Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “low boom”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 289 records · Page 16
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

X-59 Air Data Probe Calibration Wind Tunnel Test

NASA's aeronautical innovators are working with Lockheed Martin to design and build a supersonic X-plane, the X-59, under the the Low Boom Flight Demonstrator (LBFD) Project, that produces a gentle thump rather than a loud sonic boom. The plane will be used to collect human response data over select U.S. communities. The data from the X-59 test flights will be provided to U.S. and international regulators to potentially allow supersonic flight over land, drastically reducing travel time within the U.S. and around the world. Two wind tunnel tests were conducted in the NASA Glenn Research Center (GRC) 8- by 6-Foot Supersonic Wind Tunnel to calibrate the nose probe for the X-59. The probe was successfully tested and calibrated at 19 Mach numbers between Mach 0.25 and Mach 1.7. Most data were collected using continuous roll angle sweeps at a set Mach number and pitch angle. About 725 high quality data runs were recorded during testing to be used in the calibration of the probe. A backup nose probe was also run through the same test matrix as the primary probe. The probe will be the primary instrument for the flight test of the X-59 for determining angle of attack, angle of sideslip, airspeed, and pressure altitude of the aircraft in flight. Knowing the aircraft's speed and attitude is critical for flight safety and is also critical data for the Sonic Boom mission. Areas of interest for the test were sea level takeoff and landing at Mach 0.2, subsonic cruise at Mach 0.9, and supersonic cruise at Mach 1.4. During Phase I flight testing, the air data nose probe and air data system as a whole will be further calibrated in flight to account for additional installed effects of the airframe on the air data system.

X-59↗
NASA NTRS2023

Accounting for Dose Uncertainty in Dose-Response Curve Estimation Using Hierarchical Bayes Models

As part of their development of the technology for low-boom supersonic flight, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) is planning to conduct a set of supersonic aircraft annoyance surveys in select communities in the United States, to measure public perception of the reduced sonic boom. The relationship between a noise exposure level of a supersonic flight event and the probability of an individual being highly annoyed by the event is quantified by a dose-response curve, which is usually based on logistic regression modeling. Unavoidable amounts of estimation error are expected in the upcoming noise measurements, which can bias the results of the logistic regression if ignored. Hence, the development of an estimation approach that accounts for such error when estimating the dose-response curve is imperative. In this paper, an evaluation study is conducted to assess the impact of measurement error on dose-response curve estimation. For this, hierarchical Bayes models using different specifications are fit to data collected by NASA in 2018, as part of a risk-reduction study of supersonic flights affecting Galveston, Texas. It is observed that the estimated dose-response curve appears sensitive to uncertainty in dose measurements, being subject to attenuation bias.

community response↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Simulations of X-59 Sonic Thumps and Traditional Sonic Booms Propagated Around the World for Three Atmospheric Models

Propagation simulations of sonic booms from supersonic aircraft through atmospheric data over time at fixed locations provides the opportunity to assess noise exposure statistics for different climate regions. Knowledge of climate-based differences in sonic boom noise exposure statistics is important to ensure that future civil supersonic aircraft noise certification standards are globally applicable and effective. In this presentation, simulated sonic booms from the NASA X-59 Quesst quiet supersonic aircraft and conventional supersonic aircraft were propagated through atmospheric data at 100 locations across the world using PCBoom. Noise exposure statistics are compared for propagation results from three different atmospheric databases (NOAA Global Forecast System, NOAA Climate Forecast System Version 2, and the ECMWF Reanalysis Version 5). These atmospheric models were chosen due to their global coverage, popularity, and database availability. Preliminary statistical models are fit to assess the impact of several factors including flight direction, season, ground elevation, and climate on noise exposure size and loudness. Areas with prevalence of higher noise due to their climate are identified, which could help inform future supersonic aircraft noise standards.

X-59↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

A Procedure for Obtaining Forecast Turbulence Parameters in the Atmospheric Boundary Layer for Acoustic Propagation

Propagation through turbulence causes a mean reduction in loudness of sonic booms and in some cases can cause significant fluctuations in loudness about that mean. Understanding these effects is important for accurately planning loudness levels during upcoming community noise tests with the X-59 aircraft as well as mitigating the risk for excessive loudness due to turbulence. Current methods for modeling acoustic propagation through turbulence require several atmospheric parameters including the atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) height, friction velocity, mixed-layer velocity scale, surface-layer temperature scale, as well as ambient pressure, temperature, and humidity within the ABL. Accurate forecasts of these parameters are needed for X-59 flight planning and may also be useful for planning future supersonic aircraft certification flight tests. This presentation showcases one method for obtaining the forecast turbulence and ambient atmospheric parameters from freely available Climate Forecast System Version 2 data. Forecast parameters are compared to measurements to assess accuracy and utility.

sonic boom↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Bounds on Robustness Limitations for Unstable Aircraft Using the Bode Sensitivity Integral

This paper investigates limitations in achievable robustness of statically unstable aircraft using the Bode sensitivity integral. A previous analysis of the X-29 aircraft is studied, and details about the available bandwidth and robustness limitations are re-examined using high-fidelity linear models of the aircraft and control system. Based on these results, a modified analysis was performed on the X-59 Low-Boom Flight Demonstrator to illustrate the same type of fundamental limitations and difficulties in meeting traditional specifications on gain and phase margins.

Bode sensitivity integral↗
NASA NTRS2010

Human Response to Low-Intensity Sonic Booms Heard Indoors and Outdoors

Test subjects seated inside and outside a house were exposed to low-intensity N-wave sonic booms during a 3-week test period in June 2006- The house was instrumented to measure the booms both inside and out. F-18 aircraft were flown to achieve a variety of boom overpressures from approximately .1 to .6 psf During four test days, seventy-seven test subjects heard the booms while seated inside and outside the house. Using the Magnitude Estimation methodology and artificial reference sounds ; the subjects rated the annoyance of the booms. Since the same subjects heard similar booms both inside and outside the house, comparative ratings of indoor and outdoor annoyance were obtained. For a given metric level, indoor subjects gave higher annoyance scores than outdoor subjects. For a given boom; annoyance scores inside were on average the same as those outside. In a post-test questionnaire, the majority of subjects rated the indoor booms as more annoying than the outdoor ones. These results are discussed in this paper.

Sullivan, Brenda M.↗
NASA NTRS2012

Pilot Test of a Novel Method for Assessing Community Response to Low-Amplitude Sonic Booms

A pilot test of a novel method for assessing residents annoyance to sonic booms was performed. During a two-week period, residents of the base housing area at Edwards Air Force Base provided data on their reactions to sonic booms using Smartphone-based interviews. Noise measurements were conducted at the same time. The report presents information about data collection methods and about test participants reactions to low-amplitude sonic booms. The latter information should not be viewed as definitive for several reasons. It may not be reliably generalized to the wider U.S. residential population (because it was not derived from a representative random sample) and the sample itself was not large.

Fidell, Sanford↗
NASA NTRS1992

HSCT design for reduced sonic boom

The topics covered include the following: low sonic boom design perspective; design approach for reduced sonic boom; target sonic boom waveforms; airplane design for reduced sonic boom loudness; design procedure for low sonic boom; wing design and nacelle lift effects; area distributions and F-functions due to volume; fuselage area distributions; low sonic boom design, configuration 3B; sonic boom characteristics; sizing, performance, and noise characteristics; a summary of phase 3 configurations; impact of sonic boom design constraints; and wing loading considerations.

Haglund, George T.↗
NASA NTRS2013

Laboratory Headphone Studies of Human Response to Low-Amplitude Sonic Booms and Rattle Heard Indoors

Human response to sonic booms heard indoors is affected by the generation of contact-induced rattle noise. The annoyance caused by sonic boom-induced rattle noise was studied in a series of psychoacoustics tests. Stimuli were divided into three categories and presented in three different studies: isolated rattles at the same calculated Perceived Level (PL), sonic booms combined with rattles with the mixed sound at a single PL, and sonic booms combined with rattles with the mixed sound at three different PL. Subjects listened to sounds over headphones and were asked to report their annoyance. Annoyance to different rattles was shown to vary significantly according to rattle object size. In addition, the combination of low-amplitude sonic booms and rattles can be more annoying than the sonic boom alone. Correlations and regression analyses for the combined sonic boom and rattle sounds identified the Moore and Glasberg Stationary Loudness (MGSL) metric as a primary predictor of annoyance for the tested sounds. Multiple linear regression models were developed to describe annoyance to the tested sounds, and simplifications for applicability to a wider range of sounds are presented.

Loubeau, Alexandra↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Estimating the Noise Floor of Sonic Boom Metrics Across the USA

NASA is building the X-59 Quiet Supersonic Technology aircraft to produce low noise sonic booms for a series of community noise surveys across the USA. Survey participants will rate their perception of the low booms from supersonic X-59 flyovers. Several noise metrics are proposed to quantify the noise dose: A-, B-, D-, E-weighted Sound Exposure Level, Stevens Perceived Level, and Indoor Sonic Boom Annoyance Predictor. Sparse measurements across the survey area will be used to estimate community noise exposure. The level of these low booms may be comparable to the ambient noise level in some locations, leading to uncertainty in noise exposure estimations. This uncertainty may necessitate increased reliance on sonic boom propagation predictions for exposure estimation. Low-boom signal to ambient noise ratio is one way to quantify uncertainty in measured sonic boom levels. An empirical relationship between A-weighted ambient level and sonic boom metric levels is used in conjunction with the National Park Service’s L50 SPL map to estimate sonic boom metric ambient levels across the USA. The estimate of ambient sonic boom metric levels will aid in X-59 test planning and execution.

sonic boom↗
NASA NTRS2021

Estimated Ambient Sonic Boom Metric Levels and X-59 Signal-to-Noise Ratios across the USA

NASA is building the X-59 Quiet Supersonic Technology aircraft to produce low noise sonic booms for a series of community noise surveys across the USA. Survey participants will rate their perception of the low-booms from supersonic X-59 flyovers. Several noise metrics are proposed to quantify the noise dose: A-, B-, D-, and E-weighted Sound Exposure Level, Stevens Perceived Level, and Indoor Sonic Boom Annoyance Predictor. Sparse measurements across the survey area will be used to estimate community noise exposure. The level of these low-booms may be comparable to the ambient noise level in some locations, leading to uncertainty in noise exposure estimations. This uncertainty may necessitate increased reliance on sonic boom propagation predictions for exposure estimation. Low-boom signal to ambient noise ratio is one way to quantify uncertainty in measured sonic boom levels. An empirical relationship between A-weighted ambient level and sonic boom metric levels is used in conjunction with the National Park Service’s L50 SPL map to estimate ambient noise levels expressed in terms of sonic boom noise metrics across the USA. These estimates of ambient levels will aid in X-59 community test planning and execution. The signal-to-noise ratio for the undertrack X-59 sonic boom is also estimated, and an example application of these data is presented for comparing potential noise monitor sites prior to a community noise test.

X-59↗
NASA NTRS1988

Sonic boom loudness study and airplane configuration development

Sonic boom wave form parameters as related to loudness were investigated analytically. The parameters studied include rise time, duration, maximum overpressure and initial overpressure. The design criteria of a 72 dBA for corridors and 65 dBA for unconstrained flight were chosen based on a review of human response testing. The 72 dBA criterion suggests that 1.0 psf shock waves may be acceptable. On that basis, acceptable low sonic boom wave forms were explored with respect to cruise conditions, aerodynamic lifting length requirements and configuration design at M 1.5 and M 2.4. An M 2.4 baseline arrow wing configuration was studied as a possible vehicle for M 1.5 cruise overland. Modifications made to approach the low boom wave form included a slightly longer forebody, staggered nacelles, a lifting arrow wing horizontal tail, and carefully tailored lift and volume elements. The same wave form criteria applied for M 2.4 cruise results in a low boom configuration that has significant weight, length and balance penalties. Further detailed design work is required to reach the target wave form and resultant loudness level for overland cruise at M 1.5. These results so far suggest that a properly designed M 2.4 overwater configuration may be capable of M 1.5 overland operation with sonic boom noise characteristcs that meet the criterion.

Brown, Jessica G.↗
NASA NTRS2013

Silent and Efficient Supersonic Bi-Directional Flying Wing

The supersonic bi-directional (SBiDir) flying wing (FW) concept has a great potential to achieve low sonic boom with high supersonic aerodynamic performance due to removal of performance conflict between high speed and low speed by rotating goo in flight. This NIAC Phase 1 research has achieved three objectives: 2) prove the concept based on simulation that it can achieve very low boom with smooth Sine wave ground over-pressure signature and excellent aerodynamic efficiency; 3) conduct trade study to correlate the geometric parameters with sonic boom and aerodynamic performance for further automated design optimization in Phase II. The design methodology developed in Phase I includes three parts: 1) an advanced geometry model, which can vary airfoil meanline angle distribution to control the expansion and shock waves on the airplane surface to mitigate sonic boom and improve aerodynamic efficiency. 2) a validated CFD procedure to resolve near field flow with accurate shock strength. The sonic boom propagation from near field to far field ground is simulated by NASA NF Boom code. The surface friction drag prediction is based on fiat plate correlation adopted by Seebass and supported by the experimental study of Winter and Smith, which is on the conservative side and is more reliable than CFD RANS simulation. 3) a mission analysis tool based on Corke's model that provides design requirements and constraints of supersonic airplanes for range, payload, volume, size, weight, etc. The design mission target is a supersonic transport with cruise Mach number 1.6, 100 passengers, and 4000nm range. The trade study has several very important findings: 1) The far field ground sonic boom signature is directly related to the smoothness of the flow on the airplane surface. The meanline angle distribution is a very effective control methodology to mitigate surface shock and expansion wave strength, and mitigating compression wave coalescing by achieving smooth loading distribution chord-wise. Compared with a linear meanline angle distribution, a design using nonlinear and non-monotonic meanline angle distribution is able to reduce the sonic boom ground loudness by over 20dBP1. The design achieves sonic boom ground loudness less than 70dBP1 and aerodynamic dynamic efficiency 1/D of 8.4. 2) Decreasing sweep angle within the Mach cone will increase 1/D as well as sonic boom. A design with variable sweep from 84° at the very leading edge to 68° at the tip achieves an extraordinarily high 1/D of 10.4 at Mach number 1.6 due to the low wave drag. If no sonic boom constraint is attached, SBiDir-FW concept still has a lot of room to increase the 1/D. 3) The round leading edge and trailing edge under high sweep angle are beneficial to improve aerodynamic performance, sonic boom, and to increase volume of the airplane. 4) Subsonic performance is benefited greatly from the high slenderness of supersonic configuration after rotating goo. A design with excellent supersonic aspect ratio of 0.44, 1/D of 8.g, gives an extraordinary subsonic aspect ration of 10 and 1/D of 1g.7. Two configurations are designed in details to install internal seats, landing gears, and engine installation to demonstrate the feasibility of SBiDir-FW configuration to accommodate all the required volume for realistic airplane. Here we emphasize that the qualitative findings in Phase I are very encouraging, more important than the quantitative results. Qualitative findings give the understanding of physics and provide the path to achieve the ultimate high performance design. The promising quantitative results achieved in Phase I need to be confirmed by wind tunnel testing in Phase II and ultimately proved by flight test. The other important step forward will be made to study the rotation transition from both CFD unsteady simulation and wind tunnel testing.

Zha, Gecheng↗
NASA NTRS2004

Human Response to Simulated Low-Intensity Sonic Booms

NASA's High Speed Research (HSR ) program in the 1990s was intended to develop a technology base for a future High-Speed Civil Transport (HSCT). As part of this program, the NASA Langley Research Center sonic boom simulator (SBS) was built and used for a series of tests on subjective response to sonic booms. At the end of the HSR program, an HSCT was deemed impractical, but since then interest in supersonic flight has reawakened, this time focusing on a smaller aircraft suitable for a business jet. To respond to this interest, the Langley sonic boom simulator has been refurbished. The upgraded computer-controlled playback system is based on an SGI O2 computer, in place of the previous DEC MicroVAX. As the frequency response of the booth is not flat, an equalization filter is required. Because of the changes made during the renovation (new loudspeakers), the previous equalization filter no longer performed as well as before, so a new equalization filter has been designed. Booms to be presented in the booth are preprocessed using the filter. When the preprocessed signals are presented into the booth and measured with a microphone, the results are very similar to the intended shapes. Signals with short rise times and sharp "corners" are observed to have a small amount of "ringing" in the response. During the HSR program a considerable number of subjective tests were completed in the SBS. A summary of that research is given in Leatherwood et al. (Individual reports are available at http://techreports.larc.nasa.gov/ltrs/ltrs.html.) Topics of study included shaped sonic booms, asymmetrical booms, realistic (recorded) boom waveforms, indoor and outdoor booms shapes, among other factors. One conclusion of that research was that a loudness metric, like the Stevens Perceived Level (PL), predicted human reaction much more accurately than overpressure or unweighted sound pressure level. Structural vibration and rattle were not included in these studies.

Sullivan, Brenda M.↗
NASA NTRS2018

Sheath-Based Rollable Lenticular-Shaped and Low-Stiction Composite Boom

Various embodiments provide rollable and deployable composite booms that may be used in a wide range of applications both for space and terrestrial structural solutions. Various embodiment composite booms may be bistable, i.e. having a stable strain energy minimum in the coiled configuration as well as the in the deployed configuration. In various embodiments, a boom may be fabricated by aligning two independent tape-springs front-to-front encircled by a durable seamless polymer sleeve. The durable seamless polymer sleeve may allow the two tape-springs to slide past each other during the coiling/deployment process so as to reduce, e.g., minimize, shear and its derived problems.

Fernandez, Juan M.↗
NASA NTRS1990

A semiempirical method for obtaining fuselage normal areas from fuselage Mach sliced areas

An aircraft designed to meet low sonic boom or shaped ground overpressure signature requirements has a volume and lift equivalent area distribution which is in close agreement with the equivalent areas of a desired theoretical curve. Final-stage design modifications of the aircraft's geometry to meet this requirement are usually made through adjustments to the fuselage normal cross-section areas that are derived from the corresponding fuselage equivalent areas by iterative methods. The time required to obtain a good agreement between the desired low-boom area distribution and the conceptual aircraft total area distribution can be reduced by using a semi-empirical method which eliminates much of the final trial-and-error iteration previously employed. Fuselages from conceptual aircraft designed to generate low sonic boom ground overpressures at cruise Mach numbers of 2.0 and 3.0 were used as examples to examine the method's capabilities and limitations. Results indicated that the method has merit as a design tool consistent with other linear theory methods.

Mack, Robert J.↗
NASA NTRS1995

Supersonic civil airplane study and design: Performance and sonic boom

Since aircraft configuration plays an important role in aerodynamic performance and sonic boom shape, the configuration of the next generation supersonic civil transport has to be tailored to meet high aerodynamic performance and low sonic boom requirements. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) can be used to design airplanes to meet these dual objectives. The work and results in this report are used to support NASA's High Speed Research Program (HSRP). CFD tools and techniques have been developed for general usages of sonic boom propagation study and aerodynamic design. Parallel to the research effort on sonic boom extrapolation, CFD flow solvers have been coupled with a numeric optimization tool to form a design package for aircraft configuration. This CFD optimization package has been applied to configuration design on a low-boom concept and an oblique all-wing concept. A nonlinear unconstrained optimizer for Parallel Virtual Machine has been developed for aerodynamic design and study.

Cheung, Samson↗