Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Jets”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 307 records · Page 17
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2000

Gravitational Effects on Flow Instability and Transition in Low Density Jets

Recent experiments have shown that low-density gas jets injected into a high-density ambient gas undergo an instability mode, leading to highly-periodic oscillations in the flow-field for certain conditions. The transition from laminar to turbulent flow in these jets is abrupt, without the gradual change in scales. Even the fine scale turbulent structure repeats itself with extreme regularity from cycle to cycle. Similar observations were obtained in buoyancy-dominated and momentum-dominated jets characterized by the Richardson numbers, Ri = [gD(rho(sub a)-rho(sub j))/rho(sub j)U(sub j)(exp 2) ] where g is the gravitational acceleration, D is the jet diameter, rho(sub a) and rho(sub a) are, respectively, the free-stream and jet densities, and U(sub j) is the mean jet exit velocity. At high Richardson numbers, the instability is presumably caused by buoyancy since the flow-oscillation frequency (f) or the Strouhal number, St = [fD/U(sub j)] scales with Ri. In momentum-dominated jets, however, the Strouhal number of the oscillating flow is relatively independent of the Ri. In this case, a local absolute instability is predicted in the potential core of low-density jets with S [= rho(sub j)/rho(sub a)] < 0.7, which agrees qualitatively with experiments. Although the instability in gas jets of high Richardson numbers is attributed to buoyancy, direct physical evidence has not been acquired in experiments. If the instability is indeed caused by buoyancy, the near-field flow structure of the jet will change significantly when the buoyancy is removed, for example, in the microgravity environment. Thus, quantitative data on the spatial and temporal evolutions of the instability, length and time scale of the oscillating mode and its effects on the mean flow and breakdown of the potential core are needed in normal and microgravity to delineate gravitational effects in buoyant jets. In momentum dominated low-density jets, the instability is speculated to originate in the potential core. However, experiments have not succeeded in identifying the direct physical cause of the instability. For example, the theory predicts an oscillating mode for S<0.62 in the limit of zero momentum thickness, which contradicts with the experimental findings of Kyle and Sreenivasan. The analyses of momentum-dominated jets neglect buoyancy effects because of the small Richardson number. Although this assumption is appropriate in the potential core, the gravitational effects are important in the annular region surrounding the jet, where the density and velocity gradients are large. This reasoning provides basis for the hypothesis that the instability in low Richardosn number jets studied by Kyle and Sreenivasan and Monkewitz et al. is caused by buoyancy. The striking similarity in characteristics of the instability and virtually the identical conclusions reached by Subbarao and Cantwell in buoyant (Ri>0.5) helium jets on one hand and by Kyle and Sreenivasan in momentum-dominated (Ri<1x10(exp -3)) helium jets on the other support this hypothesis. However, quantitative experiments in normal and microgravity are necessary to obtain direct physical evidence of buoyancy effects on the flow instability and structure of momentum-dominated low-density jets. The primary objective of this new research project is to quantify how buoyancy affects the flow instability and structure in the near field of low-density jets. The flow will be described by the spatial and temporal evolutions of the instability, length and time scales of the oscillating mode, and the mean and fluctuating concentration fields. To meet this objective, concentration measurements will be obtained across the whole field using quantitative Rainbow Schlieren Deflectometry, providing spatial resolution of 0.1mm and temporal resolution of 0.017s to 1ms. The experimental effort will be supplemented with linear stability analysis of low-density jets by considering buoyancy. The first objective of this research is to investigate the effects of gravity on the flow instability and structure of low-density jets. The flow instability in these jets has been attributed to buoyancy. By removing buoyancy in our experiments, we seek to obtain the direct physical evidence of the instability mechanism. In the absence of the instability, the flow structure will undergo a significant change. We seek to quantify these changes by mapping the flow field (in terms of the concentration profiles) of these jets at non-buoyant conditions. Such information is presently lacking in the existing literature. The second objective of this research is to determine if the instability in momentum-driven, low-density jets is caused by buoyancy. At these conditions, the buoyancy effects are commonly ignored because of the small Richardson based on global parameters. By eliminating buoyancy in our experiments, globally as well as locally, we seek to examine the possibility that the instability mechanism in self-excited, buoyant or momentum-driven jets is the same. To meet this objective, we would quantify the jet flow in normal and microgravity, while systematically decreasing the Richardson number from buoyancy-driven to momentum driven flow regime. The third objective of this research is to perform a linear stability analysis of low-density gas jets by including the gravitational effects. The flow oscillations in these jets are attributed to an absolute instability, whereby the disturbance grows exponentially at the site to ultimately contaminate the entire flow field. We seek to study the characteristics of both convective and absolute instabilities and demarcate the boundary between them.

Agrawal A. K.↗
NASA NTRS2013

Filament Eruptions, Jets, and Space Weather

Previously, from chromospheric H alpha and coronal X‐ray movies of the Sun's polar coronal holes, it was found that nearly all coronal jets (greater than 90%) are one or the other of two roughly equally common different kinds, different in how they erupt: standard jets and blowout jets (Yamauchi et al 2004, Apl, 605, 5ll: Moore et all 2010, Apj, 720, 757). Here, from inspection of SDO/AIA He II 304 A movies of 54 polar x-ray jets observed in Hinode/XRT movies, we report, as Moore et al (2010) anticipated, that (1) most standard x-ray jets (greater than 80%) show no ejected plasma that is cool enough (T is less than or approximately 10(exp 5K) to be seen in the He II 304 A movies; (2) nearly all blownout X-ray jets (greater than 90%) show obvious ejection of such cool plasma; (3) whereas when cool plasma is ejected in standard X-ray jets, it shows no lateral expansion, the cool plasma ejected in blowout X-ray jets shows strong lateral expansion; and (4) in many blowout X-ray jets, the cool plasma ejection displays the erupting-magnetic-rope form of clasic filament eruptions and is thereby seen to be a miniature filament eruption. The XRT movies also showed most blowout X-ray jets to be larger and brighter, and hence to apparently have more energy, than most standard X-ray jets. These observations (1) confirm the dichotomy of coronal jets, (2) agree with the Shibata model for standard jets, and (3) support the conclusion of Moore et al (2010) that in blowout jets the magnetic-arch base of the jet erupts in the manner of the much larger magnetic arcades in which the core field, the field rooted along the arcade's polarity inversion line, is sheared and twisted (sigmoid), often carries a cool‐plasma filament, and erupts to blowout the arcade, producing a CME. From Hinode/SOT Ca II movies of the polar limb, Sterling et al (2010, ApJ, 714, L1) found that chromospheric Type‐II spicules show a dichotomy of eruption dynamics similar to that found here for the cool‐plasma component of coronal X‐ray jets. This favors the idea that Type‐II spicules are miniature counterparts of coronal X‐ray jets. In Moore et al (2011, ApJ, 731, L18), we pointed out that if Type‐II spicules are magnetic eruptions that work like coronal X‐ray jets, they carry an area‐averaged mechanical energy flux of approximately 7x10)(exp 5) erg cm(exp -2) s(exp-1) into the corona in the form of MHD waves and jet outflow, enough to power the heating of the global corona and solar wind. On this basis, from our observations of mini‐filament eruptions in blowout X‐ray jets, we infer that magnetic explosions of the type that have erupting filaments in them are the main engines of both (1) the steady solar wind and (2) the CMEs that produce the most severe space weather by blasting out through the corona and solar wind, making solar energetic particle storms, and bashing the Earth's magnetosphere. We conclude that in focusing on prominences and filament eruptions, Einar had his eye on the main bet for understanding what powers all space weather, both the extreme and the normal.

Moore, Ronald↗
NASA NTRS2002

Synthetic Jet Interaction With A Turbulent Boundary Layer Flow

Perhaps one of the more notable advances to have occurred in flow control technology in the last fifteen years is the application of surface-issuing jets for separation control on aerodynamic surfaces. The concept was introduced by Johnston and Night (1990) who proposed using circular jets, skewed and inclined to the wall, to generate streamwise vortices for the purpose of mitigating boundary layer separation. The skew and inclination angles have subsequently been shown to affect the strength and sign of the ensuing vortices. With a non-circular orifice, in addition to skew and inclination, the yaw angle of the major axis of the orifice can influence the flow control effectiveness of the jet. In particular, a study by Chang arid Collins (1997) revealed that a non-circular orifice, yawed relative to the freestream, can be used to control the size and strength of the vortices produced by the control jet. This early work used jets with only a steady injection of mass. Seifert et al. revealed that an unsteady blowing jet, could be as effective at separation control as a steady jet but with less mass flow. Seifert et al. showed that small amplitude blowing oscillations superimposed on a low momentum steady jet Was the most effective approach to delaying separation on a NACA 0015 airfoil at post-stall angles of attack. More recent work suggests that perhaps the most efficient jet control effect comes from a synthetic (oscillatory) jet where the time-averaged mass flux through the orifice is zero, but the net wall normal momentum is non-zero. The control effectiveness of synthetic jets has been demonstrated for several internal and external flow fields used synthetic jet control on a thick, blunt-nosed airfoil to delay stall well beyond the stall angles for the uncontrolled airfoil and with a dramatic increase in the lift-to-drag performance. Amitay et al. used an array of synthetic jets to mitigate flow separation in curved and diffusing ducts. While the control effectiveness of synthetic jet actuators in an application setting has been confirmed through a number of studies, the fluid dynamic mechanism by which control is effected is not well understood. Issues like yaw angle arid velocity ratio that have been studied for steady control jets have not been investigated for synthetic jets. Moreover, the role played by the inherently unsteady nature of a synthetic jet in the interaction with the controlled flow is not known. Some recent work by Rinehart and Glazer and Smith suggests that away from tile immediate vicinity of the jet orifice the flow field is steady in the mean, and that the interaction of a synthetic jet and a boundary layer creates a secondary flow in the boundary layer consisting primarily of streamwise vortices.

Smith, Douglas R.↗