Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “CO 2 reduction”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 307 records · Page 17

Restructuring of Benzimidazole-Based Copper Complexes during Electrochemical CO 2 Reduction

Copper-based molecular catalysts have been widely used for the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide (ERCO 2 ). However, establishing a correlation between structure and catalytic performance has been challenging due to the dynamic nature of these materials under ERCO 2 working conditions. Here, we report on the restructuring of the copper complexes [Cu(bzimpy)Cl 2 ] and [Cu(pyrben) 2 (NO 3 )]NO 3 during ERCO 2 in an acidic medium, evidencing its effects on the observed activity, selectivity, and stability. In situ X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) suggested that, at sufficiently negative potentials, the Cu 2+ centers of both complexes are reduced to undercoordinated Cu 0 species. Pb underpotential deposition of post-ERCO 2 samples indicated that such Cu 0 species also present a dominant contribution of the (100) domain, which is in line with the high Faradaic efficiency toward C 2 products (∼45%) shown by both complexes at −1.24 V vs RHE. By combining online electrochemical mass spectrometry, in situ XAS, electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR), and quantitative product analysis, we found that [Cu(bzimpy)Cl 2 ] exhibits a partially reversible restructuring, regenerating the main complex moiety, [Cu(bzimpy)] 2+ , and its geometry.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗

How to Minimize Faradaic Efficiency Error in Electrochemical CO 2 Reduction for Gas Products

Faradaic efficiency (FE) is an important metric for evaluating electrochemical processes, such as carbon dioxide reduction, that is often used for performance comparisons. Although the equation to calculate FE is well-known, details needed to yield accurate values are often overlooked, potentially leading to errors exceeding 100%. Avoiding any errors is crucial for drawing correct conclusions, especially during a catalysis optimization process. Factors with high potential for FE errors include incorrect mass flow rates and temperature values, imprecise gas chromatography calibrations, and uncorrected gas viscosities, while factors with less potential are also identified. In conclusion, this manuscript presents FE calculation guidelines intended for both newcomers and experts in the field of electrochemical fuel production.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗