Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “groundwater”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 343 records · Page 19

High Priority Samples to Characterize the Habitability of Groundwaters and Search for Rock-Hosted Life on Mars with Sample Return

Objective 1.1 of the iMOST sample return objectives is to establish the geologic context, interpret the potential habitability, and evaluate the potential for biosignature preservation in samples from an environment hypothesized to have had elevated potential for Martian life. Here, we describe the strategies required to understand the geologic context and habitability of Martian groundwater aquifers and to search for evidence of life in the Martian subsurface using samples.

Source record↗

Contractors Road Heavy Equipment Area (SWMU055) Hot Spot 1 Bioremediation Interim Measure Performance Monitoring And Site-Wide Interim Groundwater Monitoring Report

This document presents a summary of activities completed from January through December 2019 at the Contractors Road Heavy Equipment (CRHE) area, located at John F. Kennedy Space Center (KSC), Florida. The activities summarized include: 1) Annual Hot Spot 1 (HS1) eastern bioremediation interim measure (IM) performance monitoring (December 2019); 2) Annual HS1 western bioremediation IM performance monitoring (December 2019); 3) Annual Interim Groundwater Monitoring (IGM) activities (December 2019); 4) Sub-slab soil gas (SSSG) sampling to investigate potential vapor intrusion (VI) (June 2019). Bioremediation IM activities were implemented in two phases at the CRHE. The first event was implemented in November and December 2016 in the eastern portion of HS1. In April and May 2018, bioremediation IM was implemented in the western portion of HS1. The bioremediation IM targeted chlorinated volatile organic compound (CVOC) concentrations greater than 10 times their Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) Natural Attenuation Default Criteria (NADC). Bioremediation IM activities included the injection of a diluted solution of SRS®-SD (electron donor) and microbial culture (KB-1®) into the subsurface via direct push technology (DPT) injection down to 50 feet below land surface (ft bls).

Andrew Scott Starr↗

Components Cleaning Facility, SWMU 30 Interim Groundwater Monitoring Report Kennedy Space Center, Florida

This Interim Groundwater Monitoring (IGWM) Report (IGWMR) presents the findings of IGWM completed in June and December 2019 at the eastern portion of the Components Cleaning Facility (CCF East) site located at Kennedy Space Center (KSC), Florida. The site has been designated Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) 030 under KSC’s Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Corrective Action Program.

Patrice L Lehocky↗

Hydrocarbon Burn Facility SWMU 007 Interim Groundwater Monitoring Report Kennedy Space Center, Florida

This Interim Groundwater Monitoring (IGWM) Report presents the findings of IGWM activities completed in November/December 2020 for the Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) Area of the Hydrocarbon Burn Facility (HBF) at Kennedy Space Center (KSC), Florida. HBF has been designated as Solid Waste Management Unit 007 under the KSC Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Corrective Action Program.

Jennifer Buel↗

Fluid Servicing Road Area SWMUs 037 and 102 Interim Groundwater Monitoring Report Kennedy Space Center, Florida

This Interim Groundwater Monitoring (IGWM) Report presents the findings of the IGWM activities conducted during the 2021 reporting period at the Fluid Servicing Road Area (FSRA) of Kennedy Space Center (KSC), Florida. The IGWM program was implemented at sites where active remediation was not occurring to monitor and track plume footprints and concentrations. FSRA is located east of the Vehicle Assembly Building and includes Components Cleaning Facility (CCF) also known as Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU) 030; Converter Compressor Building (CCB) also known as SWMU 089; Area South of K7-516 (516S) also known as SWMU 100; Propellants Support Building Area (PSBA) also known as SWMU 102; and Former Drum Storage Area (FDSA) also known as SWMU 037.

Carol Cady↗

2021 Corrective Measures Implementation and Interim Measures Annual Status Report: Summary of Biosparge System Operation and Maintenance, and Interim Groundwater Monitoring Mobile Launch Platform Rehabilitation Sites / Vehicle Assembly Building Area (SWMU 056) Kennedy Space Center, Florida

This report presents a summary of the Corrective Measures Implementation (CMI) and Interim Measure (IM) implementation activities that occurred from January 2021 through December 2021 at the Mobile Launch Platform Rehabilitation Sites (MLP)/Vehicle Assembly Building (VAB) Area, Solid Waste Management Unit 056 (SWMU 056), located at the John F. Kennedy Space Center, Florida. The following summaries briefly describe areas within SWMU 056 identified by historical site investigation activities where groundwater monitoring and remedial actions have been implemented to date.

Randall K. Sillan↗

Hydrocarbon Burn Facility SWMU 007 Interim Groundwater Monitoring Report Kennedy Space Center, Florida

This Interim Groundwater Monitoring (IGWM) Report presents the findings of IGWM activities completed in November 2021 along with an October 2021 direct push technology (DPT) investigation to confirm plume stability for the Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) Area of the Hydrocarbon Burn Facility (HBF) at Kennedy Space Center (KSC), Florida. HBF has been designated as Solid Waste Management Unit 007 under the KSC Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Corrective Action Program.

Jennifer Buel↗

Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances: A Preliminary Evaluation of Groundwater Contamination in the Western States

Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) are a manufactured group of chemicals that have been used since the 1940s. PFAS break down very slowly and studies show that exposure to these chemicals may cause negative reproductive effects, developmental delays in children, increased risk of some cancers, and interference with the body’s natural hormones. On June 15, 2022, EPA issued interim updated drinking water health advisories for the two most widely studied PFAS, perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS). The concentrations for the health advisory limits are 0.004 parts per trillion (ppt) and 0.02 ppt respectively. Because data is often reported in combined PFOA and PFOS concentrations, and for ease of data visualization, concentrations of the two chemicals will be discussed as a single, summed value and will be compared to the combined health advisory limits of 0.024 ppt. Due to the recently published near-zero health advisory limits and the known negative health effects, a map of estimated PFAS groundwater contamination was created using ArcGIS Pro and geostatistical tools to inform the public and determine which regions are most at-risk.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗

The Challenge of Achieving Site Closure of a Complex Groundwater Plume - 20531

Over the last three decades, DOE has made substantial progress in nearly every area of nuclear waste cleanup and has closed and transitioned 91 of the 107 sites in the EM complex. Several of the remaining groundwater plumes at Hanford, Los Alamos, Paducah, Oak Ridge, and Savannah River are complex and tend to have unique site or contaminant characteristics which provide an almost impossible challenge to remediate to regulatory levels. As a result, these complex sites will require a large investment to remediate. In order for DOE to achieve regulatory closure, a technically sound case must be developed and presented to regulators and stakeholders that clearly demonstrates that remedial goals have been or will be irreversibly achieved or that there is an alternate acceptable end-state. Five lines of evidence are required: - A conceptual site model that is as complete as possible, with the knowledge that it may continue to evolve with time; - Demonstration that trends in contaminant concentrations, or flux, versus time indicate that remedial goals will be achieved on schedule or within a reasonable time thereafter and that trends that deviate from this path are explainable by the conceptual model; - Demonstration that remobilization of attenuated contaminants is unlikely to occur in the future; - Explicit consideration of remedial contingencies, should deviations in the path toward remedial goals occur; - Development of an effective long-term monitoring plan to detect any conditions that might alter the path toward remedial goals. SRS has made significant progress in the remediation of contamination associated with the F-area and H-Area Seepage Basins, and it is currently developing a strategic closure path that addresses each of these lines of evidence and identifies both basic and applied scientific issues that will need to be addressed in order to obtain regulatory closure. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗

Fluidic impedance platform for in-situ detection and quantification of PFAS in groundwater

Materials for binding per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are disclosed. A fluidic device comprising the materials for detection and quantification of PFAS in a sample is disclosed. The fluidic device may be configured for multiplexed analyses. Also disclosed are methods for sorbing and remediating PFAS in a sample. The sample may be groundwater containing, or suspected of containing, one or more PFAS.

Chatterjee, Sayandev↗

Groundwater Inflows to the Columbia River Along the Hanford Reach and Associated Nitrate Concentrations

Healthy river ecosystems require the interaction of many physical and biological processes to maintain their status. One physical process supporting biogeochemical cycling is hydrologic exchange (i.e., hydrologic exchange flows, HEFs) between relatively fast-flowing channel waters and slower-flowing surface and subsurface waters (lateral and vertical). Land uses adjacent to rivers have the potential to alter the water quality of off-channel surface and subsurface waters, and HEFs therefore have the potential to deliver solutes associated with river-adjacent land uses to rivers. HEFs can be nonpoint, diffuse sources of pollution, making the ultimate pollution source difficult to identify, especially in large rivers. Here, we seek to identify HEFs in the Columbia River near Richland, WA by looking for anomalies in temperature and electrical conductivity (EC) along the bed of the river in February, June, July, August, and November 2018. These are ultimately the “ends” of HEFs as they are locations of subsurface inflow to the river. We found these anomalies to be a combination of warmer or colder and higher (but not lower) EC than river water. We identified a majority of warm anomalies in February and July 2018, and majority cold anomalies in June, August, and November 2018. High-EC anomalies were found mostly in February, August, and November. Combined, we observe a shift from warm, high EC anomalies dominating in February to equivalent EC, warm anomalies in June, to equivalent EC, cool anomalies dominating July. In August, we also measured dissolved nitrate ($NO^-_3$) in-situ to determine whether anomalies were associated with increased $NO^-_3$ loading to the river, especially along the eastern shoreline, which is dominated by agricultural land use. Inflows along the eastern shoreline have greater concentrations of nitrate than river water (up to 10 mg $N–NO^-_3$/L). This research demonstrates that HEFs are temporally and spatially dynamic transferring heat and solutes to rivers.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗