Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Propeller noise”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 307 records · Page 17
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1985

Theoretical analysis of linearized acoustics and aerodynamics of advanced supersonic propellers

The derivation of a formula for prediction of the noise of supersonic propellers using time domain analysis is presented. This formula is a solution of the Ffowcs Williams-Hawkings equation and does not have the Doppler singularity of some other formulations. The result presented involves some surface integrals over the blade and line integrals over the leading and trailing edges. The blade geometry, motion and surface pressure are needed for noise calculation. To obtain the blade surface pressure, the observer is moved onto the blade surface and a linear singular integral equation is derived which can be solved numerically. Two examples of acoustic calculations using a computer program are currently under development.

Farassat, F.↗
NASA NTRS1979

Interior noise control prediction study for high-speed propeller-driven aircraft

An analytical model was developed to predict the noise levels inside propeller-driven aircraft during cruise at M = 0.8. The model was applied to three study aircraft with fuselages of different size (wide body, narrow body and small diameter) in order to determine the noise reductions required to achieve the goal of an A-weighted sound level which does not exceed 80 dB. The model was then used to determine noise control methods which could achieve the required noise reductions. Two classes of noise control treatments were investigated: add-on treatments which can be added to existing structures, and advanced concepts which would require changes to the fuselage primary structure. Only one treatment, a double wall with limp panel, provided the required noise reductions. Weight penalties associated with the treatment were estimated for the three study aircraft.

Rennison, D. C.↗
NASA NTRS1979

Tone noise of three supersonic helical tip speed propellers in a wind tunnel

Three eight bladed supersonic helical tip speed propellers were tested in the NASA Lewis Wind Tunnel at through flow Mach numbers of 0.6, 0.7, 0.75, 0.8, and 0.85. Such propellers are being considered as propulsors for a future energy conservative aircraft. The three propellers of equal performance, incorporate different plan forms and different amounts of sweep in order to investigate their noise generation, which could cause a cabin environment problem. The acoustically designed propeller SR-3 had 45 deg of tip sweep and was significantly quieter at Mach 0.8 cruise than the straight bladed propeller, SR-2. An intermediate 30 deg tip sweep propeller, SR-1m exhibited a noise level between the other two. Enhanced pressure-time traces indicated that SR-2 and SR-1m exhibited shock-like pressure traces at Mach-0.8 cruise while the SR-3 did not. Noise trends with varying helical tip Mach number and blade loading were also observed.

Dittmar, J. H.↗
NASA NTRS1987

Noise of a model high speed counterrotation propeller at simulated takeoff/approach conditions (F7/A7)

A high speed advanced counterrotation propeller, was tested in the NASA-Lewis 9 x 15 foot Anechoic Wind Tunnel at simulated takeoff/approach conditions of 0.2 Mach number. Acoustic measurements were taken with fixed floor microphones, an axially translating microphone probe, and with a polar microphone probe which was fixed to the propeller nacelle and could take both sideline and circumferential acoustic surveys. Aerodynamic measurements were also made to establish the propeller operating conditions. The propeller was run over a range of blade setting angles from 36.4/36.5 to 41.1/39.4 deg, tip speeds from 165 to 259 m/sec, rotor spacings from 1.56 to 3.63 based on forward rotor tip chord to aerodynamic separation, and angles of attack to + or - 16 deg. First order rotor alone tones showed highest directivity levels near the propeller plane, while interaction tone showed high levels throughout sideline directivity, especially toward the propeller rotation axis. Interaction tone levels were sensitive to propeller row spacing while rotor alone tones showed little spacing effect. There is a decreased noise level associated with higher propeller blade numbers for the same overall propeller thrust.

Woodward, Richard P.↗
NASA NTRS1987

Noise of a model high speed counterrotation propeller at simulated takeoff/approach conditions (F7/A7)

A high speed advanced counterrotation propeller, was tested in the NASA-Lewis 9 x 15 foot Anechoic Wind Tunnel at simulated takeoff/approach conditions of 0.2 Mach number. Acoustic measurements were taken with fixed floor microphones, an axially translating microphone probe, and with a polar microphone probe which was fixed to the propeller nacelle and could take both sideline and circumferential acoustic surveys. Aerodynamic measurements were also made to establish the propeller operating conditions. The propeller was run over a range of blade setting angles from 36.4/36.5 to 41.1/39.4 deg, tip speeds from 165 to 259 m/sec, rotor spacings from 1.56 to 3.63 based on forward rotor tip chord to aerodynamic separation, and angles of attack to + or - 16 deg. First order rotor alone tones showed highest directivity levels near the propeller plane, while interaction tone showed high levels throughout sideline directivity, especially toward the propeller rotation axis. Interaction tone levels were sensitive to propeller row spacing while rotor alone tones showed little spacing effect. There is a decreased noise level associated with higher propeller blade numbers for the same overall propeller thrust.

Woodward, Richard P.↗
NASA NTRS1997

A Users Guide for the NASA ANOPP Propeller Analysis System

The purpose of this report is to document improvements to the Propeller Analysis System of the Aircraft Noise Prediction Program (PAS-ANOPP) and to serve as a users guide. An overview of the functional modules and modifications made to the Propeller ANOPP system are described. Propeller noise predictions are made by executing a sequence of functional modules through the use of ANOPP control statements. The most commonly used ANOPP control statements are discussed with detailed examples demonstrating the use of each control statement. Originally, the Propeller Analysis System included the angle-of-attack only in the performance module. Recently, modifications have been made to also include angle-of-attack in the noise prediction module. A brief description of PAS prediction capabilities is presented which illustrate the input requirements necessary to run the code by way of ten templates. The purpose of the templates are to provide PAS users with complete examples which can be modified to serve their particular purposes. The examples include the use of different approximations in the computation of the noise and the effects of synchrophasing. Since modifications have been made to the original PAS-ANOPP, comparisons of the modified ANOPP and wind tunnel data are also included. Two appendices are attached at the end of this report which provide useful reference material. One appendix summarizes the PAS functional modules while the second provides a detailed discussion of the TABLE control statement.

Nguygen, L. Cathy↗
NASA NTRS1998

Preliminary Work for Modeling the Propellers of an Aircraft as a Noise Source in an Acoustic Boundary Element Analysis

An algorithm for generating appropriate velocity boundary conditions for an acoustic boundary element analysis from the kinematics of an operating propeller is presented. It constitutes the initial phase of Integrating sophisticated rotorcraft models into a conventional boundary element analysis. Currently, the pressure field is computed by a linear approximation. An initial validation of the developed process was performed by comparing numerical results to test data for the external acoustic pressure on the surface of a tilt-rotor aircraft for one flight condition.

Vlahopoulos, Nickolas↗
NASA NTRS1987

Noise propagation from a four-engine, propeller-driven airplane

A flight experiment was conducted to investigate the propagation of periodic low-frequency noise from a propeller-driven airplane. The test airplane was a large four-engine, propeller-driven airplane flown at altitudes from 15 to 500 m over the end of an 1800-m-long, 22-element microphone array. The acoustic data were reduced by a one-third octave-band analysis. The primary propagation quantities computed were lateral attenuation and ground effects, both of which become significant at shallow elevation angles. Scatter in the measured results largely obscured the physics of the low-frequency noise propagation. Variability of the noise source, up to 9.5 dB over a 2-sec interval, was the major contributor to the data scatter. The microphones mounted at ground level produced more consistent results with less scatter than those mounted 1.2 m above ground. The ground noise levels were found to be greater on the port side than on the starboard side.

Willshire, William L., Jr.↗
NASA NTRS1989

Cruise noise of an advanced single-rotation propeller measured from an adjacent aircraft

Results are reported from flight measurements of the noise from a full-scale SR-7L advanced single-rotation turbofan model mounted on the wing of the NASA Lewis Propfan Test Assessment (PTA) aircraft (a modified Gulfstream II). Data obtained on the PTA with an outboard microphone boom and by the NASA Lewis acoustically instrumented Learjet flying along several sidelines relative to the PTA are presented in tables and graphs and briefly discussed. It is found that the PTA-boom and Learjet sound levels are in good agreement at Mach 0.69 and altitude 20,000 ft, but the Learjet values are significantly lower than the boom levels at Mach 0.79 and altitude 36,000 ft.

Woodward, Richard P.↗
NASA NTRS1982

Rough analysis of installation effects on turboprop noise

A rough analysis of noise from a propeller operated at angle of attack, and in the nonuniform flow due to a line vortex approximating a wing flow field suggests installation can significantly affect turboprop noise levels. On one side of the propeller, where the blades approach the horizontal plane from above, decreases of noise occur; while on the other side noise increases. The noise reduction is due to negative interference of steady and unsteady sources. An angle of attack, or distance between propeller and vortex, exists for which noise is a minimum.

Durbin, P. A.↗
NASA NTRS2021

Noise Measurements from Ground Tests of the Moog SureFly Vehicle

Noise measurements from a ground test of a small vertical lift research vehicle are presented. The proof-of-concept all-electric vehicle called “SureFly” was developed by Moog, Inc. A cooperative effort between NASA and Moog, Inc. has led to one of the first acoustic test datasets from an Urban Air Mobility (UAM) vehicle being developed for passenger and cargo. Results show propeller and possibly motor tones are important for the overall noise levels. The vehicle has four support arms each with a pair of contra-rotating propellers. Noise measurements show higher noise levels from the lower propellers, likely due to inflow distortion from the arms and top propellers. Possible motor noise was identified by calculating harmonics of the line frequency and comparing to the tones in the narrowband acoustic spectra and phased microphone array data. The acoustic far field was found to be about 100 ft away from the vehicle, but additional microphones are needed to provide a better assessment. Results show the presence of modulation for some test conditions. The work reported here is only for ground tests.

Acoustics↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Noise Measurements from Ground Tests of the Moog SureFly Vehicle

Noise measurements from a ground test of a small vertical lift research vehicle are presented. The proof-of-concept all-electric vehicle called “SureFly” was developed by Moog, Inc. A cooperative effort between NASA and Moog, Inc. has led to one of the first acoustic test datasets from an Urban Air Mobility (UAM) vehicle being developed for passenger and cargo. Results show propeller and possibly motor tones are important for the overall noise levels. The vehicle has four support arms each with a pair of contra-rotating propellers. Noise measurements show higher noise levels from the lower propellers, likely due to inflow distortion from the arms and top propellers. Possible motor noise was identified by calculating harmonics of the line frequency and comparing to the tones in the narrowband acoustic spectra and phased microphone array data. The acoustic far field was found to be about 100 feet away from the vehicle, but additional microphones are needed to provide a better assessment. Results show the presence of modulation for some test conditions. The work reported here is only for ground tests.

Acoustics↗
NASA NTRS1986

The evolution of methods for noise prediction of high speed rotors and propellers in the time domain

Linear wave equation models which have been used over the years at NASA Langley for describing noise emissions from high speed rotating blades are summarized. The noise sources are assumed to lie on a moving surface, and analysis of the situation has been based on the Ffowcs Williams-Hawkings (FW-H) equation. Although the equation accounts for two surface and one volume source, the NASA analyses have considered only the surface terms. Several variations on the FW-H model are delineated for various types of applications, noting the computational benefits of removing the frequency dependence of the calculations. Formulations are also provided for compact and noncompact sources, and features of Long's subsonic integral equation and Farassat's high speed integral equation are discussed. The selection of subsonic or high speed models is dependent on the Mach number of the blade surface where the source is located.

Farassat, F.↗
NASA NTRS1982

Impact of Advanced Propeller Technology on Aircraft/Mission Characteristics of Several General Aviation Aircraft

Studies of several General Aviation aircraft indicated that the application of advanced technologies to General Aviation propellers can reduce fuel consumption in future aircraft by a significant amount. Propeller blade weight reductions achieved through the use of composites, propeller efficiency and noise improvements achieved through the use of advanced concepts and improved propeller analytical design methods result in aircraft with lower operating cost, acquisition cost and gross weight.

Keiter, I. D.↗
NASA NTRS2018

Tonal Noise Prediction of a Distributed Propulsion Unmanned Aerial Vehicle

Noise is expected to be a major barrier of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) to public acceptance. A noise prediction scheme is introduced in this paper and applied to a specific vehicle configuration, namely, the Greased Lightning-10. Results herein will be used to demonstrate the feasibility of incorporating a noise constraint within the flight control system of a distributed electric propulsion vehicle by modifying commands for low-noise operation over sensitive areas, e.g., communities, schools, etc. Steady loading and thickness noise signatures of single propellers are computed using the Propeller Analysis System of the NASA Aircraft NOise Prediction Program. The individual signatures are then superposed at far field observers after applying corrections for spherical spreading and phase delays based on straight ray propagation. Two-propeller source fields are verified using analytical directivity patterns of monopoles. Notional effects of rotation rate, rotation direction, and relative propeller phase are given. Under ideal circumstances and equivalent RPM, random phasing, which occurs in most small UAVs, can produce up to 20 decibels uncertainty in the tonal sound pressure level at a given ground observer. Additionally, directivity modification via relative propeller phase control is shown to have great potential as a noise reduction technique. This paper will focus on the forward flight mode but will also briefly discuss the vertical flight mode.

Pascioni, Kyle A.↗
NASA NTRS1987

Prediction of added noise due to the effect of unsteady flow on pusher propellers

An analytical/computational study has been conducted to predict the effect of an upstream wing or pylon on the noise of an operating propeller. The wing trailing edge was placed at variable distances (0.1 and 0.3 chord) upstream of a scaled model propeller (SR-2). The wake was modeled using a similarity formulation. The instantaneous pressure distribution on the propeller blades during the passage through the wake was formulated in terms of a time-dependent variation of each blade section's angle of attack and in terms of the shed vortices from the blade trailing edge. It was found that the final expressions for the unsteady loads considerably altered the radiated noise pattern. Predicted noise for various observer positions, rotational speeds and propeller/pylon distances were computed and are presented in terms of the pressure time history. It has been shown that the positioning of a pylon upstream of a propeller indeed increases the noise. Some comparisons with experimental results are also given.

Takallu, M. A.↗
NASA NTRS1986

Wing loads induced by a propeller wake

A wing located in the wake of a propeller sustains unsteady loading. This loading can generate components of structureborne noise which are transmitted to the interior of the aircraft. The vibration of the wing can also contribute to reradiation of propeller noise. An analysis system for the evaluation of wing unsteady loads is presented. The propeller wake is modeled as a potential helical tip vortex and unsteady airfoil theory is used to determine the wing response. The result is the forcing function for determining the structureborne noise. The wing response is evaluated as a function of propeller thrust coefficient, advance ratio, and propeller installation geometry. The system capabilities are demonstrated by application to three significantly different aircraft.

Weir, D. S.↗