Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “CGI”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2023

Stability and Fidelity of Power-Hardware-in-the-Loop Using NREL's CGI

The presentation focuses on dynamic analysis of power hardware-in-the-loop (PHIL) experiments using National Renewable Energy Laboratory Flatirons Campus' grid simulator - 7MVA Controllable Grid Interface (CGI). A control diagram of typical PHIL experiment is described, and transfer functions of critical components are explained. An impedance-based definition of PHIL experiment bandwidth is defined using open loop transfer functions of the system. Further an example resistive divider circuit is introduced that is used to explain implication of PHIL on accuracy of simulation by comparing measured results against ideal expected signals. At the end the real-life PHIL simulation using Maui power system model is described showing various oscillation modes observed and discussing the meaning of these in context of dynamic bandwidth of simulation.

grid simulator↗
NASA NTRS2016

Closing the Contrast Gap Between Testbed and Model Prediction with WFIRST-CGI Shaped Pupil Coronagraph

JPL has recently passed an important milestone in its technology development for a proposed NASA WFIRST mission: demonstration of a better than 1x10-8 contrast over broad bandwidth (10%) on both shaped pupil coronagraph (SPC) and hybrid Lyot coronagraph (HLC) testbeds with WFIRST telescope optics. Challenges remain, however, in the technology readiness for the proposed mission. One such is the discrepancy between the achieved contrast on testbeds and their corresponding model predictions. A series of testbed diagnosis and modeling activity were planned and (some) carried out on SPC testbed in order to close the gap. A very useful tool we developed was to analyze the measured testbed Jacobian and compare with its model version that was used to control image plane speckle pattern. The difference between these two is the error in the control Jacobian. When the error, which includes both amplitude and phase, was inserted into a separate prediction model with nominal Jacobian, the model prediction became closely matching the SPC testbed behavior in both contrast floor and contrast convergence speed. This offers a new perspective and is a step closer toward model validation for high contrast coronagraph. Further Jacobian analysis and modeling provided clues to the possible sources for the mismatch: the DM misregistration and the underrepresented testbed optics wavefront error (WFE) and the deformable mirror (DM) setting for correcting this WFE. These analyses suggested that high contrast coronagraph has a tight tolerance in the accuracy of its control Jacobian. Modifications to both testbed control model as well as prediction model are being implemented and future works discussed.

diffraction modeling↗
NASA NTRS1988

Rotor Stator CGI

This video contains computer graphics of numerous kinds of flow within jet engines. Analyses include pressure contours (shock waves), fluid pressures, etc. The video also contains dramatic views of jet engine manufacturing.

Source record↗