Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Airframes”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 325 records · Page 18
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1971

Flight investigation of airframe installation effects on an auxiliary inlet ejector nozzle on an underwing engine nacelle

The local flow field approaching an installed nozzle may vary from isolated test conditions, thereby affecting exhausting nozzle performance. An installation of general interest is a podded engine mounted near the aft lower surface of the wing. The effect of this installation on the performance of an auxiliary inlet ejector nozzle was investigated over a Mach number range of 0.7 to 1.3 by using a modified F-106B aircraft. Both floating and fixed-open door configurations were examined. The ejector nozzle trailing-edge flaps were simulated in the closed position with rigid structure which provided a boattail angle of 15 deg. Primary nozzle area was varied as exhaust gas temperature was varied between 982.2 and 2003.3 K.

Burley, R. R.↗
NASA NTRS1973

Development of airframe design technology for crashworthiness.

This paper describes the NASA portion of a joint FAA-NASA General Aviation Crashworthiness Program leading to the development of improved crashworthiness design technology. The objectives of the program are to develop analytical technology for predicting crashworthiness of structures, provide design improvements, and perform full-scale crash tests. The analytical techniques which are being developed both in-house and under contract are described, and typical results from these analytical programs are shown. In addition, the full-scale testing facility and test program are discussed.

Kruszewski, E. T.↗
NASA NTRS1974

Navy participation in the development of airframe parameter identification techniques

The Navy is currently involved in the development of advanced parameter identification techniques for use in aircraft flight testing and refinement of aircraft dynamic systems modeling. An overview is presented of the Navy's research programs, capabilities, and facilities. The use of parameter identification techniques are related to the flight testing, development, and simulation of aircraft and aircraft systems in the areas of flying qualities, automatic flight controls, flight dynamics, and advanced landing systems. Preliminary analytical and flight test results are presented. The impact that new parameter identification technology has on Navy flight test philosophy is discussed. Future plans are outlined.

Burton, R. A.↗
NASA NTRS1975

Experimental and analytical study of an inlet forebody for an airframe-integrated scramjet concept

Preliminary analytical and experimental inlet forebody investigations have been conducted at Mach numbers of 6.0 and 8.5. The forebody design concept consisted of a sharp-nosed right circular cone followed by elliptical cross sections. This concept resulted in swept isentropic compression which would allow swept cowl leading edges. Measurements were made to define the condition of the inviscid flow field developed by the forebody, including flow profiles in the vicinity of cowl leading-edge stations, and the three-dimensional boundary-layer effects. The investigation verified some of the expected differences between the predicted and the experimental results.

Andrews, E. H., Jr.↗
NASA NTRS1976

Wind tunnel investigation of Nacelle-Airframe interference at Mach numbers of 0.9 to 1.4-force data

Detailed interference force and pressure data were obtained on a representative wing-body-nacelle combination at Mach numbers of 0.9 to 1.4. The model consisted of a delta wing-body aerodynamic force model with four independently supported nacelles located beneath the wing-body combination. The model was mounted on a six-component force balance, and the left-hand wing was pressure-instrumented. Each of the two right-hand nacelles was mounted on a six-component force balance housed in the thickness of the nacelle, while each of the left-hand nacelles was pressure-instrumented. The primary variables examined included Mach number, angle of attack, nacelle position, and nacelle mass-flow ratio. Four different configurations were tested to identify various interference forces and pressures on each component; these included tests of the isolated nacelle, the isolated wing-body combination, the four nacelles as a unit, and the total wing-body-nacelle combination. Nacelle axial location, relative to both the wing-body combination and to each other, was the most important variable in determining the net interference among the components.

Bencze, D. P.↗
NASA NTRS1976

Wind tunnel investigation of Nacelle-Airframe interference at Mach numbers of 0.9 to 1.4-pressure data, volume 2

Detailed interference force and pressure data were obtained on a representative wing-body nacelle combination at Mach numbers of 0.9 to 1.4. The model consisted of a delta wing-body aerodynamic force model with four independently supported nacelles located beneath the wing-body combination. The primary variables examined included Mach number, angle of attack, nacelle position, and nacelle mass flow ratio. Four different configurations were tested to identify various interference forces and pressures on each component; these included tests of the isolated nacelle, the isolated wing-body combination, the four nacelles as a unit, and the total wing-body-nacelle combination. Nacelle axial location, relative to both the wing-body combination and to each other, was the most important variable in determining the net interference among the components. The overall interference effects were found to be essentially constant over the operating angle-of-attack range of the configuration, and nearly independent of nacelle mass flow ratio.

Bencze, D. P.↗
NASA NTRS1976

Wind tunnel investigation of nacelle-airframe interference at Mach numbers of 0.9 to 1.4 - pressure data, volume 1

Detailed interference force and pressure data were obtained on a representative wing-body nacelle combination at Mach numbers of 0.9 to 1.4. The model consisted of a delta wing-body aerodynamic force model with four independently supported nacelles located beneath the wing-body combination. The model was mounted on a six component force balance, and the left hand wing was pressure instrumented. Each of the two right hand nacelles was mounted on a six component force balance housed in the thickness of the nacelle, while each of the left hand nacelles was pressure instrumented. The primary variables examined included Mach number, angle of attack, nacelle position, and nacelle mass flow ratio. Nacelle axial location, relative to both the wing-body combination and to each other, was the most important variable in determining the net interference among the components.

Bencze, D. P.↗
NASA NTRS1976

Actively cooled airframe structures for high-speed flight

An assessment of forced convectively cooled aircraft structures is presented based on recent and on-going studies. Particular emphasis is given to contractual efforts in which large panels of three different concepts are being designed and fabricated for cyclic thermal-structural tests at the Langley Research Center. Results of ambient temperature fatigue tests of small specimens of these concepts are reviewed. Aspects of conceptual and detail designs, material selection, fabrication, reliability, and heat-load/hydrogen fuel heat-sink matching are discussed. Results to date indicate that active cooling significantly impacts the structural design process, and, despite the use of conventional aluminum materials, advanced complex fabrication processes are required.

Nowak, R. J.↗
NASA NTRS1976

Correlation microphone for measuring airframe noise in large-scale wind tunnels

A correlation microphone arrangement was used in the test section of the Ames 7- by 10-Foot and 40- by 80-Foot Wind Tunnels in an attempt to reject the reverberant and wind noise. The tests in the 7- by 10-foot wind tunnel covered a frequency range from 400 Hz to 8 kHz while the tests in the 40- by 80-foot tunnel covered the range from 31.5 to 800 Hz. Examination of the experimental data plus calculations of cross-correlations due to reflective noise indicate that the correlation microphone is effective in rejecting microphone wind noise and reverberant noise even at low frequencies, and that the low-frequency background noise monitored by the correlation microphone is reflected noise with a preferred direction from the tunnel drive system. Design studies indicate that this tunnel drive noise can be reduced substantially through suitable modification of the drive fans and acoustical treatment of the nacelles that house these fans.

Ahtye, W. F.↗
NASA NTRS1976

Low-frequency noise reduction of lightweight airframe structures

The results of an experimental study to determine the noise attenuation characteristics of aircraft type fuselage structural panels were presented. Of particular interest was noise attenuation at low frequencies, below the fundamental resonances of the panels. All panels were flightweight structures for transport type aircraft in the 34,050 to 45,400 kg (75,000 to 100,000 pounds) gross weight range. Test data include the results of vibration and acoustic transmission loss tests on seven types of isotropic and orthotropically stiffened, flat and curved panels. The results show that stiffness controlled acoustically integrated structures can provide very high noise reductions at low frequencies without significantly affecting their high frequency noise reduction capabilities.

Getline, G. L.↗