SEARCH · Search NASA
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Test blending equipment identified in the “Engineering Options Assessment Report: Nitrate Salt Waste Stream Processing”. Determine if the equipment will provide adequate mixing of zeolite and surrogate salt/Swheat stream; optimize equipment type and operational sequencing; impact of baffles and inserts on mixing performance; and means of validating mixing performance
The purpose of this report is to provide molten salt reactor (MSR) developers and future US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) license applicants with recommendations for developing an effective and practical material control and accounting (MC&A) plan, focused primarily on MSR designs that use circulating liquid fuel. Because of the breadth of MSR designs, there is no single, generic, detailed MC&A plan that will work for every design. The wide variation of fresh fuel salts, the method and frequency of loading fresh fuel, the reactor system design components (e.g., tanks, filtration systems, chemical processing streams), and waste streams will determine the specific measurement locations and instrumentation that can best meet MC&A objectives throughout an MSR facility. Additionally, MSR designs are rapidly evolving, and new design features and deployment scenarios that will affect MC&A are being explored and pursued. This report defines a generic MC&A approach that was developed for terrestrial (as opposed to maritime) deployments to meet the intent of NRC domestic safeguards and MC&A. MSR license applicants should consider nuclear safeguards (both domestic and international) and security throughout the design, as early as the preconceptual design phase. MC&A of special nuclear material (SNM) is an aspect of the NRC’s domestic safeguards program, alongside physical protection. Because liquid-fueled MSRs are reactors with SNM in nondiscrete (or item) form, it is likely that the NRC may require liquid-fueled MSR license applicants to submit a formal MC&A plan as a part of their license application. Currently, the NRC licensing protocol presents a challenge because the NRC MC&A regulations have not been updated to accommodate advanced reactors, including types of MSRs. Because no liquid-fueled MSR has been licensed for operation at the time of this report, no template or precedence for a successfully licensed MSR MC&A plan exists. However, the MSR license applicant can take advantage of the NRC’s published commitments to performance-based regulations. The authors recommend that the license applicant, or MSR designers, develop an MC&A plan throughout the design lifecycle and plan to submit a detailed MC&A program description, or MC&A plan, to the NRC as a part of a license application. No MC&A plan template or guidance exists that is specific to liquid-fueled MSRs. The authors recommend that license applicants discuss the topic of MC&A during preapplication engagement. Because of the uniqueness of MC&A for liquid fueled MSRs, the authors recommend that liquid fueled MSR developers engage with the NRC on the topic of MC&A in the early phases of its design development and follow up any time there are significant modifications in design plans that would affect MC&A. For example, topics like modifications in fuel handling processes, changes in uranium enrichment, or additional chemical processing streams added to the design could be discussed with the NRC specifically on the topic of MC&A.
Sealed reactor tests were performed to measure the hydrogen generation rate (HGR) from stored radioactive waste at the Savannah River Site. HGR may be very low, on the order of 7.5 x 10{sup -13} (m{sup 3}/h)/L [that is, cubic meters of H{sub 2} generated per hour per liter of radioactive liquid waste, or 10{sup -10} (ft{sup 3}/h)/gal]. Because the estimated HGR limit of detection for an open, continuous flow, system is approximately 7.5 x 10{sup -10} (m{sup 3}/h)/L [or 10{sup -7} (ft{sup 3}/h)/gal], a more sensitive method was needed. By accumulating generated gasses in a sealed system without a continuous purge gas, the resulting concentrations can increase the sensitivity of measurement, which is based on time of heating. In 2017, Savannah River Remediation declared a Potential Inadequacy in the Safety Analysis related to the potential thermal decomposition of organics that generate hydrogen in each of three Liquid Waste facilities: Concentration, Storage and Transfer Facility, Saltstone Production Facility, and the Defense Waste Processing Facility. The research for this study concerns low activity waste of Tank 50, which feeds the Saltstone Production Facility. This study evaluated the impact of organics including formate on the generation of H{sub 2}. Samples of SRS Tank 50 waste, which is a nominal 5 molar sodium salt solution, were sealed in stainless steel reactors and held at varying temperatures, e.g., 50 deg. C, 75 deg. C, 100 deg. C, and 120 deg. C, to determine if organic compounds are decomposing into H2. The experiments included trace solids used to stabilize waste in grout, e.g., grout-premix and Blast Furnace Slag, to determine if any solid phase reactions are present, which would accelerate or inhibit the generation of H{sub 2} at these temperatures. This paper describes the sealed reactors designed and constructed at Savannah River National Laboratory and the radioactive tests that were performed to measure HGR in both oxic and anoxic atmospheres. The shakedown tests showed the sealed reactors to be leak tight and hydrogen concentrations from calibrated standards could be accurately measured. Previous simulant tests helped to perfect the test methods and better design the radioactive tests. The radioactive results showed that the rate of hydrogen generated from Tank 50 waste, over a range of temperatures from 30 deg. C up to 120 deg. C, is bounded by an empirical relation (Hu Equation) that can be used to approximate HGRs in Tank 50 radioactive waste. (authors)
The Direct Feed High-Level Waste (DFHLW) strategy represents an alternative flowsheet to bypass the Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) Pretreatment Facility. Key processing functions previously captured during baseline pretreatment operations include leaching and washing prior to solids concentration and should be considered in the new DFHLW flowsheet to maximize waste feed loading, minimize high-level waste (HLW) volume, and mitigate corrosion challenges associated with vitrification of high phosphate and fluoride concentrations. The effectiveness and efficiency of sludge washing can have a substantial impact on DST space and mission duration. Two target species that benefit significantly from washing are phosphate and fluoride. Commonly present in many high-level wastes at Hanford, phosphate and fluoride are found predominately in the form of salt precipitates and can have adverse and detrimental effects on glass waste loading. Additionally, fluoride produces melter off-gas that creates corrosion risks in the off-gas system piping. Determining the solubilities of fluoride and phosphate salts, as well as the dissolution kinetics under potential HLW processing conditions will help to mitigate future operational risks and mature flowsheet technical bases.
This report provides results from batch-blending test work for remediated nitrate salt (RNS) treatment. Batch blending was identified as a preferred option for blending RNS and unremediated nitrate salt (UNS) material with zeolite to effectively safe the salt/Swheat material identified as ignitable (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency code D001). Blending with zeolite was the preferred remediation option identified in the Options Assessment Report and was originally proposed as the best option for remediation by Clark and Funk in their report, Chemical Reactivity and Recommended Remediation Strategy for Los Alamos Remediated Nitrate Salt (RNS) Wastes, and also found to be a preferred option in the Engineering Options Assessment Report: Nitrate Salt Waste Stream Processing. This test work evaluated equipment and recipe alternatives to achieve effective blending of surrogate waste with zeolite.
Under the auspices of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), nationally developed underground research laboratories (URLs) and associated research institutions are being offered for use by other nations. These facilities form an Underground Research Facilities (URF) Network for training in and demonstration of waste disposal technologies and the sharing of knowledge and experience related to geologic repository development, research, and engineering. In order to achieve its objectives, the URF Network regularly sponsors workshops and training events related to the knowledge base that is transferable between existing URL programs and to nations with an interest in developing a new URL. Toward that end, a three-day workshop was held in Albuquerque, New Mexico in October 2014 to identify and compare the understanding of URF Network members on the place and role of generic and site-specific URLs in the overall, iterative geological disposal development process, including repository siting, design, and post-closure safety assessment. Attention was also given to the need for URLs in salt host rock, since there is currently no such facility in operation in the world. This paper describes some of the outcomes of the workshop in the context of the general timeline for repository development and the evolving role of research, development, and demonstration (RD and D) activities in URLs. Of particular interest is the relationship between technology maturity, as measured by technology readiness level (TRL), and the stages or milestones in the repository development timeline. The long history of RD and D in worldwide URLs (> 40 years) can be argued to be the primary reason that nuclear waste disposal systems are currently at a high level of maturity. One of the key recommendations from the workshop was that an international, easily accessible knowledge base should soon be established to avoid the loss of important experiences and information obtained from existing and closed URLs. It was also recognized that a new generic URL in salt host rock would provide a number of benefits, but one should not be initiated until a national program specifically decides to site its repository in salt. (authors)
Currently at the Savannah River Site (SRS), the Tank Closure Cesium Removal (TCCR) is an “at-tank” process designed to remove cesium from aqueous tank waste. Cesium will be removed by ion exchange using the engineered IONSIV® R9120 form of Crystalline Silicotitanate (CST) media. The current TCCR design has two columns online in a lead-lag configuration to optimize media usage and achieve the target decontamination. Once the lead column is saturated with cesium, it will be removed from service, the lag column will rotate into the lead position, and a new column with fresh ion-exchange media will be placed into the lag position. The TCCR process for cesium removal from Tank 10H is detailed in X-SOW-H- 00002. Demonstration of the system began in early calendar year 2019 with two batches of salt solution generated by dissolving saltcake in Tank 10H, followed by processing of these batches through the TCCR system. A third TCCR Tank 10H dissolved saltcake batch is scheduled for processing soon. Upon completion of the demonstration with Tank 10H dissolved saltcake, Tank 9H salt solution will be transferred to Tank 10H and subsequently processed through the TCCR unit with new CST media (referred to as R9120-B 30x60) added to new IX columns. The TCCR processing campaign of Tank 9H salt solution is referred to as TCCR-1A .
The performance of the refractory lining in glass melters used for nuclear waste vitrification is critical to the melter reliability for long-term continuous operation. Monofrax® K-3, a high Cr 2 O 3 fused cast refractory material, has been widely used to build the liners of nuclear waste glass melters in the United States. Corrosion behaviour of Monofrax® K-3 refractory has been evaluated based on crucible-scale testing, inspection of the refractory components following scaled melter testing, and inspections of the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) melter refractory after service. The literature generally consists of empirical models based on short-term testing to describe refractory corrosion dependence on glass composition. Corrosion data from tests with longer testing times, at various temperatures, in the presence of molten salts, and with different redox reactions in the plenum atmosphere exist, may be insufficient to provide accurate refractory service life estimates. Additionally, the corrosion data collected under actual and scaled melter operating conditions are limited. Recommendations to achieve more direct correlation between the laboratory refractory corrosion data predictions and the observed melter service life are discussed to allow for more accurate predictions of the useful life of melter refractory linings.
Melter feeds for high-level nuclear waste (HLW) typically contain a large number of constituents that evolve gas on heating, Multiple gas-evolving reactions are both successive and simultaneous, and include the release of chemically bonded water, reactions of nitrates with organics, and reactions of molten salts with solid silica. Consequently, when a sample of a HLW feed is subjected to thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), the rate of change of the sample mass reveals multiple overlapping peaks. In this study, a melter feed, formulated for a simulated high-alumina HLW to be vitrified in the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant, currently under construction at the Hanford Site in Washington State, USA, was subjected to TGA. In addition, a modified melter feed was prepared as an all-nitrate version of the baseline feed to test the effect of sucrose addition on the gas-evolving reactions. Activation energies for major reactions were determined using the Kissinger method. The ultimate aim of TGA studies is to obtain a kinetic model of the gas-evolving reactions for use in mathematical modeling of the cold cap as an element of the overall model of the waste-glass melter. In this study, we focused on computing the kinetic parameters of individual reactions without identifying their actual chemistry, The rough provisional model presented is based on the first-order kinetics.
Graphical abstract: Display Omitted Highlights: Black-Right-Pointing-Pointer Vacuum pyrolysis as a pretreatment was used to separate cathode material from aluminum foils. Black-Right-Pointing-Pointer Cobalt and lithium can be leached using oxalate while cobalt can be directly precipitated as cobalt oxalate. Black-Right-Pointing-Pointer Cobalt and lithium can be separated efficiently from each other only in the oxalate leaching process. Black-Right-Pointing-Pointer High reaction efficiency of LiCoO{sub 2} was obtained with oxalate. - Abstract: Spent lithium-ion batteries containing lots of strategic resources such as cobalt and lithium are considered as an attractive secondary resource. In this work, an environmentally compatible process based on vacuum pyrolysis, oxalate leaching and precipitation is applied to recover cobalt and lithium from spent lithium-ion batteries. Oxalate is introduced as leaching reagent meanwhile as precipitant which leaches and precipitates cobalt from LiCoO{sub 2} and CoO directly as CoC{sub 2}O{sub 4}{center_dot}2H{sub 2}O with 1.0 M oxalate solution at 80 Degree-Sign C and solid/liquid ratio of 50 g L{sup -1} for 120 min. The reaction efficiency of more than 98% of LiCoO{sub 2} can be achieved and cobalt and lithium can also be separated efficiently during the hydrometallurgical process. The combined process is simple and adequate for the recovery of valuable metals from spent lithium-ion batteries.
Some facilities have successfully been installed at ENEA laboratories for pyrochemical process studies under inactive conditions. PYREL III, MECRYP and OGATA plants allow to perform experiments about electrorefining and electroreduction of simulated fuel, melt crystallization of lithium chloride containing impurities from electroreduction campaigns, and trapping of volatile and semi-volatile fission products. Moreover, an argon-atmosphere glove-box is used for conditioning of chloride salt wastes with sodalite or SAP (SiO{sub 2}-Al{sub 2}O{sub 3}-P{sub 2}O{sub 5}) matrix.
The Modular Caustic-Side Solvent Extraction (CSSX) Unit (MCU) is a process for Cs-137 removal from legacy nuclear waste. MCU began hot operations in 2008 with an initial planned operating life of three years and a design life of five years. After eight years of operation, MCU has processed more than 23.8 million liters (6.3 million gallons) of waste. The MCU process uses a solvent developed by Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) to extract the fission product Cs-137 from liquid salt waste, or salt solution (SS), stored in the Tank Farms at Savannah River Site (SRS) after the material has been treated through the Actinide Removal Process (ARP). Batches of SS are prepared and first fed to the ARP, where it is treated to become clarified SS (CSS), then fed to MCU. Once the Cs-137 has been extracted by the solvent, the CSS becomes decontaminated SS (DSS), which is ultimately processed into a cementitious grout at the Saltstone Production Facility (SPF) and subsequently disposed of at the Saltstone Disposal Facility (SDF). The Cs-137 is then stripped from the solvent into an aqueous strip effluent (SE) stream for incorporation into borosilicate glass at the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF). The solvent used in the MCU process is made of four components: the extractant (extracts Cs-137 from CSS), the modifier (increases solubility of extractant and suppressor in the diluent), the suppressor (suppresses the effects of anions and improves stripping), and the diluent (controls density and viscosity). There have been two solvents utilized during the lifetime of MCU. The first solvent was developed by ORNL and was used to design the plant based on its cesium removal capability. Due to the extended life of MCU, in order to continue to minimize the curies disposed at SDF, a new solvent capable of removing more cesium from the CSS was developed by ORNL and implemented at MCU. The second MCU solvent, Next-Generation Solvent (NGS), uses the same modifier and diluent as the original solvent, but a different extractant and suppressor. Subsequent changes to the overall MCU flowsheet were made for the use of NGS. The success of cesium removal from the CSS is often presented as the cesium decontamination factor (DF) achieved for each batch processed. The DF is the ratio of the concentration of cesium in the CSS to the cesium concentration in the DSS. The BOBCalixC6 based solvent was capable of achieving DFs between 100 and 400 for each DSS batch. The NGS solvent is capable of achieving DFs greater than 40,000 for each DSS batch. The NGS blend solvent is currently meeting the goals of the pure NGS solvent. (authors)
As part of a larger program to address mercury issues at the Savannah River Site, a number of samples from across the salt processing flowsheet have been collected and analyzed for several mercury species. The results indicate the presence of organomercury species, predominately methylmercury cation. This result was not expected, and it represents a significant paradigm shift in the understanding of mercury chemistry in high-level tank waste. Concentrations of total and soluble mercury have been measured as high as 0.5 g/L with methylmercury concentrations of at least fifty percent of that value. The distribution of mercury species being observed have ramifications to waste processing strategies. In particular, the mercury behavior across the cesium solvent extraction process has been examined. Leachates, from toxicity testing of the cementitious waste form used for decontaminated salt waste at Savannah River, have been tested and shows methylmercury as the dominant extractable species. (authors)
Volatile loss of technetium (Tc) during vitrification of low-activity wastes is a technical challenge for treating and immobilizing the large volumes of radioactive and hazardous wastes stored at the U.S. Department of Energy's Hanford Site. There are various research efforts being pursued to develop technologies that can be implemented for cost effective management of Tc, including studies to understand the behavior of Tc during vitrification, with the goal of eventually increasing Tc retention in glass. Furthermore, one of these studies has focused on identifying the form or species of Tc and Re (surrogate for Tc) that evolve during the waste-to-glass conversion process. This information is important for understanding the mechanism of Tc volatilization. In this paper, available information collected from the literature is critically evaluated to clarify the volatile species of Tc and Re and, more specifically, whether they volatilize as alkali pertechnetate and perrhenate or as technetium and rhenium oxides after decomposition of alkali pertechnetate and perrhenate. The evaluated data ranged from mass spectrometric identification of species volatilized from pure and binary alkali pertechnetate and perrhenate salts to structural and chemical analyses of volatilized materials during crucible melting and scaled melter processing of simulated wastes.
The Liquid Waste (LW) System at Savannah River Site (SRS) is a highly integrated operation involving safely storing radioactive liquid waste in underground storage tanks; vitrifying the higher activity waste; and storing the vitrified waste in stainless steel canisters until permanent disposition is provided; and removing, treating, and dispositioning the low-level waste (LLW) fraction in concrete with final disposition being the salt-stone Disposal Units (SDUs) at the SRS salt-stone Disposal Facility (SDF). Treatment and disposition of salt waste is the critical path to completion of the SRS Liquid Waste (LW) Disposition Program. Successful and timely salt waste removal and disposal is integral to efforts by SRS to proceed with all aspects of tank cleanup and removal from service. The construction and implementation of the first-of-a-kind Mega SDU (MSDU) is underway to provide the most environmentally safe and cost-effective solution for salt processing and long term storage of the LLW at SRS. The MSDU design is a duplicate of the Water Treatment Tanks located in Syracuse, New York. This commercial design, developed by an affiliate of Savannah River Remediation LLC (SRR), was slightly modified to meet the requirements of the nuclear industry. The MSDU is a critical link in salt disposition. In comparison to the current SDU design, approximately 46 meters (150 feet) in diameter and 7 meters (22 feet) tall with a capacity of approximately 11,000 m{sup 3} (3.0 million gallons), the MSDU is 114 meters (375 feet) in diameter and 13 meters (43 feet) tall which will provide a capacity of approximately 121,000 m{sup 3} (32.0 million gallons) to receive the LLW fraction embedded in a grout-like form. The MSDU will provide the taxpayers an estimated $300 M in life cycle savings at SRS by reducing the number of SDUs from the estimated 72 smaller vessels to 7 of the new larger vessels. Additionally, based on the reduced number of SDUs, the environmental footprint is significantly reduced as well. Due to the similarities between the existing SDU design and the MSDU design, efforts to integrate the MSDU into the LW system are minimal. Required infrastructure modifications will consist of tying into the existing grout and drain lines, as well as the installation of new electrical and instrumentation services for the MSDU. Grout flow testing has been successfully completed, with results showing the MSDU will be a safe and cost-effective replacement for the existing SDUs. The MSDU design is complete, Critical Decision (CD)-3 was approved on June 17, 2014, and the first MSDU, salt-stone Disposal Unit n.6 (SDU 6), is being constructed in the existing LW SDF operated by SRR as a Capital Line Item project. As an added benefit, once constructed, lessons learned will be available for future MSDUs at SRS and throughout the complex as necessary. (authors)
The Hanford Site Effluent Treatment Facility (ETF) currently treats aqueous waste streams generated during site cleanup activities. When the Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) begins operations, including Direct Feed Low Activity Waste (DFLAW) vitrification, a liquid secondary waste (LSW) stream from the WTP will need to be treated. The volume of effluent for treatment at the ETF will increase significantly. The powdered salt waste form produced by the ETF will be replaced by a stabilized solidified waste form for disposal in Hanford’s Integrated Disposal Facility (IDF). Washington River Protection Solutions is implementing a Secondary Liquid Waste Immobilization Technology Development Plan to address the technology needs for a waste form and solidification process to treat the increased volume of waste planned for disposal at the IDF. Waste form testing to support this plan is composed of work in the near term to provide data as input to a performance assessment (PA) for Hanford’s IDF. In 2015, three Hanford Liquid Secondary Waste simulants were developed based on existing and projected waste streams. Using these waste simulants, fourteen mixes of Hanford Liquid Secondary Waste were prepared and tested varying the waste simulant, the water-to-dry materials ratio, and the dry materials blend composition.1 In FY16, testing was performed using a simulant of the EMF process condensate blended with the caustic scrubber—from the Low Activity Waste (LAW) melter—, processed through the ETF. The initial EMF-16 simulant will be based on modeling efforts performed to determine the mass balance of the ETF for the DFLAW.2 The compressive strength of all of the mixes exceeded the target of 3.4 MPa (500 psi) to meet the requirements identified as potential IDF Waste Acceptance Criteria in Table 1 of the Secondary Liquid Waste Immobilization Technology Development Plan.3 The hydraulic properties of the waste forms tested (hydraulic conductivity and water characteristic curves) were comparable to the properties measured on the Savannah River Site (SRS) Saltstone waste form. Future testing should include efforts to first; 1) determine the rate and amount of ammonia released during each unit operation of the treatment process to determine if additional ammonia management is required, then; 2) reduce the ammonia content of the ETF concentrated brine prior to solidification, making the waste more amenable to grouting, or 3) manage the release of ammonia during production and ongoing release during storage of the waste form, or 4) develop a lower pH process/waste form thereby precluding ammonia release.
The Liquid Waste (LW) contractor at the Savannah River Site (SRS) is Savannah River Mission Completion (SRMC). The LW Mission is tasked with processing legacy nuclear waste stored in underground waste tanks for final disposition. The Concentration, Storage, and Transfer Facilities (CSTF) contain 43 active waste tanks and 8 closed waste tanks between the two tank farms, F-Area Tank Farm (FTF) and H-Area Tank Farm (HTF). The first steps in the Waste Retrieval and Tank Closure (WRTC) process are the waste removal campaigns, consisting of either salt dissolution or sludge mobilization. Two tanks that are rapidly approaching the final closure determination and have demonstrated considerable success with salt dissolution are Tanks 9 and 10. The closure of these tanks is a high priority for the LW Mission due to the greater environmental risk they pose since both tanks reside within the water table and contain active leak sites from the primary tank to the annulus space. Tanks 9 and 10 have each recently completed their respective salt dissolution campaigns and achieved the Preliminary Cease Waste Removal (PCWR) milestone.
Saltstone Disposal Units (SDU) are long term disposal units for low activity grout produced from the solidification of decontaminated non-hazardous salt waste at SRS. The unit is a cylindrical disposal vault of 150 ft. in diameter and 23 ft. in height. The total volume the SDU can hold is 3 million gallons of grout. The hydration process of the grout material produces heat from an exothermic chemical reaction. If the grout reaches temperatures higher than the maximum safety temperature of 95 deg. C, cracks can start forming leading to contamination of the environment. The purpose of this study is to develop the optimal baseline domain boundary conditions and to perform a sensitivity analysis with respect to the baseline modeling conditions. The following assumptions were made for the modeling calculations: - The system geometry is axisymmetric; - The system was at steady state; - Ambient temperature was set to 100 deg. F; - Air was assumed to be an incompressible ideal gas; - Radiation was neglected for a conservative estimation; - Natural convection for the SDU vapor space is assumed to be turbulent because Rayleigh number based on typical operating conditions is higher than 10{sup 8}; - Water tables were not taken into consideration. The following sensitivity analyses were performed to find the optimal domain boundary: - Mesh size sensitivity; - Soil depth sensitivity - Soil depth varied from 30 ft to 250 ft with a soil thickness of 90 ft; - Soil thickness sensitivity - Soil thickness varied from 30 ft to 270 ft with a soil depth of 180 ft; - Soil conductivity sensitivity - Soil thermal conductivity varied from 0.25 W/m-K to 1 W/m-K; - Ambient Temperature Sensitivity - Ambient temperature varied from 70 deg. F to 110 deg. F. For the thermal calculations, the temperature of the bottom of the soil was set to 17.4 deg. C. The heat flux on the roof of the building and surface of the earth is 163.2 W/m{sup 2}. The soil sides are set to be adiabatic. The sensitivity analysis shows that the mesh size has no effect on the numerical results. This is mainly due to a small convection zone and large conduction zones in the modeling domain. The optimal domain boundary was found to be a soil thickness of 90 ft and a soil depth of 150 ft. The different sensitivity analysis performed here shows the optimal boundary domain to be used for thermal calculations is a soil depth of 150 ft beneath the SDU and a soil thickness of 90 ft. Anything larger would produce similar solutions but at a longer computational time to solve. The maximum temperature was more sensitive to soil properties as shown here. While the ambient temperature affected the max temperature linearly. Most of the heat transfer takes place downward vertically between the SDU and the soil beneath it. Using the optimal domain boundary determined by the sensitivity analyses, the maximum thermal loading to keep the maximum grout temperature below 95 deg. C is 1.646 W/m{sup 3}.