Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “aeroelasticity”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 325 records · Page 18
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Aeroelastic Analysis of Highly Flexible Wings with Linearized Frequency-Domain Aerodynamics

Flutter analysis of configurations with geometric structural nonlinearities typically is done with time-domain analysis. The results from this process are computationally expensive and can yield cumbersome results that may be difficult to manage/interpret. Compared to time-domain methods, frequency-domain flutter analysis can provide additional insight into the characteristics of a flutter stability problem. By linearizing the aeroelastic problem about the nonlinear equilibrium state, this work applies frequency-domain aeroelastic analysis to the Pazy wing, the subject of the Large Deformation Working Group in the Aeroelastic Prediction Workshop. Generalized aerodynamic forces (GAFs) are computed with both a doublet-lattice method and a computational fluid dynamics solver at a range of reduced frequencies as well as a range of dynamic pressures to account for the dependence of the mode shapes on the nonlinear equilibrium state. These GAFs are used in a p-k flutter solver, which is modified to handle the dependence of the stiffness matrix and GAFs on the dynamic pressure.

Bret K Stanford↗
NASA NTRS1988

AGARD standard aeroelastic configurations for dynamic response. 1: Wing 445.6

This report contains experimental flutter data for the AGARD 3D swept tapered standard configuration "Wing 445.6", along with related descriptive data of the model properties required for comparative flutter calculations. As part of a cooperative AGARD-SMP programme, guided by the Sub-Committee on Aeroelasticity, this standard configuration may serve as a common basis for comparisons of calculated and measured aeroelastic behaviour. These comparisons will promote a better understanding of the assumptions, approximations and limitations underlying the various aerodynamic methods applied, thus pointing the way to further improvements.

Aircraft↗
NASA NTRS2014

Aeroelastic Optimization Study Based on X-56A Model

A design process which incorporates the object-oriented multidisciplinary design, analysis, and optimization (MDAO) tool and the aeroelastic effects of high fidelity finite element models to characterize the design space was successfully developed and established. Two multidisciplinary design optimization studies using an object-oriented MDAO tool developed at NASA Armstrong Flight Research Center were presented. The first study demonstrates the use of aeroelastic tailoring concepts to minimize the structural weight while meeting the design requirements including strength, buckling, and flutter. A hybrid and discretization optimization approach was implemented to improve accuracy and computational efficiency of a global optimization algorithm. The second study presents a flutter mass balancing optimization study. The results provide guidance to modify the fabricated flexible wing design and move the design flutter speeds back into the flight envelope so that the original objective of X-56A flight test can be accomplished.

flutter constraints↗
NASA NTRS2015

Aeroelastic Analysis of a Flexible Wing Wind Tunnel Model with Variable Camber Continuous Trailing Edge Flap Design

This paper presents data analysis of a flexible wing wind tunnel model with a variable camber continuous trailing edge flap (VCCTEF) design for drag minimization tested at the University of Washington Aeronautical Laboratory (UWAL). The wind tunnel test was designed to explore the relative merit of the VCCTEF concept for improved cruise efficiency through the use of low-cost aeroelastic model test techniques. The flexible wing model is a 10%-scale model of a typical transport wing and is constructed of woven fabric composites and foam core. The wing structural stiffness in bending is tailored to be half of the stiffness of a Boeing 757-era transport wing while the torsional stiffness is about the same. This stiffness reduction results in a wing tip deflection of about 10% of the wing semi-span. The VCCTEF is a multi-segment flap design having three chordwise camber segments and five spanwise flap sections for a total of 15 individual flap elements. The three chordwise camber segments can be positioned appropriately to create a desired trailing edge camber. Elastomeric material is used to cover the gaps in between the spanwise flap sections, thereby creating a continuous trailing edge. Wind tunnel data analysis conducted previously shows that the VCCTEF can achieve a drag reduction of up to 6.31% and an improvement in the lift-to-drag ratio (L=D) of up to 4.85%. A method for estimating the bending and torsional stiffnesses of the flexible wingUWAL wind tunnel model from static load test data is presented. The resulting estimation indicates that the stiffness of the flexible wing is significantly stiffer in torsion than in bending by as much as 9 to 1. The lift prediction for the flexible wing is computed by a coupled aerodynamic-structural model. The coupled model is developed by coupling a conceptual aerodynamic tool Vorlax with a finite-element model of the flexible wing via an automated geometry deformation tool. Based on the comparison of the lift curve slope, the lift prediction for the rigid wing is in good agreement with the estimated lift coefficients derived from the wind tunnel test data. Due to the movement of the VCCTEF during the wind tunnel test, uncertainty in the lift prediction due to the indicated variations of the VCCTEF deflection is studied. The results show a significant spread in the lift prediction which contradicts the consistency in the aerodynamic measurements, thus suggesting that the indicated variations as measured by the VICON system may not be reliable. The lift prediction of the flexible wing agrees very well with the measured lift curve for the baseline configuration. The computed bending deflection and wash-out twist of the flexible wing also match reasonably well with the aeroelastic deflection measurements. The results demonstrate the validity of the aerodynamic-structural tool for use to analyze aerodynamic performance of flexible wings.

Wind Tunnel↗
NASA NTRS2015

Use of a Viscous Flow Simulation Code for Static Aeroelastic Analysis of a Wing at High-Lift Conditions

In this paper, we present a static aeroelastic analysis of a wind tunnel test model of a wing in high-lift configuration using a viscous flow simulation code. The model wing was tailored to deform during the tests by amounts similar to a composite airliner wing in highlift conditions. This required use of a viscous flow analysis to predict the lift coefficient of the deformed wing accurately. We thus utilized an existing static aeroelastic analysis framework that involves an inviscid flow code (Cart3d) to predict the deformed shape of the wing, then utilized a viscous flow code (Overflow) to compute the aerodynamic loads on the deformed wing. This way, we reduced the cost of flow simulations needed for this analysis while still being able to predict the aerodynamic forces with reasonable accuracy. Our results suggest that the lift of the deformed wing may be higher or lower than that of the non-deformed wing, and the washout deformation of the wing is the key factor that changes the lift of the deformed wing in two distinct ways: while it decreases the lift at low to moderate angles of attack simply by lowering local angles of attack along the span, it increases the lift at high angles of attack by alleviating separation.

Aeroelastic↗
NASA NTRS2017

New Flutter Analysis Technique for Time-Domain Computational Aeroelasticity

A new time-domain approach for computing flutter speed is presented. Based on the time-history result of aeroelastic simulation, the unknown unsteady aerodynamics model is estimated using a system identification technique. The full aeroelastic model is generated via coupling the estimated unsteady aerodynamic model with the known linear structure model. The critical dynamic pressure is computed and used in the subsequent simulation until the convergence of the critical dynamic pressure is achieved. The proposed method is applied to a benchmark cantilevered rectangular wing.

HWB aircraft↗
NASA NTRS2020

TURBOMAT-FR: Turbomachinery Aeroelastic Forced Response Analysis Automation Using MATLAB®: PART 1

The primary aim of this effort is to develop a software tool named “Turbomachinery Aeroelastic Analysis Tool for Forced Response (TURBOMAT-FR)” using MATLAB® (The MathWorks, Inc.) scripts. The tool will aid in performing routine forced response analysis of turbomachinery fan blades with the aid of the modal summation method (MSUM). The MSUM approach requires a modal solution consisting of modal displacements, modal frequencies, and modal stresses. The MATLAB® scripts facilitate easy extraction of the required quantities from the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and MSC Nastran (Hexagon AB) solution files. These quantities are subsequently utilized by the MSUM approach to perform a complete forced response analysis.The MATLAB® scripts in TURBOMAT-FR are utilized in postprocessing of the MSC Nastran finite element analysis outputs in three types of solutions or steps, namely (1) stresses and displacements from static and steady response solution, (2) unsteady stresses and displacements from direct forced response solution, and (3) modal solution containing modal displacements and modal stresses. In step (4), separate MATLAB® scripts are also developed to read the processed outputs in step (3) and perform forced response analysis using MSUM. The TURBOMAT-FR MATLAB® scripts mentioned previously are presented in two reports designated “Part 1” and “Part 2”. The current report, Part 1, presents the scripts needed to accomplish steps (1) and (2), noted previously. This will be exclusively useful for performing only the static and steady response analysis and the forced response analysis using the direct forced response solution approach. Part 2 contains the TURBOMAT-FR MATLAB® scripts needed to accomplish steps (3) and (4). The MATLAB® scripts given in Part 2 facilitate the calculation of unsteady stresses using MSUM and provide an automated procedure associated with aeroelastic forced response analysis with different pressure files for the same structural model. The unsteady stresses calculated using MSUM in Part 2 can be compared with those presented in Part 1. A cantilevered blade-alone model subjected to a realistic pressure loading to a boundary was used for static and unsteady direct forced response analysis to demonstrate the effectiveness of the TURBOMATFR MATLAB® scripts.

MATLAB-Scripts↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Fundamental Aeroelastic Analysis of an Urban Air Mobility Rotor

A computational investigation was conducted of the aeroelastic characteristics of a representative rotor typical of aircraft for Urban Air Mobility. A rotorcraft comprehensive analysis was used to examine the aeroelastic characteristics of the model, both in hover and in forward flight. Throughout the study, parameters examined included rotor rotational speed, forward flight speed, blade torsion stiffness, and chordwise locations of the blade elastic axis and center of gravity. Three sets of airfoil properties were analyzed: NACA 0012, VR8, and VR12. For hover, the effect of dynamic inflow was studied via a comparison of uniform inflow and dynamic inflow models. Thrust coefficient and blade tip twist were analyzed to ascertain performance characteristics, and eigen analysis was employed to determine stability. For the forward flight cases, rpm and forward flight speed were swept separately, and the effect of each on performance and stability was assessed. Thrust coefficient and mean drag coefficient were used to evaluate performance of the rotor, and eigen analysis was invoked to study rotor stability. Forward flight stability results generated via a constant coefficient analysis were compared with results generated via Floquet Theory.

Fundamental Aeroelastic Analysis↗
NASA NTRS1973

A study of the effects of aeroelastic divergence on the wing structure of an oblique-wing supersonic transport configuration

The aerodynamic characteristics of transport aircraft with oblique wing flying at supersonic speeds are discussed. Aeroelastic divergence of the forward swept portion of the wing is analyzed. The effect of aspect ratio as a method for avoiding aeroelastic divergence is examined. A relatively low aspect ratio appears necessary for an oblique wing when constructed of conventional aluminum alloy materials. The aspect ratio may be increased by increasing the wing thickness ratio and by utilizing materials with higher moduli of elasticity and rigidity.

Source record↗
NASA NTRS1973

Aeroelastic analysis of sounding rocket vehicles.

Rigid-body stability analysis can be extended to treat aeroelastic effects by allowing the structure to deflect under airloads as a simple beam. Linear aerodynamics and the bent shape then define the airloads. The resulting equations are indeterminant but can be manipulated to show the basic aeroelastic effects of flexibility, dynamic pressure, and angle of attack. The FLMD quasi-static program can solve these equations by iteration and compute stability for a specific vehicle/payload combination. Given the proper distributed inputs for the instant of time investigated, the FLMD predicts the center of pressure and related parameters, such as static margin.

Meyers, S. C.↗
NASA NTRS1974

Aeroelastic-stability characteristics of a V/STOL tilt-rotor aircraft with hingeless blades - Correlation of analysis and test

The potential aeroelastic problems of a tilt rotor aircraft are described. The type of mathematical model required to predict such behavior is discussed and results of a design study on a specific configuration are presented. The sensitivity of the results to variation of the structural parameters is evaluated. The methodology used for analytical studies is shown to predict accurately the behavior of a full-scale rotor-pylon-wing system tested in the NASA-Ames 40- by 80-foot wind tunnel. It is concluded that there is no impediment from an aeroelastic viewpoint in designing and flying a tilt-rotor aircraft using a soft-in-plane hingeless rotor.

Alexander, H. R.↗
NASA NTRS1975

Study of Dynamic Characteristics of Aeroelastic Systems Utilizing Randomdec Signatures

The feasibility of utilizing the random decrement method in conjunction with a signature analysis procedure to determine the dynamic characteristics of an aeroelastic system for the purpose of on-line prediction of potential on-set of flutter was examined. Digital computer programs were developed to simulate sampled response signals of a two-mode aeroelastic system. Simulated response data were used to test the random decrement method. A special curve-fit approach was developed for analyzing the resulting signatures. A number of numerical 'experiments' were conducted on the combined processes. The method is capable of determining frequency and damping values accurately from randomdec signatures of carefully selected lengths.

Chang, C. S.↗
NASA NTRS1974

Automated structural design with aeroelastic constraints - A review and assessment of the state of the art

A review and assessment of the state of the art in automated aeroelastic design is presented. Most of the aeroelastic design studies appearing in the literature deal with flutter, and, therefore, this paper also concentrates on flutter. The flutter design problem is divided into three cases: as isolated flutter mode, neighboring flutter modes, and a hump mode which can rise and cause a sudden, discontinuous change in the flutter velocity. Synthesis procedures are presented in terms of techniques that are appropriate for problems of various levels of difficulty. Current trends, which should result in more efficient, powerful and versatile design codes, are discussed. Approximate analysis procedures and the need for simultaneous consideration of multiple design requirements are emphasized.

Stroud, W. J.↗
NASA NTRS1976

A review of some tilt-rotor aeroelastic research at NASA-Langley

An overview of an experimental and analytical research program conducted within the Aeroelasticity Branch of the NASA Langley Research Center for studying the aeroelastic and dynamic characteristics of tilt-rotor VTOL aircraft is presented. Selected results from several joint NASA/contractor investigations of scaled models in the Langley transonic dynamics tunnel are shown and discussed with a view toward delineating various aspects of dynamic behavior peculiar to proprotor aircraft. Included are such items as proprotor/pylon stability, whirl flutter, gust response, and blade flapping. Theoretical predictions, based on analyses developed at Langley, are shown to be in agreement with the measured stability and response behavior.

Kvaternik, R. G.↗
NASA NTRS1976

Aeroelastic stability and control of an oblique wing - Wind tunnel experiments

Results are presented for wind tunnel tests of an elastic wing model to verify the theoretical predictions for the aeroelastic instability of an oblique wing. The model wing has an elliptic planform of 10 to 1 axis ratio and a symmetrical airfoil section of 7-1/2% thickness/chord ratio. The wing is of wood and as may be seen in the photographs presented, slack wires are used to limit the amplitude of unstable motions. The fuselage is mounted on bearings permitting freedom of roll, but provision is made to clamp the fuselage for some of the tests. It is found that freedom in roll increases the dynamic pressure at which aeroelastic instability first appears. With the model free in roll, the effectiveness of the ailerons in maintaining trim is not noticeably affected by passage through the speed at which the wing would become unstable if clamped.

Jones, R. T.↗
NASA NTRS1977

Aeroelastic Analysis for Rotorcraft in Flight or in a Wind Tunnel

An analytical model is developed for the aeroelastic behavior of a rotorcraft in flight or in a wind tunnel. A unified development is presented for a wide class of rotors, helicopters, and operating conditions. The equations of motion for the rotor are derived using an integral Newtonian method, which gives considerable physical insight into the blade inertial and aerodynamic forces. The rotor model includes coupled flap-lag bending and blade torsion degrees of freedom, and is applicable to articulated, hingeless, gimballed, and teetering rotors with an arbitrary number of blades. The aerodynamic model is valid for both high and low inflow, and for axial and nonaxial flight. The rotor rotational speed dynamics, including engine inertia and damping, and the perturbation inflow dynamics are included. For a rotor on a wind-tunnel support, a normal mode representation of the test module, strut, and balance system is used. The aeroelastic analysis for the rotorcraft in flight is applicable to a general two-rotor aircraft, including single main-rotor and tandem helicopter configurations, and side-by-side or tilting proprotor aircraft configurations.

Johnson, W.↗
NASA NTRS1977

Aeroelastic stability of coupled flap-lag-torsional motion of helicopter rotor blades in forward flight

A set of coupled periodic nonlinear differential flap-lag-torsional equations of blade motion is described which can simulate a blade having a precone, twist, distributed torsion, root torsion, torque offset, blade-root offsets, and offsets among the elastic axis, the aerodynamic center, and the blade cross-sectional center of mass. It is noted that the aerodynamic loads derived for these equations are applicable to cases of both hover and forward flight. The aeroelastic stability of a hingeless helicopter blade is investigated by linearizing the nonlinear differential equations of motion about a time-dependent equilibrium position of the helicopter in forward flight, using propulsion and moment trim procedures. A comparison of the results with those obtained previously for coupled flap-lag-torsional boundaries in hover indicates that aeroelastic-stability margins are degraded due to forward flight.

Friedmann, P.↗