Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Wing body configuration”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 289 records · Page 16
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2016

Design of the Hybrid Wing Body with Nacelle: N3-X Propulsion-Airframe Configuration

The Hybrid Wing Body (HWB) aircraft is of great interest for future transport concepts due to itspromises of reduced aircraft noise, nitrous-oxide emissions, and fuel consumption. A design parameterizationmethod for HWB configurations with mail slot nacelle has been developed for a fast exploration of designspace in conceptual and preliminary design phases of a HWB configuration. A HWB planform model byLaughlin [11] was implemented, and the Class Shape Transformation (CST) airfoil generation method byKulfan [10] was utilized to construct the needed geometry for computational high fidelity aerodynamicsimulations. Geometric constraints for the parameterization such as internal cabin and cargo hold layoutswere imposed on the geometry generation. A CFD simulation was performed for a HWB configurationgenerated by the current geometric modeler, clearly showing a significant effect of the installed nacelle on theflowfield.

Nacelle Installation↗
NASA NTRS2025

Subsonic Ultra Green Aircraft Research: Phase V – Buffet Test Report

This test report summarizes work performed by the Boeing Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) team in the Phase V Transonic Truss-Braced Wing contract task. The task was awarded in September 2020, and ended at the end of September 2022. As a part of the SUGAR Phase V contract task, Boeing developed a wind tunnel test plan, model requirements, then fabricated and conducted a dedicated transonic buffet wind tunnel test. The test focused on the investigation of buffet onset, and the ability to accurately predict buffet onset for the TTBW configuration. This report summarizes the results and post-test analysis of the 9% scale, semispan, Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) transonic buffet model tested at the NASA Ames Research Center Unitary Plan Wind Tunnel (UPWT) 11-Foot Transonic Wind Tunnel (11-Ft TWT) facility located at Moffett Field, CA. It was tested from January 24, 2022, through February 18, 2022. The wind tunnel test was successful in capturing buffet onset at the model design dynamic pressure. Multiple configurations were tested starting in the wing-body-strut configuration and ending with the full configuration including wing-body-strut-nacelle/pylon, and flap hinge. The test also measured the effect of control surface deflections (ailerons and spoilers), as well as the effect of an outboard strut flap. Steady data collected during the test included standard force and moment measurements, as well as wing, strut, nacelle, and body (fuselage) static pressures. These data were collected in a standard pitch-pause mode. Unsteady data captured in the test, collected in continuous pitch mode, included wing and strut dynamic pressures, accelerations, and strains. According to test data, previous concerns regarding critical buffet onset on the strut (at low vehicle lift coefficient) and in the wing-strut channel have been mitigated. Buffet onset on the TTBW appears to follow conventional wing-induced buffet onset mechanisms. However, the critical station where buffet onset first occurs has moved inboard to the wing-strut juncture span location (55-60% span) from the typical ~70% span location. Test data obtained by unsteady pressure transducers provided a good match to expected buffet onset modes. An assessment of different tools and methodologies for predicting buffet onset was conducted. Reasonable agreement was found for buffet boundary predictions between most of the methods examined when using a forward trip location, with the greatest discrepancies from the pitching moment break and trailing edge pressure divergence methods. When an aft trip location was used the buffet boundary predictions diverged more significantly from unsteady pressure measurements. In addition, good agreement between the buffet onset trends were found when the Reynolds number, configuration, or spanload was changed.

strut↗
NASA NTRS2018

Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of the STARC-ABL Concept for Minimal Inlet Distortion

The NASA single-aisle turboelectric aircraft with an aft boundary layer propulsor (STARC-ABL) concept utilizes a novel electrically driven aft fan that ingests the fuselage boundary-layer for increased propulsive efficiency. In this paper we examine how aerodynamic shaping of the fuselage diffuser and nacelle inlet can reduce the flow distortion at the aft fan. Adjoint-based aerodynamic shape optimization with the ARP1420 distortion metric objective is used to automatically determine the optimal shapes for minimal fan-face distortion. Single and multipoint optimizations are carried out for simplified body-duct and wing-body-duct configurations. These two configurations highlight the importance of including the wing downwash effects when designing the propulsor. The optimizations showed the body-duct configuration can obtain cruise distortion values of approximately 1% while the wing-body-duct configuration can obtain distortion values of just over 2%.

Kenway, Gaetan K. W.↗
NASA NTRS2011

Acoustic Prediction Methodology and Test Validation for an Efficient Low-Noise Hybrid Wing Body Subsonic Transport

This investigation was conducted to: (1) Develop a hybrid wing body subsonic transport configuration with noise prediction methods to meet the circa 2007 NASA Subsonic Fixed Wing (SFW) N+2 noise goal of -52 dB cum relative to FAR 36 Stage 3 (-42 dB cum re: Stage 4) while achieving a -25% fuel burned compared to current transports (re :B737/B767); (2) Develop improved noise prediction methods for ANOPP2 for use in predicting FAR 36 noise; (3) Design and fabricate a wind tunnel model for testing in the LaRC 14 x 22 ft low speed wind tunnel to validate noise predictions and determine low speed aero characteristics for an efficient low noise Hybrid Wing Body configuration. A medium wide body cargo freighter was selected to represent a logical need for an initial operational capability in the 2020 time frame. The Efficient Low Noise Hybrid Wing Body (ELNHWB) configuration N2A-EXTE was evolved meeting the circa 2007 NRA N+2 fuel burn and noise goals. The noise estimates were made using improvements in jet noise shielding and noise shielding prediction methods developed by UC Irvine and MIT. From this the Quiet Ultra Integrated Efficient Test Research Aircraft #1 (QUIET-R1) 5.8% wind tunnel model was designed and fabricated.

Kawai, Ronald T.↗
NASA NTRS2013

High Bypass Ratio Jet Noise Reduction and Installation Effects Including Shielding Effectiveness

An experimental investigation was performed to study the propulsion airframe aeroacoustic installation effects of a separate flow jet nozzle with a Hybrid Wing Body aircraft configuration where the engine is installed above the wing. Prior understanding of the jet noise shielding effectiveness was extended to a bypass ratio ten application as a function of nozzle configuration, chevron type, axial spacing, and installation effects from additional airframe components. Chevron types included fan chevrons that are uniform circumferentially around the fan nozzle and T-fan type chevrons that are asymmetrical circumferentially. In isolated testing without a pylon, uniform chevrons compared to T-fan chevrons showed slightly more low frequency reduction offset by more high frequency increase. Phased array localization shows that at this bypass ratio chevrons still move peak jet noise source locations upstream but not to nearly the extent, as a function of frequency, as for lower bypass ratio jets. For baseline nozzles without chevrons, the basic pylon effect has been greatly reduced compared to that seen for lower bypass ratio jets. Compared to Tfan chevrons without a pylon, the combination with a standard pylon results in more high frequency noise increase and an overall higher noise level. Shielded by an airframe surface 2.17 fan diameters from nozzle to airframe trailing edge, the T-fan chevron nozzle can produce reductions in jet noise of as much as 8 dB at high frequencies and upstream angles. Noise reduction from shielding decreases with decreasing frequency and with increasing angle from the jet inlet. Beyond an angle of 130 degrees there is almost no noise reduction from shielding. Increasing chevron immersion more than what is already an aggressive design is not advantageous for noise reduction. The addition of airframe control surfaces, including vertical stabilizers and elevon deflection, showed only a small overall impact. Based on the test results, the best overall nozzle configuration design was selected for application to the N2A Hybrid Wing Body concept that will be the subject of the NASA Langley 14 by 22 Foot Subsonic Tunnel high fidelity aeroacoustic characterization experiment. The best overall nozzle selected includes T-fan type chevrons, uniform chevrons on the core nozzle, and no additional pylon of the type that created a strong acoustic effect at lower bypass ratios. The T-fan chevrons are oriented azimuthally away from the ground observer locations. This best overall nozzle compared to the baseline nozzle was assessed, at equal thrust, to produce sufficient installed noise reduction of the jet noise component to enable the N2A HWB to meet NASA s noise goal of 42 dB cumulative below Stage 4.

Thomas, Russell H.↗
NASA NTRS1961

Transonic Aerodynamic Loading Characteristics of a Wing-Body-Tail Combination Having a 52.5 deg. Sweptback Wing of Aspect Ratio 3 With Conical Wing Camber and Body Indentation for a Design Mach Number of Square Root of 2

An investigation has been made of the effects of conical wing camber and body indentation according to the supersonic area rule on the aerodynamic wing loading characteristics of a wing-body-tail configuration at transonic speeds. The wing aspect ratio was 3, taper ratio was 0.1, and quarter-chord-line sweepback was 52.5 deg. with 3-percent-thick airfoil sections. The tests were conducted in the Langley 16-foot transonic tunnel at Mach numbers from 0.80 to 1.05 and at angles of attack from 0 deg. to 14 deg., with Reynolds numbers based on mean aerodynamic chord varying from 7 x 10(exp 6) to 8 x 10(exp 6). Conical camber delayed wing-tip stall and reduced the severity of the accompanying longitudinal instability but did not appreciably affect the spanwise load distribution at angles of attack below tip stall. Body indentation reduced the transonic chordwise center-of-pressure travel from about 8 percent to 5 percent of the mean aerodynamic chord.

Cassetti, Marlowe D.↗
NASA NTRS1960

Aerodynamic Performance and Static Stability at Mach Number 3.3 of an Aircraft Configuration Employing Three Triangular Wing Panels and a Body Equal Length

An aircraft configuration, previously conceived as a means to achieve favorable aerodynamic stability characteristics., high lift-drag ratio, and low heating rates at high supersonic speeds., was modified in an attempt to increase further the lift-drag ratio without adversely affecting the other desirable characteristics. The original configuration consisted of three identical triangular wing panels symmetrically disposed about an ogive-cylinder body equal in length to the root chord of the panels. This configuration was modified by altering the angular disposition of the wing panels, by reducing the area of the panel forming the vertical fin, and by reshaping the body to produce interference lift. Six-component force and moment tests of the modified configuration at combined angles of attack and sideslip were made at a Mach number of 3.3 and a Reynolds number of 5.46 million. A maximum lift-drag ratio of 6.65 (excluding base drag) was measured at a lift coefficient of 0.100 and an angle of attack of 3.60. The lift-drag ratio remained greater than 3 up to lift coefficient of 0.35. Performance estimates, which predicted a maximum lift-drag ratio for the modified configuration 27 percent greater than that of the original configuration, agreed well with experiment. The modified configuration exhibited favorable static stability characteristics within the test range. Longitudinal and directional centers of pressure were slightly aft of the respective centroids of projected plan-form and side area.

James, Carlton S.↗
NASA NTRS1977

Prediction of static aerodynamic characteristics for slender bodies alone and with lifting surfaces to very high angles of attack

An engineering-type method is presented for computing normal-force and pitching-moment coefficients for slender bodies of circular and noncircular cross section alone and with lifting surfaces. In this method, a semi-empirical term representing viscous-separation crossflow is added to a term representing potential-theory crossflow. For many bodies of revolution, computed aerodynamic characteristics are shown to agree with measured results for investigated free-stream Mach numbers from 0.6 to 2.9. The angles of attack extend from 0 deg to 180 deg for M = 2.9 from 0 deg to 60 deg for M = 0.6 to 2.0. For several bodies of elliptic cross section, measured results are also predicted reasonably well over the investigated Mach number range from 0.6 to 2.0 and at angles of attack from 0 deg to 60 deg. As for the bodies of revolution, the predictions are best for supersonic Mach numbers. For body-wing and body-wing-tail configurations with wings of aspect ratios 3 and 4, measured normal-force coefficients and centers are predicted reasonably well at the upper test Mach number of 2.0. Vapor-screen and oil-flow pictures are shown for many body, body-wing and body-wing-tail configurations. When spearation and vortex patterns are asymmetric, undesirable side forces are measured for the models even at zero sideslip angle. Generally, the side-force coefficients decrease or vanish with the following: increase in Mach number, decrease in nose fineness ratio, change from sharp to blunt nose, and flattening of body cross section (particularly the body nose).

Jorgensen, L. H.↗
NASA NTRS1986

Effects of some geometric variations on missile aerodynamic characteristics at supersonic speeds

A summary of some results from tests of a wing-body general research missile model is presented for a Mach number range up to 4.63. A basic ogive-cylinder body with a length-to-diameter ratio of 10 was used to which was attached a series of wing planforms. The planforms included a family of delta wings and a family of rectangular wings having a constant root chord but varying spans so that wings of constant exposed area could be compared. In addition, a cranked-tip planform was included and a rectangular planform with reduced chord. Some results are presented for wing-body-tail configurations - one utilizing a cranked wing planform and one with wings having a constant root chord and span, but tip chords that were 0, 20, and 40 percent of the root chord.

Spearman, M. L.↗
NASA NTRS1986

Effects of some geometric variations on missile aerodynamic characteristics at supersonic speeds

A summary of some results from tests of a wing-body general research missile model is presented for a Mach number range up to 4.63. A basic ogive-cylinder body with a length-to-diameter ratio of 10 was used to which was attached a series of wing planforms. The planforms included a family of delta wings and a family of rectangular wings having a constant root chord but varying spans so that wings of constant exposed area could be compared. In addition, a cranked-tip planform was included and a rectangular planform with reduced chord. Some results are presented for wing-body-tail configurations - one utilizing a cranked wing planform and one with wings having a constant root chord and span, but tip chords that were 0, 20, and 40 percent of the root chord.

Spearman, M. L.↗
NASA NTRS2010

Summary of the Fourth AIAA CFD Drag Prediction Workshop

Results from the Fourth AIAA Drag Prediction Workshop (DPW-IV) are summarized. The workshop focused on the prediction of both absolute and differential drag levels for wing-body and wing-body-horizontal-tail configurations that are representative of transonic transport air- craft. Numerical calculations are performed using industry-relevant test cases that include lift- specific flight conditions, trimmed drag polars, downwash variations, dragrises and Reynolds- number effects. Drag, lift and pitching moment predictions from numerous Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes computational fluid dynamics methods are presented. Solutions are performed on structured, unstructured and hybrid grid systems. The structured-grid sets include point- matched multi-block meshes and over-set grid systems. The unstructured and hybrid grid sets are comprised of tetrahedral, pyramid, prismatic, and hexahedral elements. Effort is made to provide a high-quality and parametrically consistent family of grids for each grid type about each configuration under study. The wing-body-horizontal families are comprised of a coarse, medium and fine grid; an optional extra-fine grid augments several of the grid families. These mesh sequences are utilized to determine asymptotic grid-convergence characteristics of the solution sets, and to estimate grid-converged absolute drag levels of the wing-body-horizontal configuration using Richardson extrapolation.

Vassberg, John C.↗
NASA NTRS2015

Damage Arresting Composites

Under NASA's Environmentally Responsible Aviation Project (ERA) the most promising vehicle concepts and technologies that can simultaneously reduce aircraft fuel use, community noise, and emissions are being evaluated. Two key factors to accomplishing these goals are reducing structural weight and moving away from the traditional tube and wing aircraft configuration to a shape that has improved lift and less drag. The hybrid wing body (HWB) configuration produces more lift and less drag by smoothly joining the wings to the center fuselage section so it provides aerodynamic advantages. This shape, however, presents structural challenges with its pressurized, non-circular cabin subjected to aerodynamic flight loads. In the HWB, the structure of the center section where the passenger cabin would be located must support large in-plane loads as well as internal pressure on nearly-flat panels and right-angle joints. This structural arrangement does not lend itself to simple, efficient designs. Traditional aluminum and even state-of-the-art composites do not provide a solution to this challenge.

Jegley, Dawn C.↗
NASA NTRS1972

Aerodynamic stability and control characteristics of TBC shuttle booster AR-11981-3

A scale model of the Boeing Company space shuttle booster configuration 3 was tested in the MSFC 14-inch trisonic wind tunnel. This test was proposed to fill-in the original test run schedule as well as to investigate the aerodynamic stability and control characteristics of the booster with three wing configurations not previously tested. The configurations tested included: (1) a cylindrical booster body with an axisymmetric nose, (2) clipped delta canards that had variable incidence from 0 deg to -60 deg, (3) different aft body mounted wing configurations, (4) two vertical fin configurations, and (5) a Grumman G-3 orbiter configuration. Tests were conducted over a Mach range from 0.6 to 5.0.

Phelps, E. R.↗
NASA NTRS1992

Coupled finite-difference/finite-element approach for wing-body aeroelasticity

Computational methods using finite-difference approaches for fluids and finite-element approaches for structures have individually advanced to solve almost full-aircraft configurations. However, coupled approaches to solve fluid/structural interaction problems are still in their early stages of development, particularly for complex geometries using complete equations such as the Euler/Navier-Stokes equations. Earlier work demonstrated the success of coupling finite-difference and finite-element methods for simple wing configurations using the Euler/Navier-Stokes equations. In this paper, the same approach is extended for general wing-body configurations. The structural properties are represented by beam-type finite elements. The flow is modeled using the Euler/Navier-Stokes equations. A general procedure to fully couple structural finite-element boundary conditions with fluid finite-difference boundary conditions is developed for wing-body configurations. Computations are made using moving grids that adapt to wing-body structural deformations. Results are illustrated for a typical wing-body configuration.

Guruswamy, Guru P.↗
NASA NTRS2007

Statistical Analysis of CFD Solutions from the Third AIAA Drag Prediction Workshop

The first AIAA Drag Prediction Workshop, held in June 2001, evaluated the results from an extensive N-version test of a collection of Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes CFD codes. The code-to-code scatter was more than an order of magnitude larger than desired for design and experimental validation of cruise conditions for a subsonic transport configuration. The second AIAA Drag Prediction Workshop, held in June 2003, emphasized the determination of installed pylon-nacelle drag increments and grid refinement studies. The code-to-code scatter was significantly reduced compared to the first DPW, but still larger than desired. However, grid refinement studies showed no significant improvement in code-to-code scatter with increasing grid refinement. The third Drag Prediction Workshop focused on the determination of installed side-of-body fairing drag increments and grid refinement studies for clean attached flow on wing alone configurations and for separated flow on the DLR-F6 subsonic transport model. This work evaluated the effect of grid refinement on the code-to-code scatter for the clean attached flow test cases and the separated flow test cases.

Statistical analysis↗