Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Trajectory Optimization”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 289 records · Page 16
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1996

Time Optimal Trajectory Planning in Dynamic Environments

A method is presented for planning the motion of a robot in a dynamic environment by computing a trajectory that avoids all obstacles and that satisfies the robot dynamics and its actuator constraints. This method consists of two steps -- the computation of the trajectory and its refinement with a dynamic optimization.

Robotics Velocity Obstacle↗
NASA NTRS2018

Method and Apparatus for Providing In-Flight Pilot Interface for Trajectory Optimization

Systems and methods of an in-cockpit flight trajectory modification system for an aircraft are provided. A receiver is capable of receiving flight-related hazard information. A traffic aware planner (TAP) module is operably connected to the receiver to receive the flight-related hazard information. A user interface device is operably connected to the TAP module on board the aircraft to provide trajectory information associated with the aircraft and to receive user input corresponding to a request for a revised trajectory. A TAP application is capable of calculating one or more revised trajectories for the aircraft based at least on active trajectory information of the aircraft and the flight-related hazard information. The user interface device may be configured to display information related to the one or more revised trajectories, including a graphic display of the active trajectory and at least one revised trajectory in a visualization panel of the user interface device.

Burke, Kelly Ann↗
NASA NTRS2024

End-to-End Mission Design & Trajectory Optimization

Need: A need exists for a generalized, robust, user-friendly and accessible end-to-end mission design optimization tool. Solution: Our solution to developing this capability was to interface two JSC tools—Copernicus and Genesis. Each of these tools has a specific area of the mission design process that it excels at. By utilizing them both, we can gain performance benefits not seen by either on their own. - Copernicus is a trajectory design and optimization software used for in-space trajectories around multiple bodies. - Genesis is a flight mechanics tool used to model ascent, entry, descent, and landing trajectories around a single planetary body. Year 1 was focused on combining these 2 software packages—allowing Copernicus to incorporate the ascent/descent capabilities of Genesis into the optimization problem—and developing this end-to-end mission design capability. Year 2 we focused on increasing the robustness of this capability by building the initial guess generator (IGG), which produces initial guesses based on simplifying assumptions and the physics of the problem. Year 3 of our project focused on utilizing the end-to-end mission design and optimization capabilities developed in the previous 2 years to analyze specific mission scenarios—scaling up from proof of concept to real analyses—capturing any resulting performance benefits, as well as addressing the Big Data challenges we’re faced with—namely, how we’re going to manage and interpret all the data that’s generated.

Kristin Nichols↗
NASA NTRS1974

Program manual for HILTOP, a heliocentric interplanetary low thrust trajectory optimization program. Part 1: User's guide

A performance-analysis computer program, that was developed explicitly to generate optimum electric propulsion trajectory data for missions of interest in the exploration of the solar system is presented. The program was primarily designed to evaluate the performance capabilities of electric propulsion systems, and in the simulation of a wide variety of interplanetary missions. A numerical integration of the two-body, three-dimensional equations of motion and the Euler-Lagrange equations was used in the program. Transversality conditions which permit the rapid generation of converged maximum-payload trajectory data, and the optimization of numerous other performance indices for which no transversality conditions exist are included. The ability to simulate constrained optimum solutions, including trajectories having specified propulsion time and constant thrust cone angle, is also in the program. The program was designed to handle multiple-target missions with various types of encounters, such as rendezvous, stopover, orbital capture, and flyby. Performance requirements for a variety of launch vehicles can be determined.

Mann, F. I.↗
NASA NTRS1978

Heliocentric interplanetary low thrust trajectory optimization program, supplement 1, part 2

The improvements made to the HILTOP electric propulsion trajectory computer program are described. A more realistic propulsion system model was implemented in which various thrust subsystem efficiencies and specific impulse are modeled as variable functions of power available to the propulsion system. The number of operating thrusters are staged, and the beam voltage is selected from a set of five (or less) constant voltages, based upon the application of variational calculus. The constant beam voltages may be optimized individually or collectively. The propulsion system logic is activated by a single program input key in such a manner as to preserve the HILTOP logic. An analysis describing these features, a complete description of program input quantities, and sample cases of computer output illustrating the program capabilities are presented.

Mann, F. I.↗
NASA NTRS1993

DUKSUP - A high thrust trajectory optimization code

Designing missions on expendable launch vehicles (ELV's) includes determining launch vehicle performance capabilities and trajectory characteristics over the range of mission requirements for suitable launch periods. This analysis depends on mathematically modeling both the launch vehicle and the mission requirements. Generally the result is a mathematical model that is described by an objective function to be optimized subject to an assortment of algebraic and dynamic constraints. About 30 years ago, engineers at Lewis Research Center (LeRC) undertook the task of creating a software code to solve 3D versions of such problems and based it on the Calculus of Variations/Optimal Control Theory. One of these codes, DUKSUP, has been in use at LeRC for nearly 25 years, during which time it has played an important role in a large number of studies and actual missions. Currently it is being used by about 12 analysts in the Center's Advanced Space Analysis Office (ASAO) to do mission design, feasibility studies, corroboration of contractor data and planning studies for the Space Exploration Initiative (SEI). Today, it is one of the few ELV mission analysis production codes based on variational methods. With future ELV missions in mind, ASAO is presently creating a new code to upgrade DUKSUP's capabilities.

Balkanyi, Leslie R.↗
NASA NTRS1987

Optimal trajectories for aeroassisted, noncoplanar orbital transfer. II - LEO-to-LEO transfer

Both classical and minimax problems of optimal control arising in the study of noncoplanar, aeroassisted orbital transfer are considered and are illustrated with the example of LEO-to-LEO transfer. Trajectory control is achieved by modulation of the lift coefficient and the angle of bank. Problems considered include the minimization of the energy required for orbital transfer, maximization of the flight time during the atmospheric portion of the trajectory, and minimization of the peak heating rate. The near-grazing solution is found to be a good compromise between energy and heating requirements.

Miele, A.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Reducing Landing Site Contamination Using 3-D Trajectory Optimization for Surface Hoppers

Rocket-powered vehicles utilizing Vertical Take-off Vertical Landing (VTVL) are a compelling alternative to surface rovers for exploring planetary and lunar bodies. These so called “hoppers” provide enhanced mobility for accessing locations difficult to reach, and over a wider region of the surface. However, contamination and plume interactions from rocket exhaust deposited at landing sites is anticipated since landing approaches are typically along a vertical direction during the final descent. Consequently, exhaust products may alter the surface chemistry, potentially confounding compositional analysis for samples collected in the vicinity of the landing site or jeopardize mining efforts. There has been no rigorous study on flight maneuvers that can mitigate plume-to-surface interactions. A multi-objective optimization tool has been developed to simulate propulsive hops on a planetary body and minimize both fuel consumption and site alterations. Trajectories are derived by multi-objective optimization and include solutions with significant reduction in contamination for a modest increase in fuel consumption. For these solutions, surface-to-surface propulsive transfer is demonstrated, but the method can also be modified for orbit-to-surface transfers (e.g., landers).

guidance↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Reducing Landing Site Contamination Using 3-D Trajectory Optimization for Surface Hoppers

Rocket-powered vehicles utilizing Vertical Take-off Vertical Landing (VTVL) are a compelling alternative to surface rovers for exploring planetary and lunar bodies. These so called “hoppers” provide enhanced mobility for accessing locations difficult to reach, and over a wider region of the surface. However, contamination and plume interactions from rocket exhaust deposited at landing sites is anticipated since landing approaches are typically along a vertical direction during the final descent. Consequently, exhaust products may alter the surface chemistry, potentially confounding compositional analysis for samples collected in the vicinity of the landing site or jeopardize mining efforts. There has been no rigorous study on flight maneuvers that can mitigate plume-to-surface interactions. A multi-objective optimization tool has been developed to simulate propulsive hops on a planetary body and minimize both fuel consumption and site alterations. Trajectories are derived by multi-objective optimization and include solutions with significant reduction in contamination for a modest in-crease in fuel consumption. For these solutions, surface-to-surface propulsive transfer is demonstrated, but the method can also be modified for orbit-to-surface transfers (e.g., landers).

guidance↗
NASA NTRS1991

Trajectory optimization for kinematically redundant arms

A review of local optimization methods for resolving joint configurations in underconstrained manipulation tasks is conducted. A new approach is developed for observing joint limits and avoiding obstacles during the trajectory planning. The methodology is used in a four-link arm example to avoid a workspace singularity and is compared with results using the extended Moore-Penrose technique. An alternative measure of arm 'manipulability' based directly on the rank of the Jacobian is also introduced.

Carignan, Craig R.↗
NASA NTRS1986

Singular perturbation analysis of AOTV related trajectory optimization problems

The problem of aeroassisted orbital plane change is discussed. This maneuver requires the use of three impulses - one to deorbit, one to reorbit and one to recircularize at the new orbit. The orbit plane change is effected entirely in the atmosphere through the use of lift and bank angle control. For circular orbits of nearly equal radii, it can be shown that the fuel consumption is minimized by minimizing the energy loss in the atmospheric portion of the trajectory. The research explores the use of singular perturbation theory to develop an optimal guidance law for the atmospheric portion.

Calise, Anthony J.↗
NASA NTRS1991

Mars entry-to-landing trajectory optimization and closed loop guidance

The guidance strategy of the Mars Rover Sample Return mission is presented in detail. Aeromaneuver versus aerobrake trades are examined, and an aerobrake analysis is presented which takes into account targeting, guidance, flight control, trajectory profile, delivery accuracy. An aeromaneuver analysis is given which includes the entry corridor, maneuver footprint, guidance, preentry phase, constant drag phase, equilibrium guide phase, variable drag phase, influence of trajectory profile on the entry flight loads, parachute deployment conditions and strategies, and landing accuracy. The Mars terminal descent phase is analyzed.

Ilgen, Marc R.↗