc ion plating and laser beam scanning were developed to obtain a good adhesion property of corrosion resistance alloy coated on a Zr substrate. The corrosion resistance alloy (Cr-based alloy and FeCrAl alloy) coated layer used by two types of coating methods was maintained without peeling off during the ring compression test at room temperature, although some cracks were formed on the coated layer. After a high-temperature oxidation test at 1200 Celsius degrees for 2000 s, a very thin oxide layer, which was a few microns, was formed on the corrosion resistance alloy layer. However, the ZrO{sub 2} phase, which was thicker than 100 μm was formed on the Zr alloy cladding surface. Thus, it is known that the high-temperature oxidation resistance of commercial Zr alloy cladding can be considerably improved by the coating of corrosion resistant alloys. In addition, the partial oxide dispersion strengthened (ODS) treatment using a laser beam scanning (LBS) method was applied to decrease the ballooning and rupture opening during accident conditions. (authors)

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2024

Measuring thermal diffusivity and gap conductance in uranium nitride and Zircaloy relevant for microreactor applications

Heat transfer across nuclear fuels and structural interfaces is an important factor for evaluating the performance of nuclear power systems. Specifically, heat generated as nuclear fuel fissions must be transported through the cladding material and through the reactor to reach the steam turbine for power generation. As new microreactor designs emerge, maximizing the efficiency of this heat transfer process becomes crucial to make them commercially viable. This article examines thermal diffusivity and gap conductance in uranium nitride (UN) fuel and Zircaloy-4 (Zry4) cladding using light flash analysis (LFA). Thermal diffusivity measurements were made on monolithic UN pellets and Zry4 exposed to carbon at peak operating temperatures of microreactors and show that carbon ingress has a minimal effect on thermal diffusivity when compared with identical materials not exposed to carbon. Evaluation of gap conductance at the UN-Zry4 interface was done using one-dimensional two-layer thermal transport models as a function of applied pressure. Here the results show that increasing pressure on the UN-Zry4 interface leads to gains in gap conductance per unit area in fuel-cladding assemblies at microreactor operating temperatures. While many other variables are expected to influence UN-Zry4 interfacial gap conductance (e.g. contact surface roughness, porosity, localized heating, environmental gas pressure), the work offers a demonstration of using a conventional LFA apparatus to determine this parameter at elevated temperatures.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2016

Selection of Nuclear Fuel for TREAT: UO 2 vs U 3 O 8

The Transient Reactor Test (TREAT) that resides at the Materials and Fuels Complex (MFC) at Idaho National Laboratory (INL), first achieved criticality in 1959, and successfully performed many transient tests on nuclear fuel until 1994 when its operations were suspended. Resumption of operations at TREAT was approved in February 2014 to meet the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Nuclear Energy’s objectives in transient testing of nuclear fuels. The National Nuclear Security Administration’s is converting TREAT from its existing highly enriched uranium (HEU) core to a new core containing low enriched uranium (LEU) (i.e., U-235< 20% by weight). The TREAT Conversion project is currently progressing with conceptual design phase activities. Dimensional stability of the fuel element assemblies, predictable fuel can oxidation and sufficient heat conductivity by the fuel blocks are some of the critical performance requirements of the new LEU fuel. Furthermore, to enable the design team to design fuel block and can specifications, it is amongst the objectives to evaluate TREAT LEU fuel and cladding material’s chemical interaction. This information is important to understand the viability of Zr-based alloys and fuel characteristics for the fabrication of the TREAT LEU fuel and cladding. Also, it is very important to make the right decision on what type of nuclear fuel will be used at TREAT. In particular, one has to consider different oxides of uranium, and most importantly, UO 2 vs U 3 O 8 . In this report, the results are documented pertaining to the choice mentioned above (UO 2 vs U 3 O 8 ). The conclusion in favor of using UO 2 was made based on the analysis of historical data, up-to-date literature, and self-consistent calculations of phase equilibria and thermodynamic properties in the U-O and U-O-C systems. The report is organized as follows. First, the criteria that were used to make the choice are analyzed. Secondly, existing historical data and current literature were reviewed. This analysis was supplemented by the construction and examination of the U-O and U-O-C phase diagrams at pressure close to negligent, thereby mimicking the conditions in which nuclear fuel is supposed to function inside the zirconium-based cladding in the reactor. Finally, our conclusion in favor of the UO 2 down selection was summarized and explained in the last Section of this document.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2020

Stability of zirconium hydride

This reports complete Milestone M2.2.1 Stability of zirconium hydride: Experimental investigation of the hydrogen concentration of encapsulated zirconium hydride before and after joining. In this milestone, we first report the successful fabrication of crack-free bulk zirconium hydride by using the ORNL static hydriding system. The fabricated hydride was characterized by using X-ray diffraction (XRD) and X-ray computed tomography (XCT). XRD results showed that the δ-phase zirconium hydride, α-zirconium, and ε-phase hydride were present. XCT confirmed the absence of the internal cracking. The hydrogen concentration was determined by the weight change before and after hydrogen loading, given the fact that the oxide phase was not found during XRD analysis. Two metallic cladding materials, i.e., molybdenum and FeCrAl, were selected to encapsulate the fabricated zirconium hydride pellets. Demonstration capsules were designed and machined. Mo crucible was successfully sealed by using a combination of electron beam welding and gas tungsten arc welding. Due to the undesired neutronics property of Mo, further investigation of this cladding material was not pursued. Electron beam welding and laser beam welding were employed to seal the FeCrAl capsules. XRD were performed on the zirconium hydride before and after the sealing. The results showed that the welding process has negligible impact on the hydrogen content in the FeCrAl-canned zirconium hydride. The presented work fulfilled the proposed work under this milestone and paves a pathway to fabricate single-phase zirconium hydride and to develop robust cladding materials to can bulk zirconium hydride.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2019

Report on Assessment of Advanced Reactor Fuel Performance

Three activities have been performed in FY 2019 to support the Advanced Fuel Cycle Campaign, which include assessment of annular fuel performance in an ultra-high burnup sodium-cooled reactor (SFR), modeling of annular fuel behavior during a transient scenario, and feasibility of a sustainable closed fuel cycle utilizing melt-refining process. Annular fuel performance parameters, including temperature profile, swelling strain, and cumulative damage fraction (CDF), in a 3000 MWt Sustainable Sodium-cooled Fast Reactor (SSFR) were assessed using the BISON fuel performance code. The SSFR is once-through ultra-long-life core based on a 34-batch fuel management scheme with 1.5-year cycle length. The fuel residence time in the SSFR is 51 years and the average discharged burnup is about 30%. Annular fuel has potential to irradiate for ultra-high burnup without major fuel-cladding mechanical interaction. This feature is achieved by using a low smeared density (~55%). In the SSFR design, however, 75% smeared density and a thick fuel pin were preferred to maintain criticality for 51 years. Due to the high smeared density and thick fuel pin configuration, the annular fuel was predicted to suffer premature cladding failure before reaching the discharge burnup of the SSFR. The current fuel creep model predicts a prominent creep strain due to gravity over the half-century irradiation, which may significantly affect the evolution of CDF. Thus, in order to use the annular fuel in an ultra-high burnup core such as the SSFR, a low smeared density and thin annular fuel is strongly recommended.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2023

Baseline Hypothetical Facility for the Production of 131 I, 99 Mo, and 133 Xe from HALEU Fission Targets

The report describes the development of a hypothetical facility to produce the pharmaceutical radioisotope 131 I at an amount of 60 curies per week via the fission of a High Assay Low Enriched Uranium (HALEU) target, along with the chemical and physical processes and equipment needed to separate the 131 I and co-produced 99 Mo and 133 Xe. The hypothetical design was carried out using a 10 MWt research reactor. The irradiation calculation determined that three HALEU targets with aluminum cladding can be used to produce 60 Ci/week of 131 I, 750 Ci/week of 99 Mo and 560 Ci/week of 133 Xe. The process selected for the baseline design uses caustic dissolution of the target material with ion exchange processes to separate and purify the iodine and molybdenum. The xenon is processed using a cryogenic carbon bed separation process. Target processing occurs in seven shielded hot cells with a total footprint of 16m 2 and waste management occurs in an eight hot cell with a 2.5 m 2 footprint. Waste generated from the processing of the three targets per week would generate less than 4 shielded drums of waste annually. These hot cells would need varying levels of shielding due to the amount of fission products being handled in the unit. Hot cell facilities also require support services including QA/QC, health physics, administrative staff, operator changing room, radiological buffer areas, and waste storage. The overall facility would require a footprint of 1050 m 2 with 20.25 m 2 of shielded hot cells.

62 RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE↗
DOE OSTI2015

Measure Guideline. Incorporating Thick Layers of Exterior Rigid Insulation on Walls

This measure guideline, written by the U.S. Department of Energy’s Building America team Building Science Corporation, provides information about the design and construction of wall assemblies that use layers of rigid exterior insulation thicker than 1-½ in. and that require a secondary cladding attachment location exterior to the insulation. The guideline is separated into several distinct sections that cover: (1) fundamental building science principles relating to the use of exterior insulation on wall assemblies; (2) design principles for tailoring this use to the specific project goals and requirements; and (3) construction detailing to increase understanding about implementing the various design elements.

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗
DOE OSTI2022

Results of Oklo Diffusion Couple Experiments

Through the Gateway for Accelerated Innovation in Nuclear (GAIN) initiative, the U.S. Department of Energy funded a GAIN Nuclear Energy Voucher to perform out-of-pile experiments related to the fuel design for Oklo Inc., headquartered in Santa Clara, CA. GAIN’s goal is to accelerate the innovation and application of advanced nuclear technologies, and voucher recipients do not receive direct financial awards but are provided access to national laboratory capabilities at no cost. This report documents the results of diffusion couple experiments performed as part of the GAIN-funded project for Oklo. This work addresses the specific problem of filling the gap in understanding of the fuel-cladding chemical interaction (FCCI) that result from the past focus on a particular fuel design. These knowledge and mechanistic modeling gaps make it difficult to extrapolate from prior fuel performance data to advance an economically competitive fuel design. Specifically, the current state-of-the-art fuel performance modeling cannot separate the entangled effects of temperature ranges, burnups, materials, and geometries.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2022

FAST irradiations and initial post irradiation examinations – Part I

The Advanced Fuels Campaign Fission Accelerated Steady-state Test (FAST) at Idaho National Laboratory (INL) completed its first irradiation cycle within the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR). The test focused on the irradiation of alloy fuel forms for use in sodium fast reactors. Tests included the use of fuel additives (Sn, Sb, and Pd) for reducing the gettering of lanthanide fission products, zirconium liners to mitigate fuel-cladding chemical interaction, and annular fuel geometry for sodium-free fuel designs. The first cycle of FAST testing was completed and a series of rodlets were removed for the initial post irradiation examination (PIE) of FAST rodlets. The rodlet irradiation conditions was evaluated using Monte Carlo N-Particle (MCNP) for as-run power history and COMSOL for temperature analysis. These rodlets include a set of low burnups (~2.5 % heavy metal [%FIMA]) control rodlets and a helium bonded annular rodlet (4.7 %FIMA). Initial non-destructive PIE has been completed and includes, visual inspection, neutron radiography and gamma scanning of the FAST rodlets. Radiography confirmed the integrity of the experiments as well as showing the complete filling of the annulus in the annular fuel at a modest burnup (4.7 %FIMA) and potential slumping of the cooler rodlets at lower burnup. Precision gamma scanning indicated mostly usual fission product behavior with the exception of the ceasium in the He-bonded annular fuel. Future destructive PIE will be necessary in order to fully understand the effects of accelerated irradiation on U-Zr metallic fuel behavior.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2016

Status Report on Irradiation Capsules Designed to Evaluate FeCrAl-UO 2 Interactions

This status report provides the background and current status of a series of irradiation capsules that were designed and are being built to test the interactions between candidate FeCrAl cladding for enhanced accident tolerant applications and prototypical enriched commercial UO 2 fuel in a neutron radiation environment. These capsules will test the degree, if any, of fuel cladding chemical interactions (FCCI) between FeCrAl and UO 2 . The capsules are to be irradiated in the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) at Idaho National Laboratory to burn-ups of 10, 30, and 50 GWd/MT with a nominal target temperature at the interfaces between the pellets and clad of 350°C.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗