Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Duct Design And Layout”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

21 records · Page 2
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1993

NASA advanced design program. Design and analysis of a radio-controlled flying wing aircraft

The main challenge of this project was to design an aircraft that will achieve stability while flying without a horizontal tail. The project focused on both the design, analysis and construction of a remotely piloted, elliptical shaped flying wing. The design team was composed of four sub-groups each of which dealt with the different aspects of the design, namely aerodynamics, stability and control, propulsion, and structures. Each member of the team initially researched the background information pertaining to specific facets of the project. Since previous work on this topic was limited, most of the focus of the project was directed towards developing an understanding of the natural instability of the aircraft. Once the design team entered the conceptual stage of the project, a series of compromises had to be made to satisfy the unique requirements of each sub-group. As a result of the numerous calculations and iterations necessary, computers were utilized extensively. In order to visualize the design and layout of the wing, engines and control surfaces, a solid modeling package was used to evaluate optimum design placements. When the design was finalized, construction began with the help of all the members of the project team. The nature of the carbon composite construction process demanded long hours of manual labor. The assembly of the engine systems also required precision hand work. The final product of this project is the Elang, a one-of-a-kind remotely piloted aircraft of composite construction powered by two ducted fan engines.

Source record↗
DOE OSTI2018

Initial Core Physics and Safety Analyses Supporting the Versatile Test Reactor

The Versatile Test Reactor (VTR) is a proposed integrated facility for investigations into the behavior of fuels and materials subjected to high, fast neutron fluxes prototypical of fast reactor environments. Detailed design of the reactor is currently being performed by a group of U.S. National Laboratories, including Argonne National Laboratory. The current design of the reactor is a 300 MW sodium-cooled pool-type fast reactor fueled with ternary U-20Pu-10Zr metallic fuel. This report documents reactor core physics and preliminary safety analyses that have been performed. The reference VTR core has 313 assembly positions, 66 of which contain fuel assemblies. The remaining assembly positions are loaded with reflector, shield, control rod duct, and test assemblies. Ten positions are available in the reference design for experimental or test assemblies, however the VTR will support test assemblies in any position in the core for alternate core loadings. The performance of the reference VTR core has been assessed for an assumed equilibrium cycle. The core power distribution and reactivity feedback coefficients have been calculated. Preliminary assessments of the reactivity coefficients have shown that each of them results in a negative reactivity change for increasing temperatures. Safety analysis of a VTR layout has been performed using the SAS4A/SASSYS-1 fast reactor safety analysis code. A model has been developed to represent the current core design and a reference heat transport system design. The model has been used to simulate and perform analysis of protected and unprotected loss of heat sink, station blackout, and transient overpower accident scenarios. These scenarios represent the three main ways to perturb the reactor core, through changes to the core inlet temperature, mass flow rate, or reactivity insertions and are credible bounding scenarios for the evaluated transient categories. The results of these simulations have been assessed against simplified criteria for Anticipated Operational Occurrences for the protected transients and for Beyond Design Basis Events for the unprotected transients. Because the primary heat transport system is able to transition quickly and effectively to natural circulation and because the shutdown heat removal system provides sufficient heat rejection capability, large margins for all criteria were predicted for all protected transients. Large margins were also predicted for the unprotected loss of heat sink and station blackout transients due to the strong negative reactivity feedbacks generated by the core. Because of the high power density in the reactor, smaller fuel melting margins are predicted for the unprotected transient overpower accident.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Benchmark Exercise for the Control Rod Swelling Evaluation

The VTR core has six reactivity control assemblies and three safety assemblies. The control assemblies or primary control rods are adjusted during the normal operation to balance the core reactivity and to control the reactor power. A typical control assembly radial layout is presented in Figure 1. The figure shows the swelled absorber (B 4 C) rod. Initially, helium gas fills the gap between the pin and the cladding before irradiation swelling takes place. For VTR, HT9 steel was selected as the cladding and duct material. The main neutron absorbing material used in the VTR is B 4 C. When residing in the core, the neutronics, thermophysical, and mechanical properties of the materials used in a control assembly will degrade due to accumulated neutron damage. Material degradation limits how long a control assembly can reside in the core. Many phenomena affect the control assembly lifetime, such as the loss of reactivity worth due to B 4 C depletion, the mechanical interaction of the absorber rod and the cladding due to B 4 C swelling, the helium gas buildup in the pin due to B-10 capture, etc. B 4 C swelling, which causes closure of the gap between the absorber rod and the cladding, is usually considered as the main limiting factor from past experience. An initial study was conducted at PNNL to evaluate the irradiation behavior of a VTR control assembly. The evaluation was performed using the CNRD2 code that was initially developed for the FFTF. The study also included an assessment of the VTR control assembly and focused on a 61-pin control assembly design, which is different from that used (37-pin design) in the core design study. The study conducted by PNNL was reviewed independently by ANL. A Python script referred to as the Control Assembly Evaluation Script (CAES) was developed for the independent review and additional assessment of 37-pin control assembly design. The script has focused on the assessment of the absorber rod swelling for its importance in determining the control assembly lifetime. CAES uses geometry, neutronics, materials data as input to predict the swelling of the absorber rod during its residence in the reactor core. The results from CAES showed some non-negligible differences against the PNNL results. Some of the differences can be attributed to the different interpretation of the control rod assembly dimensions. To resolve this issue, a benchmark exercise was proposed. The benchmark specification was developed by PNNL. The benchmark exercise was performed independently at PNNL and ANL using different codes/scripts (CRND2 and CAES). This memo documents the results calculated using the different codes. However, this report is limited to presenting the results obtained. Further investigation of the cause of the observed difference will be performed as part of future activities, pending continuation of the VTR program.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗