Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “GFIT”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

21 records · Page 2

Low-Drag Acoustic Liner Development

Interest in characterization of the aerodynamic drag of acoustic liners has increased in the past several years. This report details experiments in the NASA Langley Grazing Flow Impedance Tube to quantify the relative drag of several perforate-over-honeycomb liner configurations at flow speeds of M=0.3 and 0.5. Various perforate geometries and orientations are investigated to determine their resistance factors using a static pressure drop approach. Comparison of these resistance factors gives a relative measurement of liner drag. For these same flow conditions, acoustic measurements are performed simultaneously with the drag measurements for tonal excitation from 400 to 3000 Hz at source sound pressure levels of 140 and 150 dB. Educed impedance and attenuation spectra are used to determine the impact of variations in perforate geometry on acoustic performance. The goal is to identify a perforate that will reduce the drag penalty associated with conventional round-hole perforates by 60%. One perforate design, based on a slot geometry, is shown to reduce this penalty by 50%. Further reductions may be possible but require a reduction in measurement uncertainty to allow a statistically rigorous evaluation.

drag↗

Acoustic Liner Drag: Measurement Uncertainty Reduction and Application to Novel Perforate Geometries

In addition to developing acoustic liner concepts and characterizing their performance, the NASA Langley Liner Physics Team has investigated issues related to liner drag. A method to quantify relative drag of liner configurations was developed and employed to understand the effects of various liner features. It was observed that perforate shape could have a marked effect on the measured liner drag and led to the discovery of a low-drag geometry that cut the drag penalty between a perforate and a smooth wall by approximately 50%. Investigations of novel perforates to further reduce drag were stymied by measurement uncertainty that prevented further resolution of drag differences between configurations. The current study details efforts to understand the causes of this uncertainty and describe changes made to testing methods to reduce it. Previously evaluated perforates were retested with these improvements in the NASA Langley Grazing Flow Impedance Tube to determine their relative drag at a flow speed of Mach 0.5 without acoustic excitation. Their performance was compared to the previously identified low-drag geometry to see if further drag reductions could be realized.

drag↗

Acoustic Liner Drag: Measurement Uncertainty Reduction and Application to Novel Perforate Geometries

In addition to developing acoustic liner concepts and characterizing their performance, the NASA Langley Liner Physics Team has investigated issues related to liner drag. A method to quantify relative drag of liner configurations was developed and employed to understand the effects of various liner features. It was observed that perforate shape could have a marked effect on the measured liner drag and led to the discovery of a low-drag geometry that cut the drag penalty between a perforate and a smooth wall by approximately 50%. Investigations of novel perforates to further reduce drag were stymied by measurement uncertainty that prevented further resolution of drag differences between configurations. The current study details efforts to understand the causes of this uncertainty and describe changes made to testing methods to reduce it. Previously evaluated perforates were retested with these improvements in the NASA Langley Grazing Flow Impedance Tube to determine their relative drag at a flow speed of Mach 0.5 without acoustic excitation. Their performance was compared to the previously identified low-drag geometry to see if further drag reductions could be realized.

drag↗