NASA NTRS1996
In many bearings and contacts, forces are transmitted through thin continuous fluid films which separate two contacting elements. Objects in contact are normally subjected to friction and wear which can be reduced effectively by using lubricants. If the lubricant film is sufficiently thin to prevent the opposing solids from coming into contact and carries the entire load, then we have hydrodynamic lubrication, where the lubricant film is determined by the motion and geometry of the solids. However, for loaded contacts of low geometrical conformity, such as gears, rolling contact bearings and cams, this is not the case due to high pressures and this is referred to as Elasto-Hydrodynamic Lubrication (EHL) In EHL, elastic deformation of the contacting elements and the increase in fluid viscosity with pressure are very significant and cannot be ignored. Since the deformation results in changing the geometry of the lubricating film, which in turn determines the pressure distribution, an EHL mathematical model must simultaneously satisfy the complex elasticity (integral) and the Reynolds lubrication (differential) equations. The nonlinear and coupled nature of the two equations makes numerical calculations computationally intensive. This is especially true for highly loaded problems found in practice. One novel feature of these problems is that the solution may exhibit sharp pressure spikes in the outlet region. To this date both finite element and finite difference methods have been used to solve EHL problems with perhaps greater emphasis on the use of the finite difference approach. In both cases, a major computational difficulty is ensuring convergence of the nonlinear equations solver to a steady state solution. Two successful methods for achieving this are direct iteration and multigrid methods. Direct iteration methods (e.g Gauss Seidel) have long been used in conjunction with finite difference discretizations on regular meshes. Perhaps one of the best examples of the application of such methods is the recent Effective Influence Method of Dowson and Wang. Multigrid methods have also been used with great success by Venner and Venner and Lubrecht with a good summary being given by Venner. As both these finite difference discretization based approaches appear to provide an efficient way of solving EHL problems, it is important to understand their relative merits. This paper is a first attempt at providing such an understanding in the context of EHL point contact problem, (contact of two spheres), in which the contact zone is a point and an ellipse or circle for unloaded and loaded dry contacts respectively. Since the film thickness and the contact width are generally small compared to the local radius of curvature of the two surfaces, the reduced geometry of the surfaces in the contact area can be accurately approximated to the contact between a paraboloid and a flat surface. The layout of the remainder of this paper is as follows. In section 2 we introduce the form of the equations to be solved. The Effective Influence Newton Method is described in Section 3 while Section 4 describes the Multigrid method to be used. Sections 5 and 6 describe the test problems to be used in the comparison between the two methods and compare the performance of the two methods. Section 7 concludes the paper with an argument of the two methods and suggests some future research directions.