SEARCH · Search NASA
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Case study of a DOE 2021 Housing Innovation Award winning custom home in a marine climate that got a HERS -13 with PV, with 1,804 square feet, highly efficient construction; high-efficiency ductless minisplit heat pumps, appliances, and lighting; triple-pane windows; and 9.9 kW of solar panels on each of the monoplane roofs.
Case study of a DOE 2021 Housing Innovation Award winning custom home in a cold climate that got a HERS 33 without PV, with 1,936 square feet, gable roof with asphalt shingles, attic insulated with 14 inches (R-49) of blown cellulose, and triple-pane windows.
Case study showing project and performance data and energy-efficiency measures of a winning entry in the Housing Innovation Awards of DOE's Building Technologies Office.
Case study showing project and performance data and energy-efficiency measures of a winning entry in the Housing Innovation Awards of DOE's Building Technologies Office.
Case study showing project and performance data and energy-efficiency measures of a winning entry in the Housing Innovation Awards of DOE's Building Technologies Office.
Case study showing project and performance data and energy-efficiency measures of a winning entry in the Housing Innovation Awards of DOE's Building Technologies Office.
Case study showing project and performance data and energy-efficiency measures of a winning entry in the Housing Innovation Awards of DOE's Building Technologies Office.
Case study of a DOE 2020 Housing Innovation Award winning custom home in a cold climate that got a HERS -7 with PV, with 1,280 square feet, ENERGY STAR certified appliances, no-VOC products, and a 7.75-kW PV system.
Case study of a DOE 2020 Housing Innovation Award winning custom home in a cold climate that got a HERS -2 with PV, with 3,357 square feet, 11-inch-thick insulated concrete form walls, 11.34 kilowatts of solar panels on the roof, and high-efficiency 98 AFUE gas furnace.
Case study of a DOE 2020 Housing Innovation Award winning custom home in a mixed-humid climate that got a HERS 9 with PV, with 2,227 square feet, an energy recovery ventilator tied to a high-efficiency central heat pump, and 2x6 advanced framed exterior walls.
As a result of increasing windstorm losses in the United States over the past 50 years, a variety of residential wind hazard mitigation strategies have been recommended. Wind hazard mitigation undoubtedly reduces windstorm losses; however, little customized information is available to support the economic decision-making process for individual stakeholders, especially at the consumer level. Therefore, there is a need for decision support tools to calculate, evaluate, and present the economic benefits of mitigation over variable decision-making time horizons for unique building characteristics in specific geographical locations. This paper presents a cost-benefit computational decision-making recommendation framework that evaluates and presents the cost effectiveness of mitigation, customized based on location, years of interest, and building characteristics. The decision-making framework consists of two cores. The user-independent core and user-dependent core which consists of eight steps, divided into four subprocesses: (1) data acquisition, (2) data evaluation, (3) cost-benefit calculation, and (4) results comparison and decision making. To demonstrate the framework, a wood-framed single-family home in light suburban terrain in Golden Meadow, Louisiana, is used as a case study, considering retrofit mitigation with a $15,000 budget and a decision-making time horizon of 30 years. The case study provides six mitigation options, with cost ranging between approximately $2,000 and $15,000 and net benefit/cost ratios ranging from 2.4 to 13. Once fully implemented in a decision making information tool, the developed mitigation recommendation framework will provide valuable information that can be used by home designers, builders, owners, and other stakeholders to better understand the economic facets of wind hazard mitigation, providing critical information as part of the overall decision-making process.
The data set represents the data used for the analysis of operational carbon emissions for a carbon case study of a typical production builder's home in two common climate zones, Climate Zone 2 (Warm) and CZ 5 (Cold). A data set for embodied carbon emissions analysis for the same project is in a separate workbook.
The data set represents the data used for the analysis of embodied carbon emissions for a carbon case study of a typical production builder's home in two common climate zones, Climate Zone 2 (Warm) and CZ 5 (Cold). A data set for operational carbon emissions analysis for the same project is in a separate workbook.
Typical air delivery systems require contractors to design systems that are complex, difficult to integrate into the framing and structural components of a home, and often do not meet the optimization demands of newer energy-efficient homes. This complex process can be a burden to already strained construction labor costs. However, a new technology simplifies duct system design to improve comfort and eliminate sources of installation error for residential air delivery systems.
For decades, the residential building industry has worked to expand opportunities to increase the thermal resistance of walls. Multiple high-R wall construction methods have been developed, yet market adoption remains low because of perceived complexity and cost. One appealing solution is an extended plate wall system (EPW). Framing for top and bottom plates is one nominal dimension larger than for studs, which provides space for a 2-inch layer of foam plastic insulative sheathing (FPIS). Wood structural sheathing (OSB or plywood) is then installed on the exterior, fastened directly to the plates and nailed through the foam to the studs. In contrast to the conventional method of installing FPIS as a fully exterior layer, the EPW greatly simplifies air sealing, installation and detailing of windows and doors, an application of a weather resistive barrier, and attachment of cladding.
This paper will be presented at the 5th Residential Building Design & Construction Conference in State College, Pennsylvania. While the number of zero energy homes constructed in the U.S. has grown dramatically, increasing nearly 400% since 2015, zero energy homes still accounted for less than 1% of all U.S. homes constructed as of December 2018. Concerns about high costs or implementation challenges have kept many builders from attempting zero energy home construction. However, builders participating in the U.S. Department of Energy’s Zero Energy Ready Home Program are showing that zero energy ready home construction can be achieved simply and cost effectively with off-the-shelf equipment and materials and common construction techniques. Construction methods used by builders in the DOE program are compared with those used in just-to-code new homes and existing homes for several key components, including wall assemblies and HVAC systems. Examples of cost-effective assemblies used in the Mid Atlantic states are provided.
The SPS is an innovative interpretation of the “perfect wall” concept, in which environmental control layers are located on the exterior side of the structural components, as opposed to traditional cavity insulated, stud-framed walls. The primary objective of this study is to validate the SPS technology in terms of its constructability, cost, and performance. Specifically for this project, we partnered with two affordable housing nonprofits in Minnesota—Twin Cities Habitat for Humanity and Urban Homeworks—to build five new houses using SPS walls, as well as two high-performance stud-framed comparison homes. We also reviewed cost and performance data from 13 SPS homes built prior to this project by MonoPath and Spero Environmental Builders. Reviewing the outcomes of these 20 homes total, we find promising results in terms of constructability, cost, and performance, although more structural performance data are needed before this new technology can see widespread adoption.
What if an aerosol-based sealing method could tighten new home envelopes more quickly and effectively than traditional sealing methods? The method involves pressurizing an entire building while dispersing an aerosol sealant "fog" to the building interior. As air escapes the building through leaks in the envelope, sealant particles are carried to the leaks where they make contact and stick, sealing the leaks. A standard blower door and connected laptop facilitate the sealing process and provide real-time feedback and a permanent record of the sealing. The technology is thus capable of simultaneously measuring, locating, and automatically sealing leaks in a building. In fact, hundreds of linear feet of narrow leaks can be sealed simultaneously, reducing the time needed for manual inspection and sealing. To investigate the use of this method in new homes, the Center for Energy and Environment and partners worked with builders who performed the technique on 11 homes in California and 15 homes in Minnesota.