Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Mars sample return missions”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 289 records · Page 16

Mars Surveyor Program 2001 Mission Overview

The Mars Surveyor 2001 mission to Mars was initially a key element in the Mars sample return sequence of missions. A capable rover, carrying the Cornell Athena instruments would be placed on Mars to roam over several kilometers, select samples, and place them in a cache for return by a subsequent mission. Inevitably, budget constraints forced descopes. At one critical point, the landed payload consisted only of the HEDS (Human Exploration and Development of Space) payloads selected for testing environmental properties of the surface for future human exploration. Then Congress intervened and put back some of the funding that had been deleted. NASA next redefined the payload to include as many of the Athena instruments as possible, to be distributed between the lander deck and a Sojourner class rover. This payload would then be placed on a modified version of the Mars Polar Lander rather than on the much larger, and more expensive, lander that had been originally designed for the mission. With this functionality restored the '01 mission remains an important and pivotal element of the Mars Surveyor program. It completes the Mars Observer objectives with the gamma ray spectrometer mapping. This mission will largely complete the global characterization phase of Mars exploration and mark the beginning of focused surface exploration leading to return of the first samples and the search for evidence of past Martian life. MSP'01 also is the first mission in the combined Mars exploration strategy of the HEDS and Space Science Enterprises of NASA. This mission, and those to follow, will demonstrate technologies and collect environmental data that will provide the basis for a decision to send humans to Mars. The NASA exploration strategy for Mars includes orbiters, landers and rovers launched in 2001 and 2003 and a sample return mission to be launched in 2005, returning a sample by 2008. The purpose of the rovers is to explore and characterize sites on Mars. The 2003 and 2005 missions will select rocks, soil, and atmosphere for return to earth.

Saunders, R. Stephen↗

A Minority Report Submitted as an Addendum to the Report of the Mars 2020 Organic Contamination Panel

This Minority Report (MR) presents seven findings in addition to or contrary to the main OCP report: 1. Contamination control for the Mars 2020 cache must be strict. Mars’ surface is known to be organics-poor from laboratory studies, Mars meteorite analyses, and from four previous NASA missions. It is imperative that contamination control measures are enacted that enable reliable and robust detection of potential biomarker compounds at the ppb level. 2. Since Mars 2020 is a sample return mission and analyses of samples in the returnable cache are expected to occur after return to Earth, positive controls are not recommended for flight on Mars 2020 unless a compelling case can be made for their use. 3. The findings of previous panels dedicated to organic compound analysis in Martian samples (OCSSG, ND-SAG, SDT) recommend TOC limits between 10-40 ppb. The MR finds that the lower limit of 10 ppb is recommended and that insufficient justification is given by the OCP Panel Report (PR) to raise the TOC limit to 40 ppb. 4. Analytical capability is sufficiently advanced that analytical capability is an irrelevant consideration with respect to differentiating between 10 and 40 ppb TOC. 5. Perceived contamination control challenges are an irrelevant consideration for raising the TOC contamination limit from 10 to 40 ppb since those challenges, and the procedures to ameliorate them, will exist regardless of whether the limit is 10 or 40 ppb. 6. The “dilution cleaning” method has not been adequately proven for utilization on the Mars 2020 mission. Shortcomings have been identified in terms of peer review, method verification, analytical and testing approach, application to space flight hardware, and performance under Martian conditions. The method should be revisited and independently tested using statistically and analytically robust methods, and scrutinized in a rigorous peer review process. 7. The Mars 2020 mission claims considerable heritage from the Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) mission, but MSL contamination control efforts contain significant errors and implementation discrepancies that would imperil the Mars 2020 caching mission were they repeated. A standing contamination control panel should be formed to provide independent oversight for the Mars 2020 mission.

Mars Sample Return↗

Mission analysis for a potential Mars Sample Return campaign in the 2020's

The Mars 2020 mission, currently under development by NASA, plans to acquire and cache carefully-selected rock and regolith samples from the surface of Mars for potential future return. NASA and ESA are jointly studying options for returning those samples to Earth with missions launching in the 2020s. This paper demonstrates a method for modeling the various campaign elements, synthesizing coordinated campaign timelines, and assuring trajectory feasibility in the presence of many constraints, and finally optimizing towards mission success. Options for complete sample return campaigns in multiple launch and arrival opportunities are explored and compared.

Huesing, Jakob↗

Mars Ascent Vehicle Development Status

The Mars robotic sample return mission has been a potential flagship mission for NASA s science mission directorate for decades. The Mars Exploration Program and the planetary science decadal survey have highlighted both the science value of the Mars Sample Return (MSR) mission, but also the need for risk reduction through technology development. One of the critical elements of the MSR mission is the Mars Ascent Vehicle (MAV), which must launch the sample cache from the surface of Mars and place it into low Mars orbit. The MAV has significant challenges to overcome due to tight constraints on the MAV s mass and volume, as well as environmental challenges associated with long duration storage on the Martian surface and during Entry Descent and Landing (EDL). In the fall of 2010, NASA selected three industrial partners for study phase contracts to develop MAV system concepts, identify technology needs, and recommend technology developments plans for follow-on work. In addition to the contractor recommendations, JPL s Team-X was used for a comparative assessment of the three vehicle concepts to understand relative strengths, weaknesses, and sensitivity to system growth. The GRC COMPASS team independently evaluated MAV system solutions using liquid bipropellant, solid rocket motors, and an advanced monopropellant option. The results of the study phase contracts and comparative assessment is provided herein.

Dankanich, John W.↗

The role of automatic control in future interplanetary spaceflight

The paper reviews the guidance and automatic control techniques used in previous U.S. and Soviet lunar and planetary exploration spacecraft, and examines the objectives and requirements of potential future interplanetary missions from the viewpoint of their further demands on automatic control technology. These missions include the Venus orbital imaging radar mission, the Pioneer Mars penetrator mission, the Mars surface sample return mission, Pioneer Saturn/Uranus/Titan probe missions, the Mariner Jupiter orbiter with daughter satellite, and comet and asteroid missions.

Scull, J. R.↗

Planetary missions

The scientific and engineering aspects of near-term missions for planetary exploration are outlined. The missions include the Voyager Neptune flyby, the Magellan survey of Venus, the Ocean Topography Experiment, the Mars Observer mission, the Galileo Jupiter Orbiter and Probe, the Comet Rendezvous Asteroid Flyby mission, the Mars Rover Sample Return mission, the Cassini mission to Saturn and Titan, and the Daedalus probe to Barnard's star. The spacecraft, scientific goals, and instruments for these missions are noted.

Mclaughlin, William I.↗

Mars Ascent Vehicle Gross Lift-off Mass Sensitivities for Robotic Mars Sample Return

The Mars ascent vehicle is a critical element of the robotic Mars Sample Return (MSR) mission. The Mars ascent vehicle must be developed to survive a variety of conditions including the trans-Mars journey, descent through the Martian atmosphere and the harsh Martian surface environments while maintaining the ability to deliver its payload to a low Mars orbit. The primary technology challenge of developing the Mars ascent vehicle system is designing for all conditions while ensuring the mass limitations of the entry descent and landing system are not exceeded. The NASA In-Space Propulsion technology project has initiated the development of Mars ascent vehicle technologies with propulsion system performance and launch environments yet to be defined. To support the project s evaluation and development of various technology options the sensitivity of the Mars ascent vehicle gross lift-off mass to engine performance, inert mass, target orbits, and launch conditions has been completed with the results presented herein.

Dux, Ian J.↗

Mars Rover Sample Return ascent, rendezvous, and return to earth

Ascent, rendezvous and earth return are three operational mission sequences in the sample return phase of the Mars Rover Sample Return (MRSR) mission. In the conduct of the current study, several vehicles have been identified to enable the sample return phase of the mission. These elements are the Mars Ascent Vehicle (MAV), the Earth Return Vehicle (ERV), the rendezvous and docking module (RDM), and the sample return capsule (SRC). The sample return elements, when combined with other elements performing the launch and delivery functions, form the basis of the MRSR system. This paper summarizes the significant mission aspects of the sample return phase, describes the Mars ascent and earth return scenario, illustrates the conceptual designs developed for the MAV, ERV, RDM, and SRC, and discusses the results of significant trade studies conducted.

Lance, Nick↗

Qualification of Domestic Lyocell Based Phenolic Impregnated Carbon Ablator (PICA-D) for NASA Missions

Phenolic Impregnated Carbon Ablator (PICA) is a low-density ablator that has been used as the planetary entry heatshield for several NASA missions since the late 90’s. Its low density and efficient performance characteristics have proven effective for use from Discovery to Flag-ship class missions, from Sample Return missions such as Stardust, OSIRIS-REx to large Mars Lander missions such as Mars Science Lab (MSL) and Mars 2020. The rayon-based carbon precursor raw material used in PICA preform manufacturing has experienced multiple supply chain issues. The challenge involved in finding a replacement fiber source is in processing as well as in the final performance of the ablator. Each replacement necessitates the requalification of the PICA. This has happened at least twice in the past 25 years, and a third substitution is now needed. Due to the obsolescence of the input foreign rayon fiber source, a new variant of PICA has been developed using a domestic rayon-like fiber source, Lyocell. Due to its flight heritage and proven capability, PICA is baselined as the Thermal Protection System (TPS) for Dragonfly and Mars Sample Return Sample Retrieval Lander mission and is being considered for the backshell of the Mars Sample Return Earth Entry System. All three missions are due to be launched between 2026 and 2028. The challenge this time is to ensure the PICA made with domestic material is a suitable replacement to the heritage PICA used in MSL and Mars 2020 so that the design of the heatshield can be matured without much risk. Results are presented from the recent efforts of 22 PICA-D billets that were Lot Acceptance Tested. Thermal, mechanical, and representative environment arc-jet tests have been conducted. Testing of PICA-Domestic (PICA-D) indicates very comparable performance with respect to “heritage” PICA materials and thus PICA-D is expected to be a sustainable and nearly a “drop-in” replacement solution for future NASA missions.

Matt Gasch↗

Qualification of Domestic Lyocell Based Phenolic Impregnated Carbon Ablator (PICA-D) for NASA Missions

Phenolic Impregnated Carbon Ablator (PICA) is a low-density ablator that has been used as the planetary entry heatshield for several NASA missions since the late 90’s. Its low density and efficient performance characteristics have proven effective for use from Discovery to Flag-ship class missions, from Sample Return missions such as Stardust, OSIRIS-REx to large Mars Lander missions such as Mars Science Lab (MSL) and Mars 2020. The rayon-based carbon precursor raw material used in PICA preform manufacturing has experienced multiple supply chain issues. The challenge involved in finding a replacement fiber source is in processing as well as in the final performance of the ablator. Each replacement necessitates the requalification of the PICA. This has happened at least twice in the past 25 years, and a third substitution is now needed. Due to the obsolescence of the input foreign rayon fiber source, a new variant of PICA has been developed using a domestic rayon-like fiber source, Lyocell. Due to its flight heritage and proven capability, PICA is baselined as the Thermal Protection System (TPS) for Dragonfly and Mars Sample Return Sample Retrieval Lander mission and is being considered for the backshell of the Mars Sample Return Earth Entry System. All three missions are due to be launched between 2026 and 2028. The challenge this time is to ensure the PICA made with domestic material is a suitable replacement to the heritage PICA used in MSL and Mars 2020 so that the design of the heatshield can be matured without much risk. Results are presented from the recent efforts of 22 PICA-D billets that were Lot Acceptance Tested. Thermal, mechanical, and representative environment arc-jet tests have been conducted. Testing of PICA-Domestic (PICA-D) indicates very comparable performance with respect to “heritage” PICA materials and thus PICA-D is expected to be a sustainable and nearly a “drop-in” replacement solution for future NASA missions.

PICA↗

The case for planetary sample return missions. II - History of Mars

This paper explains why returned samples will be critical elements of future Mars exploration. The types of samples that are needed and how they will be studied is addressed. Why putative Martian meteorites are not acceptable substitutes for documented samples is pointed out.

Gooding, James L.↗

Mars: Past, present, and future; Proceedings of the Conference, Williamsburg, VA, July 16-19, 1991

The present conference discusses the terraforming of Mars, the history of the Viking lander efforts, prospective Mars exploration management and research initiatives in view of the Viking Missions, the rationale and constituencies for NASA's Space Exploration Initiative, Mars mission benefits, and a Congressional perspective on the Space Exporation initiative. Also discussed are a risk-based approach to robotic mission requirements, a Mars Environment Survey Mission concept, a Mars network of surface stations, Mars sample-return mission options, an integrated STS for Mars exploration, nuclear propulsion technology development by NASA/DOE, radiation shielding en route to Mars and on the surface, advanced technologies for nuclear propulsion, and 'smart' space suits for space exploration.

Pritchard, E. B.↗

The 'sample experiment' on the Mars Rover/Sample Return mission

Sample Experiment denotes the set of all operations that include collection, analysis, packaging, and environmental control of atmospheric and geologic samples of Mars. Various functions may be distributed among surface roving vehicles, stationary landers, and spacecraft but the Sample Experiment remains an integrated mission activity that extends from Mars landing through delivery of the sample payload to the recieving facility on Earth. Technological challenges not faced in previous planetary missions include development of robotic systems to manipulate and characterize samples and to reliably seal them in containers with minimal contamination or degradation.

Gooding, James L.↗

Micro Thermal and Chemical Systems for In Situ Resource Utilization on Mars

Robotic sample return missions and postulated human missions to Mars can be greatly aided through the development and utilization of compact chemical processing systems that process atmospheric gases and other indigenous resources to produce hydrocarbon propellants/fuels, oxygen, and other needed chemicals. When used to reduce earth launch mass, substantial cost savings can result. Process Intensification and Process Miniaturization can simultaneously be achieved through the application of microfabricated chemical process systems, based on the rapid heat and mass transport in engineered microchannels. Researchers at NASA's Johnson Space Center (JSC) and the Department of Energy's Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) are collaboratively developing micro thermal and chemical systems for NASA's Mission to Mars program. Preliminary results show that many standard chemical process components (e.g., heat exchangers, chemical reactors and chemical separations units) can be reduced in hardware volume without a corresponding reduction in chemical production rates. Low pressure drops are also achievable when appropriate scaling rules are applied. This paper will discuss current progress in the development of engineered microchemical systems for space and terrestrial applications, including fabrication methods, expected operating characteristics, and specific experimental results.

Wegeng, Robert S.↗

Mars Biosignature - Detection Capabilities: A Method for Objective Comparison of In Situ Measurements and Sample Return

A Mars sample-return mission has been proposed within NASA's Mars Exploration Program. Studying Martian samples in laboratories on Earth could address many important issues in planetary science, but arguably none is as scientifically compelling as the question of whether biosignatures indicative of past or present life exist on that planet. It is reasonable to ask before embarking on a sample-return mission whether equivalent investigation of Martian biosignatures could be conducted in situ. This study presents an approach to (1)identifying an optimal instrument suite for in situ detection of biosignatures on Mars,and (2)comparing the projected confidence level of in situ detection in a 2026 timeframe to that of Earth-based analysis. We identify a set of candidate instruments, the development of which is projected to be achievable by 2026 well within a $200 million cost cap. Assuming that any biosignatures near the surface of Mars are similar to those of terrestrial life, we find that this instrument suite, if successfully developed and deployed, would enable in situ biosignature detection at essentially the same level of confidence as that of Earth-based analysis of the same samples. At a cost cap of half that amount,the confidence level of in situbiosignature detection analysis could reach about 90% that of Earth-based investigations.

National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)↗

Concept for coring from a low-mass rover

Future Mars missions, such as the Mars Sample Return (MSR) mission, may benefit from core sample acquisition from a low-mass rover where the rover cannot be assumed to be stationary during a coring operation. Manipulation from Mars rovers is currently done under the assumption that the rover acts as a stationary, stable platform for the arm. An MSR mission scenario with a low-mass rover has been developed and the technology needs have been investigated. Models for alternative types of coring tools and tool-environment interaction have been developed and input along with wheel-soil interaction models into the Stanford Simulation & Active Interfaces (SAI) simulation environment to enable simulation of coring operations from a rover. Coring tests using commercial coring tools indicate that the quality of the core is a critical criterion in the system design. Current results of the models, simulation, and coring tests are provided.

rovers↗