Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “error testing”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 325 records · Page 18

Symbol error rate performance evaluation of the LM37 multimegabit telemetry modulator-demodulator unit

The LM37 multimegabit telemetry modulator-demodulator unit was tested for evaluation of its symbol error rate (SER) performance. Using an automated test setup, the SER tests were carried out at various symbol rates and signal-to-noise ratios (SNR), ranging from +10 to -10 dB. With the aid of a specially designed error detector and a stabilized signal and noise summation unit, measurement of the SER at low SNR was possible. The results of the tests show that at symbol rates below 20 megasymbols per second (MS)s) and input SNR above -6 dB, the SER performance of the modem is within the specified 0.65 to 1.5 dB of the theoretical error curve. At symbol rates above 20 MS/s, the specification is met at SNR's down to -2 dB. The results of the SER tests are presented with the description of the test setup and the measurement procedure.

Malek, H.↗

An improved error assessment for the GEM-T1 gravitational model

Several tests were designed to determine the correct error variances for the GEM-T1 gravitational solution which was derived exclusively from satellite tracking data. The basic method employs both wholly independent and dependent subset data solutions and produces a full field coefficient by coefficient estimate of the model uncertainties. The GEM-T1 errors were further analyzed using a method based upon eigenvalue-eigenvector analysis which calibrates the entire covariance matrix. Dependent satellite and independent altimetric and surface gravity data sets, as well as independent satellite deep resonance information, confirm essentially the same error assessment.

Lerch, F. J.↗

Test-to-Test Repeatability of Results From a Subsonic Wing-Body Configuration in the National Transonic Facility

Results from three wind tunnel tests in the National Transonic Facility of a model of an advanced-technology, subsonic-transport wing-body configuration have been analyzed to assess the test-to-test repeatability of several aerodynamic parameters. The scatter, as measured by the prediction interval, in the longitudinal force and moment coefficients increases as the Mach number increases. Residual errors with and without the ESP tubes installed suggest a bias leading to lower drag with the tubes installed. Residual errors as well as average values of the longitudinal force and moment coefficients show that there are small bias errors between the different tests.

Mineck, Raymond E.↗

Landsat-7 Simulation and Testing Environments

A spacecraft Attitude Control and Determination Subsystem (ACDS) is heavily dependent upon simulation throughout its entire development, implementation and ground test cycle. Engineering simulation tools are typically developed to design and analyze control systems to validate the design and software simulation tools are required to qualify the flight software. However, the need for simulation does not end here. Operating the ACDS of a spacecraft on the ground requires the simulation of spacecraft dynamics, disturbance modeling and celestial body motion. Sensor data must also be simulated and substituted for actual sensor data on the ground so that the spacecraft will respond by sending commands to the actuators as they will on orbit. And finally, the simulators is the primary training tool and test-bed for the Flight Operations Team. In this paper various ACDS simulation, developed for or used by the Landsat 7 project will be described. The paper will include a description of each tool, its unique attributes, and its role in the overall development and testing of the ACDS. Finally, a section is included which discusses how the coordinated use of these simulation tools can maximize the probability of uncovering software, hardware and operations errors during the ground test process.

Holmes, E.↗

Defining Pupil Knowledge Requirements for Roman Space Telescope Integrated Payload Assembly Testing

This thesis examines the use of phase retrieval to characterize an optical system under testing conditions with pupil knowledge error. The purpose of this research is to define pupil knowledge requirements for the integrated payload testing of the Roman Space Telescope (RST). I have conducted a Monte Carlo study to determine how uncertainty in the location of the ground support equipment relative to the payload will affect the ability to use image-based wavefront sensing during the test to characterize system alignment. This test will be conducted in the Space Environment Simulator (SES) with the presence of Wavefront Error (WFE) due to gravity sag on the primary mirror. In this study, I incrementally decentered a piece of ground support equipment, the SubAperture Metrology System (SAMS), and evaluated how the phase retrieval algorithm attempted to fit the wavefront with the pupil mismatch. The results of this study are a factor in the overall Integrated Payload Assembly (IPA) testing WFE budget.

Roman Space Telescope↗

Accuracy analysis of the semi-analytical method for shape sensitivity calculation

The semianalytical method, widely used for calculating derivatives of static response with respect to design variables for structures modeled by finite elements, is studied in this paper. The paper shows that the method can have serious accuracy problems for shape design variables in structures modeled by beam, plate, truss, frame, and solid elements. The errors are shown to be associated with the structural model. An error index is developed to test the accuracy of the semianalytical method. It characterizes the difference in errors between a general finite-difference method and the semianalytical method. Moreover, a method for improving the accuracy of the semianalytical method (when possible) is provided. Examples are presented to demonstrate the use of the error index.

Barthelemy, Bruno↗

Accuracy analysis of the semi-analytical method for shape sensitivity calculation

The semianalytical method of design sensitivity analysis that is widely used for calculating derivatives of static response with respect to design variables for structures modeled by finite elements is studied. It is shown that the method can have serious accuracy problems for shape design variables in structures modeled by beam, plate, truss, frame, and solid elements. Errors are shown to be associated with an incompatibility of the sensitivity field with the structure. An error index is developed to test the accuracy of the semianalytical method. It characterizes the difference in errors between a general finite-difference method and the semianalytical method. A method for improving the accuracy of the semianalytical method (when possible) is provided. Examples are presented to demonstrate the use of the error index.

Barthelemy, Bruno↗

On-the-shaft data systems for rotating engine components

Two rotating data systems for engine component testing which demonstrate the techniques of on-the-shaft microelectronic signal conditioning and rotary transformer power- and data-transfer are described. (1) A digital data system provides 69 channels of 1100 C maximum thermocouple data with less than 0.5 percent error from a turbine test rig rotating at speeds up to 9000 rpm. (2) An analog data system amplifies and transfers 72 channels of dynamic strain data with less than 5 percent error from a compressor rig at speeds above 14,000 rpm.

Lesco, D. J.↗

Single event test methodology for integrated optoelectronics

A single event upset (SEU), defined as a transient or glitch on the output of a device, and its applicability to integrated optoelectronics are discussed in the context of spacecraft design and the need for more than a bit error rate viewpoint for testing and analysis. A methodology for testing integrated optoelectronic receivers and transmitters for SEUs is presented, focusing on the actual test requirements and system schemes needed for integrated optoelectronic devices. Two main causes of single event effects in the space environment, including protons and galactic cosmic rays, are considered along with ground test facilities for simulating the space environment.

Label, Kenneth A.↗

On-the-shaft data systems for rotating engine components

Two rotating data systems for engine component testing, which demonstrate the techniques of on-the-shaft microelectronic signal conditioning and rotary transformer power- and data-transfer, are described. These systems are a digital data system which provides 69 channels of 1100 C maximum thermocouple data with less than 0.5% error from a turbine test rig rotating at speeds up to 9000 rpm and an analog data system which amplifies and transfers 72 channels of dynamic strain data with less than 5% error from a compressor rig at speeds above 14,000 rpm.

Lesco, D. J.↗

Statistical analysis of modeling error in structural dynamic systems

The paper presents a generic statistical model of the (total) modeling error for conventional space structures in their launch configuration. Modeling error is defined as the difference between analytical prediction and experimental measurement. It is represented by the differences between predicted and measured real eigenvalues and eigenvectors. Comparisons are made between pre-test and post-test models. Total modeling error is then subdivided into measurement error, experimental error and 'pure' modeling error, and comparisons made between measurement error and total modeling error. The generic statistical model presented in this paper is based on the first four global (primary structure) modes of four different structures belonging to the generic category of Conventional Space Structures (specifically excluding large truss-type space structures). As such, it may be used to evaluate the uncertainty of predicted mode shapes and frequencies, sinusoidal response, or the transient response of other structures belonging to the same generic category.

Hasselman, T. K.↗

Analysis of faults detected in a large-scale multi-version software development experiment

In a multiversion software experiment, twenty programs were built to the same specification of an inertial navigation problem. The programs were then subjected to a three-phase testing and debugging process: an acceptance test, a certification test, and an operational test. Less than 20 percent of the faults discovered during the certification and operational testing were nonunique, i.e., the same or very similar faults would be found in more than one program. However, some of these common faults spanned as many as half of the versions. Faults discovered during the certification testing were due to specification errors and ambiguities, inadequate programmer background knowledge, insufficient programming experience, incomplete analysis, and insufficient acceptance testing. Faults discovered during the operational testing were of a more subtle nature, and were mostly due to various programmer knowledge defects and incomplete analysis errors. Techniques that might have prevented the observed faults are discussed.

Vouk, Mladen A.↗

Error Sources and Mitigation Strategies for Thermocouples Integrated in Flexible Thermal Protection System Materials

Brief Presenter Biography:Ruth Miller is an aer-ospace systems engineer in the Entry Systems and Ve-hicle Development Branch at NASA Ames Research Center.Introduction:The flexible thermal protection sys-tem (FTPS) on NASA’s Low-Earth Orbit Flight Test of an Inflatable Decelerator (LOFTID) vehicle will be in-strumented with thermocouples (TCs) to measure the in-depth thermal response during entry into Earth’s atmos-phere[1, 2]. Accurate flight temperature measurements are critical for verifying vehicle performance during the flight test and reducing uncertainties in the thermal models.However,the deployable nature of inflatable decelerator technology presents challengesfor integrat-ing TCs, specifically the TCsneed to be compactableand cannot damage the FTPSnor the inflatable structure(IS).Unlike traditional rigid aeroshells, routing TCsthrough the thickness of the FTPS could cause signifi-cant damage during packing of the deployable aeroshellbecause the different layers may shift small amounts in relation to each other imparting strain on the TCsand FTPS materials. The LOFTID TCleads are routed from the measurement location back to the data acquisition system in the vehicle centerbody within the same FTPS layer that they are monitoring the temperature. This ap-proach eliminates the need to put holes in the FTPS lay-ers,butas a consequence,the insulated TCleads travel for an appreciable distance through a region that will expose them to high temperaturesand large thermal gra-dients.LOFTID’s TCswere baselined to be commercially available Type K TCswith a binder impregnated glass braid insulation. These TCswere chosen because they had been used successfully on IRVE-3 and in ground-based arc jet testing. Additionally, these TCsdid notdamage the FTPS nor IS during packing and deploy-ment testing. However, the glass braid insulation is only rated to a maximum continuous use temperature of 482ºC. For reference, the duration of the heat pulse on the LOFTID vehicle is on the order of minutes and themaximum predicted temperaturebeneaththe outermost FTPS layersis 1350ºC.Ground-based testing in a tube furnace at NASA Ames Research Centerwas conducted to determine if the baseline TCsrouted through FTPS samples would survive and provide accurate temperature measure-mentsat LOFTID flight-relevant temperatures[3].The test results showed large measurement errors occurred beginning at approximately 400°C due to conductive deposits on the TCinsulation electrically shorting the TCleads.The conductive deposits and thus electrical shorting weredetermined to be caused by twoerror sources:1.The organic binder on the TCinsulation carbon-izingin a high temperature, low oxygen envi-ronment2.Decomposition products from the FTPSperme-atingthe braided TC insulationFurther testing in the tube furnace demonstrated that heat cleaning the TCinsulation effectivelyremovedthe organic binder andeliminatedthe first error source.The second error sourcewas shown to be mitigated by the addition of amica wraparound each individual TCleadtoact as an impermeable barrier.To understand the applicability of theground-based tube furnace test results to flight,anarc jet testseriesat Boeing’s Large Core Arc Tunnel (LCAT) facilitywas conducted[4].The error sourcesand mitigation strate-giesidentified in the tube furnace testing were substan-tiatedin the arc jet testing.However, the arc jet testing also revealed three new error sources:1.Glass TCinsulation meltingwhich resultsin electrical shorting of the TCeither through di-rect contact between the two leads or through the electrically conductive FTPS materials2.TCwire meltingwhich results in a noisy and/or open-loop TCresponse3.Type K TCwire green-rotwhich results in large calibration errors Scope of the Presentation:This presentation will include a brief discussion onthe effect of electrical shorting on the output of a TC(i.e. how to identify elec-trical shorting in TCdataand what the associated erroris).The tube furnace and arc jet test resultswill be dis-cussedand the solutions LOFTID is implementing to mitigate the error sourcesidentified in the tube furnace and arc jet testingwill be presented.Additionally, futureresearch and development work to eliminateTCerror sourcesfor future missionswill be recommended.

R A Miller↗

The effect of earth orientation errors in baseline determination

Baselines estimated from certain space techniques are susceptible to systematic errors affecting the relative coordinates. The set of parameters that describes the continuously changing relative orientation of the conventional terrestrial (CTS) and inertial (CIS) reference frames is one source of error. As a result of these errors, the coordinates of each terminal station may actually refer to a slightly different coordinate system and therefore errors will result when these coordinates are used to compute the length between the stations. The present paper examines the expected magnitudes of these errors and their possible presence in current solutions. To test for the presence of such errors, some of the NASA/GSFC preliminary SL5 monthly baseline variations during 1979-1981 were analyzed. It is found that the present level of accuracy and stability of the available parameters linking the CTS and CIS is unsatisfactory for centimeter level baseline length determinations. It is noted that the available options are either the use of strictly simultaneous SLR data sets or the improvement of the parameters linking the CTS and CIS.

Pavlis, E. C.↗

At least some errors are randomly generated (Freud was wrong)

An experiment was carried out to expose something about human error generating mechanisms. In the context of the experiment, an error was made when a subject pressed the wrong key on a computer keyboard or pressed no key at all in the time allotted. These might be considered, respectively, errors of substitution and errors of omission. Each of seven subjects saw a sequence of three digital numbers, made an easily learned binary judgement about each, and was to press the appropriate one of two keys. Each session consisted of 1,000 presentations of randomly permuted, fixed numbers broken into 10 blocks of 100. One of two keys should have been pressed within one second of the onset of each stimulus. These data were subjected to statistical analyses in order to probe the nature of the error generating mechanisms. Goodness of fit tests for a Poisson distribution for the number of errors per 50 trial interval and for an exponential distribution of the length of the intervals between errors were carried out. There is evidence for an endogenous mechanism that may best be described as a random error generator. Furthermore, an item analysis of the number of errors produced per stimulus suggests the existence of a second mechanism operating on task driven factors producing exogenous errors. Some errors, at least, are the result of constant probability generating mechanisms with error rate idiosyncratically determined for each subject.

Sellen, A. J.↗

A Vehicle Management End-to-End Testing and Analysis Platform for Validation of Mission and Fault Management Algorithms to Reduce Risk for NASAs Space Launch System

The engineering development of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration's (NASA) new Space Launch System (SLS) requires cross discipline teams with extensive knowledge of launch vehicle subsystems, information theory, and autonomous algorithms dealing with all operations from pre-launch through on orbit operations. The nominal and off-nominal characteristics of SLS's elements and subsystems must be understood and matched with the autonomous algorithm monitoring and mitigation capabilities for accurate control and response to abnormal conditions throughout all vehicle mission flight phases, including precipitating safing actions and crew aborts. This presents a large and complex systems engineering challenge, which is being addressed in part by focusing on the specific subsystems involved in the handling of off-nominal mission and fault tolerance with response management. Using traditional model-based system and software engineering design principles from the Unified Modeling Language (UML) and Systems Modeling Language (SysML), the Mission and Fault Management (M&FM) algorithms for the vehicle are crafted and vetted in Integrated Development Teams (IDTs) composed of multiple development disciplines such as Systems Engineering (SE), Flight Software (FSW), Safety and Mission Assurance (S&MA) and the major subsystems and vehicle elements such as Main Propulsion Systems (MPS), boosters, avionics, Guidance, Navigation, and Control (GNC), Thrust Vector Control (TVC), and liquid engines. These model-based algorithms and their development lifecycle from inception through FSW certification are an important focus of SLS's development effort to further ensure reliable detection and response to off-nominal vehicle states during all phases of vehicle operation from pre-launch through end of flight. To test and validate these M&FM algorithms a dedicated test-bed was developed for full Vehicle Management End-to-End Testing (VMET). For addressing fault management (FM) early in the development lifecycle for the SLS program, NASA formed the M&FM team as part of the Integrated Systems Health Management and Automation Branch under the Spacecraft Vehicle Systems Department at the Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC). To support the development of the FM algorithms, the VMET developed by the M&FM team provides the ability to integrate the algorithms, perform test cases, and integrate vendor-supplied physics-based launch vehicle (LV) subsystem models. Additionally, the team has developed processes for implementing and validating the M&FM algorithms for concept validation and risk reduction. The flexibility of the VMET capabilities enables thorough testing of the M&FM algorithms by providing configurable suites of both nominal and off-nominal test cases to validate the developed algorithms utilizing actual subsystem models such as MPS, GNC, and others. One of the principal functions of VMET is to validate the M&FM algorithms and substantiate them with performance baselines for each of the target vehicle subsystems in an independent platform exterior to the flight software test and validation processes. In any software development process there is inherent risk in the interpretation and implementation of concepts from requirements and test cases into flight software compounded with potential human errors throughout the development and regression testing lifecycle. Risk reduction is addressed by the M&FM group but in particular by the Analysis Team working with other organizations such as S&MA, Structures and Environments, GNC, Orion, Crew Office, Flight Operations, and Ground Operations by assessing performance of the M&FM algorithms in terms of their ability to reduce Loss of Mission (LOM) and Loss of Crew (LOC) probabilities. In addition, through state machine and diagnostic modeling, analysis efforts investigate a broader suite of failure effects and associated detection and responses to be tested in VMET to ensure reliable failure detection, and confirm responses do not create additional risks or cause undesired states through interactive dynamic effects with other algorithms and systems. VMET further contributes to risk reduction by prototyping and exercising the M&FM algorithms early in their implementation and without any inherent hindrances such as meeting FSW processor scheduling constraints due to their target platform - the ARINC 6535-partitioned Operating System, resource limitations, and other factors related to integration with other subsystems not directly involved with M&FM such as telemetry packing and processing. The baseline plan for use of VMET encompasses testing the original M&FM algorithms coded in the same C++ language and state machine architectural concepts as that used by FSW. This enables the development of performance standards and test cases to characterize the M&FM algorithms and sets a benchmark from which to measure their effectiveness and performance in the exterior FSW development and test processes. This paper is outlined in a systematic fashion analogous to a lifecycle process flow for engineering development of algorithms into software and testing. Section I describes the NASA SLS M&FM context, presenting the current infrastructure, leading principles, methods, and participants. Section II defines the testing philosophy of the M&FM algorithms as related to VMET followed by section III, which presents the modeling methods of the algorithms to be tested and validated in VMET. Its details are then further presented in section IV followed by Section V presenting integration, test status, and state analysis. Finally, section VI addresses the summary and forward directions followed by the appendices presenting relevant information on terminology and documentation.

Trevino, Luis↗

Sensitivity of Force Specifications to the Errors in Measuring the Interface Force

Force-Limited Random Vibration Testing has been applied in the last several years at the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) and other NASA centers for various programs at the instrument and spacecraft level. Different techniques have been developed over the last few decades to estimate the dynamic forces that the test article under consideration will encounter in the flight environment. Some of these techniques are described in the handbook, NASA-HDBK-7004, and the monograph, NASA-RP-1403. This paper will show the effects of some measurement and calibration errors in force gauges. In some cases, the notches in the acceleration spectrum when a random vibration test is performed with measurement errors are the same as the notches produced during a test that has no measurement errors. The paper will also present the results Of tests that were used to validate this effect. Knowing the effect of measurement errors can allow tests to continue after force gauge failures or allow dummy gauges to be used in places that are inaccessible to a force gage.

Worth, Daniel↗

US terrestrial solar cell calibration and measurement procedures

A workshop was held in the fall of 1976, to evaluate and revise interim terrestrial solar cell calibration and measurement procedures. The revisions made to the interim testing procedures are described. The calibration of reference cells and the design of their holders are covered. Considerations include view angle and optical and thermal matching. Atmospheric factors which affect the calibration and performance of solar cells are discussed. The most critical atmospheric parameter appears to be water vapor. Techniques for matching reference cells to cells or arrays under test are described. Data showing errors in performance under artificial sunlight simulators due to mismatch of reference and test cells are presented. Finally, measurement procedures and data transformations needed to obtain the performance of solar cells and arrays in outdoor natural sunlight are described.

Brandhorst, H. W., Jr.↗