Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “BOLT II”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

22 records · Page 2
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2024

Contactless Position Measurement System for Remote Alignment of Highly Reflective Objects

The Contactless Position Measurement System (CPMS) permits automatic alignment of highly-reflecting components that cannot or should not be touched by human hands, such as those used in SRF cavities. CPMS also has application during maintenance of fusion reactors, when the components in the reactor are radioactive. The length of time for which humans can handle the components in order to carry out maintenance or repairs is limited. We would like to measure the relative positions of such objects so we can bring them into alignment with motorized stages, thus eliminating the need for human contact. The CPMS is a computer vision system that measures the location of highly reflective components to within a fraction of a millimeter by finding the edges of silhouette images. This is done by placing a uniform, infrared backlight behind the components, and viewing each component with two low-aberration, infrared cameras. Each of these stereoscopic cameras are located within a coordinate system we set up with reference platforms, light sources, and survey cameras distributed around the perimeter of the string assembly room, or fusion reactor. We obtain stereoscopic silhouette images of each component, and we use these to determine the position of the component within our string assembly coordinate system. The CPMS combines the silhouette images with knowledge of the dimensions of the objects to obtain the relative positions of components in its field of view. These position measurements then allow us to mechanically maneuver the components into contact. Once we know where they are, we can move the components to where they are supposed to be with motorized stages or other mechanical means, check they are in the right place, and bolt them together. In Phase I, we built a prototype infrared backlights and cameras, tested it, wrote an analysis program to fit the images. At a range of 50 cm, we are able to measure the relative positions of two stainless steel flanges with an accuracy of 150 μm rms. The next steps are to test the analysis program with motorized stages, build a full-size prototype, and implement it in an cleanroom with SRF cavity assembly. This can be done in a cost effective way given the materials with which the system is designed. As Open Source Instruments achieved more in Phase I than anticipated, despite not receiving a Phase II SBIR grant, we hope to move forward with product development and sales with a testing partner.

43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS↗
NASA NTRS2003

Columbia Accident Investigation Board Report. Volume Two

Volume II of the Report contains appendices that were cited in Volume I. The Columbia Accident Investigation Board produced many of these appendices as working papers during the investigation into the February 1, 2003 destruction of the Space Shuttle Columbia. Other appendices were produced by other organizations (mainly NASA) in support of the Board investigation. In the case of documents that have been published by others, they are included here in the interest of establishing a complete record, but often at less than full page size. Contents include: CAIB Technical Documents Cited in the Report: Reader's Guide to Volume II; Appendix D. a Supplement to the Report; Appendix D.b Corrections to Volume I of the Report; Appendix D.1 STS-107 Training Investigation; Appendix D.2 Payload Operations Checklist 3; Appendix D.3 Fault Tree Closure Summary; Appendix D.4 Fault Tree Elements - Not Closed; Appendix D.5 Space Weather Conditions; Appendix D.6 Payload and Payload Integration; Appendix D.7 Working Scenario; Appendix D.8 Debris Transport Analysis; Appendix D.9 Data Review and Timeline Reconstruction Report; Appendix D.10 Debris Recovery; Appendix D.11 STS-107 Columbia Reconstruction Report; Appendix D.12 Impact Modeling; Appendix D.13 STS-107 In-Flight Options Assessment; Appendix D.14 Orbiter Major Modification (OMM) Review; Appendix D.15 Maintenance, Material, and Management Inputs; Appendix D.16 Public Safety Analysis; Appendix D.17 MER Manager's Tiger Team Checklist; Appendix D.18 Past Reports Review; Appendix D.19 Qualification and Interpretation of Sensor Data from STS-107; Appendix D.20 Bolt Catcher Debris Analysis.

CAIB (COLUMBIA ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION BOARD)↗
NASA NTRS1993

Double Cantilever Beam and End Notched Flexure Fracture Toughness Testing of Two Composite Materials

Two different unidirectional composite materials were provided by NASA Langley Research Center and tested by the Composite Materials Research Group within the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Wyoming. Double cantilever beam and end notched flexure tests were performed to measure the mode I (crack opening) and mode II (sliding or shear) interlaminar fracture toughness of the two materials. The two composites consisted of IM7 carbon fiber combined with either RP46 resin toughened with special formulation of LaRC IA resin, known as JJS1356; or PES chain extended thermoplastic resin known as JJS1361. Double Cantilever Beam Specimen Configuration and Test Methods As received from NASA, the test specimens were nominally 0.5 inch wide, 6 inches long, and 0.2 inch thick. A 1 inch long Kapton insert at the midplane of one end of the specimen (placed during laminate fabrication) facilitated crack initiation and extension. It was noted that the specimens provided were smaller than the nominal 1.5 inch wide, 9.0 inch long configuration specified. Similarly, the Kapton inserts were of greater length than those in the present specimens. Hence, the data below should not be compared directly to those generated with the referenced methods. No preconditioning was performed on the specimens prior to testing. In general, the methodology was used for the present work. Crack opening loads were introduced to the specimens via piano hinges attached to the main specimen faces at a single end of each specimen. Hinges were bolted to the specimens using the technique presented. The cracks were extended a small distance from the end of the Kapton insert prior to testing. Just before precracking, the sides of the specimens were coated with water-soluble typewriter correction fluid to aid in crack visualization. Scribe marks were then made in the coating at half-inch intervals.

Kessler, Jeff A.↗
NASA NTRS2003

Stable, Thermally Conductive Fillers for Bolted Joints

A commercial structural epoxy [Super Koropon (or equivalent)] has been found to be a suitable filler material for bolted joints that are required to have large thermal conductances. The contact area of such a joint can be less than 1 percent of the apparent joint area, the exact value depending on the roughnesses of the mating surfaces. By occupying the valleys between contact peaks, the filler widens the effective cross section for thermal conduction. In comparison with prior thermal joint-filler materials, the present epoxy offers advantages of stability, ease of application, and -- as a byproduct of its stability -- lasting protection against corrosion. Moreover, unlike silicone greases that have been used previously, this epoxy does not migrate to contaminate adjacent surfaces. Because this epoxy in its uncured state wets metal joint surfaces and has low viscosity, it readily flows to fill the gaps between the mating surfaces: these characteristics affect the overall thermal conductance of the joint more than does the bulk thermal conductivity of the epoxy, which is not exceptional. The thermal conductances of metal-to-metal joints containing this epoxy were found to range between 5 and 8 times those of unfilled joints.

LeVesque, Raymond J., II↗