Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Coal tar pitch”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

20 records · Page 2

Effect of secondary gas-phase reactions (SGR) in pyrolysis of carbon feedstocks for anisotropic carbon materials production – 2: Effects of SGR on tars produced from varying ranks of coal

Herein, this work explores the extent to which secondary gas-phase reactions (SGR) in pyrolysis can be used to modify coal tar chemistries from coals of different ranks in favor of improved anisotropy formation in their respective pitches. Pyrolysis was performed on four different coals of varying bituminous rank (Utah Sufco, Wyoming PRB Black Thunder, Illinois #6, and West Virginia Flying Eagle), with SGR temperatures ranging from 800 to 900° C and nominal SGR gas-phase residence times from 1 to 2.5 s. The oxygen content, aliphatic content, and molecular weight distributions of the coal tar samples were measured to indicate the changes with increasing levels of SGR, and microscopy was also used to measure changes in anisotropy formation in the resulting pitch samples. Generally, for all coals tested, increased levels of pyrolysis SGR led to decreased oxygen and aliphatic content, increased molecular weight sizes, and improved anisotropy formation. However, it was clear that the extent of these property changes depended on the chemistry and rank of the starting coal feedstock. Despite the relatively high rank of the Illinois #6 coal, its respective pitch samples performed poorly in improving anisotropy formation, due to its high sulfur content. The PRB, Sufco, and Flying Eagle coals performed better in their anisotropy formation than Illinois #6, depending on their respective coal ranks. Statistical analysis (analysis of variance, ANOVA) performed on the sample characterization data also suggests that SGR temperature is consistently the most dominant and significant effect on the resulting coal products.

01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT↗

Effect of secondary gas-phase reactions (SGR) in pyrolysis of carbon feedstocks for anisotropic carbon materials production – 3: Modifying non-coking coal tar through co-pyrolysis of coal with linear low-density polyethylene and high-impact polystyrene

Herein, this work focuses on co-pyrolysis experiments of Utah Sufco coal with linear low-density polyethylene (LLDPE) and high-impact polystyrene (HIPS). These two plastic types have differing pyrolysis chemistries and have different hydrogen transfer behavior. Similar to earlier work in this series of papers, controlled secondary gas-phase reactions during pyrolysis were used to induce cracking and condensation reactions among the pyrolytic tar species. Co-pyrolysis tests were performed with feed plastic percentages ranging from 10-20 wt% and pyrolysis SGR temperatures ranging from 800-900°C. Analyses of the intermediate tar products showed that oxygen contents and aromaticity were substantially different, depending on the plastic, and resulting pitch softening points and mesophase contents also varied greatly depending on the starting plastic feedstock used. Most of the synergies observed in the co-pyrolysis results were negative, except for the oxygen content. Oxygen contents were higher than expected when LLDPE was used, resulting in reactive pitches with softening points > 350°C. On the other hand, oxygen contents were lower than expected when HIPS was used, resulting in less reactive pitches. Ultimately, only the HIPS/coal samples created at the SGR temperature of 900°C had reasonable softening points at or under 350°C, making them the only samples created in this work potentially suitable for mesophase pitch-based carbon fiber production. The success in creating fusible mesophase pitches from co-pyrolyzing HIPS with Utah Sufco coal is likely attributed to the fact that polystyrene is a stronger hydrogen acceptor rather than donor, which should facilitate more cracking rather than stabilizing tar oxygen functional groups, making the tar species ultimately less reactive during thermal conversion to mesophase pitch.

01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT↗