Comparison of Inlet Broadband Acoustic Liner Predictions to Quiet Technology Demonstrator 3 Flight Data
Companion acoustic liner attenuation predictions and flight data representative of certification conditions are analyzed to determine the validation quality and gain an understanding of current prediction shortcomings. These comparisons are limited to the inlet broadband component of fan noise. Two prediction methods are assessed: a traditional, semiempirical model, and a computational approach with a parabolic duct propagation code coupled with a Ffowcs Williams-Hawkings solver for free-field propagation. The semiempirical method is widely used for aircraft system noise predictions, but does not explicitly account for several physical parameters important for sound attenuation. The computational approach includes these effects, but requires a significant increase in cycle time. For the three-degree-of-freedom (3DOF) liner tested, both methods have a bias error less than 0.5 dB for cutback and takeoff power settings, and a much larger 3–4 dB bias for approach power setting. The standard deviation of each method varies between 1–2 dB for different conditions. The similar performance of both approaches illustrates that, in this instance, the additional complexity of the computational approach does not provide a clear improvement over the semiempirical method. Planned improvements to the numerical grid and source assumptions may result in reevaluation of this conclusion in later work.