Steric and Lewis Basicity Influence of the Second Coordination Sphere on Electrocatalytic CO 2 Reduction by Manganese Bipyridyl Complexes
This study aims to provide a greater insight into the balance between steric (bpy vs (Ph) 2 bpy vs mes 2 bpy ligands) and Lewis basic ((Ph) 2 bpy vs (MeOPh) 2 bpy vs (MeSPh) 2 bpy ligands) influence on the efficiencies of the protonation-first vs reduction-first CO 2 reduction mechanisms with [Mn I (R 2 bpy)(CO) 3 (CH 3 CN)] + precatalysts, and on their respective transition-state geometries/energies for rate-determining C–OH bond cleavage toward CO evolution. The presence of only modest steric bulk at the 6,6'-diphenyl-2,2'-bipyridyl ((Ph) 2 bpy) ligand has here allowed unique insight into the mechanism of catalyst activation and CO 2 binding by navigating a perfect medium between the nonsterically encumbered bpy-based and the highly sterically encumbered mes2bpy-based precatalysts. Cyclic voltammetry conducted in CO 2 -saturated electrolyte for the (Ph) 2 bpy-based precatalyst [2-CH 3 CN] + confirms that CO 2 binding occurs at the two-electron-reduced activated catalyst [2] – in the absence of an excess proton source, in contrast to prior assumptions that all manganese catalysts require a strong acid for CO 2 binding. This observation is supported by computed free energies of the parent–child reaction for [Mn–Mn] o dimer formation, where increased steric hindrance relative to the bpy-based precatalyst correlates with favorable CO 2 binding. A critical balance must be adhered to, however, as the absence of steric bulk in the bpy-based precatalyst [1-CH 3 CN] + maintains a lower overpotential than [2-CH 3 CN] + at the protonation-first pathway with comparable kinetic performance, whereas an ~2-fold greater TOF max is observed at its reduction-first pathway with an almost identical overpotential as [2-CH 3 CN] + . Notably, excessive steric bulk in the mes2bpy-based precatalyst [3-CH 3 CN] + results in increased activation free energies of the C–OH bond cleavage transition states for both the protonation-first and the reduction-first pathways relative to both [1-CH 3 CN] + and [2-CH 3 CN] + . In fact, [3-CH 3 CN] + requires a 1 V window beyond its onset potential to reach its peak catalytic current, which is in contrast to the narrower (<0.30 V) potential response window of the remaining catalysts here studied. Furthermore, voltammetry recorded under 1 atm of CO 2 with 2.8 M (5%) H 2 O establishes [2-CH 3 CN] + to have the lowest overpotential (η = 0.75 V) in the series here studied, attributed to its ability to lie “on the fence” when providing sufficient steric bulk to hinder (but not prevent) [Mn–Mn] o dimerization, while simultaneously having a limited steric impact on the free energy of activation for the rate-determining C–OH bond cleavage transition state. While the methoxyphenyl bpy-based precatalyst [4-CH 3 CN] + possesses an increased steric presence relative to [2-CH 3 CN] + , this is offset by its capacity to stabilize the C–OH bond cleavage transition states of both the protonation-first and the reduction-first pathways by facilitating second coordination sphere H-bonding stabilization.