Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “uranyl”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

282 records · Page 16

Online monitoring the hydrolysis of uranium hexafluoride for intermediates by cryogenic layering and FTIR

Uranium hexafluoride (UF 6 ) is a commonly utilized material feedstock in uranium enrichment processes due to its high vapor pressure and ease of sublimation. When exposed to air, UF 6 undergoes spontaneous hydrolysis to form uranyl fluoride (UO 2 F 2 ) particulates which are utilized for the detection of undeclared nuclear activities by nuclear safeguards organizations. In this study, the kinetics of the hydrolysis reaction and how they relate to particle morphology of the product are still debated in the literature. Here, we report the direct, in situ observation of UF 6 reaction intermediates by cooling the reaction to cryogenic temperatures to significantly reduce the rate of hydrolysis. The reaction is then observable by Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. The conversion of UF 6 to UOF 4 is observed as well as several other bands associated with possible long lived intermediate complexes. Chemometrics are used to further elucidate the reaction pathway from UF 6 to UO 2 F 2 .

38 RADIATION CHEMISTRY, RADIOCHEMISTRY, AND NUCLEA↗

Leveraging design of experiments to build chemometric models for the quantification of uranium (VI) and HNO3 by Raman spectroscopy

Partial least squares regression (PLSR) and support vector regression (SVR) models were optimized for the quantification of U(VI) (10–320 g L −1 ) and HNO 3 (0.6–6 M) by Raman spectroscopy with optimized calibration sets chosen by optimal design of experiments. The designed approach effectively minimized the number of samples in the calibration set for PLSR and SVR by selecting sample concentrations with a quadratic process model, despite complex confounding and covarying spectral features in the spectra. The top PLS2 model resulted in percent root mean square errors of prediction for U(VI), HNO 3 , and NO 3 − of 3.7%, 3.6%, and 2.9%, respectively. PLS1 models performed similarly despite modeling an analyte with a majority linear response (i.e., uranyl symmetric stretch) and another with more covarying vibrational modes (i.e., HNO 3 ). Partial least squares (PLS) model loadings and regression coefficients were evaluated to better understand the relationship between weaker Raman bands and covarying spectral features. Support vector machine models outperformed PLS1 models, resulting in percent root mean square error of prediction values for U(VI) and HNO 3 of 1.5% and 3.1%, respectively. The optimal nonlinear SVR model was trained using a similar number of samples (11) compared with the PLSR model, even though PLS is a linear modeling approach. The generic D-optimal design presented in this work provides a robust statistical framework for selecting training set samples in disparate two-factor systems. This approach reinforces Raman spectroscopy for the quantification of species relevant to the nuclear fuel cycle and provides a robust chemometric modeling approach to bolster online monitoring in challenging process environments.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗

Overview of Algorithms for Using Particle Morphology in Pre-Detonation Nuclear Forensics

A major goal in pre-detonation nuclear forensics is to infer the processing conditions and/or facility type that produced radiological material. This review paper focuses on analyses of particle size, shape, texture (“morphology”) signatures that could provide information on the provenance of interdicted materials. For example, uranium ore concentrates (UOC or yellowcake) include ammonium diuranate (ADU), ammonium uranyl carbonate (AUC), sodium diuranate (SDU), magnesium diuranate (MDU), and others, each prepared using different salts to precipitate U from solution. Once precipitated, UOCs are often dried and calcined to remove adsorbed water. The products can be allowed to react further, forming uranium oxides UO3, U3O8, or UO2 powders, whose surface morphology can be indicative of precipitation and/or calcination conditions used in their production. This review paper describes statistical issues and approaches in using quantitative analyses of measurements such as particle size and shape to infer production conditions. Statistical topics include multivariate t tests (Hotelling’s T 2 ), design of experiments, and several machine learning (ML) options including decision trees, learning vector quantization neural networks, mixture discriminant analysis, and approximate Bayesian computation (ABC). ABC is emphasized as an attractive option to include the effects of model uncertainty in the selected and fitted forward model used for inferring processing conditions.

98 NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT, SAFEGUARDS, AND PHYSICAL P↗

Uranium Retardation Capacity of Lithologies from the Negev Desert, Israel—Rock Characterization and Sorption Experiments

A series of batch experiments were performed to assess the uranium sorption capacity of four mineralogically distinct lithologies from the Negev Desert, Israel, to evaluate the suitability of a potential site for subsurface radioactive waste disposal. The rock specimens consisted of an organic-rich phosphorite, a bituminous marl, a chalk, and a sandstone. The sorption data for each lithology were fitted using a general composite surface complexation model (GC SCM) implemented in PHREEQC. Sorption data were also fitted by a non-mechanistic Langmuir sorption isotherm, which can be used as an alternative to the GC SCM to provide a more computationally efficient method for uranium sorption. This is because all the rocks tested have high pH/alkalinity/calcium buffering capacities that restrict groundwater chemistry variations, so that the use of a GC SCM is not advantageous. The mineralogy of the rocks points to several dominant sorption phases for uranyl (UO 2 2+ ), including apatite, organic carbon, clays, and iron-bearing phases. The surface complexation parameters based on literature values for the minerals identified overestimate the uranium sorption capacities, so that for our application, an empirical approach that makes direct use of the experimental data to estimate mineral-specific sorption parameters appears to be more practical for predicting uranium sorption.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Optimization Of In-field Alpha Spectrometry For Uranium Enrichment Determination In Uranium Hexafluoride

In response to needs identified by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) research is underway to develop In-Field Alpha Spectrometry (IFAS) as a method to allow IAEA safeguards inspectors to collect samples of uranium hexafluoride (UF6) at processing facilities to assess and verify uranium enrichment. For sample collection, the IFAS method uses Single-Use Destructive Assay (SUDA) samplers, which contain thin zeolite coatings that trap UF6 gas and convert it to the safer, more stable form uranyl fluoride (as a dihydrate, UO2F2·2H2O). For alpha spectrometry, the IFAS instrument employs a large area silicon semiconductor transducer to detect and record alpha particle energy-deposition events. Over the past year optimization work has significantly increased the diameter of useful SUDA samples (from 12.7 mm to 48 mm), improved the manufacturability and reproducibility of SUDA samples, increased the area of the IFAS alpha spectrometer sensor from 1.2 cm to 3.1 cm, and improved source positioning within the IFAS. This paper will report on this optimization work, its impacts on IFAS performance, and future plans for IFAS miniaturization, improvements, and testing.

Chichester, David↗

Single-Use Destructive Assay for Uranium Hexafluoride Sampling

Sampling uranium hexafluoride (UF6) for the determination of enrichments by destructive analysis (DA) is a critical component in the International Atomic Energy Agency’s layered safeguards approach for uranium processing facilities. Typically, gram-quantity UF6 samples are collected during inspections and stored under tag-and-seal until transportation to an off-site analytical laboratory. The shipping times can be long, and evolving restrictions on radioactive/corrosive materials shipments may increasingly limit the IAEA’s ability to transport UF6 samples easily. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory has developed a low-cost UF6 sampling technology called Single-Use Destructive Assay (SUDA) that addresses these challenges, as well as provides DA sample geometries that can be tailored for different analytical methods, including potential on-site analyses. The SUDA samplers, along with a unique holder, are designed for direct attachment to existing taps at uranium processing facilities, allowing gaseous UF6 to come into direct contact with a zeolite film. The SUDA technology features the ability to capture uranium in a more easily shipped and handled form as the solid, more stable, and relatively less hazardous hydrated uranyl fluoride (UO2F2•nH2O), which is formed through the controlled hydrolysis of UF6. We have recently simulated uranium collection under enrichment plant sampling conditions to further improve our understanding of SUDA sampling. Presented here is our recent work on measuring the relationship between sampling conditions and uranium collection, which includes control of the uranium-mass-to-zeolite ratio and assessing variable UF6 gas and sampling parameters that can affect collection using the SUDA sampler.

Pope, Timothy R.↗

DEVELOPMENT OF AN APPROACH FOR DOWNBLENDING AND DISPOSITION OF IRRADIATED GRAPHITE FUEL

The IGR reactor, a pulse-type test experimental reactor, reached full power in 1961. The reactor contains a center axial experimental ampoule that is subjected to a large pulse of neutrons (neutron flux maximum density of 7×1016 n/cm2·s, peak power 10GW) when the reactor is operated. The fuel form for the IGR reactor is graphite cubes and rods impregnated with highly enriched (90%) uranyl-dinitrate (UO2(NO3)2·6H2O). This fuel is eligible for return to Russia for reprocessing under the Russian Research Reactor Fuel Return program. However due to some technical and licensing issues it was decided to immobilize this fuel in Kazakhstan. The disposition approach thus selected for the spent HEU fuel involves down-blending of the fuel followed by cementation. Development of the process for down-blending and subsequent cementation requires a process that satisfies many criteria, including fissile content, compressive strength, permeability, and containment of radioactivity, among others. One key goal of the final product is to meet the criteria for termination of safeguards. This paper will describe the overall challenge associated with disposition of irradiated HEU graphite spent fuel, the identification of the objectives of the disposition process, and the constraints associated with development of the process and the waste form.

Gaines, Kris↗

Understanding the Chemical Complexity of Multicomponent Systems: Uranium Polyoxometalates as Nanosorbents

The overarching objective of this project was to develop a molecular-scale understanding of chemical interactions of the transuranic (TRU) elements with uranyl-based polyoxometalate nanoclusters (UPOMs). The specific goals that supported this overarching objective were to: (i) quantify TRU interactions with UPOMs as a function of TRU, carbonate, and UPOM concentration, pH, and temperature; (ii) examine the molecular-level bonding environment of TRU-UPOM complexes; and (iii) develop a rate expression capable of describing the sorption and reduction of TRU by UPOMs. The published literature suggests several potential interactions can occur in TRU-UPOM systems: (i) encapsulation of TRU and coordination with the internal ‘-yl’ oxygens of the UPOM, (ii) coordination of TRU with the external ‘-yl’ oxygens of the UPOM, and (iii) coordination of TRU with the bridging ligands (e.g., peroxo, hydroxo, oxalate) of the UPOM. The latter two may induce aggregation of the UPOMs. The concept of encapsulation is demonstrated by the X-ray diffraction structure of crystallized U 20 , which reveals a Na + cation under each pentagonal face (Sigmon et al., 2009). Computational modeling shows that, while the negative charge of U 20 is spread among all the oxygen atoms, the internal ‘-yl’ oxygens host the most negative charge (Miro and Bo, 2012). This negative charge is reduced through the complexation of the templating sodium ions in the interior of the UPOM. Furthermore, Nyman et al. (2011) shows that cesium can exit through the pentagonal window of U 28 in the aqueous phase, suggesting that the TRU elements, which are smaller than cesium, may be capable of entering a UPOM through these windows in an exchange reaction. Under this project, we focused on hafnium, neptunium, and plutonium interactions with UPOMs.

38 RADIATION CHEMISTRY, RADIOCHEMISTRY, AND NUCLEA↗

Optimization of In-Field Alpha Spectrometry for Uranium Enrichment Determination in Uranium Hexafluoride

In response to needs identified by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) research is underway to develop In-Field Alpha Spectrometry (IFAS) as a method to allow IAEA safeguards inspectors to collect samples of uranium hexafluoride (UF6) at processing facilities to assess and verify uranium enrichment. For sample collection, the IFAS method uses Single-Use Destructive Assay (SUDA) samplers, which contain thin zeolite coatings that trap UF6 gas and convert it to the safer, more stable form uranyl fluoride (UO2F2). For alpha spectrometry, the IFAS instrument employs a large area silicon semiconductor transducer to detect and record alpha particle energy-deposition events. Over the past year optimization work has significantly increased the diameter of useful SUDA samples (from 12.7 mm to 48 mm), improved the manufacturability and reproducibility of SUDA samples, increased the area of the IFAS alpha spectrometer sensor from 1.2 cm to 3.1 cm, and improved source positioning within the IFAS. This paper will report on this optimization work, its impacts on IFAS performance, and future plans for IFAS miniaturization, improvements, and testing.

46 - INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AN↗

Fractionation of Oxygen Isotopes in Uranium Oxides during Peroxide Precipitation and Dry Air Calcination

The interaction between uranium and oxygen-containing substrates is nearly ubiquitous within the nuclear fuel cycle. Given the well-known and predictable oxygen stable isotope compositions of atmospheric oxygen and meteoric waters around the world, the use of these isotopes as a potential geolocation or processing signature of uranium compounds has been of interest within the nuclear safeguards community. This study focuses on measuring the oxygen-stable isotope composition of synthetically produced uranium oxides to determine the mechanism and extent of fractionation during materials processing relevant to the nuclear fuel cycle. Here, metastudtite [UO 2 O 2 (H 2 O) 2 ] samples were first produced using water and hydrogen peroxide of a known oxygen isotope composition. This starting material was calcined in dry air at temperatures ranging from 300 °C to 1000 °C for 20 h producing oxides ranging in composition from UO 3 +x (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.5) to U 3 O 8 . In addition, calcinations between 500 and 800 °C were performed at different time intervals to evaluate the rate of isotopic equilibration. The δ 18 O values of water bound to metastudtite were measured by thermogravimetric analysis coupled to isotope ratio infrared spectroscopy (TGA–IRIS). A redesigned fluorination manifold was constructed at the University of Utah and was used to extract the bulk oxygen from precipitated and calcined products using bromine pentafluoride (BrF 5 ). Mineralization water on metastudtite (measured by TGA–IRIS) was closely associated with the aqueous environment of precipitation with a fractionation of +3.5 ± 0.6‰. In contrast, bulk oxygen from metastudtite (measured by fluorination and gas chromatography combined with isotope ratio mass spectrometry) was found to have an inconsistent fractionation with precipitation water. Samples calcined in dry air exhibited a wide range of oxygen isotope compositions which increased from δ 18 O = +1.4 ± 0.9‰ at 300 °C to +17.3 ± 0.9‰ at 1000 °C. This variation in δ 18 O values was a result of oxygen exchange with atmospheric O 2 and was found to be rapid at calcination temperatures greater than 600°C—with equilibration occurring in less than 2 h. These results provide insights into the incorporation and exchange of oxygen isotopes during precipitation and calcination processes comparable to those employed within the nuclear fuel cycle and establish a foundation for future investigations to build upon.

38 RADIATION CHEMISTRY, RADIOCHEMISTRY, AND NUCLEA↗

Guiding Principles for Geochemical/Thermodynamic Model Development and Validation in Nuclear Waste Disposal: A Close Examination of Recent Thermodynamic Models for H + —Nd 3+ —NO 3 - (—Oxalate) Systems

Development of a defensible source-term model (STM), usually a thermodynamical model for radionuclide solubility calculations, is critical to a performance assessment (PA) of a geologic repository for nuclear waste disposal. Such a model is generally subjected to rigorous regulatory scrutiny. In this article, we highlight key guiding principles for STM model development and validation in nuclear waste management. We illustrate these principles by closely examining three recently developed thermodynamic models with the Pitzer formulism for aqueous H + —Nd 3+ —NO 3 - (—oxalate) systems in a reverse alphabetical order of the authors: the XW model developed by Xiong and Wang, the OWC model developed by Oakes et al., and the GLC model developed by Guignot et al., among which the XW model deals with trace activity coefficients for Nd(III), while the OWC and GLC models are for concentrated Nd(NO 3 ) 3 electrolyte solutions. The principles highlighted include the following: (1) Principle 1. Validation against independent experimental data: A model should be validated against experimental data or field observations that have not been used in the original model parameterization. We tested the XW model against multiple independent experimental data sets including electromotive force (EMF), solubility, water vapor, and water activity measurements. The results show that the XW model is accurate and valid for its intended use for predicting trace activity coefficients and therefore Nd solubility in repository environments. (2) Principle 2. Testing for relevant and sensitive variables: Solution pH is such a variable for an STM and easily acquirable. All three models are checked for their ability to predict pH conditions in Nd(NO 3 ) 3 electrolyte solutions. The OWC model fails to provide a reasonable estimate for solution pH conditions, thus casting serious doubt on its validity for a source-term calculation. In contrast, both the XW and GLC models predict close-to-neutral pH values, in agreement with experimental measurements. (3) Principle 3. Honoring physical constraints: Upon close examination, it is found that the Nd(III)-NO 3 association schema in the OWC model suffers from two shortcomings. Firstly, its second stepwise stability constant for Nd(NO 3 ) 2+ (log K 2 ) is much higher than the first stepwise stability constant for NdNO 3 2+ (log K 1 ), thus violating the general rule of (log K 2 –log K 1 ) < 0, or $\frac{K1}{K2}$>1. Secondly, the OWC model predicts abnormally high activity coefficients for Nd(NO 3 ) 2 + (up to ~900) as the concentration increases. (4) Principle 4. Minimizing degrees of freedom for model fitting: The OWC model with nine fitted parameters is compared with the GLC model with five fitted parameters, as both models apply to the concentrated region for Nd(NO 3 ) 3 electrolyte solutions. The latter appears superior to the former because the latter can fit osmotic coefficient data equally well with fewer model parameters. The work presented here thus illustrates the salient points of geochemical model development, selection, and validation in nuclear waste management.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗