Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “fast reactors”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 307 records · Page 17
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2023

Characterization of Mk-IV and EBR-II X441A Metallic Fuel Pins for the THOR-C-2 and THOR-M-TOP-1 Experiments: Results from Post-Transient Neutron Tomography of THOR-C-2 Capsule and Pre-transient Non-Destructive and Destructive Examination of DP 36 and DP 40 (Rev.1)

Current interest in sodium-cooled fast reactor designs, such as TerraPower’s Natrium Reactor, has highlighted the need for advanced-reactor fuel technology development. A Fuel Safety Research and Development (FSRD) program for metallic fast reactor fuels has been created to achieve comprehensive safety testing within the re-commissioned Transient Reactor Test (TREAT) facility at the Idaho National Laboratory. Despite over 60 years of metallic fuel irradiation, uncertainties exist in the performance of the fuel system, particularly under anticipated operational occurrences and severe accident scenarios. Throughout historical testing within the Experimental Breeder Reactor (EBR)-II and the Fast Flux Test Facility, fuel behavior has demonstrated benign response to transient reactor conditions; however, accurate predictions of failure thresholds rely heavily on fuel composition and irradiation history. In advancing the FSRD program, two planned transient heating experiments are at various stages of completion. The Temperature Heat sink Overpower Response (THOR)-C-2, fueled with an unirradiated Mk IV U-10Zr pin, has undergone transient irradiation in TREAT and post-transient three-dimensional neutron tomography. Additionally, pre-transient characterization of test and sibling U-19Pu-10Zr pins for THOR-M-TOP-1 was evaluated by both non-destructive and destructive methods. The test and sibling pins were selected from previously irradiated EBR-II experiment X441A. Both pins underwent visual examination, precise gamma spectrometry, two-dimensional neutron radiography, and element contact profilometry while the sibling pin was additionally subjected to sectioning and optical microscopy. THOR-C-2 radiography captured the fuel and cladding relocation during the intermediate transient at the top and bottom of the THOR capsule, allowing key features to be linked to the pin’s measured thermal response. For THOR M TOP 1, a solid baseline for steady-state behavior has been established. No anomalous features were identified in either the test or sibling pin. Defining characteristics and features were recorded for further comparisons.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2024

Experimental Investigations into the Corrosion of Alloy 625 Using NaCl-PuCl3 Molten Salt in a Natural Circulation Microloop

Molten salt reactors (MSRs) can potentially revolutionize the nuclear industry by providing a path to a near-zero nuclear waste fuel cycle, contributing to more sustainable energy sources. As a plethora of MSR developers in the United States work toward an aggressive commercialization timeline, many of their fueled-salts—notably, chloride-based compositions—have limited operational testing with nuclear material. Licensing and operating these reactors require an understanding of corrosion effects on reactor materials of construction under operational conditions. The TerraPower Molten Chloride Fast Reactor (MCFR) is a liquid-fueled chloride-salt fast reactor which has received notable interest from the utility sector based on its desirable economic characteristics. The reactor operates at low pressure but does not require the use of highly reactive chemicals, leading to a reduced use of concrete and steel during construction. Additionally, liquid fuel allows for inherently stable behavior and natural circulation during a loss-of-site-power scenario. MCFR can be refueled while operating which makes it compatible with variable generation sources such as wind and solar. MCFR is a breed-and-burn in-situ reactor that does not implement any chemical processing or separations in the fuel cycle. Only mechanical filtration of noble metals and off-gassing of noble gases are utilized while the actinides stay mixed with the fuel at all times. The MCFR will require technology development to reach commercialization. With a breed-and-burn in-situ reactor like MCFR, the transmutation of fertile U-238 to fissile Pu-239 allows for much greater fuel utilization.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2025

Code Coverage Status of the ARC Code PERSENT

The Argonne Reactor Code (ARC) software system supports users in their fast reactor design goals by providing neutronic, thermal-hydraulic, and structural analysis capabilities. PERSENT fulfills the role of generating reactivity coefficients for a given time point of a REBUS calculation usable in a point kinetics based safety analysis capability. PERSENT also provides a sensitivity coefficient capability on eigenvalue, reactivity worth, and several other key coefficients that are used in the follow-on safety analysis. Given a co-variance matrix, PERSENT can carry out the uncertainty quantification to indicate the amount of error in the reactivity coefficients derived from the errors in the cross section measurements. With continued improvement of computational resources, many of the geometry modeling capabilities in DIF3D that were primarily used in low order schemes are not really needed anymore. Today, the diffusion and transport capabilities of DIF3D-VARIANT are primarily used in the reactor design process with some scattered usage of DIF3D-FD and DIF3D-Nodal. PERSENT is part of the ARC code system and is built around DIF3D-VARIANT and the flux solution it provides. The purpose of the present work is to identify a set of test problems for PERSENT and assess the code coverage of PERSENT for those test problems. PERSENT treats the DIF3D executable as an external executable and thus the code coverage considerations only need to focus on the PERSENT source code and only a fraction of the connected modules in the existing ARC software library. The goal is to document what parts of the existing PERSENT code are touched by the set of test problems and which are not. Because the verification work done on PERSENT was focused on the most common uses of PERSENT for fast reactor analysis, the code coverage assessment of those capabilities is the highest priority. This will ensure that nothing is being missed by the existing verification test problems that users of PERSENT rely upon. The code coverage analysis of PERSENT was performed with the Code Coverage Tool of the Intel Fortran compiler which requires modifications to the compilation of PERSENT. The detailed coverage tables are given for each submodule of PERSENT. Most of the uncovered parts/files could be easily ignored because they are either for error message and debugging output or not needed by PERSENT today. Only a few uncovered parts of PERSENT deserve extending the verification test suite.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2019

Summary Report for U.S. and Japan Bilateral Collaborations (FY2019)

Within the frame work of the Civil Nuclear Energy R&D Working Group (CNWG), researchers from Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA) and Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry (CRIEPI) have been participating in the R&D collaborations in three tasks that are related to the fast reactor technologies, which include metal fuel sodium-cooled fast reactor (SFR) core bowing analysis, modeling and simulation of Monju Turbine Trip Benchmark, and collaborative improvement of the SAS4A code.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Physics demonstration and verification of MOOSE framework reactor module meshing capabilities

The recently developed Reactor module in the open-source MOOSE framework includes finite element meshing capabilities for analysis of common reactor geometries. Capabilities in the Reactor module have been employed to generate meshes for physics applications including a sodium-cooled fast reactor core analysis using Griffin, a fast reactor assembly thermal deformation analysis using MOOSE Tensor Mechanics, and a heat-pipe cooled microreactor coupled analysis using Griffin, Bison, and Sockeye. The process to build these meshes using MOOSE's meshing capabilities is described. Physics simulation results using MOOSE-based meshes have been verified to match results which leverage external meshing software such as Cubit or Argonne's Mesh Tools. MOOSE's Reactor module provides significant advantages compared to the use of external meshing tools when analyzing Cartesian and hexagonal reactor lattices using MOOSE-based applications: accessibility to the end user, low barrier to entry for new users, speed of mesh generation, volume preservation of meshed fuel pins, and simplification of analysis workflow when using MOOSE applications.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2019

Summary: Verification of the ENDF/B-VII.1 and VIII.0 AMPX 1597-group Libraries for Advanced Reactor Analysis

The SCALE/AMPX multigroup (MG) cross section processing procedure has been updated to minimize reactivity differences for various advanced thermal and fast reactor designs, as observed for the current MG libraries, resulting in excellent agreement between the calculations with the new MG libraries and the continuous-energy reference calculations. The SCALE MG calculations are widely applied to thermal spectrum light-water reactor systems, as well as fast spectrum metallic systems. Due to growing interest from industry and regulators in applying SCALE for the design of fast spectrum reactors—both sodium and molten salt—it was desirable to review and improve the SCALE/AMPX procedure for unresolved resonance self-shielded data and high-energy neutron spectra. The data were improved by generating MG unresolved resonance data based on the analytic probability table method with the narrow resonance approximation and by using very fine and intermediate group structures that are typical for fast system analysis. This study focused on verifying the improved SCALE/AMPX MG cross section processing procedure and the new AMPX 1597-group library with the ENDF/B-VII.1 and VIII.0 evaluated nuclear data. The verification was made by performing reaction rate analysis and benchmark calculations for various thermal and fast reactor systems. Results indicate that the improved SCALE/AMPX MG cross section processing and libraries provide excellent results for advanced reactor analysis.

Kim, Kang Seog↗
DOE OSTI2021

NRC Multiphysics Analysis Capability Deployment (FY2021 - Part 2)

This report details the progress and activities of Idaho National Laboratory (INL) on the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) project “Development and Modeling Support for Advanced Non-Light Water Reactors.” Task 4b was completed for this report. INL developed a sample problem showing how to use Serpent 2 to calculate macroscopic cross sections for use in Griffin for a typical sodium fast reactor Unprotected Loss of Flow (ULOF) transient. The complicating factor is the relatively large axial gradient of the coolant (and hence fuel) temperature and its evolution during the transient. A 3D Griffin model of the Advanced Burner Test Reactor (ABTR) is coupled to the System Analysis Module (SAM) to perform the ULOF transient. The model includes various explicit feedback mechanisms for fast reactors, including Doppler, radial expansion from the displacement of the support plate, and axial expansion from the displacement of the fuel pins. The results for the ULOF transient are consistent with published values. We observed small effects in the transient results that arise from the superhomogenization equivalence correction of uniform and nonuniform temperature data sets, but they diminish as more dominant reactivity mechanisms are added to the model. Potential improvements to the neutronics model include: adding the differential control rod and sodium feedback mechanisms, implementing cross section re-homogenization based on the partial volume of the various materials, and enhancing the kinetics parameters. Furthermore, the fluids model only includes four subchannels to represent the entire active core due to performance limitations in SAM when attempting to model one subchannel per assembly.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2021

SAS4A/SASSYS-1 Lead Verification Test Suite

SAS4A/SASSYS-1 is a simulation tool used to perform deterministic analyses of anticipated events as well as design basis and beyond design basis accidents for advanced liquid-metal-cooled nuclear reactors. With its origin as SAS1A in the late 1960s, the SAS series of codes has been under continuous use and development for over forty-five years and represents a critical investment in safety analysis capabilities for the U.S. Department of Energy. Although SAS4A/SASSYS-1 was developed to support the analysis of any liquid-metal-cooled nuclear reactor, it has primarily been utilized to design and analyze Sodium Fast Reactors (SFRs). As a result, most of the verification basis for SAS4A/SASSYS-1 utilizes sodium as a coolant and geometry descriptions that are typical of a SFR facility. In this work, new verification problems are defined to extend the applicability of the SAS4A/SASSYS-1 verification basis into Lead Fast Reactor (LFR) design space. A review of the existing SAS4A/SASSYS-1 SFR verification test suite is performed to determine the number of test cases that are SFR specific. SFR specific test cases are replicated using lead as a coolant and system layouts that are representative of LFRs. This report provides definitions and reference solutions for seven new test cases that scope lead-specific features and capabilities of the software. For a verification test to be considered acceptable, comparisons of analytical solutions to SAS4A/SASSYS-1 predictions must produce negligible or justifiable errors. All LFR specific test cases are found to be acceptable.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2021

Qualification of System-Level Advanced Reactor Safety Analysis Software for Lead Systems: Final CRADA Report

SAS4A/SASSYS-1 is a simulation tool used to perform deterministic analysis of anticipated events as well as design basis and beyond design basis accidents for advanced liquid-metal-cooled nuclear reactors. With its origin as SAS1A in the late 1960s, the SAS series of codes has been under continuous use and development for over forty-five years and represents a critical investment in safety analysis capabilities for the U.S. Department of Energy. Although SAS4A/SASSYS-1 was developed to support the analysis of any liquid-metal-cooled nuclear reactor, it has primarily been utilized to design and analyze Sodium Fast Reactors (SFRs). As a result, most of the qualification basis for SAS4A/SASSYS-1 has utilized sodium as a coolant and geometry descriptions that are prototypic of SFR configurations. In this project, which partnered with Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC, the initial foundation for a qualification basis centered on prototypic pool-type lead-cooled systems has been established, where the end goal is to extend support for utilization of SAS4A/SASSYS-1 in Lead Fast Reactor (LFR) licensing or authorization. This project included three fundamental technical tasks: LFR V&V test suite development (Task 1); qualification support for LFRs (Task 2); and LFR modeling capabilities evaluation and improvement (Task 3)

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2023

Deep Learning for Multigroup Cross-Section Representation in Two-Step Core Calculations

Here we investigate using deep learning, a type of machine-learning algorithm employing multiple layers of artificial neurons, for the mathematical representation of multigroup cross sections for use in the Griffin reactor multiphysics code for two-step deterministic neutronics calculations. A three-dimensional fuel element typical of a high-temperature gas reactor as well as a two-dimensional sodium-cooled fast reactor lattice are modeled using the Serpent Monte Carlo code, and multigroup macroscopic cross sections are generated for various state parameters to produce a training data set and a separate validation data set. A fully connected, feedforward neural network is trained using the open-source PyTorch machine-learning framework, and its accuracy is compared against the standard piecewise linear interpolation model. Additionally, we provide in this work a generic technique for propagating the cross-section model errors up to the k eff using sensitivity coefficients with the first-order uncertainty propagation rule. Quantifying the eigenvalue error due to the cross-section regression errors is especially practical for appropriately selecting the mathematical representation of the cross sections. We demonstrate that the artificial neural network model produces lower errors and therefore enables better accuracy relative to the piecewise linear model when the cross sections exhibit nonlinear dependencies; especially when a coarse grid is employed, where the errors can be halved by the artificial neural network. However, for linearly dependent multigroup cross sections as found for the sodium-cooled fast reactor case, a simpler linear regression outperforms deeper networks.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2019

Characteristics of TRU Fueled SFR Core during the Transition with Partially Loaded LEU Assemblies

The fast reactor (FR) fuels typically require higher fissile content than the thermal reactor fuels because the cross sections of the fissile isotopes are smaller relative to the fertile isotopes and higher neutron leakage from the reactor core. The medium-sized high-burnup sodium-cooled fast reactors (SFRs) in the framework of uranium-plutonium/transuranic (U/Pu or U/TRU) fuel-cycle can be optimized to operate with less than 17 % of Pu/TRU content in the driver fuel while having higher TRU conversion ratios (CR~1.0) [1]. However, possible shortage or inaccessibility to TRU based fuel could be accommodated by the use of uranium-based fuels on demand such as low enriched uranium (LEU) having significantly higher 235U content than used in the commercial light water reactors (LWRs), which is defined as high-assay LEU. The reactor systems having low TRU conversion ratio are commonly categorized as burner reactors, which include LWRs and even can be achieved by FRs with designed to utilize higher TRU fractions (e.g., increased neutron leakage and lower fuel volume fractions). Such reactor systems need to be initially loaded with high excess reactivity, which decreases toward the end of cycle, in order to achieve target burnup conditions. Therefore, in order to offset the excess reactivity, neutron absorbing materials need to be inserted into the core to compensate (e.g., control rods). By reducing the neutron leakage (e.g., increasing the fuel volume fraction or thicker blankets), the TRU conversion ratio in the FR can be increased. If the TRU conversion ratio becomes 1.0 (technically slightly greater than 1.0 to account for process losses during recycle), the reactor is in the condition known as “breakeven”, in which fuel contains the same amount of fissile material after recycling that was used to fuel the reactor. In such a condition, combined with the fact that fission products do not have strong poisoning effects in FRs, the reactivity swing becomes smaller than that of burner type reactors. For breeders, the reactivity can increase toward the end of the cycle because more fissile material is produced than consumed. In this regard, the breakeven FR core is implicitly optimized in a sense by eliminating the large insertion of control elements to offset the reactivity during the normal operation. However, the breakeven condition here is assumed to be achieved only by the TRU based fuel. Possible lack of TRU based fuel needs to be compensated by available LEU resources containing equivalent amount of fissile (i.e., 235U). The use of LEU will have some impact on important safety parameters that need to be evaluated. U-235 has a higher effective delayed neutron fraction than Pu-239. Also, the number of neutrons produced by fissions per neutron absorption (i.e. ?) of 235U in the fast energy range (>1e4 eV) is lower than that of 239Pu, which may lead to the poor fissile conversion when LEU is used as a high-conversion FR fuel. The full-paper presents the study of the impact of partially loaded LEU fuels within TRU fueled breakeven SFR on the transition of nuclide evolutions and core characteristics particularly focusing on the burnup reactivity swing. The full paper analyzes how the large reactivity swing occurs during the LEU loading and addresses possible options to reduce it to the level equivalent to that of the TRU fueled SFR core.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI1991

Nuclear Safety [Vol. 32, No. 1, January-March 1991]

Nuclear Safety is a review journal that covers significant developments in the field of nuclear safety. Its scope includes the analysis and control of hazards associated with nuclear energy, operations involving fissionable materials, and the products of nuclear fission and their effects on the environment. Primary emphasis is on safety in reactor design, construction, and operation; however, the safety aspects of the entire fuel cycle, including fuel fabrication, spent-fuel processing, nuclear waste disposal, handling of radioisotopes, and environmental effects of these operations, are also treated. Table of Contents for this issue follows. GENERAL SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS: 1 The Safety Review and Approval Process for Space Nuclear Power Sources, G. L. Bennett; 19 Report on the American Nuclear Society International Topical Meeting: "The Safety, Status, and Future of Non-Commercial Reactors and Irradiation Facilities", E. G. Silver; 35 Book Review: Fission Product Transport Processes in Reactor Accidents, Proceedings to the International Centre tor Heat and Mass Processes T. S. Kress; 38 Fast Reactor Technology in the 1990s: A Summary of the 1990 International Fast Reactor Safety Meeting, A. E. Levin; ACCIDENT ANALYSIS: 56 Effects of Chemical Phenomena on LWR Severe Accident Fission Product Behavior, A. P. Malinauskas and T. S. Kress; CONTROL AND INSTRUMENTATION: 65 Technical Note: Safety Parameter Display Systems—10 Years Later, R. J. Eckenrode; 68 Potential Application of Neural Networks to the Operation of Nuclear Power Plants, R. E. Uhrig; DESIGN FEATURES: 80 Twenty-First DOE/NRC Nuclear Air-Cleaning Conference, R. R. Bellamy, D. W. Moeller, and M. W. First; 91 Impact of an Apparent Radiation Embrittlement Rate on the Life Expectancy of PWR Vessel Supports, R. D. Cheverton, G. C. Robinson, W. E. Pennell, and R. K. Nanstad; ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS: 103 Technical Note: The Impact of Offsite Factors on the Safety Performance of Small Nuclear Power Plants, Yu. D. Baranaev and A. N. Viktorov; WASTE AND SPENT FUEL MANAGEMENT: 109 Activities Related to Waste Management, Compiled by E. G. Silver; OPERATING EXPERIENCES: 118 Reactor Shutdown Experience, Compiled by J. W. Cletcher; 121 Selected Safety-Related Events, Compiled by G. A. Murphy; 123 Operating U.S. Power Reactors, Compiled by E. G. Silver; RECENT DEVELOPMENTS: 140 General Administrative Activities, Compiled by E. G. Silver; 150 Reports, Standards, and Safety Guides, D. S. Queener; 155 Status of Power-Reactor Licensing Activities, Compiled by E. G. Silver; 157 Proposed Rule Changes as of Sept. 30, 1990; ANNOUNCEMENTS: 79 MIT Offers Summer Program on Nuclear Power Reactor Safety; 108 Harvard School of Public Health Offers Several Short Courses; 139 Short Course and Workshop on Nuclear Criticality Safety at University of New Mexico; 160 SCK/CEN Announces Training Course on Emergency Planning and Response; 161 The Authors; 164 Indexes to Nuclear Safety, Volume 31

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2020

Simplified Approach for Scoping Assessment of Non-LWR Source Terms

This report describes a structure to aid in evaluation of release mitigation strategies across a range of reactor technologies. The assessment performed for example reactor concepts utilizes previous studies of postulated accident sequences for each reactor concept. This simplified approach classifies release mitigation strategies based on a range of barriers, physical attenuation processes, and system performance. It is not, however, intended to develop quantitative estimates of radiological release magnitudes and compositions to the environment. Rather, this approach is intended to identify the characteristics of a reactor design concepts release mitigation strategies that are most important to different classes of accident scenarios. It uses a scoping methodology to provide an approximate, order-of-magnitude, estimate of the radiological release to the environment and associated off-site consequences. This scoping method is applied to different reactor concepts, considering the performance of barriers to fission product release for these concepts under sample accident scenarios. The accident scenarios and sensitivity evaluations are selected in this report to evaluate the role of different fission product barriers in ameliorating the source term to the environment and associated off-site consequences. This report applies this structure to characterize how release mitigation measures are integrated to define overall release mitigation strategies for High Temperature Gas Reactors (HTGRs), Sodium Fast Reactors (SFRs), and liquid fueled Molten Salt Reactors (MSRs). To support this evaluation framework, factors defining a chain of release attenuation stages, and thus an overall mitigation strategy, must be established through mechanistic source term calculations. This has typically required the application of an integral plant analysis code such as MELCOR. At present, there is insufficient evidence to support a priori evaluation of the effectiveness of a release mitigation strategy for advanced reactor concepts across the spectrum of events that could challenge the radiological containment function. While it is clear that these designs have significant margin to radiological release to the environment for the scenarios comprising the design basis, detailed studies have not yet been performed to assess the risk profile for these plants. Such studies would require extensive evaluation across a reasonably complete spectrum of accident scenarios that could lead to radiological release to the environment.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2021

Overview of Advanced Reactor Simulation Capabilities to Support Demonstrations

The Virtual Test Bed (VTB) was established to support the deployment of advanced reactors by facilitating the use of state-of-the-art modeling and simulation capabilities. These tools are able to solve previously prohibitive challenge problems in greater levels of fidelity and in a multi-physics framework. A VTB repository was recently set up to host models for a wide variety of reactor types and using a range of NEAMS-developed software. Table I summarizes the different capabilities already available in the repository and up-and-coming near/long term ones. The repository currently hosts models for a wide variety of reactor types, including High-Temperature Gas Cooled Reactors (HTGR), Sodium Fast Reactors (SFR), Fluoride salt cooled High-temperature Reactors (FHR), Molten Salt Reactors (MSR), and Heat-Pipe Microreactors (HP-MR). It should be noted that work is ongoing for all of the models and each example problem is at a different state of maturity.

99 GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS↗
DOE OSTI2021

Preliminary Radioisotope Screening for Off-site Consequence Assessment of Advanced Non-LWR Systems

Currently a set of 71 radionuclides are accounted for in off-site consequence analysis for LWRs. Radionuclides of dose consequence are expected to change for non-LWRs, with radionuclides of interest being type-specific. This document identifies an expanded set of radionuclides that may need to be accounted for in multiple non-LWR systems: high temperature gas reactors (HTGRs); fluoride-salt-cooled high-temperature reactors (FHRs); thermal-spectrum fluoride-based molten salt reactors (MSRs); fast-spectrum chloride-based MSRs; and, liquid metal fast reactors with metallic fuel (LMRs) Specific considerations are provided for each reactor type in Chapter 2 through Chapter 5, and a summary of all recommendations is provided in Chapter 6. All identified radionuclides are already incorporated within the MACCS software, yet the development of tritium-specific and carbon-specific chemistry models are recommended.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
DOE OSTI2023

Thermal Extraction Modeling within HYBRID: Nominal and Extraction Conditions in Advanced Reactor Systems

This document details continuing development of thermal extraction modeling within the HYBRID repository, the modeling repository of the Integrated Energy Systems program at Idaho National Laboratory. The focus of the thermal extraction work is setting up template energy conversion systems for advanced reactor systems. Based on these nominal conditions, the IES team is developing extraction capability maps that present the system thermal-to-electric efficiency of the remaining system and the mass extraction fraction capability of these systems when extracting steam at various pressures to send steam to applications at a lower given pressure. These curves are mapped on what has become termed “whale chart” due to the appearance of the results. Multiple advanced reactor systems are complete, and it is anticipated that all four of the main advanced reactor types: advanced light-water reactors, high temperature gas reactors, liquid metal fast reactors, and molten salt reactors, will be complete by the end of the fiscal year.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2023

Molten Salt Reactor Experiment Simulation using Shift/Griffin

The Department of Energy (DOE)’s NEAMS focuses its efforts on the development of advanced modeling and simulation (M&S) tools for light-water reactors (LWRs) and non–LWRs (i.e., molten salt reactors, high-temperature gas reactors, microreactors, and fast reactors). In the previous fiscal year, the Multiphysics Applications Driver Technical Area funded molten salt reactor (MSR) M&S at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) to generate multigroup macroscopic cross sections with Shift for a MSRE 2D lattice model in Griffin. In addition, Shift’s capability to calculate gamma dose rates from activated components in the primary exchangers in a molten salt breeder reactor was also demonstrated. In fiscal year 2023, ORNL generated multigroup macroscopic cross sections using Shift for a 3D MSRE core model. MSRE depletion calculations using Griffin were also demonstrated in this fiscal year. For the depletion calculation, one-group microscopic cross sections for the 3D MSRE core were generated using Shift, and the decay transmutation library from ORIGEN was converted to an ISOXML file, which is required as input in Griffin. Several Monte Carlo codes, such as OpenMC and Serpent, were also used to benchmark and supplement multigroup cross sections generated by Shift. Multigroup libraries were generated with 8 and 20 group structures, and the study found the 8-group structure to be more accurate when comparing Griffin results to continuous energy (CE) Monte Carlo results. The average flux from CE Shift calculations is up to ~6% higher than the CE Serpent calculations because of different values applied for the energy released per fission (κ values). The average flux in the fuel salt calculated by Griffin using cross sections generated with Shift agrees well with the reference CE Shift solution; the same is valid for the corresponding Serpent results. The maximum relative error is ~6% and ~2% compared to the CE Shift and Serpent reference solutions, respectively. Meanwhile, the average flux calculated by Griffin in the graphite moderator shows a higher difference in the thermal range when compared to both reference Monte Carlo solutions; this result suggests a need for improvement in cross section generation for the graphite moderator in the thermal range in both Monte Carlo codes. Griffin depletion calculations using cross sections from Shift and Serpent were performed and compared against ORIGEN calculations, and the nuclide densities calculated by Griffin were found to be generally in agreement with those of ORIGEN. Because a different approach was taken to calculate the energy released per fission ( κ values) in Shift and Serpent, a difference in nuclide densities from differences in the average flux was observed between Griffin using Serpent and Shift cross sections. Griffin calculations with Shift cross sections produced higher average flux in the salt than with Serpent cross sections, leading to higher consumption of 235 U and higher production of 135 Xe. For time-dependent depletion calculations, cross sections were generated with Serpent, and Griffin’s results using these cross sections were compared to CE Serpent depletion results, demonstrating good agreement. The average difference in keff between Serpent and Griffin as a function of burnup is about 155 pcm. Similarly, good agreement with small differences up to ~0.5% was also noticed in the nuclide density of 235 U and 135 Xe. More details regarding the methodologies invoked to generate the cross section to make code-to-code comparisons are discussed further in this report. User feedback on Griffin and Shift capabilities that will enhance these calculations is provided in this report for future consideration. The work performed this fiscal year can be extended further for multiphysics coupling of Griffin-Pronghorn/SAM with Mole to study precursor flow and salt chemistry.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗