SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Adaptive Compliant Trailing Edge”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

30 records · Page 2

All sources NASA NTRS DOE OSTI

NASA NTRS2015

Status of ERA Airframe Technology Demonstrators

NASA has created the Environmentally Responsible Aviation (ERA) Project to explore and document the feasibility, benefits and technical risk of advanced vehicle configurations and enabling technologies that will reduce the impact of aviation on the environment. A critical aspect of this pursuit is the development of a lighter, more robust airframe that will enable the introduction of unconventional aircraft configurations that have higher lift-to-drag ratios, reduced drag, and lower community noise. The Airframe Technology subproject contains two elements. Under the Damage Arresting Composite Demonstration an advanced material system is being explored which will lead to lighter airframes that are more structural efficient than the composites used in aircraft today. Under the Adaptive Compliant Trailing Edge Flight Experiment a new concept of a flexible wing trailing edge is being evaluated which will reduce weight and improve aerodynamic performance. This presentation will describe the development these two airframe technologies.

Davis, Pamela↗

NASA NTRS2016

Analysis of Low-Speed Stall Aerodynamics of a Swept Wing with Seamless Flaps

Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis was conducted to study the low-speed stall aerodynamics of a Gulfstream G-III airplane (Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation, Savannah, Georgia) swept wing modified with an experimental seamless, compliant flap called the Adaptive Compliant Trailing Edge (ACTE) flap. The stall characteristics of the modified ACTE wing were analyzed and compared with the unmodified, clean wing at the flight speed of 120 knots and altitude of 2300 feet above mean sea level, in free air as well as in ground effect. A polyhedral finite-volume unstructured full Navier-Stokes CFD code, STAR-CCM (registered trademark) plus (CD-adapco [Computational Dynamics Limited, United Kingdom, and Analysis & Design Application Co., United States]), was used. Steady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes CFD simulations were conducted for a clean wing and the ACTE wings at various ACTE deflection angles in free air (-2 degrees, 15 degrees, and 30 degrees) as well as in ground effect (15 degrees and 30 degrees). Solution sensitivities to grid densities were examined. In free air, the ACTE wings are predicted to stall at lower angles of attack than the clean wing. In ground effect, all wings are predicted to stall at lower angles of attack than the corresponding wings in free air. Even though the lift curves are higher in ground effect than in free air, the maximum lift coefficients for all wings are lower in ground effect. Finally, the lift increase due to ground effect for the ACTE wing is predicted to be less than the clean wing.

CFD↗

NASA NTRS2016

Applications of Displacement Transfer Functions to Deformed Shape Predictions of the G-III Swept-Wing Structure

In support of the Adaptive Compliant Trailing Edge [ACTE] project at the NASA Armstrong Flight Research Center, displacement transfer functions were applied to the swept wing of a Gulfstream G-III airplane (Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation, Savannah, Georgia) to obtain deformed shape predictions. Four strainsensing lines (two on the lower surface, two on the upper surface) were used to calculate the deformed shape of the G III wing under bending and torsion. There being an insufficient number of surface strain sensors, the existing G III wing box finite element model was used to generate simulated surface strains for input to the displacement transfer functions. The resulting predicted deflections have good correlation with the finite-element generated deflections as well as the measured deflections from the ground load calibration test. The convergence study showed that the displacement prediction error at the G III wing tip can be reduced by increasing the number of strain stations (for each strain-sensing line) down to a minimum error of l.6 percent at 17 strain stations; using more than 17 strain stations yielded no benefit because the error slightly increased to 1.9% when 32 strain stations were used.

displacement theory↗

NASA NTRS2018

Analysis of High-Speed Aerodynamics of a Swept Wing with Seamless Flaps

Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis was conducted to evaluate the high-speed aerodynamics of a Gulfstream GIII airplane (Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation, Savannah, Georgia) swept wing modified with an experimental seamless, compliant flap called the Adaptive Compliant Trailing Edge (ACTE) flap for airworthiness. The high-speed aerodynamics of the modified ACTE wing were analyzed at a Mach number of 0.85 and an altitude of 40,000 ft. A polyhedral finite-volume unstructured Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes CFD code was used with a two-equation turbulence model. Wing aerodynamics sensitivities to lift coefficients, airplane engine operation, vortex generators (VGs), and ACTE flap deflections were examined. High-speed flow over the clean GIII wing without VGs was found to be complex with outboard shock and boundary-layer interactions causing flow separation over the upper wing surface upstream of the aileron, which could result in buffet and controllability problems at higher lift coefficient values. The VGs were found to improve the high-speed aerodynamics of the clean wing, as expected; however, ACTE flap deflections of as little as 1 to 2 deg were found to negate all of the aerodynamic benefits provided by the VGs at high speeds.

wings↗

NASA NTRS2018

Analysis of High-Speed Aerodynamics of a Swept Wing with Seamless Flaps

wing design↗

NASA NTRS2018

Best Practices for Training the Structures Flight Test Engineer

The Structures Flight from 412th Test Wing and the Aerostructures Branch at NASA Armstrong Flight Research Center at Edwards Air Force Base have developed a set of best practices for training a structures flight test engineer. These practices represent the hard-won lessons learned and best practices from training generations of engineers to perform high risk envelope expansion and developmental flight test. Collectively, these organizations have tested many of the world's most advanced and innovative aircraft, including the B-2, C-17, F-22, F-35, RQ-4, X-29, F-18 High Angle of Attack Research Vehicle, X-53, G-III Adaptive Compliant Trailing Edge, and X-56.

flight tests↗

NASA NTRS2018

Flight and Ground Operations in Support of Airframe Noise Reduction Tests

The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Acoustic Research Measurements (ARM) project was established to evaluate via flight tests the noise reduction benefits of the Adaptive Compliant Trailing Edge (ACTE) technology along with various main landing gear noise reduction concepts. The ACTE replaces the original Fowler flaps on the NASA SubsoniC Research Aircraft Testbed (SCRAT), thus creating a seamless trailing edge that provides significant noise abatement benefits. The various main landing gear noise reduction concepts are grouped under the LAnding Gear noisE Reduction (LAGER) task and consist of fairings placed on the main landing gear along with two separate treatments applied to the main landing gear wheel well cavities. This paper discusses the tasks necessary to prepare each of these technologies for the ARM flights. The LAGER hardware was taken from model-scale concepts tested in wind tunnels to flight hardware, which had to be cleared as airworthy for the ARM flights. The ACTE flaps were initially intended to be removed from the SCRAT prior to the start of the ARM project. Retaining the ACTE flaps on the aircraft for a longer period of time to support the ARM flights resulted in additional inspections and considerations since the ACTE flaps were flown longer and at certain flight conditions for longer periods of time than initially analyzed. The flight and ground operations required for the ARM tests required extensive coordination among multiple groups and organizations in order to be successful. This paper provides an overview of the hardware development, ground operations, and flight operations which went into acquiring the desired acoustic measurements. In general, the flights were successful and demonstrated the noise reduction benefits of the ACTE flaps, the LAGER gear fairings, and the LAGER gear cavity treatments.

ground operations↗

NASA NTRS2018

Simulations of a Full-Scale Aircraft with Installed Airframe Noise Reduction Technologies

Computational results are presented for a high-fidelity, full-scale, full-span Gulfstream G-III aircraft model equipped with flap and main landing gear (MLG) noise reduction technologies. The simulations, which were conducted in support of a NASA airframe noise flight test campaign of the same technologies, use the lattice Boltzmann solver PowerFLOW® to capture time-accurate flow data with sound propagation to the far field accomplished using a Ffowcs-Williams and Hawkings (FWH) acoustic analogy approach. The aerodynamic and aeroacoustic behavior of the aircraft were investigated in the approach configuration with combinations of flap and landing gear deployments. The simulated flap concept is an Adaptive Compliant Trailing Edge (ACTE) flap that replaces the Fowler flap system on the G-III aircraft. The simulated MLG noise reduction concept is comprised of porous fairings and a collection of other smaller fairings fitted around the flow-facing components. Using the Fowler flap results as a reference, comparisons are presented on the noise reduction effectiveness of the ACTE flap system. Investigations were made on the effects of using the porous fairings and ACTE flap as noise reduction concepts in tandem. The ACTE flap was found to reduce the total airframe noise level at all flap deflection angles when compared to the Fowler flap equipped model. As anticipated, a reduction in aerodynamic performance was also found when the ACTE flap system was used. The MLG fairings were shown to further reduce the total airframe noise level of the G-III.

Ferris, Ryan J.↗

NASA NTRS2019

Update to ACTE II TechPort Web Page

Adding an ACTE II (Adaptive Compliant Trailing Edge II) closeout summary to the ACTE II TechPort page.

ACTE II↗

NASA NTRS2018

Flight-Test Evaluation of Airframe Noise Mitigation Technologies

A series of flight tests targeting airframe noise reduction was planned and executed under the NASA Flight Demonstrations and Capabilities project. The objectives of the tests were two-fold: to evaluate the aeroacoustic performance of several noise reduction technologies in a relevant environment and to generate a comprehensive database for advancing the state of the art in simulation-based airframe noise prediction methodologies. These technologies – an Adaptive Compliant Trailing Edge flap, main landing gear fairings, and gear cavity treatments – were integrated on a NASA Gulfstream G-III aircraft to determine their effectiveness, both on a component-level (individually) and a system-level (combined) basis. With the aircraft flying an approach pattern and the engines set at ground idle, extensive acoustic measurements were acquired using a phased microphone array system. Detailed analyses of the gathered acoustic data clearly demonstrate that significant noise reduction was achieved for the flap and main landing gear components.

Khorrami, Mehdi R.↗

NASA NTRS2019

Assessment of Airframe Noise Reduction Technologies Based on EPNL from Flight Tests

The acoustic performance of various airframe noise reduction technologies – Adaptive Compliant Trailing Edge flap, main landing gear fairings, and gear cavity treatments – was determined, individually and in combination, using the Effective Perceived Noise Level metric. These noise measurements and calculations closely follow the Federal Aviation Administration aircraft noise certification standards, specifically for the approach noise measurement point. The flyover data correspond to pole-mounted, single-microphone measurements obtained during a series of flight tests, conducted under the NASA Flight Demonstrations and Capabilities project, that evaluated flap and landing gear noise reduction technologies. To minimize contributions from the propulsion system, the aircraft was flown along the approach path with engine thrust set at ground idle. Although contamination from engine, background, and secondary airframe noise sources partially masked the true performance of the tested technologies, the resulting acoustic data clearly showed substantial noise reductions relative to baseline levels. The acoustic benefits measured by the single microphones are consistent with previously reported trends in acoustic levels obtained from phased microphone array data.

Ravetta, Patricio A.↗

NASA NTRS2019

Simulation-Based Assessment of a Full-Scale Installed Quiet Landing Gear

Full-scale simulations of a Gulfstream G-III aircraft, performed in support of the NASA Acoustic Research Measurements flights, are presented to complement results discussed in earlier studies. The flow solver employed in those studies, Dassault Systèmes’ lattice Boltzmann PowerFLOW®, was also used during this investigation to conduct time-dependent simulations of the entire aircraft in landing configuration with a fully dressed landing gear. The high-fidelity simulations, performed at a Mach number of 0.23 and a Reynolds number of 10.5 × 106 based on mean aerodynamic chord, captured all relevant airframe noise sources. The computations were used to assess the aeroacoustic performance of the main landing gear, with and without noise reduction fairings installed, of a G-III aircraft equipped with Adaptive Compliant Trailing Edge technology and conventional Fowler flaps. To facilitate comparison of predicted noise signatures with effective perceived noise levels obtained from flight test measurements, the “as-flown” nose landing gear geometry, missing in our earlier studies, was added to the simulated G-III aircraft configurations. The high fidelity, synthetic data were post-processed using a Ffowcs-Williams and Hawkings integral approach to estimate farfield acoustic behavior, with pressures on the model solid surface or pressure and velocity components on a permeable surface enveloping the acoustic near field used as input.

Duda, Benjamin↗