SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “ASCENT”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2

All sources NASA NTRS DOE OSTI

NASA NTRS1980

Verification of the Space Shuttle ascent flight control

The unique avionics design features of the Space Shuttle ascent flight control are described, along with the test article, test equipment, and test techniques used to verify the ascent flight control prior to commitment to the first orbital flight test. The ascent mission profiles are described, noting that upon ignition of the solid rocket boosters the Shuttle vehicle will rise vertically until achieving tower clearance. The Space Shuttle vehicle uses an integrated avionics system with the Orbiter avionics providing the command, control, and monitoring for the total mated Shuttle vehicle. The sensors and the actuator systems are discussed; the method of ascent flight control system verification is described, and it is concluded that the need for an advanced avionics integration and verification laboratory was recognized early in the program to provide maximum support to all program requirements.

Chambers, T. V.↗

NASA NTRS1987

Ascent aeromaneuvering capabilities of transatmospheric vehicles

The low-earth orbit rendezvous capability of a conceptual transatmospheric vehicle is analyzed for two endo-/exo-atmospheric ascent missions. Both cases involve coasting aerodynamic maneuvers starting from the burn-out conditions corresponding to air-breathing propulsion systems that achieve orbital velocity within the atmosphere. The powered phase of the ascent trajectories approximate constant dynamic pressure, fuel-efficient flightpaths typically flown by supersonic aircraft. The aeromaneuvering coast phases of the ascent include both coplanar (to determine altitude capability without plane-inclination changes) and aeroturning to LEO rendezvous at 400 km altitude (to assess plane-change capability). The coast-phase ascent maneuvers are correlated with G-load requirements and aerothermodynamic heating characteristics at two critical locations on the vehicle surface (i.e., the nose stagnation point and the body centerline). The results are correlated and recommendations are made concerning thermal protection and structural requirements.

Menees, Gene P.↗

NASA NTRS1988

Ascent Guidance for a Winged Boost Vehicle

The objective of the advanced ascent guidance study was to investigate guidance concepts which could contribute to increased autonomy during ascent operations in a winged boost vehicle such as the proposed Shuttle II. The guidance scheme was required to yield near a full-optimal ascent in the presence of vehicle system and environmental dispersions. The study included consideration of trajectory shaping issues, trajectory design, closed loop and predictive adaptive guidance techniques and control of dynamic pressure by throttling. An extensive ascent vehicle simulation capability was developed for use in the study.

Corvin, Michael Alexander↗

NASA NTRS1989

SRB ascent aerodynamic heating design criteria reduction study, volume 1

An independent set of solid rocket booster (SRB) convective ascent design environments were produced which would serve as a check on the Rockwell IVBC-3 environments used to design the ascent phase of flight. In addition, support was provided for lowering the design environments such that Thermal Protection System (TPS), based on conservative estimates, could be removed leading to a reduction in SRB refurbishment time and cost. Ascent convective heating rates and loads were generated at locations in the SRB where lowering the thermal environment would impact the TPS design. The ascent thermal environments are documented along with the wind tunnel/flight test data base used as well as the trajectory and environment generation methodology. Methodology, as well as, environment summaries compared to the 1980 Design and Rockwell IVBC-3 Design Environment are presented in this volume, 1.

Crain, W. K.↗

NASA NTRS1989

Wind models for the NSTS ascent trajectory biasing for wind load alleviation

New concepts are presented for aerospace vehicle ascent wind profile biasing. The purpose for wind biasing the ascent trajectory is to provide ascent wind loads relief and thus decrease the probability for launch delays due to wind loads exceeding critical limits. Wind biasing trajectories to the profile of monthly mean winds have been widely used for this purpose. The wind profile models presented give additional alternatives for wind biased trajectories. They are derived from the properties of the bivariate normal probability function using the available wind statistical parameters for the launch site. The analytical expressions are presented to permit generalizations. Specific examples are given to illustrate the procedures. The wind profile models can be used to establish the ascent trajectory steering commands to guide the vehicle through the first stage. For the National Space Transportation System (NSTS) program these steering commands are called I-loads.

Smith, O. E.↗

NASA NTRS1990

Wind models for the NSTS ascent trajectory biasing for wind load alleviation

New concepts are presented for aerospace vehicle ascent wind profile biasing. The purpose for wind biasing the ascent trajectory is to provide ascent wind loads relief and thus decrease the probability for launch delays due to wind loads exceeding critical limits. Wind biasing trajectories to the the profile of monthly mean winds have been widely used for this purpose. The wind profile models presented give additional alternatives for wind biased trajectories. They are derived from the properties of the bivariate normal probability function using the available wind statistical parameters for the launch site. The analytical expressions are presented to permit generalizations. Specific examples are given to illustrate the procedures. The wind profile models can be used to establish the ascent trajectory steering commands to guide the vehicle through the first stage. For the National Space Transportation System (NSTS) program these steering commands are called I-loads.

Smith, O. E.↗

NASA NTRS1993

Minimum Hamiltonian Ascent Trajectory Evaluation (MASTRE) program (update to automatic flight trajectory design, performance prediction, and vehicle sizing for support of Shuttle and Shuttle derived vehicles) engineering manual

The Minimum Hamiltonian Ascent Trajectory Evaluation (MASTRE) program and its predecessors, the ROBOT and the RAGMOP programs, have had a long history of supporting MSFC in the simulation of space boosters for the purpose of performance evaluation. The ROBOT program was used in the simulation of the Saturn 1B and Saturn 5 vehicles in the 1960's and provided the first utilization of the minimum Hamiltonian (or min-H) methodology and the steepest ascent technique to solve the optimum trajectory problem. The advent of the Space Shuttle in the 1970's and its complex airplane design required a redesign of the trajectory simulation code since aerodynamic flight and controllability were required for proper simulation. The RAGMOP program was the first attempt to incorporate the complex equations of the Space Shuttle into an optimization tool by using an optimization method based on steepest ascent techniques (but without the min-H methodology). Development of the complex partial derivatives associated with the Space Shuttle configuration and using techniques from the RAGMOP program, the ROBOT program was redesigned to incorporate these additional complexities. This redesign created the MASTRE program, which was referred to as the Minimum Hamiltonian Ascent Shuttle TRajectory Evaluation program at that time. Unique to this program were first-stage (or booster) nonlinear aerodynamics, upper-stage linear aerodynamics, engine control via moment balance, liquid and solid thrust forces, variable liquid throttling to maintain constant acceleration limits, and a total upgrade of the equations used in the forward and backward integration segments of the program. This modification of the MASTRE code has been used to simulate the new space vehicles associated with the National Launch Systems (NLS). Although not as complicated as the Space Shuttle, the simulation and analysis of the NLS vehicles required additional modifications to the MASTRE program in the areas of providing additional flexibility in the use of the program, allowing additional optimization options, and providing special options for the NLS configuration.

Lyons, J. T.↗

NASA NTRS1998

Mars Ascent Vehicle Flight Analysis

The scientific objective of the Mars Surveyor Program 2005 mission is to return Mars rock, soil, and atmospheric samples to Earth for detailed analysis. The present investigation focuses on design of Mars Ascent Vehicle for this mission. Aerodynamic, aerothermodynamic, and trajectory design considerations are addressed to assess the ascent configuration, determine aerodynamic stability, characterize thermal protection system requirements, and ascertain the required system mass. Aerodynamic analysis reveals a subsonic static instability with the baseline configuration; however, stability augmentation options are proposed to mitigate this problem. The ascent aerothermodynamic environment is shown to be benign (on the order of the sea-level boiling point of water on Earth). As a result of these low thermal and pressure loads, a lightweight, low rigidity material can be employed as the aftbody aerodynamic shroud. The required nominal MAV lift-off mass is 426 kg for a December 2006 equatorial launch into a 300-km circular orbit with 30-degree inclination. Off-nominal aerodynamic and atmospheric conditions are shown to increase this liftoff mass by approximately 10%. Through performance of these analyses, the Mars Ascent Vehicle is deemed feasible with respect to the current mission mass and size constraints.

Desai, P. N.↗

NASA NTRS2007

Crew Exploration Vehicle Ascent Abort Overview

One of the primary design drivers for NASA's Crew Exploration Vehicle (CEV) is to ensure crew safety. Aborts during the critical ascent flight phase require the design and operation of CEV systems to escape from the Crew Launch Vehicle and return the crew safely to the Earth. To accomplish this requirement of continuous abort coverage, CEV ascent abort modes are being designed and analyzed to accommodate the velocity, altitude, atmospheric, and vehicle configuration changes that occur during ascent. The analysis involves an evaluation of the feasibility and survivability of each abort mode and an assessment of the abort mode coverage. These studies and design trades are being conducted so that more informed decisions can be made regarding the vehicle abort requirements, design, and operation. This paper presents an overview of the CEV, driving requirements for abort scenarios, and an overview of current ascent abort modes. Example analysis results are then discussed. Finally, future areas for abort analysis are addressed.

Davidson, John B., Jr.↗

NASA NTRS2012

ASCENT Program

The ASCENT program solves the three-dimensional motion and attendant structural loading on a flexible vehicle incorporating, optionally, an active analog thrust control system, aerodynamic effects, and staging of multiple bodies. ASCENT solves the technical problems of loads, accelerations, and displacements of a flexible vehicle; staging of the upper stage from the lower stage; effects of thrust oscillations on the vehicle; a payload's relative motion; the effect of fluid sloshing on vehicle; and the effect of winds and gusts on the vehicle (on the ground or aloft) in a continuous analysis. The ATTACH ASCENT Loads program reads output from the ASCENT flexible body loads program, and calculates the approximate load indicators for the time interval under consideration. It calculates the load indicator values from pre-launch to the end of the first stage.

Brown, Richard↗

NASA NTRS2015

Design Considerations for a Crewed Mars Ascent Vehicle

Exploration architecture studies identified the Mars Ascent Vehicle (MAV) as one of the largest "gear ratio" items in a crewed Mars mission. Because every kilogram of mass ascended from the Martian surface requires seven kilograms or more of ascent propellant, it is desirable for the MAV to be as small and lightweight as possible. Analysis identified four key factors that drive MAV sizing: 1) Number of crew: more crew members require more equipment-and a larger cabin diameter to hold that equipment-with direct implications to structural, thermal, propulsion, and power subsystem mass. 2) Which suit is worn during ascent: Extravehicular Activity (EVA) type suits are physically larger and heavier than Intravehicular Activity (IVA) type suits and because they are less flexible, EVA suits require more elbow-room to maneuver in and out of. An empty EVA suit takes up about as much cabin volume as a crew member. 3) How much time crew spends in the MAV: less than about 12 hours and the MAV can be considered a "taxi" with few provisions for crew comfort. However, if the crew spends more than 12 consecutive hours in the MAV, it begins to look like a Habitat requiring more crew comfort items. 4) How crew get into/out of the MAV: ingress/egress method drives structural mass (for example, EVA hatch vs. pressurized tunnel vs. suit port) as well as consumables mass for lost cabin atmosphere, and has profound impacts on surface element architecture. To minimize MAV cabin mass, the following is recommended: Limit MAV usage to 24 consecutive hours or less; discard EVA suits on the surface and ascend wearing IVA suits; Limit MAV functionality to ascent only, rather than dual-use ascent/habitat functions; and ingress/egress the MAV via a detachable tunnel to another pressurized surface asset.

Rucker, Michelle A.↗

NASA NTRS2019

Guidance and Navigation Design for a Martian Sample Return Ascent Vehicle

This paper focuses on the work being performed at the NASA Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) in support of Mars Ascent Vehicles (MAVs). Specifically, the analysis presented is in support of Martian sample return architectures. In or-der to assess vehicle sensitivities, a detailed simulation tool, (MAV Analysis Tool in Simscape) MANTIS, was implemented using the MATLAB/Simulink Sim-scape architecture. High fidelity navigation sensor models and guidance algorithms were included in order to facilitate sensor requirement development and flight algorithm selection. This work focuses on the performance of the integrated system and the coupling of navigation and guidance capabilities. The architecture trades are heavily dependent on the ascent flight profile chosen. This work assesses both open- and closed-loop guidance algorithms to capture their relative performance and the resulting requirements on sensor capability to support preliminary vehicle design. The analysis builds on previous work that focused on navigation performance for initialization and ascent flight of crewed vehicle. The results provide insight into the coupling between sensor requirements and ascent guidance approach. The analysis provides data to support requirements for hard-ware selection and testing. Additional discussion is also included focusing on other system constraints that affect hardware selection and operational constraints.

Anzalone, Evan↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Mars Entry, Descent, Landing, and Ascent Systems Sensitivities to Landing Site and Atmospheric Dust

Plans for human missions to Mars continue to go through several architectural changes, dating all the way back to the 1950s. The continuous study, reformulation, and refinement of Mars architectures and system concepts is necessary in order to incorporate evolving mission objectives, technology advancements, and growth in the body of knowledge regarding human factors and the various environments of human space travel. This evolution has continued into the 21st century. Despite the breadth and depth of these studies, impacts due to several key design parameters relevant to the entry, descent, landing, and ascent (EDLA) systems have remained nebulous. This study quantified sensitivities to the EDLA system as a result of these design parameters. Results indicate up to +2% to -4% mass variation from the current baseline Mars Ascent Vehicle concept. Variations in the descent system due to landing site were much more significant with mass variations in the range of -15% to +30% around the current baseline Mars Descent System concept. System sensitivities to dust were much less pronounced, with ascent systems showing roughly a -0.6% to + 0.4% mass variations from the baseline Mars Ascent Vehicle, while the Mars Descent System saw a greater variations due to dust, roughly -4% to +6% around the baseline concept.

Douglas J Trent↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Mars Entry, Descent, Landing, and Ascent Systems Sensitivities to Landing Site and Atmospheric Dust

Douglas J Trent↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Space Launch System Artemis I Ascent Loads Reconstruction Summary

On November 16, 2022, NASA successfully launched the Space Launch System (SLS) rocket and Orion spacecraft for the first SLS mission, Artemis 1. This first flight was outfitted with Developmental Flight Instrumentation (DFI) such as accelerometers, pressure sensors, and strain gauges. The DFI supports many post-flight activities, one of which is the ascent loads reconstruction effort. The integrated vehicle ascent loads spans both boost phase and Core phase and often produces the largest loads experienced by the vehicle during flight. One of the primary goals of the ascent loads reconstruction is to evaluate applicable Coupled Loads Analysis (CLA) design math models, assumptions, and analysis methodologies. To achieve this goal, all significant ascent subevents have been reconstructed through the use of flight data, reconstructed inputs, and existing CLA simulations. Resulting responses have been compared to available flight measurements. Additionally, reconstructed subevent loads were combined and compared to appropriate flight data and pre-flight predictions.

SLS↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Design Considerations of an Ascent Abort Monitor Algorithm for Use During Service Module Aborts

In support of human rating the Artemis missions, NASA's Orion program requires continuous abort coverage from liftoff through mission destination. During a portion of the ascent trajectory, the currently achievable abort mode is determined by an Orion algorithm using the onboard navigated vehicle state. This ascent abort monitor determines achievability for Orion's Mode 2 abort, Untargeted Abort Splashdown (UAS), by propagating the current vehicle state through ascent abort events to determine sufficient timing to perform the abort and to a ballistic touchdown point to approximate landing location relative to prescribed keep out boundaries. The algorithm was updated for Artemis 2 to allow the capability to limit loads for the majority of ascent. Performance of the algorithm has been demonstrated and verified through dispersed trajectory analysis with emulated flight software, unit testing, and hardware in the loop testing.

Esteban Guzman↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

A Parametric Assessment of Lunar and Mars Ascent Vehicle Synergy

The National Aeronautics and Space Administration has long had a focus on the human exploration of space, starting with Earth orbit, progressing to the Moon, and looking forward to Mars and other deep space destinations. With current priorities aiming toward a return to the Lunar surface in 2024 as part of an extended exploration campaign that will prepare the way for the first crewed mission to Mars, it is timely to examine possible commonalities between the Lunar and Martian mission architectures, particularly in the vehicle systems. One area of potential similarity lies within the ascent phase of the missions; at a first look, the initial Artemis missions to return to the Moon and a short-duration surface stay option for a Mars mission appear similar in several regards, especially in regards to the selection of the crew size, duration of crewed flight, and general subsystem functionality. This paper will take a closer look at these similarities as they apply to the respective ascent vehicles for each planetary body and how those similarities could enable synergies between the Lunar and Mars ascent vehicles of both missions.

Human Exploration↗

NASA NTRS2015

On Small Disturbance Ascent Vent Behavior

As a spacecraft undergoes ascent in a launch vehicle, its ambient pressure environment transitions from one atmosphere to high vacuum in a matter of a few minutes. Venting of internal cavities is necessary to prevent the buildup of pressure differentials across cavity walls. These pressure differentials are often restricted to low levels to prevent violation of container integrity. Such vents usually consist of fixed orifices, ducts, or combinations of both. Duct conductance behavior is fundamentally different from that for orifices in pressure driven flows governing the launch vehicle ascent depressurization environment. Duct conductance is governed by the average pressure across its length, while orifice conductance is dictated by a pressure ratio. Hence, one cannot define a valid equivalent orifice for a given duct across a range of pressure levels. This presentation discusses development of expressions for these two types of vent elements in the limit of small pressure differentials, explores conditions for their validity, and compares their features regarding ascent depressurization performance.

Venting↗