Outstanding Science with a Great Observatory the Chandra X-Ray Observatory
No abstract available
Weisskopf, Martin C.↗
SEARCH · Search NASA
Results for “Great Observatories”
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Becoming and Being a Scientist: My Perspective & Outstanding Science With a Great Observatory
No abstract available
Chandra↗
Outstanding Science with a Great Observatory: The Chandra X-Ray Observatory
No abstract available
X-Ray Polarimetr↗
Technologies to Enable the Next Great Observatory
The Large Ultraviolet/Optical/Infrared Surveyor (LUVOIR) is one of four mission concepts being studied by NASA for the 2020 Decadal Survey in Astronomy and Astrophysics. LUVOIR will be capable of a broad range of science, including: direct imaging and characterization of a wide range of exoplanets and the search for biosignatures on Earth-like planets around sun-like stars; studying galaxy formation and evolution; investigating star and planet formation; and remote sensing of bodies within the Solar System. Enabling a mission as ambitious as LUVOIR requires an array of technologies, such as ultra-stable structures and optics, precision metrology and wavefront sensing, high-contrast imaging techniques, large-format detectors with very low noise, and high-throughput ultraviolet instrumentation. Critically, a systems-level approach must be taken to developing these technologies, guided by architecture studies to place each technology in the appropriate system context.In this poster, we describe LUVOIR's technology needs, as well as current efforts that are actively developing these technologies. We will discuss recent advancements in: measuring picometer-level displacements of optical and structural elements; sub-milli-kelvin thermal sensing and control; non-contact vibration isolation for pointing and dynamic stability; coronagraph design for achieving 10-10 contrast on a segmented system; high-speed metrology for optical system alignment; low-order and out-of-band wavefront sensing for maintaining high-contrast images; low-noise detectors across the ultraviolet, optical, and near infrared bands; broadband coatings with high-reflectivity below Ly. We will also describe a systems approach to coordinating the development of these technologies to achieve the necessary maturity for a LUVOIR mission start in the next decade.
space telescopes↗
Technologies to Enable the Next Great Observatory
The Large Ultraviolet/Optical/Infrared Surveyor (LUVOIR) is one of four mission concepts being studied by NASA for the 2020 Decadal Survey in Astronomy and Astrophysics. Enabling a mission as ambitious as LUVOIR requires an array of technologies. Critically, a systems-level approach must be taken to developing these technologies, guided by architecture studies to place each technology in the appropriate system context. Three technology systems enable the LUVOIR science objectives: the system, the system, and the system. Each of the technology systems comprise the individual technology components that must be developed and demonstrated as a system. Supporting engineering manufacturing development efforts are also identified for early risk reduction. It is important to note that the high-contrast coronagraph instrument and ultra-stable segmented telescope technology systems are tightly coupled; the performance capabilities of one system drive the requirements of the other. Similarly, the ultraviolet instrumentation technology system is loosely coupled to the other two; while the relative performance affects each system, they do not necessarily drive one another. This coupling between systems requires continuous cross-validation between the technology development paths. It is therefore critical that the technology development plan be executed in parallel with a detailed Pre-Phase A Architecture Study to provide the necessary systems-level perspective and cross-validation.
Bolcar, Matthew R.↗
Great Observatory for Long Wavelengths (GO-LoW) NIAC Phase I Final Report
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Mary Knapp↗
ISTPNext and the Heliophysics Great Observatories - Motivation, Background, and Current Status
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Larry Kepko↗
On the Impact of Inclination-dependent Attenuation on Derived Star Formation Histories: Results from Disk Galaxies in the Great Observatories Origins Deep Survey Fields
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Keith Doore↗
The Great Geospace Observatory and Simultaneous Missions of Opportunity
A predictive understanding of the sun to geospace environment is one of the main goals of ILWS. This can only be achieved through a "system-level" approach, meaning long-term, simultaneous, continuous observations across the relevant scales of the magnetosphere and ionosphere/thermosphere (IT). To date such an approach, which must involve simultaneous, multi-scale, global imaging of different geospace regions, has not been carried out for a complete geomagnetic storm. Such imagery, now routine for the Solar community, is of critical scientific importance and captures public imagination. Its absence in geospace studies has limited the growth and impact of geospace science. In this presentation, we discuss a concept called the Great Geospace Observatory, which would involve coordinated geospace imaging through an international effort of multiple, simultaneous Missions of Opportunity. In this way, the cost would be spread among different agencies as well as putting remote sensors in vantage points optimized for each type of imaging. 24/7 auroral imaging from weather satellites on Molniya (or similar) orbits, EUV imaging of the plasmasphere from high-inclination orbits, continuous and global ENA imaging from geosynchronous commercial satellites, and continuous X-ray imaging of the cusp and magnetosheath from a high-altitude dedicated probe would quantitatively track system-level dynamics at through substorms, sawtooth events, steady magnetospheric convection, and storms; studying energy and mass coupling between the solar wind, magnetosphere, and the upper atmosphere. In our minds, The Great Geospace Observatory represents the next strategic step for ILWS and needs to be seriously considered.
Donovan, Eric↗
The Great Geospace Observatory and Simultaneous Missions of Opportunity
A predictive understanding of the sun to geospace environment is one of the main goals of ILWS. This can only be achieved through a "system-level" approach, meaning long-term, simultaneous, continuous observations across the relevant scales of the magnetosphere and ionosphere/thermosphere (IT). To date such an approach, which must involve simultaneous, multi-scale, global imaging of different geospace regions, has not been carried out for a complete geomagnetic storm. Such imagery, now routine for the Solar community, is of critical scientific importance and captures public imagination. Its absence in geospace studies has limited the growth and impact of geospace science. In this presentation, we discuss a concept called the Great Geospace Observatory, which would involve coordinated geospace imaging through an international effort of multiple, simultaneous Missions of Opportunity. In this way, the cost would be spread among different agencies as well as putting remote sensors in vantage points optimized for each type of imaging. 24/7 auroral imaging from weather satellites on Molniya (or similar) orbits, EUV imaging of the plasmasphere from high-inclination orbits, continuous and global ENA imaging from geosynchronous commercial satellites, and continuous X-ray imaging of the cusp and magnetosheath from a high-altitude dedicated probe would quantitatively track system-level dynamics at through substorms, sawtooth events, steady magnetospheric convection, and storms; studying energy and mass coupling between the solar wind, magnetosphere, and the upper atmosphere. In our minds, The Great Geospace Observatory represents the next strategic step for ILWS and needs to be seriously considered.
Donovan, Eric↗
Direct Measurement of Small Particle Growth and Aging at the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Southern Great Plains Observatory Field Campaign Report
Two identical Captive Aerosol Growth and Evolution (CAGE) chambers were operated at the U.S. Department of Energy Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) user facility’s Southern Great Plains (SGP) observatory in the late summer and fall of 2021. The field study was scheduled to begin in spring, 2020, but was delayed because of the pandemic. CAGE chambers are designed to expose particles to an environment that mirrors that of the surroundings with or without a controlled perturbation designed to assess a sensitivity. The analysis here focuses on roughly the last two months of the overall study period during which measurements were almost continuous and when several perturbation experiments were conducted. Though the utility of a dual-chamber system is the ability to measure the influence of a single change on top of ambient conditions, both chambers were initially operated in the same way, with ambient air pulled through the gas exchange channel in both and ammonium sulfate particles injected into both. The similar time-dependent particle growth observed in the chambers for those periods provides confidence in differences observed during the subsequent perturbation experiments. The growth rate of particles in the reference chamber into which only ammonium sulfate particles were injected and for which only ambient air was pulled through were used to describe time-of-day averages. The average growth rate was highest in the evening and in the morning after sunrise and lowest in the late afternoon. The sensitivity of particle growth to secondary aerosol precursor gases was studied by adding them at a controlled rate to the ambient air flow pulled through one of the two chambers. Addition of 5 ppb of α-pinene resulted in an average particle growth rate of 4.4 nm hr -1 , compared with that of just 0.8 nm hr -1 in the reference chamber. The added α-pinene also triggered one new particle formation (NPF) event in the early evening just before sunset and another in the morning just after sunrise. Similarly, addition of 5 ppb of SO 2 to one chamber led to a pair of NPF events and to increased particle growth rate, though unlike the impact of added α-pinene, growth was enhanced only during the daytime when OH concentration is highest. The influence of aerosol liquid water on secondary aerosol formation and particle growth was investigated by injecting ammonium sulfate seed particles into one chamber and potassium sulfate particles into the other. Particles were injected into the two chambers four times over a 1.5-day period. The chamber relative humidity (RH) history during and following each injection was used to determine whether each particle type was crystalline or aqueous. For the case when both particle types remained crystalline throughout the period, they were tracked and for the case when they remained aqueous, the magnitude and time-dependence of the growth of both were almost exactly the same. For the other two cases the ammonium sulfate particles deliquesced upon injection and remained aqueous, while the potassium sulfate particles remained crystalline. For those two cases, the aqueous particles grew substantially faster than did the crystalline particles, providing evidence of the role of aerosol liquid water on secondary aerosol formation and particle growth.
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗
Chandra Space Flight Software: Using Software to Autonomously Operation the Largest and Most Sensitive X-Ray Telescope in the World
Chandra is the world's largest and most sensitive X-ray telescope. The Chandra X-ray Observatory is the third in NASA's family of "Great Observatories." The Chandra X-ray Observatory, launched by Space Shuttle Columbia on July 23, 1999, is NASA's newest Great Observatory. The Chandra space flight software is the operational software, which controls and directs the Chandra X-ray Observatory. The Chandra flight software has executed faultlessly for over 13,000 hours on-orbit. The Chandra flight software directly controls the Pointing, Aspect Determination, Electrical Power Subsystem, Propulsion system, and the Command, Communications, and Data Management subsystems. The software controls the spacecraft operations during all phases of the mission. The software also performs thermal control of the telescope to maintain pointing accuracy and monitors radiation levels throughout the orbit so that the Science Instruments can be safed if radiation thresholds are exceeded. The efficient operation of Chandra flight software has enabled the gathering of crucial science data. The Chandra flight software fault protection is the key to early detection and prevention of science instrument or spacecraft damage in an operating platform/environment, which is completely unforgiving. Permanently open Sun Shade Door and ACIS focal plane radiator sensitivity exposes science instruments and mirrors to damage for pointing anomalies causing an attitude excursion. The Chandra flight software must prevent these attitude excursions from occurring for ANY failure. Another example is that the power system has an unregulated bus, which imposes severe operating requirements on Chandra flight software to control array pointing and battery connection/disconnect using a unique algorithmic and logic approach. The Chandra flight software has enabled a truly autonomous vehicle with greater than 99% of all mission data collected as planned. Less than 15% of spacecraft operations are conducted in view (1 hour out of 8) leading to very extended periods without ground contact. The Chandra flight software implements the flexible mission plan during this out of view period, manages the solid state recorder capacity, controls all pointing and maneuvers, provides fault detection for all satellite subsystems, and initiates communications with the ground at the appropriate time. This paper will describe the software architecture features, key design elements and software testing techniques that have facilitated Chandra's success.
Crumbley, Tim↗
Overview of the Chandra X-Ray Observatory Facility
The Chandra X-Ray Observatory (originally called the Advanced X-Ray Astrophysics Facility - AXAF) is the X-Ray component of NASA's "Great Observatory" Program. Chandra is a NASA facility that provides scientific data to the international astronomical community in response to scientific proposals for its use. The Observatory is the product of the efforts of many organizations in the United States and Europe. The Great Observatories also include the Hubble Space Telescope for space-based observations of astronomical objects primarily in the visible portion of the electromagnetic spectrum, the now defunct Compton Gamma- Ray Observatory that was designed to observe gamma-ray emission from astronomical objects, and the soon-to-be-launched Space Infrared Telescope Facility (SIRTF). The Chandra X-Ray Observatory (hereafter CXO) is sensitive to X-rays in the energy range from below 0.1 to above 10.0 keV corresponding to wavelengths from 12 to 0.12 nanometers. The relationship among the various parts of the electromagnetic spectrum, sorted by characteristic temperature and the corresponding wavelength, is illustrated. The German physicist Wilhelm Roentgen discovered what he thought was a new form of radiation in 1895. He called it X-radiation to summarize its properties. The radiation had the ability to pass through many materials that easily absorb visible light and to free electrons from atoms. We now know that X-rays are nothing more than light (electromagnetic radiation) but at high energies. Light has been given many names: radio waves, microwaves, infrared, visible, ultraviolet, X-ray and gamma radiation are all different forms. Radio waves are composed of low energy particles of light (photons). Optical photons - the only photons perceived by the human eye - are a million times more energetic than the typical radio photon, whereas the energies of X-ray photons range from hundreds to thousands of times higher than that of optical photons. Very low temperature systems (hundreds of degrees below zero Celsius) produce low energy radio and microwave photons, whereas cool bodies like our own (about 30 degrees Celsius) produce infrared radiation. Very high temperatures (millions of degrees Celsius) are one way of producing X-rays.
Weisskopf, M. C.↗
STS-93: Columbia / Chandra Mission Overview (from JSC)
A press briefing held on July 7, 1999 reviews the progress of the Chandra X ray Observatory project. The tape begins with an animated view of the launch of the Chandra X ray Observatory from the shuttle, as it was planned. Next is a press briefing. Bryan Austin, the Lead Flight Director, discusses the five day mission, and the reason for the shortened length, due to the added weight from the Chandra Observatory. He also reviews the other payloads, and activities that will take place during the mission. Kenneth Ledbetter, Science Director Mission Development, discusses the 4 great observatories and the role of each. They are the Hubble, which observed visible light; Compton Gamma Ray Observatory, the Chandra, and the Space Infrared Telescope Facility. A time line of the expected operational lifetime of each of the 4 great observatories is shown. Specific information about the Chandra Telescope is reviewed. The last press briefing presenter is Fred Wojtalik, who is the Chandra Program Manager. He reviews the Chandra's components, and acknowledges a few of the many companies that contributed to its building. He also reviews the orbital activation and checkout sequences. Question that follows, center around contingency plans if some part of the planned sequence is not successful. The costs are reviewed, and concerns about the Initial Upper Stage, the propulsion unit required to take the Chandra to its high orbit are addressed. The Chandra is planned to take an eliptical orbit, which is higher than the other space telescopes, thus far launched due to the requirement to avoid Earth generated X rays.
Source record↗
Gamma Ray Observatory (GRO) Prelaunch Mission Operations Report (MOR)
The NASA Astrophysics Program is an endeavor to understand the origin and fate of the universe, to understand the birth and evolution of the large variety of objects in the universe, from the most benign to the most violent, and to probe the fundamental laws of physics by examining their behavior under extreme physical conditions. These goals are pursued by means of observations across the entire electromagnetic spectrum, and through theoretical interpretation of radiations and fields associated with astrophysical systems. Astrophysics orbital flight programs are structured under one of two operational objectives: (1) the establishment of long duration Great Observatories for viewing the universe in four major wavelength regions of the electromagnetic spectrum (radio/infrared/submillimeter, visible/ultraviolet, X-ray, and gamma ray), and (2) obtaining crucial bridging and supporting measurements via missions with directed objectives of intermediate or small scope conducted within the Explorer and Spacelab programs. Under (1) in this context, the Gamma Ray Observatory (GRO) is one of NASA's four Great Observatories. The other three are the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) for the visible and ultraviolet portion of the spectrum, the Advanced X-ray Astrophysics Facility (AXAF) for the X-ray band, and the Space Infrared Telescope Facility (SIRTF) for infrared wavelengths. GRO's specific mission is to study the sources and astrophysical processes that produce the highest energy electromagnetic radiation from the cosmos. The fundamental physical processes that are known to produce gamma radiation in the universe include nuclear reactions, electron bremsstrahlung, matter-antimatter annihilation, elementary particle production and decay, Compton scattering, synchrotron radiation. GRO will address a variety of questions relevant to understanding the universe, such as: the formation of the elements; the structure and dynamics of the Galaxy; the nature of pulsars; the existence of black holes; the possible existence of large amounts of antimatter, energetic and explosive phenomena occurring in galactic nuclei; the origin of the cosmic diffuse background; particle acceleration in the Sun, stars and stellar systems; processes in supernovae; and the origin and evolution of the universe itself.
Source record↗
Science Instruments for the Advanced X-Ray Astrophysics Facility (AXAF)
The AXAF program has undergone major changes since the Announcement of Opportunity was extended by NASA Headquarters in 1983. The Science Instruments (SI's) for AXAF have also experienced several design changes since they were competitively selected in 1985. Moreover, two separate complementary missions are now being baselined for AXAF; one is designated AXAF-I for imaging and will include the high precision Wolter type I optics, and the other is called AXAF-S for spectroscopy. The resulting less-costly AXAF will still be superior to any previous x-ray observatories. Both missions continue to be managed. AXAF-I contains two focal plane SI's, the High Resolution Camera (HRC), and the AXAF Charge-Coupled Device (CCD) imaging spectrometer (ACIS), as well as the High-Energy Transmission Grating Spectrometer (HETGS) and the Low-Energy Transmission Grating Spectrometer (LETGS). Optics/Cryogenics Division (BECD). AXAF-S features only one focal plane SI, the X-Ray Spectrometer (XRS). The grazing incidence mirrors for this mission are mainly to provide a large collecting area and to concentrate these x-ray photons onto the XRS detector. Precise focusing, although preferred, is of secondary importance. Nested conical foil mirrors are currently baselined; however, replicated imaging optics are being evaluated for collecting efficiency and cost. AXAF-S is scheduled to be launched in late 1999. It has been designated as an MSFC in-house project. In addition to overall management, MSFC is fully responsible for the design, development, integration, and test of the complete AXAF-S observatory, including the XRS which will be furnished by the Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC). Together, AXAF-I and AXAF-S constitute the third of NASA's series of Great Observatories, joining the Hubble space telescope (HST) and the Gamma-Ray Observatory (GRO) which are already operational. The develop- ment, launch, and operation of the Space InfraRed Telescope Facility (SIRTF) will follow later to complete the Great Observatory series. This paper summarizes the impact these changes have had on the SI's.
Carl E Winkler↗
Astrophysics Strategic Technology Gaps Following the 2020 Decadal Survey
The Decadal Survey on Astronomy and Astrophysics 2020, "Pathways to Discovery in Astronomy and Astrophysics for the 2020s," recommended a suite of compelling missions, including a 6m-class IR/Optical/UV observatory for exoplanet characterization and general astrophysics studies, a far-IR flagship, an X-ray flagship, and three Probe missions. The proposed launch dates for these are: Early 2030s for the first Probe (X-ray or far-IR) Early 2040s for the next Probe (CMB or the one not launched before) Mid-2040s for the IR/O/UV Great Observatory The following decade(s) for the far-IR and X-ray Great Observatories. Such missions require technologies that far exceed today's state of the art. To begin developing and maturing technologies that enable and enhance such missions, NASA established the Strategic Astrophysics Technology (SAT) program. Where needed, direct-funded projects may supplement the SAT program.
PCOS COR ExEP Astro2020 technology gaps↗