Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Code Case”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2020

Technical Qualification of New Materials for High Efficiency Coal-Fired Boilers and Other Advanced FE Concepts: Haynes® 282® ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Case

This DOE Fossil Energy project, FEAA117, addressed materials issues relevant to qualifying and deploying a Ni-base alloy for a new application in an advanced ultra-supercritical coal-fired boiler. The goal was the deployment of Haynes International alloy Haynes® 282® for applications in superheaters, reheaters, and steam delivery pipes, by completing base metal, cross-weld and all-weld metal mechanical testing needed for an ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Case and the associated microstructural analyses needed for assurance of boiler-relevant lifetimes. The alloy also is of interest for other applications including supercritical CO₂ power generation cycles. Tensile testing was completed from 20°-927°C on the three base metal alloy 282 heats, two sets of cross-weld specimens and all weld metal specimens. A total of 148 creep tests with over 565,000 h of cumulative testing was completed on base metal, cross-weld and all weld metal specimens. This project was performed with cost share from Haynes International.

01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT↗
DOE OSTI2025

FY25 status report on the addition of candidate materials in Class B Code Case

This report provides the time-dependent allowable stress calculation strategy leveraging the limited creep rupture tests data generated to support the allowable stress for 100,000 hours in American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (BPVC), Section II, Part D. A variable confidence index procedure to extrapolate material properties to support 500,000 hours design life is discussed. Time-dependent allowable stresses for Class B component design and analysis are presented for Grade 1 and Grade 2 of Alloy 625. The presented data extrapolation and allowable stress calculation method will support new material addition using limited creep rupture data in the new ASME Boiler and BPVC, Section III, Division 5, Class B rules.

Part D↗
DOE OSTI2021

Integrated FY21 Elevated Temperature Mechanical Testing Results for Alloy 709 Code Case

This report provides the status of creep, fatigue, and creep-fatigue testing that transpired in Fiscal Year 2021 at Argonne National Laboratory, Idaho National Laboratory and Oak Ridge National Laboratory. This testing is being conducted to develop the data package to qualify Alloy 709 in Section III, Division 5 of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. This would permit the use of Alloy 709 for elevated-temperature nuclear construction. Preliminary results continue to demonstrate the improved creep and fatigue resistance of Alloy 709 compared to 316H stainless steel.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2023

GCR: Class B Code Case

This PowerPoint presentation is for Joint ART Materials/AMMT Program Review, Germantown, MD, on June-5-8, 2023. It will discuss development to revamp the ASME Section III Division 5 Class B design rules. There will be a plan in the FY24 to assess extrapolation methods for other Class A materials, alternative strain range evaluations for fatigue damage, evaluation of Class B intersection point in D-diagram relative to material-specific Class A intersection points, and evaluation of new Class B rules against Class A rules based on Elastic-Perfectly Plastic (EPP) methodology and full inelastic analysis method, using sample problems.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2024

Interim Development of new Class B Code Case with Variable Design Lifetime and enhanced design rules to guard against cyclic structural failure mode

This report summarizes updates on the ongoing development of the new American Society of Mechanical Engineers Section III, Division 5, Class B rules to address the potential failure modes of Class B components. An initial design-by-analysis approach and supporting design rules are presented. The elastic-perfectly plastic (EPP) analysis approach has been adopted for primary stress limit and ratcheting check to prevent the component failure against the structural failure mode against primary load and strain accumulation due to cyclic loads. The creep-fatigue damage assessment uses explicitly defined elastic follow-up calculated from the stress concentration region of given component. Damage fraction calculation uses a novel coupled approach to capture the influence of the elastic follow-up and provide adequate conservatism for Class B components. The proposed Class B rules does not use the stress classification approach and uses the combined loads to assess component.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2021

Advancements Toward ASME Nuclear Code Case for Compact Heat Exchangers

Our research team proposes to advance the state of the ASME section III code (nuclear service) for Compact Heat Exchangers (CHX). This work will improve the technical state of CHXs and lay the foundation necessary for these heat exchangers to be certified for use in nuclear service. During the course of this work, we will advance the understanding of the performance, integrity, and lifetime of the CHXs for use in any industrial application, making their use more attractive and accessible to the industry. We will do this by developing qualification and inspection procedures that utilize Non-destructive evaluation (NDE) and advanced in-service inspection techniques, with insight from the industrial utility leader EPRI. We have enlisted colleagues at MPR Associates (MPR), an elite nuclear code consulting firm, who are experts on the ASME section III code and who, with input from members of the ASME section III committee, will direct the testing and help develop a series of documents that define the rules and regulations for use of the CHX. Colleagues at North Carolina State University (NCSU) and Oregon State University (OSU) will conduct extensive tensile, creep, and fatigue experiments on diffusion bonded samples (manufactured by US-based Vacuum Process engineering) along with modeling using the elastic perfectly plastic assumptions and comprehensive full inelastic finite element analysis (FEA). This work will allow analysis by design and confidence in the strength of different internal structures. To ensure industry acceptance and long term confidence, team members at the University of Wisconsin–Madison (UW), University of Michigan (UM), Georgia Tech (GT), and the University of Idaho (UI) will extensively test prototypic heat exchangers manufactured by US-based manufactures CompRex and Vacuum Process Engineering (VPE), a leader in the development of advanced CHX. This testing will include the use of various working fluids (salt, sodium, helium, and sCO2) to evaluate operational issues as well as structural integrity under the most severe conditions. Post-test analysis of the tested CHXs coupled with pre/in-service/post NDE (ultrasonic and radiography) led by the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) will be incorporated into the development of the rules and regulations for their use in nuclear service.

42 ENGINEERING↗
DOE OSTI2022

Interim Creep, Fatigue and Creep-Fatigue Data from FY 2022 INL Testing of A709 with Precipitation Treatment for ASME Code Case Data Package

This report provides the status of creep, fatigue, and creep-fatigue testing that transpired in fiscal year 2022 at Idaho National Laboratory (INL). This testing is being conducted to develop the data package to qualify A709 in Section III, Division 5 of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (BPVC). This would permit the use of A709 for elevated temperature nuclear construction. Preliminary results continue to demonstrate the improved creep and fatigue resistance of A709 compared to 316H stainless steel.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2024

Evaluation of the Mechanical Properties of Cast and Wrought CF8C-Plus Relevant to ASME Code Case Qualification

The mechanical behavior of a cast form of an advanced austenitic stainless steel, CF8C-Plus, is compared with that of its wrought equivalent in terms of both tensile and creep-rupture properties and estimated allowable stress values for pressurized service at temperatures up to about 850°C. A traditional Larson-Miller parametric model is used to analyze the creep-rupture data and to predict long-term lifetimes for comparison of the two alloy types. The cast CF8C-Plus exhibited lower yield and tensile strengths, but higher creep strength compared to its wrought counterpart. Two welding methods, shielded-metal-arc welding (SMAW) and gas-metal-arc welding, met the weld qualification acceptance criteria in ASME BPVC Section IX for the cast CF8C-Plus. However, for the wrought CF8C-Plus, while SMAW and gas-tungsten-arc welding passed the tensile acceptance criteria, they failed the side bend tests due to lack of fusion or weld metal discontinuities.

Chen, Xiang↗
DOE OSTI2021

Creep, Fatigue, and Creep-Fatigue Testing of Alloy 709 Base Metal at ORNL (FY 2021)

The testing activities and research in support of ASME Code qualification of Alloy 709, an advanced austenitic steel, are being carried out at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Argonne National Laboratory, and Idaho National Laboratory. ORNL has been tasked to carry out a subset of the Code Case testing for creep rupture, fatigue and creep-fatigue. The focus of the FY 2021 Code Case testing on Alloy 709 base metal at ORNL includes (1) continuing the long-term creep rupture testing on ESR1100 and AOD1100; (2) adding ESR1150-AH to the creep Code Case testing matrix; and (3) continuing fatigue and creep-fatigue Code Case testing on ESR1150- AH. This report summarizes the status and the preliminary test results of FY 2021 planned Code Case testing at ORNL.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2023

ASME Section III, Division 5, High Temperature Reactors

Section III, Division 5 stands ready to support near-term deployment of advanced reactors. Progress on improving design rules, extending design lifetimes, adding more materials, and adding advanced component fabrication methods. Lessons-learned from Alloy 617 Code Case effort have streamlined the balloting workflow for Class A material code cases. After requester submitted material design parameters and supporting data package to ASME, Division 5 could turn around a material code case in about three Code Week cycles (less than a year). Data requirements for new materials are described in Division 5, “Nonmandatory Appendix HBB-Y, Guidelines For Design Data Needs For New Materials”.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2020

ASME Code Activities

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is currently assessing ASME Section III, Division 5 (2017 Edition) and accompanying Code Cases for endorsement Draft Regulatory Guide (DG-1380) and draft NUREG (2245) on the endorsement of Division 5 were issued and public comment phase completed DG-1380 places conditions in the areas of general requirements, mechanical design, metallic materials allowable stresses, and graphite materials/design of Division 5 DG-1380 is a revision to Regulatory Guide 1.87, Revision 1, 1975 (which endorsed the 159X series of ASME Code Cases, with conditions) NRC staff is currently reviewing the low-temperature and elevated temperature Alloy 617 code cases for endorsement Results of the review will be incorporated into DG-1380 and changes will be announced publicly The formal endorsement of Section III, Division 5 and accompanying code cases, with conditions, will be made through Regulatory Guide 1.87, Revision 2

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
NASA NTRS1994

Radiant Energy Measurements from a Scaled Jet Engine Axisymmetric Exhaust Nozzle for a Baseline Code Validation Case

A non-flowing, electrically heated test rig was developed to verify computer codes that calculate radiant energy propagation from nozzle geometries that represent aircraft propulsion nozzle systems. Since there are a variety of analysis tools used to evaluate thermal radiation propagation from partially enclosed nozzle surfaces, an experimental benchmark test case was developed for code comparison. This paper briefly describes the nozzle test rig and the developed analytical nozzle geometry used to compare the experimental and predicted thermal radiation results. A major objective of this effort was to make available the experimental results and the analytical model in a format to facilitate conversion to existing computer code formats. For code validation purposes this nozzle geometry represents one validation case for one set of analysis conditions. Since each computer code has advantages and disadvantages based on scope, requirements, and desired accuracy, the usefulness of this single nozzle baseline validation case can be limited for some code comparisons.

Baumeister, Joseph F.↗
DOE OSTI2022

A709 Qualification Plan Update and Mechanical Properties Data Assessment

This report provides a summary of the development effort for the qualification of Alloy 709, an advanced austenitic stainless steel, in the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section III, Division 5, High Temperature Reactors. It provides an assessment of the mechanical properties data generated to date from the tensile, creep, fatigue and creep-fatigue tests of the precipitation-treated Alloy 709 from two commercial heats in plate product form. It was concluded that the mechanical properties of Alloy 709 with the precipitation treatment continued to outperform those of Type 316 stainless steel. This affirms the recommendation to Code qualification this alloy as a replacement for Type 316 stainless steel to support the objective of reducing the construction and operating costs to incentivize advanced reactor deployment. The data also demonstrated that the precipitation treatment is effective in enhancing the creep-fatigue resistance of Alloy 709 while maintaining a significant creep strength advantage over Type 316 stainless steel. This report also provides an update to the test conditions for the creep, fatigue and creep-fatigue test matrices in order to cover the Code Case data package more effectively. Finally, it is recommended to continue the Alloy 709 Code Case Testing Program to develop the data package needed for the determination of the material-specific design parameters for inclusion in the Alloy 709 Code Case.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2021

Historical Context and Perspective on Allowable Stresses and Design Parameters in ASME Section III, Division 5, Subsection HB, Subpart B

In the 1970s, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) issued Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.87 (Rev 1, June 1975) to provide interim licensing guidelines to aid applicants in implementing the 10 CFR Part 50 requirements with respect to American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Boiler Pressure and Vessel Code (BPVC) Class 1 components operating at elevated temperatures for high-temperature gas-cooled reactors, liquid-metal fast-breeder reactors, and gas-cooled fast-breeder reactors. RG 1.87 referenced ASME Code Case 1592 for materials and design and Code Cases 1593, 1594, 1595, and 1596 for fabrication and installation, examination, testing, and overpressure protection, respectively.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2025

Microstructure & Mechanical Properties of Scaled Thermally Aged LPBF 316H SS Builds

As part of the US Department of Energy’s Advanced Materials and Manufacturing Technologies program’s mission to accelerate qualification of advanced manufacturing pathways for nuclear applications, laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) 316H stainless steel (SS) has been selected as a model system to develop a rapid code case framework. This effort directly addresses the grand challenges of (1)expanding the limited portfolio of materials currently codified for elevated-temperature nuclear structural service under Section III, Division 5of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers’ Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code; and (2) significantly reducing qualification timelines that traditionally exceed a decade. The strategic importance of LPBF 316H lies in its immediate industrial relevance, existing data foundation from wrought 316H, and alignment with ongoing code case development for LPBF 316L.Prior work revealed accelerated precipitation of deleterious secondary phases and reduced creep ductility in as-printed LPBF 316H. Building on that prior research, FY2025activities focused on establishing an understanding of the key failure mechanisms of crept 316H specimens to aid in code case development and on evaluating stress relief (SR) parameters on the high-temperature performance and thermal aging-induced degradation of tensile and fracture behavior in LPBF316H.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2025

Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Scaled Thermally Aged LPBF 316H SS Builds

As part of the US Department of Energy’s Advanced Materials and Manufacturing Technologies program’s mission to accelerate qualification of advanced manufacturing pathways for nuclear applications, laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) 316H stainless steel (SS) has been selected as a model system to develop a rapid code case framework. This effort directly addresses the grand challenges of (1) expanding the limited portfolio of materials currently codified for elevated-temperature nuclear structural service under Section III, Division 5 of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers’ Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code; and (2) significantly reducing qualification timelines that traditionally exceed a decade. The strategic importance of LPBF 316H lies in its immediate industrial relevance, existing data foundation from wrought 316H, and alignment with ongoing code case development for LPBF 316L. Prior work revealed accelerated precipitation of deleterious secondary phases and reduced creep ductility in as-printed LPBF 316H. Building on that prior research, FY 2025 activities focused on establishing an understanding of the key failure mechanisms of crept 316H specimens to aid in code case development and on evaluating stress relief (SR) parameters on the high-temperature performance and thermal aging induced degradation of tensile and fracture behavior in LPBF 316H.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗