Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Exascale Computing Project (ECP)”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2018

A Survey of MPI Usage in the U.S. Exascale Computing Project

The Exascale Computing Project (ECP) is currently the primary effort in the United States focused on developing “exascale” levels of computing capability, including hardware, software and applications. In order to obtain a more thorough understanding of how the software projects under the ECP are using, and planning to use the Message Passing Interface (MPI), and help guide the work of our own project within the ECP, we created a survey. Of the 97 ECP projects active at the time the survey was distributed, we received 77 responses, 56 of which reported that their projects were using MPI. This paper reports the results of that survey for the benefit of the broader community of MPI developers.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2024

The ECP SICM project: Managing complex memory hierarchies for exascale applications

The Exascale Computing Project (ECP)’s Simplified Interface to Complex Memories (SICM) effort focuses on developing universal interfaces for discovering, managing, and sharing data across complex memory hierarchies. These facilitate the exploitation of emerging memory technologies and support precise control over their various trade-offs such as high-bandwidth versus low-latency, persistent versus ephemeral, high-capacity versus low-capacity, and near-CPU versus near-GPU. SICM comprises three interrelated components: a low-level interface, a high-level interface, and a persistent-heap interface. The low-level SICM interface is intended for system and run-time developers as well as expert application developers who prefer full control of the memory objects used within their application. The high-level SICM interface builds upon the low-level interface, employing application-level profiling and analysis to optimize data management for complex memory hierarchies. The persistent-heap interface provides applications with a persistent memory allocator that can allocate custom C++ data structures in both block-storage and byte-addressable persistent memories.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2024

High-performance finite elements with MFEM

The MFEM (Modular Finite Element Methods) library is a high-performance C++ library for finite element discretizations. MFEM supports numerous types of finite element methods and is the discretization engine powering many computational physics and engineering applications across a number of domains. Furthermore, this paper describes some of the recent research and development in MFEM, focusing on performance portability across leadership-class supercomputing facilities, including exascale supercomputers, as well as new capabilities and functionality, enabling a wider range of applications. Much of this work was undertaken as part of the Department of Energy’s Exascale Computing Project (ECP) in collaboration with the Center for Efficient Exascale Discretizations (CEED).

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2021

Enabling particle applications for exascale computing platforms

The Exascale Computing Project (ECP) is invested in co-design to assure that key applications are ready for exascale computing. Within ECP, the Co-design Center for Particle Applications (CoPA) is addressing challenges faced by particle-based applications across four “sub-motifs”: short-range particle–particle interactions (e.g., those which often dominate molecular dynamics (MD) and smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) methods), long-range particle–particle interactions (e.g., electrostatic MD and gravitational N-body), particle-in-cell (PIC) methods, and linear-scaling electronic structure and quantum molecular dynamics (QMD) algorithms. Our crosscutting co-designed technologies fall into two categories: proxy applications (or “apps”) and libraries. Proxy apps are vehicles used to evaluate the viability of incorporating various types of algorithms, data structures, and architecture-specific optimizations and the associated trade-offs; examples include ExaMiniMD, CabanaMD, CabanaPIC, and ExaSP2. Libraries are modular instantiations that multiple applications can utilize or be built upon; CoPA has developed the Cabana particle library, PROGRESS/BML libraries for QMD, and the SWFFT and fftMPI parallel FFT libraries. Success is measured by identifiable “lessons learned” that are translated either directly into parent production application codes or into libraries, with demonstrated performance and/or productivity improvement. The libraries and their use in CoPA’s ECP application partner codes are also addressed.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2025

HPC I/O innovations in the exascale era

As high performance computing architecture evolves to deliver ever-increasing performance, the middleware tools also need to adapt in order for applications to better use these higher-performance features. Here, the Adaptable Input Output System (ADIOS), which provides scalable IO performance for exascale HPC applications is one such middleware. During the Exascale Computing Project (ECP), key portions of the ADIOS environment were adapted to respond to ongoing developments in exascale computing and the stresses and opportunities inherent in those changes. This paper examines those changes and where appropriate compares them to pre-exascale implementations.

ADIOS↗
DOE OSTI2020

Understanding the use of message passing interface in exascale proxy applications

The Exascale Computing Project (ECP) focuses on the development of future exascale-capable applications. Most ECP applications use the message passing interface (MPI) as their parallel programming model with mini-apps serving as proxies. This paper explores the explicit usage of MPI in such ECP proxy applications. We empirically analyze 14 proxy applications from the ECP Proxy Apps Suite. We use the MPI profiling interface (PMPI) to collect MPI usage patterns in ECP proxy apps. Our analysis shows that a small subset of features from MPI is commonly used in the proxies of exascale-capable applications, even when they reference third-party libraries. Overall, this study is intended to provide a better understanding of the use of MPI in current exascale applications. The findings can help focus software investments made for exascale systems in the MPI middleware including optimization, fault-tolerance, tuning, and hardware-offload.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2022

ExaCA: A performance portable exascale cellular automata application for alloy solidification modeling

Modeling the as-solidified grain structures that form during alloy processing is a critical component in understanding process-property relationships, particularly for additive manufacturing (AM) where grain structure is very sensitive to processing conditions. While cellular automata (CA)-based models have proven able to predict aspects of microstructure for several alloys and AM process conditions, long run times and large resource sets required limit the utility and the problem size to which existing CA models can be applied. As part of the ExaAM project, an initiative within the Exascale Computing Project (ECP) to develop, test, and optimize an exascale-capable coupled and self-consistent model of AM parts, we developed ExaCA (https://github.com/LLNL/ExaCA) for the liquid–solid phase transformation in the wake of AM melt pools. The CA-based code is parallelized using MPI and the Kokkos programming model, the latter enabling simulation on both CPUs and GPUs within a single-source implementation. Here, we detail the steps taken to transform a baseline, MPI-based CA code into one that is performant on CPUs and GPUs. Performance testing of ExaCA on Summit (a pre-exascale machine at Oak Ridge National Laboratory) was used to quantify CPU–GPU speedup comparing with equal numbers of nodes. Testing showed comparable CPU performance to the MPI-only CA code and a 5-20x speedup when running AM-based test problems using GPUs. The improved performance of CA through GPU utilization and the performance portable nature of ExaCA will enable accurate part-scale modeling by harnessing the power of current and future generations of high performance computing resources. Future work will include improving the strong scaling of ExaCA on GPUs by reducing load imbalance associated with the locality of the problem, and continuing performance optimization across exascale hardware.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2021

Non-Proprietary Companion to the Q1 CY2021 PathForward Final Assessment (WBS 2.4.1, Milestone PM-HI-1040)

The PathForward element of the Exascale Computing Project (ECP) Hardware and Integration (HI) focus area has met its goals of preparing the US industry for exascale system procurements and generally improving US competitiveness in the worldwide computing market. This report is a companion to the deliverable for the ECP milestone PM-HI-1040, Assess PathForward Impact Against Exascale Hardware Challenges, which gives a summary of the final status of each PathForward project, describes progress achieved against PathForward contract milestones, and includes a final assessment of each vendor’s progress on key exascale challenges. This companion document details the results of the PathForward research to the extent possible without disclosing proprietary information and the impact on products and US exascale systems. In addition, it captures lessons learned in order to inform future projects in general and in high-performance computing in particular.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2018

ECP ALCC Quarterly Report (Oct-Dec 2017)

The scientific goal of ExaWind Exascale Computing Project (ECP) is to advance our fundamental understanding of the flow physics governing whole wind plant performance, including wake formation, complex terrain impacts, and turbine-turbine-interaction effects. Current methods for modeling wind plant performance fall short due to insufficient model fidelity and inadequate treatment of key phenomena, combined with a lack of computational power necessary to address the wide range of relevant length scales associated with wind plants. Thus, our ten-year exascale challenge is the predictive simulation of a wind plant composed of O(100) multi-MW wind turbines sited within a 100 km2 area with complex terrain, involving simulations with O(100) billion grid points. The project plan builds progressively from predictive petascale simulations of a single turbine, where the detailed blade geometry is resolved, meshes rotate and deform with blade motions, and atmospheric turbulence is realistically modeled, to a multi turbine array in complex terrain. The ALCC allocation will be used continually throughout the allocation period. In the first half of the allocation period, small (e.g., for testing Kokkos algorithms) and medium (e.g., 10K cores for highly resolved ABL simulations) sized jobs will be typical. In the second half of the allocation period, we will also have a number of large submittals for our resolved-turbine simulations. A challenge in the latter period is that small time step sizes will require long wall-clock times for statistically meaningful solutions. As such, we expect our allocation-hour burn rate to increase as we move through the allocation period.

17 WIND ENERGY↗
DOE OSTI2019

O(N) Quantum Molecular Dynamics (QMD) Algorithms, Code Requirements, Release Notes, and Library Deployment

The Exascale Computing Project (ECP) Co-design Center for Particle Applications (CoPA) is addressing the challenges for particle applications to run on upcoming exascale computing architectures. This includes short- and long-range molecular dynamics (MD), particle-in-cell (PIC), and quantum molecular dynamics (QMD). This document addresses $\mathcal{O}(N)$ QMD. The goal of this CoPA team is to develop $\mathcal{O}(N)$ linear scaling methods for QMD optimized for new and next generation architectures. This will provide the capability to simulate larger systems and run for longer timeframes than is possible today. Focus is initially on the density matrix construction. This requires efficient matrix formats and linear algebra operations for distributed architectures. A significant reduction in the wallclock time for an MD timestep is necessary to achieve practical large scale QMD. Equally challenging is to develop scalable distributed implementations. This requires the exploration of efficient data formats (dense, sparse, etc.), data decomposition and distribution across compute nodes using block- and graph-based methods. Traditional programming models such as MPI/OpenMP, hybrid MPI/OpenMP/Accelerator, as well as asynchronous task-based models will be explored to achieve maximum parallelism. Parallelism at the level of a matrix operation, solver, and/or application needs to be explored to gain the most benefit on new and emerging architectures. This report serves as a “living document” of the additions and enhancements throughout the ECP CoPA project for $\mathcal{O}(N)$ QMD. The following sections address the applications we are working with, the quantum chemistry libraries (BML and PROGRESS), and our co-design exploration through the use of a proxy application.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2021

Performance Portability in the Exascale Computing Project: Exploration Through a Panel Series

Performance portability is a critical issue for the Exascale Computing Project (ECP) because of nontrivial architectural differences between machines available today and those expected at exascale. Many ECP project teams are working toward performance portability, and would expect to benefit from sharing lessons learned, identifying gaps, and discovering opportunities for partnerships. To facilitate this communication, the IDEAS-ECP project partnered with the three focus areas of ECP (application development, software technology, and hardware and integration), and Department of Energy computing facilities, to lead a series of panel discussions on performance portability. The panels were organized around broadly common themes of algorithmic and data locality challenges. In this article, we describe the panel series, its objectives, and perspectives from the various areas of the project. Finally, we also discuss use cases that are distinctive, as well as conclusions drawn from the collective experience of the participants.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2024

Then and Now: Improving Software Portability, Productivity, and 100× Performance

The US Exascale Computing Project (ECP) has succeeded in preparing applications to run efficiently on the first reported Exascale supercomputers in the world. To achieve this, it modernized the whole leadership software stack, from libraries to simulation codes. In this article, we contrast selected leadership software before and after ECP. We discuss how sustainable research software development for leadership computing can embrace the conversation with the hardware vendors, the leadership computing facilities, the software community, and the domain scientists who are the application developers and integrators of software products. We elaborate on how software needs to take portability as a central design principle and to benefit from interdependent teams; we also demonstrate how moving to programming languages with high momentum, like modern C++, can help improve the sustainability, interoperability, and performance of research software. Finally, we showcase how cross-institutional efforts can enable algorithm advances that are beyond incremental performance optimization.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2020

2020 Exascale Computing Project Annual Meeting (Executive Summary Report)

The Exascale Computing Project (ECP) delivers specific applications, software products, and outcomes on DOE computing facilities. Integration across these elements for specific hardware technologies for exascale system instantiations is fundamental to ECP success. The outcome of the ECP is the delivery of a capable exascale computing ecosystem to provide breakthrough solutions addressing our most critical challenges in scientific discovery, energy assurance, economic competitiveness, and national security. This outcome is not a matter of ensuring more powerful computing systems. The ECP is designed to create more valuable and rapid insights from a wide variety of applications (“capable”), which requires a much higher level of inherent efficacy in all methods, software tools, and ECP-enabled computing technologies to be acquired by DOE laboratories (“ecosystem”). The ECP annual meeting provides a unique opportunity for the core technical expertise in the United States focused on achieving this next plateau of computational science and computing performance to engage in direct discussions on project execution. Face-to-face gatherings in technical communities like this are common and needed for the exchange of scientific ideas and technical performance. The ECP annual meeting stands apart from other technical conferences and meetings in the computing community as it is uniquely and solely focused on the execution of the ECP and the integration of technical activities leading to the creation of the exascale computing ecosystem for the future. The direct interaction of key critical technical staff, who are leaders in their respective fields, and the resulting give-and-take between software, applications, and hardware and the technical co-design therein, is unique and essential to the effective execution of the ECP. The first annual meeting was held in Knoxville, Tennessee, January 31 – February 2, 2017 and brought together, for the first time, a diverse collection of researchers from 16 DOE national laboratories as well as university computer and computational science researchers to discuss shared problems and joint solutions for the development of a capable exascale computing ecosystem. These interactions resulted in focused technical plans and an energized community centered on advances for ECP. The second annual meeting was held in Knoxville, Tennessee, February 5–9, 2018. It included 643 individual thought leaders and performers in application development, software research and deployment, and hardware research and integrators, all of whom are part of the multifaceted, billion dollar HPC community. This meeting provided a platform to discuss and disseminate numerous examples where researchers with common goals and synergistic solutions came together for the first time to deliver tangible results. Additionally, at the 2018 meeting, ECP researchers had the opportunity to digest all US HPC vendor R&D product roadmaps pointing to exascale – not only to learn how their research can play a role, but, more importantly, to influence those roadmaps to ensure successful delivery on DOE applications that will contribute to (if not solve) problems of national interest in national security, science, energy, and health, as well as growing security threats. The third annual meeting was held in Houston, Texas, January 14–17, 2019. With a 19% increase in the number of registrations (768 people), and the change in location, the third annual meeting was considered the most impactful of the three at the time. The new website provided a better platform for the dissemination of the content, the new venue as a meeting hotel instead of a conference center facilitated interactions and discussions after event hours, and the addition of an award-winning mobile event conference app (Whova) transformed dramatically the attendee experience at the event. This fourth annual meeting was held in Houston, Texas, February 3-7, 2020. This meeting had an increase in the number of attendees for a total of 824 people registered (782 attendees) and included numerous enhancements based on feedback and lessons learned from previous meetings, some of which are listed here: Improved quality of the sessions, their material and the whole program.; Had more industry participation and addition of external collaborators from overseas.; Published the full agenda earlier to better accommodate attendance and travel plans based on schedule.; Centralized all sessions in one venue.; Provided additional hotels and room blocks for the attendees.; Improved communication with the audience (links, material, directions, notifications, etc.) to go paperless.; Enhanced side meeting scheduling, management and user experience.; Made available additional space and tables for impromptu meetings and side discussions.; Improved IT and A/V solutions for speakers. In addition, our final survey captured the following points as opportunities for improvement in future meetings: consider a different meeting location that is more pedestrian friendly, reduce talks during working meals to allow more collaboration and informal time, adapt the agenda to acknowledge attendees from different timezones, consider recording some of the tutorials and/or sessions to share broadly with the HPC community, have a larger poster room, provide additional power strips, and improve the WiFi.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2024

Transforming Science Through Software: Improving While Delivering 100×

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Exascale Computing Project (ECP) funded the development of new (and the transformation of important existing) applications, libraries, and tools that realized improvement in performance and capabilities of often 100 times or more on emerging exascale computers. This exceptional gain inspired the title of this special issue: Transforming Science through Software: Improving while delivering 100X. The term 100X refers to advancing capabilities in modeling, simulation, and analysis by a factor of 100 or more using some combination of new algorithms, optimization techniques, software libraries, and programming models, coupled with the next generation of hardware for high-performance computing (HPC). The papers in this issue share experiences with the practice and science of scientific software development, with an emphasis on developing a coherent, portable, and sustainable HPC software ecosystem for next-generation computational science. Finally, we hope to foster expanded community efforts related to the fundamental role of sustainable scientific software ecosystems in advancing the computing sciences.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2019

Future High Performance Computing Capabilities: Summary Report of the Advanced Scientific Computing Advisory Committee (ASCAC) Subcommittee

The ASCAC Subcommittee on Future High Performance Computing (HPC) Capabilities has reviewed opportunities and challenges related to the most promising technologies that are currently planned for the post-exascale (2020's) and post-Moore (2030's and beyond) timeframes. We briefly summarize in this report the key findings and recommendations from this review, from the perspective of planning and research directions that need to be given priority to prepare for the very significant challenges that await us in the post-Moore computing era. An overarching concern that emerged from the subcommittee's deliberations is that DOE has lost considerable momentum in funding and sustaining a research pipeline in the applied math and computer science areas that should have been the "seed corn" for preparing for these future challenges, and it is therefore critical to correct this gap as soon as possible. While the subcommittee understands the paramount importance of DOE's commitment to deliver exascale capabilities, we believe that it is essential for DOE ASCR to fund research and development that looks beyond the Exascale Computing Project (ECP) horizon so as to ensure our nation's continued leadership in HPC and we were glad to learn about the ASCAC exascale transition subcommittee in this regard.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗