Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “ETW”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

25 records · Page 2
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2019

Uniaxial Tensile Properties of AS4 3D Woven Composites with Four Different Resin Systems: Experimental Results and Analysis: Property Computations

As a part of the NASA Composite Technology for Exploration project, eight different AS4 3D orthogonal woven composite panels were manufactured and were subjected to mechanical testing including uniaxial tension along the weaves' warp direction. Each set, with four different resin systems (KCR-IR6070, EP2400, RTM6, and RS-50), included weave architectures designed using 12K and 6K AS4 carbon fiber yarns. For the tension testing conducted at Room Temperature Ambient (RTA) conditions, the elastic modulus and strength of these eight panels (as-processed and thermally-cycled) were measured and compared while the potential evolution of micro-cracking before and after thermal cycling were monitored via optical microscopy and X-Ray Computed Tomography. The data set also included test results of the as-processed materials at Elevated Temperature Wet (ETW) conditions. In the second part of this study, efforts were made to compute elastic constants for AS4 6K/RTM6 and AS4 12K/RTM6 materials by implementing a finite element approach and the Multiscale Generalized Method of Cells (MSGMC) technique developed at NASA Glenn Research Center. Digimat-FE was used to model the weave architectures, assign properties, calculate yarn properties, create the finite element mesh, and compute the elastic properties by applying periodic boundary conditions to finite element models of each repeating unit cell. The required input data for MSGMC was generated using Matlab® from Digimat exported weave information. Experimental and computational results were compared, and the differences and limitations in correlating to the test data were briefly discussed.

Property Computations↗
NASA NTRS2019

Uniaxial Tensile Properties of AS4 3D Woven Composites with Four Different Resin Systems: Experimental Results & Analysis - Property Computations

As a part of the NASA Composite Technology for Exploration project, eight different AS4 3D orthogonal woven composite panels were manufactured and were subjected to mechanical testing including uniaxial tension along the weaves' warp direction. Each set, with four different resin systems (KCR-IR6070, EP2400, RTM6, and RS-50), included weave architectures designed using 12K and 6K AS4 carbon fiber yarns. For the tension testing conducted at Room Temperature Ambient (RTA) conditions, the elastic modulus and strength of these eight panels (as-processed and thermally cycled) were measured and compared while the potential evolution of micro-cracking before and after thermal cycling were monitored via optical microscopy and X-Ray Computed Tomography. The data set also included test results of the as-processed materials at Elevated Temperature Wet (ETW) conditions. In the second part of this study, efforts were made to compute elastic constants for AS4 6K/RTM6 and AS4 12K/RTM6 materials by implementing a finite element approach and the Multiscale Generalized Method of Cells (MSGMC) technique developed at NASA Glenn Research Center. Digimat-FE was used to model the weave architectures, assign properties, calculate yarn properties, create the finite element mesh, and compute the elastic properties by applying periodic boundary conditions to finite element models of each repeating unit cell. The required input data for MSGMC was generated using Matlab® from Digimat exported weave information. Experimental and computational results were compared, and the differences and limitations in correlating to the test data were briefly discussed.

Property Computations↗
NASA NTRS2018

Comparative Analysis of Two Cryogenic Force Balance Calibration Systems

Cryogenic wind-tunnel facilities face unique challenges in the calibration and operation of various measurement systems and instrumentation. Instruments that are subjected to the cryogenic conditions of the test plenum require careful design and calibration procedures to maintain instrument performance. NASA’s National Transonic Facility (NTF) and the European Transonic Windtunnel (ETW) are two cryogenic wind-tunnel facilities, each with the ability to calibrate force measurement systems (FMS) at cryogenic conditions. These facilities have different methodologies and processes for calibrating these systems. This paper discusses differences in the methodologies and processes and compares the results of two separate cryogenic calibrations of the NTF-118A force balance that were completed at both wind-tunnel facilities.

Toro, Kenneth G.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Role of Cryogenic Aerodynamic Testing for Current and Future Technologies

The motivation for cryogenic wind tunnels originated during the 1960s from an internationally recognized need for a high Reynolds number test capability based on experiences with preflight predictions of aerodynamic characteristics and an anticipated need in support of research and development for future aerospace vehicle systems. More specifically, the motivation for a flight (or near flight) Reynolds number ground test facility was captured in the foreword to reference 1 which states:“...AGARD held a Specialists’ Meeting in Paris on ‘Transonic Aerodynamics’ in recognition of the fact that the absence of adequate theoretical methods and wind tunnels of high enough Reynolds number had already led to costly shortcomings in the transonic performance of certain combat and transport aircraft.” Preflight prediction of flight characteristics is a necessary process for the developer of any aerospace vehicle, and introduces significant risk to the success of the vehicle. Whether the vehicle customer is commercial or governmental, the final full-scale vehicle must meet certain requirements to be certified as safe, and certain performance requirements to be economically successful. Aircraft companies strive to know the flight characteristics and performance of their vehicle with high confidence prior to flight, thus enabling optimal design trades and elimination of any costly modifications to the aircraft during and after initial flight testing. The problems of predicting flight characteristics across the full flight envelope prior to flight have been and continue to be challenging. Much has changed since the US National Transonic Facility (NTF) became operational in the 1980s, followed by the European Transonic Windtunnel (ETW) in 1990s, not the least of which has been the advancement and positive impact of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) on aircraft design and development. Today, the need for integrated CFD and ground-based high Reynolds number test and evaluation capability remains as aerodynamics will always be central to defining an aircraft directly as well as providing critical input to other disciplines. Today the economic stakes of being surprised during flight tests are higher than ever. This oral-only presentation describes the past, current, and future role of high Reynolds number aerodynamic testing in aerospace vehicle design and development. Discussion of relevant flow physics, past experiences with preflight prediction, and future needs, challenges, and opportunities is included. 1.“Facilities and Techniques for Aerodynamic Testing at Transonic Speeds and High Reynolds Number,” AGARD CP-83-71, 1971.

Aerodynamics↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Press-fit Connectors in Spaceflight Applications - Drivers and Challenges

Starting from the 1970s when press-fit technology was nascent and confined within the telecommunications industry, this technology has matured as its adoption has increased within high reliability applications such as medical devices and avionics. Press-fit connectors are strongly preferred in today’s designs because the smaller press-fit pins require smaller diameter holes which require smaller pads and allows more routing real-estate without taking exceptions to specs. The lack of solder for a press-fit connection makes the conductive path more predictable for high-speed digital design and impedance discontinuities can be minimized as the signal moves from the printed circuit board to the connector. Touch-up during manufacturing is also reduced and streamlines the assembly process. This presentation at the 2022 NEPP ETW will introduce the audience to press-fit connectors and its contact physics followed by a deeper dive into specific press-fit applications for space flight environments, including information on qualification, testing, and screening.

pressfit↗
NASA NTRS2012

NASA Electronic Parts and Packaging (NEPP) Program

Recent Findings from Audits, New Technology Data Reviews a) Disabled Chip Burn-ins A recent audit for a QML device discovered that the chip was disabled during the static burn-in, thus it was not drawing any current. Recommendation: For new SMDs add a statement within the burn-in paragraphs stating that the parts shall be kept in their enabled state during the burn-in. b) Class Q 160-hr/125oC Burn-in This is being interpreted as a static burn-in (even for CMOS technology). Recommendation: Provide clarification in MIL-STD-883, Test Method 5004. c) At Frequency (Dynamic) Burn-ins Test equipment limitation is being cited for not doing burn-ins at the application frequency. Recommendation: The burn-in task group to discuss and provide guidance. When the SMD says that the part can be used at 200 MHz, then doing burn-in at 6 MHz (cited as burn-in equipment limitation frequency) is not going to be meaningful! d) Two Static Burn-ins Some manufacturers are doing electrical testing between the two static burn-ins, whereas others do electricals after completing both static burn-ins. Recommendation: Provide clarification in MIL-STD-883, Test Method 5004. e) Thermal Imaging For a device with hot spots, the thermal resistance, junction-to-case, would be much higher than the guidelines given in MIL-STD-1835. One of the suppliers used thermal imaging to find hot spots on the die. Recommendation: Assign a task group to evaluate the effectiveness of thermal imaging at the product development stage.

Class Y↗