SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “HTTF”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2

All sources NASA NTRS DOE OSTI

DOE OSTI2024

Progress in the HTTF Benchmark and RELAP5-3D Gas-Cooled Reactor Validation

This slide set presents results of analysis done in the first year after the kickoff of the HTTF benchmark. This work includes the development of a new RELAP5-3D model of the facility and collection and presentation of results from one of the exercises in the benchmark. Highlights include good agreement between the new and legacy models for full-power steady state and similar predictions of maximum block temperature during a pressurized conduction cooldown. Additionally, code-to-code comparisons of a full-power steady state and depressurized conduction cooldown (DCC) from full-power steady state as part of Problem 2 Exercises 1A and 1B show good agreement on temperatures predicted in the core but considerable spread in central reflector temperatures. During the DCC, temperature behavior is similar across all models, but cooldown rates are dictated by the performance of the reactor cavity cooling system

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

DOE OSTI2012

HTTF Core Stress Analysis

In accordance with the need to determine whether cracking of the ceramic core disks which will be constructed and used in the High Temperature Test Facility (HTTF) for heatup and cooldown experiments, a set of calculation were performed using Abaqus to investigate the thermal stresses levels and likelihood for cracking. The calculations showed that using the material properties provided for the Greencast 94F ceramic, cracking is predicted to occur. However, this modeling does not predict the size or length of the actual cracks. It is quite likely that cracks will be narrow with rough walls which would impede the flow of coolant gases entering the cracks. Based on data recorded at Oregon State University using Greencast 94F samples that were heated and cooled at prescribed rates, it was concluded that the likelihood that the cracks would be detrimental to the experimental objectives is small.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2023

HTTF Benchmarking Activities in FY 2023

This report describes the work conducted in FY23 within the High Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactor (HTGR) Applications Drivers activity under the Multiphysics Applications technical area in the Nuclear Energy Advanced Modeling and Simulation (NEAMS) program within DOE-NE. The focus of this past year’s activity was on the OECD/NEA thermal hydraulic benchmark for high temperature gas-cooled reactors using HTTF data (HTGR T/H). The activities focus on code-to-code comparisons for two benchmark problems: (1) Depressurized Conduction Cooldown using SAM, and (2) Lower Plenum Mixing using Nek5000/RS.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

DOE OSTI2020

RELAP5-3D Assessment of High Temperature Test Facility (HTTF) Data

HTTF Facility Selected test RELAP5-3D model Paul Bayless' model Recent model changes Ongoing work status Few preliminary results Outlook What is the plan going forward?

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2021

RELAP5-3D Simulation of PG-27 Test at the HTTF Facility

The High Temperature Test Facility (HTTF) at Oregon State University (OSU) is a quarter scaled integral-effect test facility designed to examine the transient phenomena occurring in a Modular Hight Temperature Gas-cooled Reactor (MHTGR). It is specifically designed to handle the pressurized and depressurized conduction cooldown (PCC and DCC) events. The PCC event is an accident scenario in which there is a loss of forced convection of the coolant through the system. However, the pressure boundary remains intact. This study focuses on the Reactor Excursions and Leak Analysis Program (RELAP)5-3D simulation of the PG-27 test (PCC phenomena) and the sensitivity of those simulations from the material properties and primary helium mass flow rate standpoint. The aim is to capture a reasonable one-dimensional picture of a three dimensional phenomena. The simulation will help in the code assessment and in understanding the various unknown parameters involved. The presented results will demonstrate the code is able to capture the detailed one-dimensional physics accurately. However, input parameters to the code (i.e., the primary mass flow rate, refractory material thermal conductivity, and heat capacity at elevated temperatures) impact the fuel temperature the most. This work will discuss the sensitivity of simulations to the identified input parameters.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2022

RELAP5-3D Modeling of the OECD-NEA HTTF Benchmark

HTTF at Oregon State University (OSU) Reference: General Atomics’ modular high-temperature gas-cooled reactor Helium cooled, electrically heated (2.2 MW) Prismatic graphite blocks in the core and reflectors Alumina ceramic blocks are used to simulate the core and top and bottom reflectors One-fourth scale in length and diameter Most of the coolant channels in the core are full scale Lower pressure compared to the prototype reactor (0.7 MPa) Over 500 instruments Designed primarily to investigate depressurized (DCC) and pressurized (PCC) conduction cooldown transients

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2023

RELAP5-3D Modeling in the OECD-NEA HTTF Benchmark

Prismatic gas-cooled reactors are a technologically mature reactor concept of interest for near- to mid-term deployment. To accelerate the deployment of these reactors, the DOE's Advanced Reactor Technologies Gas-Cooled Reactor campaign is spearheading a thermal hydraulics code validation benchmark based on the High Temperature Test Facility at Oregon State University. This presentation provides an introduction to that benchmark and an overview of some of the RELAP5-3D validation activities stemming from that benchmark.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

DOE OSTI2019

Velocimetry during depressurized conduction cooldown events in the HTTF

Not Available

André, Matthieu A.↗

DOE OSTI2010

Studies Related to the Oregon State University High Temperature Test Facility: Scaling, the Validation Matrix, and Similarities to the Modular High Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactor

The Oregon State University (OSU) High Temperature Test Facility (HTTF) is an integral experimental facility that will be constructed on the OSU campus in Corvallis, Oregon. The HTTF project was initiated, by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), on September 5, 2008 as Task 4 of the 5 year High Temperature Gas Reactor Cooperative Agreement via NRC Contract 04-08-138. Until August, 2010, when a DOE contract was initiated to fund additional capabilities for the HTTF project, all of the funding support for the HTTF was provided by the NRC via their cooperative agreement. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) began their involvement with the HTTF project in late 2009 via the Next Generation Nuclear Plant project. Because the NRC interests in HTTF experiments were only centered on the depressurized conduction cooldown (DCC) scenario, NGNP involvement focused on expanding the experimental envelope of the HTTF to include steady-state operations and also the pressurized conduction cooldown (PCC). Since DOE has incorporated the HTTF as an ingredient in the NGNP thermal-fluids validation program, several important outcomes should be noted: 1. The reference prismatic reactor design, that serves as the basis for scaling the HTTF, became the modular high temperature gas-cooled reactor (MHTGR). The MHTGR has also been chosen as the reference design for all of the other NGNP thermal-fluid experiments. 2. The NGNP validation matrix is being planned using the same scaling strategy that has been implemented to design the HTTF, i.e., the hierarchical two-tiered scaling methodology developed by Zuber in 1991. Using this approach a preliminary validation matrix has been designed that integrates the HTTF experiments with the other experiments planned for the NGNP thermal-fluids verification and validation project. 3. Initial analyses showed that the inherent power capability of the OSU infrastructure, which only allowed a total operational facility power capability of 0.6 MW, is inadequate to permit steady-state operation at reasonable conditions. 4. To enable the HTTF to operate at a more representative steady-state conditions, DOE recently allocated funding via a DOE subcontract to HTTF to permit an OSU infrastructure upgrade such that 2.2 MW will become available for HTTF experiments. 5. Analyses have been performed to study the relationship between HTTF and MHTGR via the hierarchical two-tiered scaling methodology which has been used successfully in the past, e.g., APEX facility scaling to the Westinghouse AP600 plant. These analyses have focused on the relationship between key variables that will be measured in the HTTF to the counterpart variables in the MHTGR with a focus on natural circulation, using nitrogen as a working fluid, and core heat transfer. 6. Both RELAP5-3D and computational fluid dynamics (CD-Adapco’s STAR-CCM+) numerical models of the MHTGR and the HTTF have been constructed and analyses are underway to study the relationship between the reference reactor and the HTTF. The HTTF is presently being designed. It has ¼-scaling relationship to the MHTGR in both the height and the diameter. Decisions have been made to design the reactor cavity cooling system (RCCS) simulation as a boundary condition for the HTTF to ensure that (a) the boundary condition is well defined and (b) the boundary condition can be modified easily to achieve the desired heat transfer sink for HTTF experimental operations.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2024

Development of an Improved RELAP5-3D Model for the High Temperature Test Facility

High-temperature gas-cooled reactors (HTGRs) are rapidly approaching deployment. Confidence in transient analysis of these systems for design, optimization, and licensing calculations requires modeling and simulation tools that have been validated against data relevant to HTGR conditions. The High Temperature Test Facility (HTTF) is an integral effects thermal hydraulics test facility for prismatic HTGRs. In spring and summer of 2019, HTTF was used for a series of experiments that now serve as the basis for the OECD/NEA Thermal Hydraulic Code Validation Benchmark for High Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactors using HTTF Data (HTGR T/H Benchmark). This benchmark contains problems for systems code, computational fluid dynamics (CFD), and coupled systems code/CFD modeling representing lower plenum mixing and both the depressurized and pressurized conduction cooldown (DCC and PCC respectively) transients. Benchmark problems include exercises for code-to-code and code-to-data comparisons as well as an exercise for error scaling between HTTF and the Modular High Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactor, which serves as the basis for the HTTF design. Previous analysis as part of the HTGR T/H benchmark used a RELAP5-3D model developed at Idaho National Laboratory (INL) and demonstrated an ability to reproduce trends in the measured data but difficulties reproducing experimental values within their uncertainty. These difficulties were largely attributed to assumptions made during the development of the initial RELAP5-3D model, which predated the HTTF experiments. A significant cause of difficulty reproducing the measured temperatures may be the radial nodalization of the previous RELAP5-3D model. The new model provides a finer nodalization to assess the impact of radial nodalization and allows for asymmetric heating within the core, which was a feature of multiple HTTF experiments. In this paper, we present the new RELAP5-3D model of HTTF. In addition to describing the new model, this paper compares the new and old models and provides results for a full-power steady state, a DCC, and a PCC in HTTF. These analyses are based on the code-to-code comparison exercises for the DCC and PCC problems of the HTGR T/H benchmark. We present the results of these exercises from the new model and compare them to the results of the old model.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

DOE OSTI2016

Density Effects on Lock Exchange Flow During a DCC

The High Temperature Test Facility (HTTF) is a scaled, electric model at Oregon State University (OSU) of the Modular High Temperature Gas Reactor (MHTGR) by General Atomics. There are a few major differences between the design and the OSU facility. In the HTTF the reactor pressure vessel and the reactor cavity are in two separate tanks connected by a crossover duct similar to the crossover duct that would be seen between the reactor core and the steam generator in the MHTGR. This feature allows for the facility to open two main break valves simulating a Double-Ended Guillotine Break (DEGB) of the cross over duct, synonymous to a crossover duct break in the MHTGR. The density gradient driven flow phenomena in the HTTF duct can then be studied further. This break would cause a depressurization of the reactor and a loss of flow. It is called the Depressurized Loss of Forced Convection Accident (D-LOFC), also known as the Depressurized Conduction Cool-Down Event for High Temperature Gas Reactors (HTGRs) because heat removal is by conduction through the core and radiation out of the vessel. The HTTF was built and scaled to maintain the highest accuracy for the DCC. Prototypical temperatures with an inlet temperature of 259 deg. C and an outlet temperature of 687 deg. C are maintained in the HTTF. The temperature profile is also maintained in the smaller volume by using a ceramic core. The HTTF uses graphite heaters because the resistive heat produced does not change significantly with temperature . In order to produce a facility of similar temperatures within the allotted budget, sacrifices had to be made in other areas. The HTTF is scaled one-fourth in diameter, one-fourth in height and one-eighth in pressure of the MHTGR. There are also a few limitations for the HTTF. While in the MHTGR, the cavity is filled with air, the HTTF uses highly pure Nitrogen and does not have the ability to simulate a full depressurization. The DCC event is traditionally comprised of multiple stages: depressurization, molecular diffusion and natural circulation. However, this traditional interpretation ignores lock exchange flow which will occur immediately following depressurization and could have significant consequences in the reactor. It was found that the traditional model underestimates the amount of air ingress by at least 660 times according to Oh and Kim in their theoretical research of air ingress. Molecular diffusion also decreases with stratification. Any model that specifies the gases are stratified has further underestimated the air ingress of the DCC event. In addition, molecular diffusion is a much slower process, allowing the reactor to shut down and cool off considerably from operating temperatures. Thus, understanding lock exchange flow, the air ingress concentrations and the time scale is critical to MHTGR research and licensing. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

DOE OSTI2024

RELAP5-3D validation studies based on the High Temperature Test facility

In the spring and summer of 2019, experiments were conducted at the High Temperature Test Facility (HTTF) that form the basis of an upcoming high-temperature gas-cooled reactor (HTGR) thermal hydraulics (T/H) benchmark. HTTF is an integral effects test facility for HTGR T/H modeling validation. This paper presents RELAP5-3D models of two of those experiments: PG-27, a pressurized conduction cooldown (PCC); and PG-29, a depressurized conduction cooldown (DCC). These models used the RELAP5-3D model of HTTF originally developed by Paul Bayless as a starting point. The sensitivity analysis and uncertainty quantification code, RAVEN was used to perform calibration studies for the steady-state portion of PG-27. Here we developed four PG-27 calibrations based on steady-state conditions. These calibrations all used an effective thermal conductivity equal to 36 % of the measured thermal conductivity, but they differed with respect to the frictional pressure drops and radial conduction models. These models all captured the trends in steady-state temperature distributions and transient temperature behavior well. All four calibrations show room for improvement in predicting the transient temperature rise. The smallest error in temperature rise during the transient was a 21 % underprediction, and the largest was a 48 % underprediction. The errors in transient temperature rise are largely a result of a mismatch in power density between the RELAP5-3D model and the experiment due to the location of active heater rods along the boundary between heat structures in the model. The best of these calibrations was applied to PG-29 to model the DCC. Once again, temperatures during the transient were underpredicted but trends in temperature were captured. The RELAP5-3D model captured trends in the data but could not reproduce measured temperatures exactly. This result is not attributed to deficiencies in the experimental data or to RELAP5–3D itself. Rather, this result likely arises due to the some of the assumptions and decisions made when the RELAP5-3D model was first developed, prior to the execution of HTTF experiments. An agreement in prediction of temperature trends but challenges reproducing HTTF temperatures within measurement uncertainty is consistent with previous analyses of HTTF in the literature. Future RELAP5-3D validation activities centered around HTTF may be able to provide greater insight into the code’s capabilities for HTGR modeling with a more finely nodalized model.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

DOE OSTI2026

Validation Studies of RELAP5-3D for High-Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactor Analysis Using a Refined RELAP5-3D Model of the High Temperature Test Facility

RELAP5-3D has been used extensively for high-temperature gas-cooled reactor (HTGR) analysis, but such analysis lies outside the validation basis for the code. Oregon State University (OSU) and the United States Department of Energy’s (DOE) Advanced Reactor Technologies (ART) – Gas-cooled reactor campaign worked together to design and operate the High Temperature Test Facility (HTTF) at OSU to provide validation data for prismatic HTGR thermal hydraulics analysis. Work using a previous RELAP5-3D model of HTTF demonstrated the ability to reproduce trends in HTTF data but an inability to reproduce the values measured in multiple experiments within the uncertainty. It was hypothesized that a new model with a finer radial nodalization would perform better for HTTF analysis. In this paper, we present the development of that more refined model and analyze HTTF experiments PG-27 and PG-29, a pressurized (PCC) and depressurized conduction cooldown (DCC) transient. Comparing PG-27 results to experimental data shows a better prediction of steady state and transient temperatures; however, a deeper dive reveals that better transient temperature predictions are a result of better initial conditions. The transient temperature rise in the core is comparable between the two models, but the legacy model predicts temperatures in the reflectors better. The new model demonstrates the ability to predict unique temperatures in each sector of the core during PG-29, capturing the azimuthal asymmetry; however, the temperature predictions still differ from measured temperatures. One hypothesis is that differences between the assumed and actual power distribution leads to the underprediction of the individual block temperatures. These results suggest that gaps and uncertainties in the measured boundary conditions for the HTTF tests do not allow to fully validate RELAP5-3D for prismatic HTGR analyses. The authors suspect that some of the differences between predicted and measured temperatures may be a result of uncertainties associated with HTTF itself rather than RELAP5-3D. We demonstrated improved validation for steady-state analysis, but significantly improved transient performance has yet to be recognized.

22 - GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

DOE OSTI2012

Scaling Studies for High Temperature Test Facility and Modular High Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactor

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

DOE OSTI2023

Investigation of thermal hydraulic behavior of the High Temperature Test Facility's lower plenum via large eddy simulation

A high-fidelity computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis was performed using the Large Eddy Simulation (LES) model for the lower plenum of the High–Temperature Test Facility (HTTF), a ¼ scale test facility of the modular high temperature gas-cooled reactor (MHTGR) managed by Oregon State University. In most next–generation nuclear reactors, thermal stress due to thermal striping is one of the risks to be curiously considered. This is also true for HTGRs, especially since the exhaust helium gas temperature is high. In order to evaluate these risks and performance, organizations in the United States led by the OECD NEA are conducting a thermal hydraulic code benchmark for HTGR, and the test facility used for this benchmark is HTTF. HTTF can perform experiments in both normal and accident situations and provide high-quality experimental data. However, it is difficult to provide sufficient data for benchmarking through experiments, and there is a problem with the reliability of CFD analysis results based on Reynolds–averaged Navier–Stokes to analyze thermal hydraulic behavior without verification. To solve this problem, high-fidelity 3-D CFD analysis was performed using the LES model for HTTF. It was also verified that the LES model can properly simulate this jet mixing phenomenon via a unit cell test that provides experimental information. As a result of CFD analysis, the lower the dependency of the sub-grid scale model, the closer to the actual analysis result. In the case of unit cell test CFD analysis and HTTF CFD analysis, the volume-averaged sub-grid scale model dependency was calculated to be 13.0% and 9.16%, respectively. As a result of HTTF analysis, quantitative data of the fluid inside the HTTF lower plenum was provided in this paper. As a result of qualitative analysis, the temperature was highest at the center of the lower plenum, while the temperature fluctuation was highest near the edge of the lower plenum wall. The power spectral density of temperature was analyzed via fast Fourier transform (FFT) for specific points on the center and side of the lower plenum. FFT results did not reveal specific frequency-dominant temperature fluctuations in the center part. It was confirmed that the temperature power spectral density (PSD) at the top increased from the center to the wake. The vortex was visualized using the well-known scalar Q-criterion, and as a result, the closer to the outlet duct, the greater the influence of the mainstream, so that the inflow jet vortex was dissipated and mixed at the top of the lower plenum. Additionally, FFT analysis was performed on the support structure near the corner of the lower plenum with large temperature fluctuations, and as a result, it was confirmed that the temperature fluctuation of the flow did not have a significant effect near the corner wall. In addition, the vortices generated from the lower plenum to the outlet duct were identified in this paper. It is considered that the quantitative and qualitative results presented in this paper will serve as reference data for the benchmark.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗

DOE OSTI2019

Instrumentation Plan for the OSU High Temperature Test Facility, Revision 4

This instrumentation plan describes the instrumentation requirements and design for the Oregon State University (OSU) High Temperature Test Facility (HTTF). This report outlines HTTF instrumentation design specifications, data acquisition and control system (DACS) design specifications as well as a brief description of the instrumentation to be used in the HTTF. The HTTF is an integral test facility, which has been designed to model the behavior of interest for a Very High Temperature Gas Reactor (VHTR) during the Depressurized Conduction Cooldown (DCC) event. It also has the potential to conduct limited explorations into the progression of the Pressurized Conduction Cooldown (PCC) event and phenomena during normal operations. The facility is scaled 1:4 by height and 1:64 by volume. The maximum core power for the facility is approximately 2.2MW. The core region is of a modular design to allow for both the prismatic block core and the pebble bed core designs to be tested. However, only the prismatic block design is discussed in this report. A correctly scaled integral facility modeling the VHTR that can be used to examine the thermal hydraulic system behavior of the design basis and beyond design basis transients is of significant value. The experimental results obtained in such a program could be used to validate analytical tools and methods being proposed for use with the VHTR. Therefore, it is of importance that the HTTF be instrumented in such a way that the required data is collected to meet its overall goals of phenomena examination and code validation. In addition to the instrumentation used to collect data to achieve the overall goals of the HTTF test program, there is instrumentation in the HTTF, which is primarily used to ensure the safe operation of the test facility. This type of instrumentation shall be termed “Control Instrumentation” and is discussed in this report. This report discusses the DACS, which is a personal computer controlled system that is used to control both the collection and storage of the test matrix and control system data as well as electrical and mechanical operation of the test facility.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

DOE OSTI2019

OSU High Temperature Test Facility Design Technical Report, Revision 2

The HTTF is an integral test facility, which has been designed to model the behavior of interest for a MHTGR during the Depressurized Conduction Cooldown (DCC) event. It also has the potential to conduct limited explorations into the progression of the Pressurized Conduction Cooldown (PCC) event and phenomena during normal operations. The facility is scaled 1:4 by height and 1:64 by volume. A scaling report has been developed and provides further detail into the scaling analysis for the HTTF. The maximum core power for the facility is approximately 2.2MW. The core region will be of a modular design to allow for both the prismatic block core and the pebble bed core designs to be tested. However, only the prismatic block design is discussed in this report. The HTTF consists of the following systems: A primary system consisting of the reactor pressure vessel (RPV), the circulator, cross over ducts and primary piping. The core internals sit inside the RPV and provide support for the core and core heaters. The purpose of the primary system is to maintain the pressure boundary, remove heat from the core through convection, conduction and radiation, and provide heat to the core through a series of electrical heaters. A secondary system consisting of a steam generator, feed water system and main steam system. The purpose of the secondary system is to remove heat from the primary system during heat up, cool down and normal operations. A reactor cavity simulation system consisting of a cavity tank, gas conditioning system and a series of break valves. Note that the prototypical MHTGR sits inside of a cavity. In the event of a break the helium will blowdown into this cavity. At the HTTF, the cavity is modeled as a separate tank, the reactor cavity simulation tank (RCST) and is connected to the RPV through break valves—hot-leg, cold-leg, upper break, and lower break. A reactor cavity cooling system (RCCS) consisting of a series of water cooled panels and the water supply system for these panels. The HTTF RCCS is not a scaled prototypical RCCS system for the MHTGR. It is provided in the HTTF in order to set the boundary condition for radiation heat transfer from the RPV. Various auxiliary systems including the city water supply system, the electrical power supply and distribution system, the chilled water system and the instrument air system.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

DOE OSTI2024

Development of an Improved RELAP5-3D Model for the High Temperature Test Facility

High-temperature gas-cooled reactors (HTGRs) are rapidly approaching deployment. Confidence in transient analysis of these systems requires modeling and simulation tools that have been validated against data relevant to HTGR conditions. The High Temperature Test Facility (HTTF) is an integral effects thermal hydraulics test facility for prismatic HTGRs. In spring and summer of 2019, HTTF was used for a series of experiments that now serve as the basis for the Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development / Nuclear Energy Agency Thermal Hydraulic Code Validation Benchmark for High Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactors using HTTF Data (HTGR T/H Benchmark). Previous analyses as part of the HTGR T/H benchmark used a RELAP5-3D model developed at Idaho National Laboratory (INL) and demonstrated an ability to reproduce trends in the measured data but difficulties reproducing experimental values within their uncertainty. These difficulties were largely attributed to assumptions made during the development of the initial RELAP5-3D model, which predated the HTTF experiments. A significant cause of difficulty reproducing the measured temperatures may be the radial nodalization of the previous RELAP5-3D model. In this paper, we present a new RELAP5-3D model of HTTF with finer radial nodalization built to assess the impact of radial heat transfer. We describe the new model and compare it against the old one at full-power steady state and for the pressurized conduction cooldown (PCC) transient. These analyses are based on the code-to-code comparison exercise for the PCC problem of the HTGR T/H benchmark. We compare maximum block temperature as the primary figure of merit and include discussion on intracore natural circulation.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗