Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “FUN3D”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 307 records · Page 17

Performance Optimization Methods for a Memory-Bound, Unstructured-Grid CFD Application on Massively Parallel GPU Platforms

Computational performance of the FUN3D unstructured-grid computational fluid dynamics (CFD) application on massively parallel GPU environments is memory-bound and highly dependent upon efficient reads from and atomic updates to the irregular cell-, edge-, and node-based data structures. In this talk, we present recent efforts into optimizing select performance-critical kernels on NVIDIA Tesla V100 and A100 GPUs and AMD CDNA MI100 GPUs. A novel use of L2 cache residency controls and asynchronous loads into on-chip shared memory are explored on the A100 GPU for the sparse iterative solver, which is dominated by mixed-precision, sparse matrix vector multiplication. Demonstrations show that these methods improve global memory bandwidth utilization by 13.5% on the A100 GPU. Several techniques are also presented that use registers and/or shared memory to facilitate array transposition and aggregation which combine to reduce the frequency and increase the cache efficiency of floating-point atomic updates to the irregular data structures. These methods are demonstrated to improve the kernel throughput by nearly 500% on select kernels on the AMD MI100 over atomic updates directly to global memory. Overall, both V100 and A100 GPUs outperformed the MI100 GPU on kernels dominated by double-precision atomic updates; however, the techniques demonstrated here reduced the performance gap and improved the MI100 performance.

GPU CPU unstructured CFD memory↗

Simulation of Fluid Flow and Collection Efficiency for a SEA Inc. Multi-Element Probe and Ice Crystal Detector Using GlennICE

Numerical simulation results of fluid flow and collection efficiency of the Science Engineering Associates Inc. Multi-Element Probe (Multiwire) and Ice Crystal Detector (ICD) are presented. Fluid flow simulations were conducted using NASA's FUN3D while collection efficiency simulations were conducted using NASA's LEWICE3D software and GlennICE software. For both probes, 3D unsteady flow results were time-averaged. Simulations were computed for free steam velocities ranging from 85 to 185 m/s and freestream total pressures of 44.8 and 93.1 kPa. Collection efficiency results were computed for four spherical particle diameter sizes of 5, 20, 50, and 100 µm. GlennICE collection efficiency results for the multiwire were compared with previously published collection efficiency values calculated using LEWICE3D. Numerical collection efficiency results for the Ice Crystal Detector are presented for the first time.

aircraft, icing, Computational Fluid Dynamics↗

Simulation of Fluid Flow and Collection Efficiency for a SEA Inc. Multi-Element Probe and Ice Crystal Detector Using GlennICE

Numerical simulation results of fluid flow and collection efficiency of the Science Engineering Associates Inc. Multi-Element Probe (Multiwire) and Ice Crystal Detector (ICD) are presented. Fluid flow simulations were conducted using NASA's FUN3D while collection efficiency simulations were conducted using NASA's LEWICE3D software and GlennICE software. For both probes, 3D unsteady flow results were time averaged. Simulations were computed for freestream velocities ranging from 85 to 185 m/s and freestream total pressures of 44.8 and 93.1 kPa. Collection efficiency results were computed for four spherical particle diameter sizes of 5, 20, 50, and 100 µm. GlennICE collection efficiency results for the multiwire were compared with previously published collection efficiency values calculated using LEWICE3D. Numerical collection efficiency results for the Ice Crystal Detector are presented for the first time.

aircraft, icing, Computational Fluid Dynamics↗

Aeroelastic Trim Drag Optimization of Mach 0.8 TransonicTruss-Braced Wing Aircraft with Variable Camber ContinuousTrailing Edge Flap

This paper presents an aeroelastic trim drag optimization study of the Mach 0.8 Tran-sonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) aircraft with the Variable Camber Continuous TrailingEdge Flap (VCCTEF). An aero-structural analysis solver VSPAERO with transonic small dis-turbance, integral boundary-layer, and wing-strut interference corrections coupled to modeshapes computed by NASTRAN using the Galerkin method is developed to provide a rapidaircraft aeroelastic performance evaluation. Aeroelastic trim drag optimization studies areconducted for a VCCTEF configuration with 6-spanwise sections. Three different flight condi-tions corresponding to Mach 0.8 are selected for the aeroelastic trim drag optimization at thedesign and off-design cruise lift coefficients. The preliminary optimization results show thatthe TTBW aircraft with the optimized VCCTEF deflection achieves a drag reduction of about 9.2 counts, 9.6 counts, and 12.3 counts corresponding to the lift coefficients 0.661, 0.695, and0.729, respectively. When accounting for the actuator weight penalty, the corresponding dragreductions are 1.77%, 1.82%, 2.41%. A high-fidelity CFD solver FUN3D is used to validatethe aeroelastic trim drag optimization.

Aeroelastic trim drag↗

Steady and Unsteady Simulations of Transonic Truss-BracedWing Aircraft for Flight Dynamic Stability Analysis

This paper presents steady and unsteady simulations of the Mach 0.8 and Mach 0.745Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) aircrafts using the high-fidelity CFD solver FUN3D for the flight dynamic stability analysis. The steady-state stability derivatives with respect to the angle of attack, angle of sideslip, and airspeed are calculated with perturbations in the angle of attack, angle of sideslip, and Mach number, respectively. A series of unsteady CFD simulations conducted for the TTBW aircrafts in pitch oscillation at various reduced frequencies. The dynamic stability derivatives are estimated using a frequency domain estimation method. The results are then compared to the results obtained from the VSPAERO stability analysis.

CFD↗

Simulation and Regression Modeling of Nasa'S X-59 Low-Boom Carpets Across America

NASA’s X-59 aircraft is predicted to produce a significantly quieter cruise sonic boom than traditional N-wave-producing aircraft. A propagation simulation study was undertaken to quantify loudness levels, exposure size, and variability of the X-59’s low-boom carpet using realistic atmospheric profiles across the contiguous United States of America (CONUS). Near-field pressure data of the X-59 in supersonic cruise from NASA’s fully unstructured Navier–Stokes three-dimensional (known as FUN3D) computational fluid dynamics code were propagated using NASA’s PCBoom code, which solves an enhanced Burgers equation along acoustic rays. Atmospheric profiles from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Climate Forecast System Version 2 database were used for propagation at 138 locations across the CONUS. Carpets at each location were generated for aircraft headings in the four cardinal directions. Over one million X-59 carpets were generated in total. The effects of the heading, season, geography, and climate zone on boom levels and exposure size are presented. Multiple linear regression models were developed to estimate carpet width and loudness metrics across the CONUS. These results inform regulators and mission planners on expected variations in boom levels and carpet extent from atmospheric variations. Understanding potential carpet variability is important when planning community noise surveys using the X-59.

X-59↗

Wall-Modeled Large Eddy Simulation Method for Unstructured-Grid Navier-Stokes Solvers

This paper reports on the implementation and assessment of a Wall-Modeled Large-Eddy Simulation (WMLES) methodology in an unstructured-grid, node-centered flow solver, FUN3D that is developed and supported at the NASA Langley Research Center. Finite-volume (FV) and finite-element (FE) discretization schemes considered in the study provide formal second-order spatial accuracy. Large-Eddy Simulations (LES) resolve large-scale turbulent-flow features and filter out small-scale effects using the Vreman subgrid-scale model. At solid-wall boundaries, a shear-stress model is employed to provide a proper boundary-flux closure. The nonlinear equations are integrated in time using either an optimized backward difference formula or an implicit multistage Runge-Kutta temporal scheme. The implicit equations at each time step are solved by strong nonlinear iteration schemes. WMLES demonstrations are shown for two high-lift configurations, namely, the McDonnell Douglas 30P30N multielement airfoil and a NASA High-Lift Common Research Model. Results show that the WMLES approaches implemented in the FV and FE discretization methods produce consistent solutions and are capable of capturing key aerodynamic characteristics and flow structures for high-lift configurations at a wide range of angles of attack including maximum-lift conditions. In the 30P30N example, correct trends in the variations of integrated aerodynamic forces and moments, surface pressure distributions, and boundary-layer profiles are captured as the Reynolds number is increased.

CFD; turbulence modeling; High-Lift flow simulatio↗

Turbulence Simulations of Transonic Flows over an NACA-0012 Airfoil

Three different simulation approaches, namely unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (URANS), delayed detached-eddy simulation (DDES), and wall-modeled large-eddy simulation (WMLES) are employed to simulate transonic flow over an NACA-0012 airfoil at different angles of attack covering pre- and post-buffet-onset regimes. The freestream Mach number is 0.75, and the Reynolds number based on the chord length is 10 million. These conditions are the same as the wind-tunnel experimental conditions of McDevitt and Okuno (1985). The NASA FUN3D solver is used for the simulations, which is an unstructured, compressible flow solver. The URANS simulations are performed using the Spalart-Allmaras (SA) model with the compressibility correction, the DDES predictions are based on the SA model, and the WMLES are performed using an equilibrium wall-model. The unsteady RANS simulations, only with the compressibility correction, predict the pre- and post- buffet characteristics, which compare well with the experimental results. DDES results predicted a lower buffet onset angle compared to experiment. The predicted shock locations are upstream of the locations predicted by URANS. Using a fine grid in the spanwise direction, WMLES predictions show buffeting consistent with the experiment.

Transonic Buffet↗

Turbulence Simulations of Transonic Flows over an NACA-0012 Airfoil

Three different simulation approaches, namely unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (URANS), delayed detached-eddy simulation (DDES), and wall-modeled large-eddy simulation (WMLES) are employed to simulate transonic flow over an NACA-0012 airfoil at different angles of attack covering pre-and post-buffet-onset regimes. The freestream Mach number is 0.75,and the Reynolds number based on the chord length is 10million. These conditions are the same as the wind-tunnel experimental conditions of McDevitt and Okuno (1985). The NASA FUN3D solver is used for the simulations, which is an unstructured, compressible flow solver. The URANS simulations are performed using the Spalart-Allmaras (SA) model with the compressibility correction, the DDES predictions are based on the SA model, and the WMLES are performed using an equilibrium wall-model. The unsteady RANS simulations, only with the compressibility correction, predict the pre-and post-buffet characteristics, which compare well with the experimental results. DDES results predicted a lower buffet onset angle compared to experiment. The predicted shock locations are upstream of the locations predicted by URANS. Using a fine grid in the span wise direction, WMLES predictions show buffeting consistent with the experiment.

Transonic Buffet↗

Turbulence Simulations of Transonic Flows over an NACA-0012 Airfoil

Three different simulation approaches, namely unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (URANS), delayed detached-eddy simulation (DDES),and wall-modeled large-eddy simulation (WMLES)are employed to simulate transonic flow over an NACA-0012 airfoil at different angles of attack covering pre- and post-buffet-onset regimes. The freestream Mach number is 0.75,and the Reynolds number based on the chord length is 10million. These conditions are the same as the wind-tunnel experimental conditions of McDevitt and Okuno (1985).1The NASA FUN3D solver is used for the simulations, which is an unstructured, compressible flow solver. The URANS simulations are performed using the Spalart-Allmaras (SA) model with the compressibility correction, the DDES predictions are based on the SA model, and the WMLES are performed using an equilibrium wall-model.The unsteady RANS simulations,only with the compressibility correction,predict the pre- and post-buffet characteristics,which compare well with the experimental results. DDES results predicted a lower buffet onset angle compared to experiment.The predicted shock locations are upstream of the locations predicted by URANS. Using a fine grid in the spanwise direction, WMLES predictions show buffeting consistent with the experiment

Transonic Buffet↗

Aeroelastic Trim Drag Optimization of Mach 0.8 Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Aircraft using High-Lift Devices and Control Surfaces

This paper presents an aeroelastic trim drag optimization study of the Mach 0.8 Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) aircraft using the High-lift devices and control surfaces. An aero-structural analysis solver VSPAERO with transonic small disturbance, integral boundary-layer, and wing-strut interference corrections coupled to mode shapes computed by NASTRAN using the Galerkin method is developed to provide a rapid aircraft aeroelastic performance evaluation. Three different flight conditions corresponding to Mach 0.8 are selected for the aeroelastic trim drag optimization at the design and off-design cruise lift coefficients. The preliminary optimization results show that the TTBW aircraft with the optimized deflection of the high-lift devices and control surfaces achieves a drag reduction of about 8.2 counts, 6.5 counts, and 9.7 counts corresponding to the lift coefficients 0.661, 0.695, and 0.729, respectively. A high-fidelity CFD solver FUN3D is used to verify the aeroelastic trim drag optimization.

TTBW↗

High-Fidelity Flight Dynamic Analysis of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing

This paper presents a high-fidelity flight dynamic analysis of the Mach 0.8 Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW). Unsteady RANS CFD simulations of the Mach 0.8 TTBW in pitch, plunge, roll, and yaw oscillations are conducted in FUN3D. The time-domain data are transformed into the frequency-domain data by Fourier series. Transfer functions of the dynamic stability derivatives are then estimated by a frequency-domain re- gression. The dynamic stability derivatives with respect to the angle of attack are determined by the regression of the unsteady aerodynamic coefficients for the plunge motion. The dynamic stability derivatives with re- spect to the pitch rate are determined by the regression of the differential unsteady aerodynamic coefficients for the pitch motion upon the removal of the angle of attack contribution by the plunge motion. Similarly, dynamic stability derivatives with respect to the angle of sideslip, roll rate, and yaw rates are determined from the frequency domain regression. The longitudinal and lateral-direction flight dynamic models of the Mach 0.8 TTBW are constructed from these dynamic stability derivatives. The eigenvalues of the aircraft modes are analyzed to determine the vehicle stability.

Aircraft Stability and Control↗

NASA Langley Research Center Contributions to the 3rd AePW High-Speed Working Group - HyMAX Computational Aeroelastic Predictions

This presentation is given at the 3rd AePW High-Speed Working Group co-located at the AIAA 2023 SciTech Conference. It is a computation study of the UNSW Canberra HyMAX hypersonic flexible plate experiment. The computations are performed with the FUN3D aeroelastic CFD code. Analysis of a 2 and 10 degree turning angle cases are done. The Mach number is 5.8. The unsteady pressures and displacements and damping of the structure are presented.

Hypersonics↗

NASA LaRC Contribution to the High Angle Working Group of the Third Aeroelastic Prediction Workshop: BSCW Shock Buffet

FUN3D Core Capabilities - Established as a research code in late 1980s; now supports numerous internal and external efforts across the speed range - Solves 2D/3D steady and unsteady Euler and RANS equations on node-based mixed element grids for compressible and incompressible flows - General dynamic mesh capability: any combination of rigid / overset / morphing grids, including 6-DOF effects - Aeroelastic modeling using mode shapes, full FEM, etc. - Constrained / multipoint adjoint-based design and mesh adaptation - Distributed development team using agile/extreme software practices including 24/7 regression, performance testing - Capabilities fully integrated, online documentation, training videos, tutorials

Pawel Chwalowski↗

High-Fidelity Analysis of Lift+Cruise VTOL Urban Air Mobility Concept Aircraft

This paper presents a high-fidelity multidisciplinary analysis for the NASA lift+cruise vertical takeoff and landing urban air mobility concept aircraft. The reported simulations couple comprehensive rotorcraft aeromechanics and high-fidelity computational fluid dynamics (CFD). Aerodynamic solutions are computed on dynamic, deforming, unstructured, overset grid systems by an unsteady CFD solver, FUN3D, developed at the NASA Langley Research Center. An integrated overset-grid assembler, Yoga, is used for communications between component grids. Two turbulence models are compared for loose-coupling simulations in hover and low-speed forward flight conditions. One model is the negative variant of the one-equation Spalart-Allmaras model (SA-neg), and the other model is the SA-neg-R model adding a simple rotation correction term to the SA-neg model. It demonstrated that the rotation correction in the SA-neg-R turbulence model significantly improves resolution of secondary vortices and wake interactions for rotorcraft simulations.

CFD↗

Design and Analysis of A Jet Stretcher for High-Altitude Supersonic Free Jet Testing

A jet stretcher can be used to extend the region of clean flow for a test article in a supersonic free jet. The device acts to shield the article from shock waves reflected from the free jet shear layer. It can also allow for overexpanded nozzle operation through blocking shocks emanating from the nozzle lip, enlarging the potential test envelope. The FUN3D computational fluid dynamics solver was used to test a design process for developing jet stretchers. The inner surface of the axisymmetric jet stretcher was obtained from a streamline extracted from a free flight simulation around a notional test article at the intended test condition of Mach 3.2, 53,000 ft. The test article and jet stretcher were then simulated in a free jet nozzle exhaust, and the flowfield within a notional inlet aperture was compared between the installed and free flight calculations. Ambient pressure was increased until separation within the free jet nozzle finally induced disturbances at the inlet. The jet stretcher was shown to provide clean flow to the inlet at cell pressure ratios up to 2.8. A process for trimming the axisymmetric jet stretcher was also tested. This was intended to provide blockage relief for complex test articles, aiding with starting, as well as reducing weight and fabrication cost. The trimmed jet stretcher performed identically to the axisymmetric model at slightly-overexpanded conditions, but at cell pressure ratios above 1.3 allowed disturbances from the trailing edge to reach the inlet.

free jet↗

High-Fidelity Analysis of Lift+Cruise VTOL Urban Air Mobility Concept Aircraft

This paper presents a high-fidelity multidisciplinary analysis for the NASA Lift+Cruise vertical takeoff and landing urban air mobility concept aircraft. The reported simulations couple comprehensive rotorcraft aeromechanics and high-fidelity computational fluid dynamics (CFD). Aerodynamic solutions are computed on dynamic, deforming, unstructured, overset grid systems by an unsteady CFD solver, FUN3D, developed at the NASA Langley Research Center. An integrated overset-grid assembler, Yoga, is used for communications between component grids. Two turbulence models are compared for loose-coupling simulations in hover and low-speed forward flight conditions. One model is the negative variant of the one-equation Spalart-Allmaras model (SA-neg), and the other model is the SA-neg-R model adding a simple rotation correction term to the SA-neg model. It demonstrated that the rotation correction in the SA-neg-R turbulence model significantly improves resolution of secondary vortices and wake interactions for rotorcraft simulations.

CFD↗

Design and Analysis of A Jet Stretcher for High-Altitude Supersonic Free Jet Testing

A jet stretcher can be used to extend the region of clean flow for a test article in a supersonic free jet. The device acts to shield the article from shock waves reflected from the free jet shear layer. It can also allow for overexpanded nozzle operation through blocking shocks emanating from the nozzle lip, enlarging the potential test envelope. The FUN3D computational fluid dynamics solver was used to test a design process for developing jet stretchers. The inner surface of the axisymmetric jet stretcher was obtained from a streamline extracted from a free flight simulation around a notional test article at the intended test condition of Mach 3.2, 53,000 ft. The test article and jet stretcher were then simulated in a free jet nozzle exhaust, and the flowfield within a notional inlet aperture was compared between the installed and free flight calculations. Ambient pressure was increased until separation within the free jet nozzle finally induced disturbances at the inlet. The jet stretcher was shown to provide clean flow to the inlet at cell pressure ratios up to 2.8. A process for trimming the axisymmetric jet stretcher was also tested. This was intended to provide blockage relief for complex test articles, aiding with starting, as well as reducing weight and fabrication cost. The trimmed jet stretcher performed identically to the axisymmetric model at slightly overexpanded conditions, but at cell pressure ratios above 1.3 allowed disturbances from the trailing edge to reach the inlet.

free jet↗