SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Verification”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 289 records · Page 16

All sources NASA NTRS DOE OSTI

NASA NTRS1983

Verification of Numerical Algorithms

The following strategy is suggested for specification and proof: (1) Defer the construction of a formal program specification with respect to I/O assertions unit the correctness of the program with respect to an abstract mathematical model of program intent is demonstrated. (2) Prove that an abstract machine (using infinite precision arithmetic) would compute that object exactly. (3) Prove that the computational sequences of arithmetic operations that occur in the abstract machine must be precisely the same at every step as those occurring on an actual machine (with finite precision arithmetic), executing the same program. (4) Use a Verification Conditions VC-generator that knows about the semantics of arithmetic operations to annotate the program with assertions that bound (or in some circumstances estimate) the difference between the actual machine state variables and the corresponding ones of the abstract machine. Construct the formal program specification by combining the verification conditions into theorems about computational error that can be proved with mechanical assistance.

Source record↗

NASA NTRS1983

Three Lectures on Theorem-proving and Program Verification

Topics concerning theorem proving and program verification are discussed with particlar emphasis on the Boyer/Moore theorem prover, and approaches to program verification such as the functional and interpreter methods and the inductive assertion approach. A history of the discipline and specific program examples are included.

Moore, J. S.↗

NASA NTRS1984

Preparation and cleanliness verifications of a space simulation chamber for contamination sensitive test specimens

Contamination sensitive optical devices were to be evaluated under thermal vacuum conditions. Test specifications called for an extremely clean chamber environment, ambient temperature chamber walls, and optical surface temperatures at approximately - 30 C. Chamber preparation included the replacement of diffusion pumps with cryopumps and the cleaning of the chamber walls to reduce contamination levels. Chamber cleaning using vacuum bake was tried and abandoned as time consuming and ineffective. Chemical cleaning and cleanliness verification methods were developed. Gas chromatograph analysis techniques were used extensively throughout the cleaning process to verify cleanliness levels prior to evacuating the chamber. A chamber cleanliness verification test using a thermoelectric quartz crystal microbalance and witness samples was performed to demonstrate that an appropriate cleanliness level was achieved.

Koch, W. R.↗

NASA NTRS1984

Formal verification of mathematical software

Methods are investigated for formally specifying and verifying the correctness of mathematical software (software which uses floating point numbers and arithmetic). Previous work in the field was reviewed. A new model of floating point arithmetic called the asymptotic paradigm was developed and formalized. Two different conceptual approaches to program verification, the classical Verification Condition approach and the more recently developed Programming Logic approach, were adapted to use the asymptotic paradigm. These approaches were then used to verify several programs; the programs chosen were simplified versions of actual mathematical software.

Sutherland, D.↗

NASA NTRS1985

The space shuttle launch vehicle aerodynamic verification challenges

The Space Shuttle aerodynamics and performance communities were challenged to verify the Space Shuttle vehicle (SSV) aerodynamics and system performance by flight measurements. Historically, launch vehicle flight test programs which faced these same challenges were unmanned instrumented flights of simple aerodynamically shaped vehicles. However, the manned SSV flight test program made these challenges more complex because of the unique aerodynamic configuration powered by the first man-rated solid rocket boosters (SRB). The analyses of flight data did not verify the aerodynamics or performance preflight predictions of the first flight of the Space Transportation System (STS-1). However, these analyses have defined the SSV aerodynamics and verified system performance. The aerodynamics community also was challenged to understand the discrepancy between the wind tunnel and flight defined aerodynamics. The preflight analysis challenges, the aerodynamic extraction challenges, and the postflight analyses challenges which led to the SSV system performance verification and which will lead to the verification of the operational ascent aerodynamics data base are presented.

Wallace, R. O.↗

NASA NTRS1985

SSME lifetime prediction and verification, integrating environments, structures, materials: The challenge

The planned missions for the space shuttle dictated a unique and technology-extending rocket engine. The high specific impulse requirements in conjunction with a 55-mission lifetime, plus volume and weight constraints, produced unique structural design, manufacturing, and verification requirements. Operations from Earth to orbit produce severe dynamic environments, which couple with the extreme pressure and thermal environments associated with the high performance, creating large low cycle loads and high alternating stresses above endurance limit which result in high sensitivity to alternating stresses. Combining all of these effects resulted in the requirements for exotic materials, which are more susceptible to manufacturing problems, and the use of an all-welded structure. The challenge of integrating environments, dynamics, structures, and materials into a verified SSME structure is discussed. The verification program and developmental flight results are included. The first six shuttle flights had engine performance as predicted with no failures. The engine system has met the basic design challenges.

Ryan, R. S.↗

NASA NTRS1985

Verification for large space structures

The primary concern for verification is the dynamic characteristics of the space structure related to the control and sensor/actuator location. Properties such as modal density, range of natural frequencies, and modal displacements at the sensor/actuator location are considered and are simulated for the verification of the structure/control closed loop system. A space beam is studied in zero gravity environment and in a 1 G gravity environment, along with their governing equations.

Chen, J.↗

NASA NTRS1986

Design and Verification Guidelines for Vibroacoustic and Transient Environments

Design and verification guidelines for vibroacoustic and transient environments contain many basic methods that are common throughout the aerospace industry. However, there are some significant differences in methodology between NASA/MSFC and others - both government agencies and contractors. The purpose of this document is to provide the general guidelines used by the Component Analysis Branch, ED23, at MSFC, for the application of the vibroacoustic and transient technology to all launch vehicle and payload components and payload components and experiments managed by NASA/MSFC. This document is intended as a tool to be utilized by the MSFC program management and their contractors as a guide for the design and verification of flight hardware.

Source record↗

NASA NTRS1985

Dynamic verification of very large space structures

A research program in spacecraft structures, structural dynamics, and controls verification using a relatively large, flexible beam as a focus is introduced. This research effort addresses fundamental problems applicable to the verification of large, flexible space structures and combines ground tests, flight behavior prediction, and instrumented orbital tests. The program is expected to produce quantitative results for use in improving the validity of ground tests for verifying flight performance analyses.

Hanks, B. R.↗

NASA NTRS1986

Future requirements of wind tunnels for Computational Fluid Dynamics code verification

The role of experiment in the development of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) for external aerodynamic flow-field prediction is discussed. Requirements for code verification from two sources pacing the development of CFD are described: (1) the need for developing adequate flow modeling, and (2) the need for establishing confidence in the use of CFD for predicting complex flows. The type of data needed to meet these needs differs in detail and scope and leads to definite wind tunnel requirements. Recent examples of testing to assess and develop turbulence models, and to verify code development are used to establish future requirements of wind tunnel testing for CFD verification.

Marvin, J. G.↗

NASA NTRS1985

Single-Event Upset (SEU) model verification and threshold determination using heavy ions in a bipolar static RAM

Single-Event Upset (SEU) response of a bipolar low-power Schottky-diode-clamped TTL static RAM has been observed using Br ions in the 100-240 MeV energy range and O ions in the 20-100 MeV range. These data complete the experimental verification of circuit-simulation SEU modeling for this device. The threshold for onset of SEU has been observed by the variation of energy, ion species and angle of incidence. The results obtained from the computer circuit-simulation modeling and experimental model verification demonstrate a viable methodology for modeling SEU in bipolar integrated circuits.

Zoutendyk, J. A.↗

NASA NTRS1985

Dynamic verification of very large space structures

The dynamic verification of spacecraft relies heavily on ground-based tests. These tests usually simulate flight environments or validate analytical models used in establishing design loads and in designing control algorithms. They also provide security against failures resulting from unanticipated or unmodeled hardware behavior. Future orbital antennas, space stations, and solar power systems are likely to be of sizes difficult to test using current ground test technology. In addition to size, other factors such as low natural frequencies, lightweight construction, and the presence of many structural joints, cause significant sensitivity of the test process to the earth-gravity environment. Yet, accuracy requirements on the verification process will be more stringent because of modern flexible-structure control approaches. This paper describes some of the problems and discusses research on potential solutions. The importance of an integrated ground test, analysis, and flight test program is emphasized. An ongoing research program of this type focusing on a 60-meter, deployable, truss-beam test article is described.

Hanks, B. R.↗

NASA NTRS1987

TSS subsatellite attitude dynamics and control laws verification programs

A dynamic model of the Tethered Satellite System (TSS) and of the relevant simulation program, developed in order to provide the dynamic analysis support for the design verification of the subsatellite attitude control, is presented. Special care was spent in the satellite attitude dynamic analysis and the model was specifically conceived to this aim. The way in which the simulation results can be utilized for the verification and testing of the attitude control is also presented.

Venditti, Floriano↗

NASA NTRS1987

Probabilistic structural analysis verification studies

The basic objective of this verification effort is to apply probabilistic structural analysis methods developed and implemented in the Numerical Evaluation of Stochastic Structures Under Stress (NESSUS) code to typical space propulsion components. The chosen typical components are turbine blade, high pressure duct, Lox post, and transfer tube liners. Since analysis options of increasing levels of sophistication are implemented in NESSUS incrementally, the verification efforts are also tailored to have increasing levels of sophistication during the progression of the contract. The current released version of the code is limited to linear structural analysis.

Rajagopal, K. R.↗

NASA NTRS1987

Wind tunnel requirements for computational fluid dynamics code verification

The role of experiment in the development of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) for aerodynamic flow field prediction is discussed. Requirements for code verification from two sources that pace the development of CFD are described for: (1) development of adequate flow modeling, and (2) establishment of confidence in the use of CFD to predict complex flows. The types of data needed and their accuracy differs in detail and scope and leads to definite wind tunnel requirements. Examples of testing to assess and develop turbulence models, and to verify code development, are used to establish future wind tunnel testing requirements. Versatility, appropriate scale and speed range, accessibility for nonintrusive instrumentation, computerized data systems, and dedicated use for verification were among the more important requirements identified.

Marvin, Joseph G.↗

NASA NTRS1986

A specification-based approach to concurrent structure verification in multiprocessor systems

A recently initiated research project concerned with the concurrent detection of software errors and errors due to physical failures in the hardware of multiprocessor systems is described in this paper. An approach to error detection is described, which is specification based and relies on the structural verification of program control flow and data structure integrity. The techniques discussed utilize the hardware redundancy inherent in parallel processing systems to provide verification of both program structure and data concurrently with program execution.

Fuchs, W. Kent↗

NASA NTRS1987

Approaches to the verification of rule-based expert systems

Expert systems are a highly useful spinoff of artificial intelligence research. One major stumbling block to extended use of expert systems is the lack of well-defined verification and validation (V and V) methodologies. Since expert systems are computer programs, the definitions of verification and validation from conventional software are applicable. The primary difficulty with expert systems is the use of development methodologies which do not support effective V and V. If proper techniques are used to document requirements, V and V of rule-based expert systems is possible, and may be easier than with conventional code. For NASA applications, the flight technique panels used in previous programs should provide an excellent way to verify the rules used in expert systems. There are, however, some inherent differences in expert systems that will affect V and V considerations.

Culbert, Chris↗

NASA NTRS1988

A software engineering approach to expert system design and verification

Software engineering design and verification methods for developing expert systems are not yet well defined. Integration of expert system technology into software production environments will require effective software engineering methodologies to support the entire life cycle of expert systems. The software engineering methods used to design and verify an expert system, RENEX, is discussed. RENEX demonstrates autonomous rendezvous and proximity operations, including replanning trajectory events and subsystem fault detection, onboard a space vehicle during flight. The RENEX designers utilized a number of software engineering methodologies to deal with the complex problems inherent in this system. An overview is presented of the methods utilized. Details of the verification process receive special emphasis. The benefits and weaknesses of the methods for supporting the development life cycle of expert systems are evaluated, and recommendations are made based on the overall experiences with the methods.

Bochsler, Daniel C.↗