Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Program management”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 289 records · Page 16
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2022

Investigation of INL Site Implementation of ARG-US

The Packaging Certification and Life Cycle Management department at Argonne National Laboratory (ANL) developed a suite of monitoring systems collectively referred to here as ARG-US. ARG-US is used to provide necessary data for nuclear facility and system operation and maintenance. ARG-US has been previously demonstrated in hot cells, radioactive material (RAM) storage areas, and RAM shipment trucks. It has also been installed directly on RAM storage and shipment containers. ARG-US offers some unique advantages over other commercially available systems by using wireless data connections, battery power supplies, and customizable monitoring methods. Idaho National Laboratory (INL) has been tasked with investigating applications for ARG-US at INL site facilities, which are operated by several different contractors. The initial investigation scope centered on CPP-603 Wet & Dry Fuel Storage Facility in relation to the upcoming DOE Spent (SNF) Packaging Demonstration. The investigation has been led by the Used Fuel Management Department in the Nuclear Science and Technology Directorate. This investigation is expected to recommend processes or facilities at the INL site at which to implement ARG-US systems. INL has engaged local site technical and oversite representatives, security, nuclear safeguards, and program management to identify good candidates for ARG-US test implementations. INL has identified high-level goals for any INL site implementation of ARG-US: provide unique testing environments, prompt development of new monitoring methods/techniques for the ARG-US suite, and acquire useful monitoring for the user facility. To these ends, INL suggests 3 program areas for further investigation: CPP-603 Fuel Handling Cave (FHC), legacy mixed waste storage systems at Idaho Nuclear Technology & Engineering Center (INTEC) known as the “tank farm”, and periodic and emergency environmental monitoring. This progress report relates activities undertaken in this investigation, describes the preliminary areas of interest for limited scope ARG-US testing or implementation, and relays expected actions needed to complete the task scope. This report offers an opportunity to the program sponsor, technical leads at ANL, and INL site representatives to give feedback on the initial assessment and make recommendations on the forthcoming activities.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2023

Residual Stresses in Spent Nuclear Fuel Storage Canisters with Cold Spray Coatings

This report describes the development of cold spray (CS) process and its application to provide on overlay coating of metal welds with a surface crack in a spent nuclear fuel (SNF) storage canister and thereby remediate the canister from further propagation of the crack. This work informs aging management programs for the SNF canisters.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2016

FutureGen 2.0 Oxy-combustion Large Scale Test – Final Report

The primary objectives of the FutureGen 2.0 CO 2 Oxy-Combustion Large Scale Test Project were to site, permit, design, construct, and commission, an oxy-combustion boiler, gas quality control system, air separation unit, and CO 2 compression and purification unit, together with the necessary supporting and interconnection utilities. The project was to demonstrate at commercial scale (168MWe gross) the capability to cleanly produce electricity through coal combustion at a retrofitted, existing coal-fired power plant; thereby, resulting in near-zeroemissions of all commonly regulated air emissions, as well as 90% CO 2 capture in steady-state operations. The project was to be fully integrated in terms of project management, capacity, capabilities, technical scope, cost, and schedule with the companion FutureGen 2.0 CO 2 Pipeline and Storage Project, a separate but complementary project whose objective was to safely transport, permanently store and monitor the CO 2 captured by the Oxy-combustion Power Plant Project. The FutureGen 2.0 Oxy-Combustion Large Scale Test Project successfully achieved all technical objectives inclusive of front-end-engineering and design, and advanced design required to accurately estimate and contract for the construction, commissioning, and start-up of a commercial-scale "ready to build" power plant using oxy-combustion technology, including full integration with the companion CO 2 Pipeline and Storage project. Ultimately the project did not proceed to construction due to insufficient time to complete necessary EPC contract negotiations and commercial financing prior to expiration of federal co-funding, which triggered a DOE decision to closeout its participation in the project. Through the work that was completed, valuable technical, commercial, and programmatic lessons were learned. This project has significantly advanced the development of near-zero emission technology and will be helpful to plotting the course of, and successfully executing future large demonstration projects. This Final Scientific and Technical Report describes the technology and engineering basis of the project, inclusive of process systems, performance, effluents and emissions, and controls. Further, the project cost estimate, schedule, and permitting requirements are presented, along with a project risk and opportunity assessment. Lessons-learned related to these elements are summarized in this report. Companion reports Oxy-combustion further document the accomplishments and learnings of the project, including: A.01 Project Management Report which describes what was done to coordinate the various participants, and to track their performance with regard to schedule and budget B.02 Lessons Learned - Technology Integration, Value Improvements, and Program Management, which describes the innovations and conclusions that we arrived upon during the development of the project, and makes recommendations for improvement of future projects of a similar nature . B.03 Project Economics, which details the capital and operation costs and their basis, and also illustrates the cost of power produced by the plant with certain sensitivities. B.04 Power Plant, Pipeline, and Injection Site Interfaces, which details the interfaces between the two FutureGen projects B.05 Contractual Mechanisms for Design, Construction, and Operation, which describes the major EPC, and Operations Contracts required to execute the project.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
DOE OSTI2015

A paradigm shift: an introduction to structured decision making for sustainable waste management and remediation - 15649

transport of contaminants and human health risk assessment. Most often these modeling activities are carried out in a conservative fashion, usually beyond even the conservatism that is built into the associated regulations and guidance. Decisions are aimed primarily at compliance with regulatory objectives, rather than optimization. This leads to unnecessarily costly remediation and under-utilization of the nation's relatively few radioactive waste disposal facilities. Risk assessment decisions under CERCLA and RCRA might seem to perform better, but if anything this is because the focus is on shorter-term decision-making because long term fate and transport modeling is not considered necessary in most cases. However, some more complex contamination problems suffer from the same basic issues as radioactive waste disposal in terms of the need for complex fate and transport modeling and subsequent risk assessment. At least CERCLA addresses optimization in the feasibility study, but it does not address how to perform that optimization in the face of uncertainty or stakeholders who have different competing objectives. Other environmental issues that fall outside the realm of DOE Orders, NRC regulations, and regulations such as CERCLA and RCRA, have found a different path towards effective decision-making. This includes land reuse and watershed management decisions, for which there is a focus on sustainability and on stakeholder involvement throughout the decision making process. EPA is using 'structured decision analysis' to achieve the primary goal of maximizing societal welfare. These same tools and approaches can be brought into environmental and waste management decisions that need to be made by DOE. Structured decision analysis provides a formal process for capturing not only the science side of the problem, but also the costs and value judgments of the stakeholders, to reach an optimal solution. But this approach requires a paradigm shift within the DOE and NRC environmental and waste management programs. That is, it requires a willingness to engage a new approach that will provide a path towards effective optimization in the decision-making process for the complex environmental problems faced by DOE and NRC. Because of the current nature of problem solving for these types of problems, which involves many layers of conservatism, this structured decision analysis path towards optimization will also realize substantial cost savings for these programs, while maintaining or improving defensibility and transparency in the decision making process. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2018

LANL: Weapons Infrastructure Briefing to Naval Reactors, July 18, 2017

Presentation slides address: The Laboratory infrastructure supports hundreds of high hazard, complex operations daily; LANL’s unique science and engineering infrastructure is critical to delivering on our mission; LANL FY17 Budget & Workforce; Direct-Funded Infrastructure Accounts; LANL Org Chart; Weapons Infrastructure Program Office; The Laboratory’s infrastructure relies on both Direct and Indirect funding; NA-50’s Operating, Maintenance & Recapitalization funding is critical to the execution of the mission; Los Alamos is currently executing several concurrent Line Item projects; Maintenance @ LANL; NA-50 is helping us to address D&D needs; We are executing a CHAMP Pilot Project at LANL; G2 = Main Tool for Program Management; MDI: Future Investments are centered on facilities with a high Mission Dependency Index; Los Alamos hosted first “Deep Dive” in November 2016; Safety, Infrastructure & Operations is one of the most important programs at LANL, and is foundational for our mission success.

45 MILITARY TECHNOLOGY, WEAPONRY, AND NATIONAL DEF↗
DOE OSTI2019

Panel Session 68: Small Business Procurement and Contracting Opportunities Within the DOE Complex and USACE FUSRAP Program

This panel session was held in the Panel Zone in the Exhibit Hall and focused on small business procurement and contracting opportunities within the DOE Complex as well as the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) National Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) projects. Each panelist provided a general overview of their respective organization, small business goals and the success in meeting those goals. They further discussed recently awarded procurement, upcoming opportunities and provided additional contact information for individual small business program managers within their organization. This panel was open to all WM participants, including Exhibitors. This panel session focused on small business procurement and contracting opportunities within the DOE Complex and the USACE FUSRAP Program. The DOE and USACE contract directly with small businesses and encourage prime contractors to obtain goods and services from small and disadvantaged businesses (Tier 2) and often tie these goals to contract award fee. Goods and services being considered for these procurements include decontamination and decommissioning, remediation, transportation and disposal of radioactive waste, health physics, emergency response planning and training, lab services, R and D products, waste treatment, maintenance, A/E and professional consulting. This panel complemented Session 21 and Session 48, US DOE Spring Quarterly Forum, and Session 88 on Doing Business with the DOE. Presentations proposed include: 1 - Small Business Procurement and Contracting Opportunities Within the DOE Complex (Aaron Deckard, US DOE (USA)); 2 - Small Business Procurement and Contracting Opportunities Within the DOE Complex (William Badger, AECOM (USA)); 3 - Engineering the Extraordinary (Lisa Tribuce-Leoung Tat, Bechtel National, Inc. (USA)); 4 - Fluor Small Business Procurement and Contracting Opportunities (Debra Sampson, Fluor Government Group (USA)); 5 - HII Technical Solutions Division Small Business Opportunities (Kela Lofton, HII Nuclear Inc. (USA)); 6 - U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Radiological Remediation Work (Nicki Fatherly, USACE (USA))

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2019

Destructive and Non-Destructive Characterization of various LLW/ILW at NRG - 19078

The Nuclear Research and consultancy Group is located at Petten, the Netherlands, and operates the High Flux Reactor (HFR). The HFR is used for isotope production for medical purposes and material research. During its exploitation several types of radioactive waste are produced, which partly have accumulated at the reactor site. In addition, NRG operated the Low Flux Reactor (LFR), a small 30 kWmax Argonaut type reactor which was used for research and education purposes. Over the past decade several projects on waste management and decommissioning were carried out requiring various approaches, including the radiochemical characterisation of the different emerging waste streams as required by the Dutch regulator. This paper focuses on the practices and technical aspects of the destructive and non-destructive characterization of various types of low- and intermediate-level waste arising from a number of nuclear activities performed at the premises of NRG, i.e. the Dutch legacy waste management program, the treatment of ion exchange resins, and the decommission of the Low-Flux Reactor. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2021

Money Matters: A Three-Step Process for Using Budget Data in Program Evaluation to Assess the Design and Management of a Novel Public Health Program

We applied a three-step process, abstracting and analyzing program budgets to examine how Colorectal Cancer Control Program (CRCCP) awardees are structuring their programs and to assess the fidelity of program design to the CRCCP public health model. We reviewed 23 state, one tribal organization, and six university awardee budgets. We assessed resource allocations, staffing structures, and contracted partners and their activities. Awardees allocated 83% of all funds to contracts and personnel. Program managers were the most budgeted personnel type across three measures: number of people, full-time equivalency, and personnel costs. Awardees not only contracted with health care systems and clinics (39% of all contracts) but also contracted other partner types. Contractors were mainly funded to implement evidence-based interventions (25%) and conduct evaluation (24%). Program design varied among awardees in the number of staff (0–22), number of full-time equivalencies (0–5.4), and the number of contracts (1–11) budgeted. State awardees budgeted more resources to contracts, compared with university awardees (57% vs. 31%), while universities budgeted more for total personnel costs (41% vs. 30%). We learned that awardees designed their programs with fidelity to the CRCCP model. Although implementation approaches varied, overall results suggest implementation requires a combination of internal capacities and contracted partners. Budgets provide opportunities to use already existing program data to evaluate program design, partnerships, and planned activities.

Uhd, Justin↗
DOE OSTI2014

The NGEE Arctic Data Archive -- Portal for Archiving and Distributing Data and Documentation

The Next-Generation Ecosystem Experiments (NGEE Arctic) project is committed to implementing a rigorous and high-quality data management program. The goal is to implement innovative and cost-effective guidelines and tools for collecting, archiving, and sharing data within the project, the larger scientific community, and the public. The NGEE Arctic web site is the framework for implementing these data management and data sharing tools. The open sharing of NGEE Arctic data among project researchers, the broader scientific community, and the public is critical to meeting the scientific goals and objectives of the NGEE Arctic project and critical to advancing the mission of the Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science, Biological and Environmental (BER) Terrestrial Ecosystem Science (TES) program.

Boden, Thomas A.↗
DOE OSTI2019

Current Status of the Russian Research Reactor Fuel Return Program

In 1999, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), together with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and the Russian Federation, agreed to start a new nuclear non-proliferation initiative to return Russian/Soviet-origin highly enriched uranium (HEU) back to its country of origin. Trilateral discussions among the U.S., the Russian Federation, and the IAEA identified more than 20 research reactors in 16 countries (Belarus, Bulgaria, China, Czech Republic, DPRK, Germany, Hungary, Kazakhstan, Latvia, Libya, Poland, Romania, Serbia, Ukraine, Uzbekistan, and Vietnam) that had Russian/Soviet-origin HEU. In 2000, the IAEA Director General sent a letter to 16 countries asking for their willingness to return this spent HEU fuel to the Russian Federation. Fourteen countries responded positively to the Director General’s letter. The primary goal of the Russian Research Reactor Fuel Return (RRRFR) program, managed by DOE’s National Nuclear Security Administration, Office of Material Management and Minimization, is to advance nuclear nonproliferation objectives by encouraging eligible countries to convert their research reactors from HEU to low-enriched uranium (LEU) fuel and to eliminate stockpiles of HEU. In May 2004, the United States and the Russian Federation signed a Government-to-Government Agreement that established the legal framework necessary for cooperation between the United States and the Russian Federation for the return of research/test reactor fuel from eligible countries. To date, the RRRFR program has completed sixty-three successful operations to repatriate almost 2,300 kg of Russian-origin HEU fresh and spent fuel. All Russian-origin HEU has been completely removed from 12 countries: Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Georgia, Latvia, Libya, Poland, Romania, Serbia, Ukraine, Uzbekistan, and Vietnam. At the present time Russian-origin HEU remains in Kazakhstan, Belarus, Germany, DPRK, and China. This paper describes the current status of the RRRFR program and preparations for upcoming HEU removal and down-blending activities.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Empower Wall: Active insulation system leveraging additive manufacturing and model predictive control

Buildings are one of the largest energy consumers worldwide, using large amounts of energy during their construction and for climate control during operation. Active insulation systems (AIS) have been shown to reduce the energy needed for climate control in buildings by dynamically regulating the heat transferred between a building’s interior and exterior. Infrastructure-scale additive manufacturing (AM) has the potential to reduce the resources needed for building construction. Combining these two technologies into a single building envelope would create a path towards more sustainable buildings. A test was conducted for the Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) Energy Exchange training and trade show, in August 2021, to investigate a new building envelope design, termed the Empower Wall, that utilized an AIS and was constructed using AM. Model predictive control was implemented to manage operation of the Empower Wall in concert with the existing HVAC system. Finally, the prototype system demonstrated that the Empower Wall lowered total energy consumption and reduced the cost of energy used.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2017

Incentivizing secondary raw material markets for sustainable waste management

Highlights: • An economic model of secondary raw material markets is presented. •Policies to enhance sustainable waste management at landfills are compared. • Correcting potential misperceptions of secondary raw materials seems quite promising. • Our theoretical model supports Circular Economy and landfilling mining initiatives. - Abstract: Notwithstanding several policy initiatives in many countries over a number of years, there remains a general sense that too much municipal solid waste is generated and that too much of the waste that is generated is landfilled. There is an emerging consensus that a sustainable approach to waste management requires further development of secondary raw material markets. The purpose of this paper is to propose a theoretical economic model that focuses upon this stage of a sustainable waste management program and explores policy options that could motivate efficiency in secondary raw material markets. In particular, we show how firm profit and social welfare optimizing objectives can be reconciled in a two-product market of waste management processes: landfilling and material reclamation. Our results provide theoretical support for building out recent Circular Economy initiatives as well as for the relatively recent emergence of landfill mining as a means for procuring secondary raw materials.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2021

Critical Asset Management at the Start of the Pandemic

COVID-19 has changed the daily lives of so many people and forced many companies to examine their way of doing business, including their Asset Management programs. This virus has given way to an unprecedented set of challenges to continue conducting business as usual when everything is unusual. On June 16, 2020, members of the Northern California Chapter of the Association of Asset Management Professionals came together for a panel discussion on Critical Asset Management during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond. Participants were representatives from health care, water, and national security, which are all considered essential industries.

Administration and management↗
DOE OSTI2015

The decommissioning imperative - motivating progress in us used fuel management - 15185

When the Yucca Mountain project was terminated in 2010 there was approximately 3500 metric tons of used fuel stored at Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installations (ISFSIs) at which there was no operating reactor (10 shutdown plant sites and the GE Morris facility). By 2015, four additional sites with five reactors will have shut down, causing the amount of used fuel 'stranded' at sites where there is no operating reactor to nearly double to approximately 6900 metric tons which will be stored at a total of 15 sites. At each of these sites, once the reactors are decommissioned, the only thing preventing the land from being returned to communities for other uses is the remaining presence of the used fuel. The cost of maintaining 15 stand-alone ISFSIs is born by electric ratepayers and taxpayers. Going forward, the costs of maintaining stand-alone ISFSIs is certain to grow even if the number of stand-alone ISFSIs does not grow beyond the already announced shutdown of the Oyster Creek reactor in 2019 (which would increase the amount of stranded used fuel by another 10% and create a 16. stand-alone ISFSI). One reason for this cost escalation will be the need for ISFSI owners to renew storage licenses, and implement aging management programs to support these renewals, due to the continued delay in the federal program for removing the used fuel. Storage licenses at 10 of 16 stand-alone ISFSIs will expire by 2021, which is the earliest projected date at which the Department of Energy (DOE) has indicated it could have a pilot interim storage facility available - and nearly 3 decades before DOE projects a repository will be available. The burden and cost of continuing to renew storage licenses - and manage aging storage facilities - at 16 stand-alone sites instead of moving stranded used fuel to a single consolidated storage location or repository will likely be significant. Industry resources are increasingly being channeled into dry storage aging management activities as public and regulator interest in potential long-term degradation mechanism continues to grow. Whether the ultimate destination for used fuel is Yucca Mountain or some other location, the current stalemate preventing progress in the federal program to move it must be broken - and the increasing prominence of the decommissioned reactor quandary may very well be a pivotal factor in breaking that stalemate. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2014

Evolution of Energy Efficiency Programs Over Time: The Case of Standby Power

Issued in 2001, Presidential Executive Order 13221 directed federal agencies to purchase products with low standby power, with the goal of 1) reducing energy consumption in federal facilities, and 2) drawing attention to the problem of high standby power consumption, with guidance provided by the Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP). At that time, standby power was newly recognized as an increasing building energy load. Since then, procurement of products with low standby power have been set in place in acquisition processes, and the purchasing power of the federal government continues to influence manufacturers design decisions related to standby power. In recent years, FEMP has shifted effort from direct manufacturer outreach for data collection, to integrating low standby requirement into broader acquisition programs including Energy Star and Electronic Product Environmental Assessment Tool (EPEAT). Another milestone has been the labeling of low standby products on the GSA Advantage website to simplify and enhance compliance. Looking forward into the program?s future, this question arises How do we design programs over time to reflect market and technology changes, by adjusting programmatic requirements while maintaining effectiveness? This paper discusses that question for the case of standby power, which transitioned from covering a single to multiple environmental attributes, both in the context of the program's past and future.

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗
DOE OSTI2023

Evolution of Energy Efficiency Programs Over Time: The Case of Standby Power

Issued in 2001, Presidential Executive Order 13221 directed federal agencies to purchase products with low standby power, with the goal of 1) reducing energy consumption in federal facilities, and 2) drawing attention to the problem of high standby power consumption, with guidance provided by the Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP). At that time, standby power was newly recognized as an increasing building energy load. Since then, procurement of products with low standby power have been set in place in acquisition processes, and the purchasing power of the federal government continues to influence manufacturers’ design decisions related to standby power. In recent years, FEMP has shifted effort from direct manufacturer outreach for data collection, to integrating low standby requirement into broader acquisition programs including Energy Star and Electronic Product Environmental Assessment Tool (EPEAT). Another milestone has been the labeling of low standby products on the GSA Advantage website to simplify and enhance compliance. Looking forward into the program’s future, this question arises “How do we design programs over time to reflect market and technology changes, by adjusting programmatic requirements while maintaining effectiveness?” This paper discusses that question for the case of standby power, which transitioned from covering a single to multiple environmental attributes, both in the context of the program’s past and future.

Payne, CT↗
DOE OSTI2022

Summary of Chloride-induced Stress Corrosion Cracking Experiments with a Spent Fuel Storage Canister Large Plate

This report provides a comprehensive summary of the crack growth rate testing and the experiments to evaluate the corrosion behavior of welded plate material taken from the Sandia National Laboratories’ full-size mockup of a spent nuclear fuel (SNF) dry storage canister. The information includes that previously reported, and new work on detailed surface characterization of the corrosion attack from the large plate experiment. The work and the results inform aging management programs for the SNF canisters.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2014

2014 HPC Annual Report

Our commitment is to support you through delivery of an IT environment that provides mission value by transforming the way you use, protect, and access information. We approach this through technical innovation, risk management, and relationships with our workforce, Laboratories leadership, and policy makers nationwide. This second edition of our HPC Annual Report continues our commitment to communicate the details and impact of Sandia’s large-scale computing resources that support the programs associated with our diverse mission areas. A key tenet to our approach is to work with our mission partners to understand and anticipate their requirements and formulate an investment strategy that is aligned with those Laboratories priorities. In doing this, our investments include not only expanding the resources available for scientific computing and modeling and simulation, but also acquiring large-scale systems for data analytics, cloud computing, and Emulytics. We are also investigating new computer architectures in our advanced systems test bed to guide future platform designs and prepare for changes in our code development models. Our initial investments in large-scale institutional platforms that are optimized for Informatics and Emulytics work are serving a diverse customer base. We anticipate continued growth and expansion of these resources in the coming years as the use of these analytic techniques expands across our mission space. If your program could benefit from an investment in innovative systems, please work through your Program Management Unit ’s Mission Computing Council representatives to engage our teams.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗