Generic Design Recommendations to Improve Intrinsic Proliferation Resistance of Advanced Reactors
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Hogue, Karen [ORNL] (ORCID:0000000159261510)↗
SEARCH · Search NASA
Results for “advanced reactor”
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) Capabilities in Support of Advanced Reactor Development [Slides]
A primary mission of the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) is to support the next generation of nuclear reactors. This is an overview of ATR irradiation capabilities in support of advanced reactor development. Topics include an overview of the ATR facility and reactor, experiment design overview, thermal and fast spectrum testing, as well as advanced material testing.
21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
Assessment of ASI-developed Sensors for Inclusion in METL Testing
The Advanced Sensors and Instrumentation (ASI) program facilitates the development of new sensors for both conventional and advanced reactors. Advanced reactor concepts utilize coolants other than light water, such as molten salts, liquid sodium, and high-temperature helium. Qualification of sensors developed for these advanced reactors is complicated by the relatively small number of facilities available that can provide relevant testing conditions (e.g., temperature, flow, and coolant chemistry). This report identifies sensors that were developed under the ASI program and may be tested in one available testbed: the Mechanisms Engineering Test Loop (METL) at Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), a non-nuclear liquid sodium flow facility.
46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗
Seismic isolation: A pathway to standardized advanced nuclear reactors
Standardizing advanced nuclear reactors is a pathway to substantially reducing their overnight capital cost and achieving parity with other power sources, including renewables and fossil fuels. The seismic load case has thwarted standardization of nuclear power plants because site-specific seismic hazard and local near-surface geology has triggered soil-structure-interaction analysis, design, equipment qualification, regulatory review, and licensing, ensuring that each build is different. To achieve standardized or site-independent certified advanced reactor designs, the impact of the seismic load case on the engineering and construction cost and time must be substantially mitigated. Seismic isolation is a mature technology that has been used for more than 30 years in non-nuclear sectors to substantially reduce earthquake demands in buildings and other infrastructure. In this paper, seismic isolation is used to enable standardization of advanced reactor designs, aimed at the complete re-use of a site-independent, certified design and repeated procurement of safety-class equipment. A pathway to standardized designs using seismic isolation is demonstrated for two fundamentally different advanced reactors: a molten salt reactor and a high temperature gas reactor. Each reactor building is equipped with three specialized pieces of safety-class equipment, namely, a reactor vessel, a steam generator, and a control rod drive mechanism housing that is attached to the reactor head. Analysis is performed per ASCE and ASME standards to design the buildings and the equipment for two base conditions: conventional (fixed base) and base isolated. The impact of the seismic load case is characterized for the reinforced concrete walls in the buildings and for the equipment, measured using vessel wall thickness and horizontal accelerations. Here the analysis results show that the fixed-base buildings, designed for a site of low seismic hazard (peak ground acceleration, PGA = 0.15 g) could be constructed at a site of much greater seismic hazard (PGA = 0.7 g) if seismic base isolation is employed. Importantly, the scope of the site-specific analysis, design, and qualification would be limited to the seismic isolators and the isolated substructure, drastically reducing plant-specific engineering, review, and licensing, and time to construction start. Regulatory challenges and opportunities with standardized reactor designs are identified.
22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
Integrity Enhancing Protocols (IEP) Evaluation Framework
Protocols play an essential role in Advance Reactor systems. A diverse set of protocols are available to these reactors. Advanced Reactors benefit from technologies that can minimize their resource utilization and costs. Evaluation frameworks are often used when assessing protocols and processes related to cryptographic security systems. The following report discusses the various characteristics associated with these protocol evaluation frameworks, and derives a novel evaluative framework.
22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
Safety Considerations for Advanced Material Irradiation at the Advanced Test Reactor
The Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) is a light water reactor with aluminum-clad driver fuel. A primary mission of the ATR is to support the next generation of nuclear reactors. This support necessarily requires irradiation of advanced materials such as sodium, fuel salts, and metal eutectics. Irradiation of advanced materials in the ATR environment presents a challenge when completing accident analyses and demonstrating compliance to the Safety Analysis Report (SAR). Many advanced materials have the possibility to react with the ATR protective barriers such as the cladding or primary coolant system (PCS) boundary during postulated accident scenarios. Further, molten fuel experiments fall outside of the standard regulatory framework for dose consequence analyses. ATR is currently developing new safety analysis methods to support irradiation of advanced materials. The primary considerations for this development are 1) experiment containment design requirements, 2) primary coolant system response to an experiment containment failure, and 3) dose analyses for molten fuels.
11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
Earthquake response of head-mounted equipment in advanced nuclear reactors
The seismic response of safety-related equipment mounted on the head of an advanced reactor, including pumps, control rod drive mechanisms, and reactor monitoring devices, will affect the design and layout of many advanced reactors. High earthquake-induced accelerations in such equipment may challenge their seismic qualification and trigger the need for additional support framing on the reactor head. Base isolation is a design solution that can drastically reduce seismic demands on equipment. This article describes a set of earthquake-simulator experiments conducted on a scale-model of a base-isolated reactor vessel including four representations of head-mounted equipment, with frequencies spanning from 4.5 to 27 Hz. Dynamic responses of the head-mounted equipment, including displacements, accelerations, and strains, were measured in the experiments for three support conditions: conventional, and seismically isolated using single concave Friction Pendulum (SFP) bearings and triple Friction Pendulum (TFP) bearings. Seismic isolation was effective at reducing equipment responses (accelerations, displacements, and strains) with respect to those in the conventionally supported vessel across a range of seismic inputs. Companion numerical studies highlight the accuracy to be expected in the calculation of different response quantities for lightly damped equipment. The importance of characterizing damping in head-mounted, safety-related equipment through physical experiments to support design and risk assessment is made clear through the numerical simulations.
Engineering↗
The Advanced Test Reactor
The Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) is currently the highest-powered research reactor in the world with a maximum thermal power of 250 MW. The ATR began operation in 1967 to support fuels and materials irradiation testing programs in the United States and current plans (2019) are to operate the ATR for two more decades. Since 2007, the ATR has been designated a National Scientific User Facility (NSUF) to provide more access for non-government researchers to use the ATR for academic irradiation research. This article is a brief description of the ATR history, construction, and experiment configurations.
21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
Predicting Safety Rod Reactivity Insertion in the Advanced Test Reactor
The Advanced Test Reactor (ATR), and complimentary zero-power ATR Critical (ATRC) reactor, located at Idaho National Labs (INL), are undergoing conversion from Highly Enriched Uranium (HEU) to Low Enriched Uranium (LEU). Both have a variety of testing locations that can receive large variations in flux due to its unique serpentine design, consisting of five lobes surrounding nine flux traps (see Figure 1). Initial criticality and power distribution throughout the core are controlled by core-external outer shim control cylinders (OSCCs). Distinct test loops allow for testing at specific temperatures, pressures, and irradiation conditions such as flux and fission density. The ATR is one of the key nuclear engineering research and testing facilities within the DOE National Laboratory Complex, and the ATRC supports its operation [1]. Currently, the Office of Material Management and Minimization (M3) within the National Nuclear Security Administration of the DOE is working to convert the remaining research reactors, including the ATR, from 93% HEU fuel to 19.75% LEU fuel (LEU) to support non-proliferation [2]. Extensive materials testing at INL and internationally has demonstrated that a high-density uranium molybdenum (U 10Mo) alloy can meet the performance requirements of the remaining high powered research reactors. The current LEU fuel element design is named the LOWE element. However, there are many technical challenges to address before the conversion to LEU can be successful, including the accurate characterization of the reactor core physics with LEU fuel. To ensure safe operation of the ATR, reactor engineers prepare a CSAP (Core Safety Assurance Package) before each cycle. The purpose of the CSAP is to verify the reactor performance calculation used to determine if the selected fuel loading meets operational, experimental, and safety criteria. Many of the criteria in the CSAP are limits on reactivity insertion in various accident scenarios.
42 ENGINEERING↗
Local Power Impact Experiment Design for a New Fuel Type for use in the Advanced Test Reactor
The Advanced Test Reactor (ATR), and complimentary zero-power ATR Critical (ATRC) reactor, located at Idaho National Labs (INL), are undergoing conversion from Highly Enriched Uranium (HEU) to Low Enriched Uranium (LEU). Both have a variety of testing locations that can receive large variations in flux due to its unique serpentine design, consisting of five lobes (see Figure 1). Initial criticality and power distribution throughout the core are controlled by core-external outer shim control cylinders (OSCCs). Distinct test loops allow for testing at specific temperatures, pressures, and irradiation conditions. The ATR is one of the key nuclear engineering research and testing facilities within the DOE National Laboratory Complex, and the ATRC supports its operation [1]. Currently, the Office of Material Management and Minimization (M3) within the National Nuclear Security Administration of the DOE is working to convert the remaining research reactors, including the ATR, from 93% HEU fuel to 19.75% LEU fuel (LEU) to support non-proliferation [2]. Extensive materials testing at INL and internationally has demonstrated that a high-density uranium molybdenum (U 10Mo) alloy can meet the performance requirements of the remaining high powered research reactors. However, there are many technical challenges to address before the conversion to LEU can be successful, including the accurate characterization of the reactor core physics with LEU fuel. Reactor physics safety evaluations currently use Monte Carlo for the 21st Century (MC21), a continuous-energy Monte Carlo radiation transport code [3]. Existing MC21 models of the ATR and ATRC cores have a validation basis for use in neutronics analyses with HEU fuel. The models are used to support safety analyses that include comparisons to the safety requirements for the reactors. However, the use of the LOWE element in the ATR and ATRC is not currently covered by the current model validation basis. To deploy the new fuel type, extensive computational reactor physics support is necessary to support the use of LOWE in the ATR and ATRC. Therefore, LOWE requires a rigorous validation basis, aligned with that of HEU fuel, that takes advantage of the existing software tools and processes currently used for the ATR and ATRC. The experiment to validate of the MC21 models for determining power, the Power Impact Validation Experiment, will consist of two flux runs in the ATRC, one with fully HEU loading and one with a single LOWE element. Both flux runs will be instrumented with 20 sets of azimuthal fission wires and 3 sets of axial fission wires, as shown in Figure 4. Standard flux run methodology will be used [4]. Power Impact Validation Experiment data will be compared against MC21 calculated data, both for absolute fission rate accuracy and to determine the relative change in fission rates between the two runs. The results of the Power Impact Validation Experiment and subsequent evaluations will provide the validation basis for MC21 for use with LOWE elements. Key features of the Power Impact Validation Experiment include: (1) Two flux runs to allow for LOWE perturbed measurements to be compared to already validated measurements taken from a full core of HEU fuel, (2) Optimization of instrumentation to balance analytical needs with practical considerations (e.g., limited time window to count beta particles from fission products), and (3) Standard ATRC core loading, including both driver positions and flux traps, to minimize cost while remaining representative of typical ATR core loading.
42 ENGINEERING↗
Summary of Thermocouple Performance in the Advanced Gas Reactor Experiment AGR-5/6/7 During Irradiation in the Advanced Test Reactor
The Advanced Gas Reactor -5/6/7 (AGR-5/6/7) experiment was the fourth and final experiment in the AGR experiment series and completed irradiation in July 2020. It serves as the formal fuel qualification test for the TRISO fuels under development by the US Department of Energy. This experiment was designed to irradiate fuel particles at temperatures ranging from 800°C ? 1500°C. The high end of the range created unique challenges for thermocouple-based temperature measurements. Commercially available high-temperature platinum-rhodium thermocouples (Types S, R, and B) and tungsten-rhenium thermocouples (Type C) suffer rapid decalibration due to transmutation of the thermoelements from neutron absorption. A special low neutron cross-section thermocouple system based on molybdenum/niobium thermoelements called High Temperature Irradiation Resistant thermocouple (HTIR-TC) has been under development at INL since circa 2004. Several examples of this thermocouple type were incorporated into regions of the test operating above 1200°C. For regions in the test operating in the 1000°C ? 1200°C range, high-performance versions of Type N thermocouples recently developed at Cambridge University were installed. Standard Type N thermocouples were used in regions of the test operating below 1000°C. A total of 54 thermocouples were incorporated into the test. A report of the performance of this large heterogenous set of thermocouples over the first third of the irradiation was previously provided (ANIMMA 2019). This follow-on paper discusses results from the balance of the experiment (Feb 2019 - July 2020). Special attention is focused on potential drift of thermocouples operating in the higher temperature regions.
46 INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ↗
Thermal Gradient and Neutron Irradiation Experiment Design for Fusion Reactor Materials in the Advanced Test Reactor
This work outlines a hypothetical coupled thermal gradient and neutron irradiation experiment in the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) at the Idaho National Laboratory. Although the ATR is a thermal spectrum test reactor and doesn’t inherently produce a flux spectrum dominated by the high-energy neutrons typical in a fusion reactor, it’s multitude of experiment positions and dynamic flux environment make it a suitable platform for investigating fusion related issues.
36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
Draft Methodology for Cybersecurity Analysis for Adoption of Wireless Technology in Nuclear Power Plants
The report is delivered as DOE-NE Cybersecurity Program Milestone M2CT-22IN1104014-Industry cybersecurity guidance adoption status. The milestone is specifically to document the process and the status of the efforts towards developing guidance in support of industry’s adoption of wireless communication technologies. To transform the operation of nuclear power plants, including domestic light-water reactors, advanced reactors, microreactors, and fission battery, for grid and non-grid applications, secure and resilient wireless capabilities are required. In addition, to realize new operational concepts such as autonomous operation and remote monitoring, advanced sensor, and instrumentation, wireless technology is essential. However, industry implementation is low, and there is no technical basis for how to understand and address potential risks for wireless communications for critical plant functions. A methodology with a technical basis for implementing secure wireless communication is crucial. This wireless adoption methodology is intended to assist a licensee in identifying an appropriate technological approach for securing wireless communications in nuclear power plant. However, this methodology does not provide guidance for addressing wireless design criteria or for addressing all the cybersecurity commitments in licensees’ cybersecurity plans (CSPs) including addressing security impact analysis that a licensee must perform before an update to a Critical Digital Asset (CDA). This methodology guides a licensee through a process of evaluating a proposed wireless implementation and drafting a plant change notification for an example use case. The example is a generic/nonproprietary version of the first test case of the methodology, which, if successfully implemented, is part of the consideration for protecting other functions’ use of wireless in a cybersecure manner.
22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
Griffin: A MOOSE-based reactor physics application for multiphysics simulation of advanced nuclear reactors
Griffin is a Multiphysics Object-Oriented Simulation Environment (MOOSE) based reactor physics application for multiphysics simulations of advanced reactor designs jointly developed by Idaho National Laboratory and Argonne National Laboratory. This paper summarizes the motivation, significance, architecture, design, and features of Griffin. Griffin offers flexible and extensible features to address the challenges associated with advanced reactor designs. These features range from fundamental particle transport to specific reactor physics tasks. The features cover a wide range including on-the-fly and traditional two-step cross-section generation methods, steady-state and transient transport solvers suitable for both heterogeneous and homogeneous models, high-fidelity depletion where thousands of isotopes can be tracked and low-fidelity depletion characterized by burnup, etc. The most fundamental aspect that sets Griffin apart from other reactor analysis codes is that it is developed based on the MOOSE framework. A modular development approach is strongly enforced, with multiphysics being an essential element considered since the beginning of Griffin’s development. Griffin links various MOOSE physics modules and couples to other MOOSE-based applications and non-MOOSE-based applications for multiphyiscs simulations. Griffin includes three modules: ISOXML for preparing and managing multigroup cross sections, radiation transport for solving the neutron transport equation, and reactor analysis for user-oriented reactor physics analysis functionalities. Griffin uses various finite element methods for spatial discretization, multigroup approximation for energy discretization and discrete ordinates method, spherical harmonics expansion method, and diffusion approximation for streaming direction discretization to solve the neutron transport equation. Griffin’s flexibility is evidenced through Griffin’s various applications to fast reactor, high-temperature reactor, pebble bed reactor, molten salt reactor, and microreactor designs. Griffin development follows the software quality assurance procedure for MOOSE-based applications and with software requirements consistent with the ASME NQA-1 standard. Griffin has been adopted into the reactor analysis system for the U.S. NRC and is in use at U.S. companies, universities and national laboratories.
97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
BISON: A Flexible Code for Advanced Simulation of the Performance of Multiple Nuclear Fuel Forms [Slides]
As fuel vendors and designers pursue the development of advanced reactors or the increase in burnup limits for existing reactors, advanced computational tools are necessary to understand the fuel performance. BISON, a fuel performance code developed primarily at Idaho National Laboratory, which is built upon the Multiphysics Object-Oriented Simulation Environment (MOOSE), provides capabilities to analyze multiple nuclear fuel forms in a wide variety of dimensions. Since its inception, BISON has been used to investigate the performance of light-water reactor fuel rods, accident tolerant fuel concepts, metallic and mixed-oxide (MOX) fuels for fast reactors, plate fuels for research reactors, and tri-structural isotropic (TRISO) fuel particles. This talk will provide a history of BISON, highlights of major development milestones, tributes to key contributors, and applications of its use to various fuel forms in one-, two-, and three-dimensions.
11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
Molten Salt in the Advanced Test Reactor [Slides]
The Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) is one of the world’s most important resources for fuel qualification. Prior to this project, ATR could not support molten salt irradiation experiments. This work expands ATR’s capability to support fuel qualification for molten salt reactors.
21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗
United States–Brazil Joint Study: A Preliminary Assessment of Opportunities and Challenges for Small Modular Reactors in Brazil
This report supplies the technical information to enable a broader understanding of different technology choices for nuclear reactors in Brazil. The assessment characteristics of this process include reactor technology, economic costs for deployment, and regulatory analyses of small modular reactors, advanced reactors, and microreactors. The analysis documented in this report provides economic and technological information to assist Brazil, whose official indicative scenarios show an increase in operating nuclear power from 2 Gigawatt in 2022 to 8–10 Gigawatt by 2050, in policy making and long-term energy planning. To protect company proprietary information, the information in this report was limited to publicly available information and therefore can only inform preliminary reactor technology assessments. This report does not recommend or endorse any specific reactor developer or technology.
22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
Initial Findings in Qualifying the Instrument Thimble 11 Position in the Advanced Test Reactor Critical
The Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) is a versatile nuclear research reactor located at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) in Eastern Idaho, United States of America. It is one of the most powerful and flexible research reactors in the world and is primarily used for materials testing, isotope production and basic nuclear science research. The ATR is a light-water-cooled, beryllium-moderated reactor with a nominal thermal power capacity of 250 MW utilizing specially designed fuel, arranged in a serpentine pattern to create 9 flux traps. The special design of ATR allows for the neutron flux within each of the flux traps providing flexibility for experiments, programs and allowing experiments with different dose requirements to be irradiated simultaneously. The Advance Test Reactor Critical (ATRC) is a full-scale replica of the ATR core but is housed in a pool instead of a pressure vessel. ATRC is usually operated at less than 600 watts [1]. There are 12 dry instrument thimbles located around the outside of the core tank where a variety of measurement equipment is housed to facilitate reactor operations. Currently Instrument Thimble 11 (IT-11) is not utilized in ATR or ATRC. A range of measurements is ongoing to qualify IT-11 as a test platform for nuclear instrumentation research, development and further experimentation.
46 - INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AN↗